Table of Contents
ISRN Radiology
Volume 2013, Article ID 419737, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2013/419737
Clinical Study

Hybrid SPECT/CT Imaging in the Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis: Role in Diabetic Patients

1Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Imaging Molecolare, Radiologia Interventistica e Radioterapia, Fondazione Ospedaliera Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Roma, Italy
2Dipartimento di Medicina Nucleare e Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense 18, 86077 Pozzilli, IS, Italy

Received 5 July 2012; Accepted 5 August 2012

Academic Editors: F. Hyafil and H. S. Thomsen

Copyright © 2013 Andrea Romagnoli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. J. Morrish, S. L. Wang, L. K. Stevens et al., “Mortality and causes of death in the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 44, supplement 2, pp. S14–S21, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. O. Bonow, N. Bohannon, and W. Hazzard, “Risk stratification in coronary artery disease and special populations,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 17s–22s, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. B. Kannel and D. L. McGee, “Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–126, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. F. L. Schinkel, A. Elhendy, R. T. Van Domburg et al., “Prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1637–1643, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. B. Sozzi, A. Elhendy, J. R. T. C. Roelandt et al., “Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1074–1078, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Nieman, M. Oudkerk, B. J. Rensing et al., “Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9256, pp. 599–603, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Nikolaou, A. Knez, C. Rist et al., “Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 111–117, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Achenbach, F. Moselewski, D. Ropers et al., “Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Schroeder, A. Kuettner, M. Leitritz et al., “Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: A comparison with histology,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 449–454, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Romagnoli, E. Martuscelli, M. Sperandio et al., “Role of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome,” Radiologia Medica, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 341–353, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Y. Kong, Z. Y. Jin, S. Y. Zhang et al., “Assessment of coronary stents by 64-slice computed tomography: in-stent lumen visibility and patency,” Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 156–160, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Maffei, C. Martini, C. Tedeschi et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data on the impact of calcium score,” Radiologia Medica, pp. 1–14, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Huxley, F. Barzi, and M. Woodward, “Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies,” British Medical Journal, vol. 332, no. 7533, pp. 73–76, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. R. Mollet, F. Cademartiri, K. Nieman et al., “Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2265–2270, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. R. Mollet, F. Cademartiri, G. P. Krestin et al., “Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 128–132, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. R. Mollet, F. Cademartiri, C. A. G. Van Mieghem et al., “High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 15, pp. 2318–2323, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, “Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 2,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. G47–G84, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. O. Lindner, W. Burchert, F. M. Bengel et al., “Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2007 in Germany: results of the query and current status,” NuklearMedizin, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 131–137, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Momose, T. Babazono, C. Kondo, H. Kobayashi, T. Nakajima, and K. Kusakabe, “Prognostic significance of stress myocardial ECG-gated perfusion imaging in asymptomatic patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease on initiation of haemodialysis,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1315–1321, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Romero-Farina, J. Candell-Riera, S. Aguadé-Bruix, G. De León, and Y. J. Castell-Conesa, “Influence of chronic angina prior to infarction in the diagnosis of viability and left ventricular remodelling in myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT,” Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 245–252, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. M. S. Dos Santos, M. D. R. Pantoja, and E. Cwajg, “Prognostic value of Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion gated SPECT in patients with diabetes mellitus and suspected coronary artery disease,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Spadafora and L. Mansi, “La malattia ischemica del miocardio oltre la stenosi coronarica: valore fisiopatologico e clinico della scintigrafia miocardica di perfusione con tecnica gated-SPECT,” Cardiology Ambulatory, vol. 3, pp. 140–147, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  23. B. J. W. Chow, A. Abraham, G. A. Wells et al., “Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronary angiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography,” Circulation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Cademartiri, G. Runza, M. Belgrano et al., “Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice Computed Tomography,” Radiologia Medica, vol. 110, no. 1-2, pp. 16–41, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Zhang, D. C. Levin, E. J. Halpern, D. Fischman, M. Savage, and P. Walinsky, “Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 1676–1683, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. U. Hoffmann, F. Moselewski, R. C. Cury et al., “Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient- versus segment-based analysis,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 17, pp. 2638–2643, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. S. Halliburton, M. Petersilka, P. R. Schvartzman, N. Obuchowski, and R. D. White, “Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. K. Ong, S. P. Chin, C. K. Liew et al., “Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification,” American Heart Journal, vol. 151, no. 6, pp. 1323–e1, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. A. Kaufmann, “Cardiac hybrid imaging: state-of-the-art,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 325–331, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Hacker, T. Jakobs, N. Hack et al., “Combined use of 64-slice computed tomography angiography and gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for the detection of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses: first results in a clinical setting concerning patients with stable angina,” NuklearMedizin, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. O. Gaemperli, T. Schepis, I. Valenta et al., “Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 696–703, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. Pelliccia, V. Pasceri, A. Evangelista et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease,” The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. Y. Li, Z. Fan, L. Xu et al., “Prospective ECG-gated 320-row CT angiography of the whole aorta and coronary arteries,” European Radiology. In press.
  34. G. Sun, M. Li, X. S. Jiang et al., “320-detector row CT coronary angiography: effects of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 1016, pp. e388–e394, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. H. Seifarth, S. Wienbeck, M. Püsken et al., “Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 189, no. 6, pp. 1317–1323, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Achenbach, M. Marwan, D. Ropers et al., “Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 340–346, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. H. Scheffel, H. Alkadhi, S. Leschka et al., “Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance,” Heart, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1132–1137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus