Table of Contents
ISRN Operations Research
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 452162, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/452162
Research Article

Dynamic Decision Making and Race Games

1Department of Economics, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4504 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-6001, USA
2Department of Management, Entrepreneurship and Technology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4504 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-6001, USA

Received 14 June 2013; Accepted 7 July 2013

Academic Editors: I. Ahmad and G. Dósa

Copyright © 2013 Shipra De and Darryl A. Seale. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. M. Hogarth, “Beyond discrete biases: functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 197–217, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. N. Kleinmuntz, “Cognitive heuristics and feedback in a dynamic decision environment,” Management Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 680–702, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Jungermann, “Two camps on rationality,” in Decision Making under Uncertainty, R. W. Scholz, Ed., pp. 63–86, North Holland, New York, NY, USA, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. W. B. Atkins, R. E. Wood, and P. J. Rutgers, “The effects of feedback format on dynamic decision making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 587–604, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Edwards, “Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing,” Human Factors, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 59–73, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. E. Bakken, “On improving dynamic decision-making: implications from multiple-process cognitive theory,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 493–501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Brehmer, “Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 211–241, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Gonzalez, P. Vanyukov, and M. K. Martin, “The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 273–286, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. D. Sterman, “Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment,” Management Science, vol. 35, pp. 321–339, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Diehl and J. D. Sterman, “Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 198–215, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. H. Thaler, “From homo economicus to homo sapiens,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Slovic and S. Lichtenstein, “Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 649–744, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Rapoport, “Research paradigms for studying dynamic decision behavior,” in Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, D. Wendt and C. Vlek, Eds., pp. 349–375, Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. J. Mackinnon and A. J. Wearing, “Systems analysis and dynamic decision making,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. D. Hey and J. A. Knoll, “Strategies in dynamic decision making—an experimental investigation of the rationality of decision behaviour,” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 399–409, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Mathematical Sciences Education Board, “The hog game,” in Measuring up: Prototypes for Mathematical Assessment, pp. 141–155, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. W. Neller and C. G. M. Presser, “Pigtail: a pig addendum,” The UMAP Journal, vol. 26, pp. 443–458, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw Hill Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  19. C. K. Doublass, “Multimedia technology,” in The Praeger Handbook of Learning and the Brain, S. Feinstein, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 315–320, Praeger, Westport, Conn, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. W. Neller and C. G. M. Presser, “Optimal play of the dice game pig,” The UMAP Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–47, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  21. W. Cheney and D. Kincaid, Numerical Mathematics and Computing, Brooks/Cole Publishing, Belmont, Calif, USA, 1980.