Table of Contents
ISRN Radiology
Volume 2013, Article ID 453763, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2013/453763
Research Article

Association of Mandible Anatomy with Age, Gender, and Dental Status: A Radiographic Study

1Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha 751024, India
2Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, King George Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226003, India
3Department of Public Health Dentistry, Shri Aurobindo Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 453111, India
4Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, MGVM’s Dental College, Nashik, Maharashtra 422003, India
5Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Wardha, Maharashtra 442004, India
6Department of Oral Pathology, Peoples Dental Academy, Bhanpur Bypass Road, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462037, India

Received 20 August 2013; Accepted 18 September 2013

Academic Editors: H. Akan and P. Cascone

Copyright © 2013 Revant H. Chole et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Francis Fish, “Change in the gonial angle,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 219–227, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. M. Casey and L. J. Emrich, “Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 373–380, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Ohm and J. Silness, “Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 883–891, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Mattila, M. Altonen, and K. Haavikko, “Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Dutra, J. Yang, H. Devlin, and C. Susin, “Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 323–328, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Q. F. Xie and A. Ainamo, “Association of mandibular angle size with cortical thickness and residual ridge height of the edentulous mandible,” Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 390–394, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. Raustia and M. A. M. Salonen, “Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers—a panoramic radiograph study,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 512–516, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Huumonen, K. SipilÄ, B. Haikola et al., “Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Ceylan, N. Yaníkoglu, A. B. Yílmaz, and Y. Ceylan, “Changes in the mandibular angle in the dentulous and edentulous states,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 680–684, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Baydaş, I. Yavuz, I. M. Daǧsuyu, B. Bölükbaşi, and I. Ceylan, “An investigation of maxillary and mandibular morphology in different overjet groups,” Australian Orthodontic Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Ashkenazi, L. Taubman, and A. Gavish, “Age-associated changes of the mandibular foramen position in anteroposterior dimension and of the mandibular angle in dry human mandibles,” Anatomical Record, vol. 294, no. 8, pp. 1319–1325, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Shahabi, B. Ramazanzadeh, and N. Mokhber, “Comparison between the external gonial angle in panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of adult patients with class I malocclusion,” Journal of Oral Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 425–429, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Gungor, M. Sagir, and I. Ozer, “Evaluation of the gonial angle in the anatolian populations: from past to present,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 375–378, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Yanikoǧlu and B. Yilmaz, “Radiological evaluation of changes in the gonial angle after teeth extraction and wearing of dentures: a 3-year longitudinal study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. e55–e60, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Ghosh, M. Vengal, K. M. Pai, and K. Abhishek, “Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study,” Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. e802–e807, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus