Table of Contents
ISRN Software Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 507984, 37 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
Review Article

Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Received 16 August 2012; Accepted 6 September 2012

Academic Editors: F. Barros, X. He, J. A. Holgado-Terriza, and C. Rolland

Copyright © 2013 Wil M. P. van der Aalst. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [138 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Thai-Minh Truong, and Lam-Son Le, “On Business Process Redesign and Configuration: Leveraging Data Mining Classification & Outliers and Artifact-Centric Process Modeling,” 2016 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Applications (ACOMP), pp. 59–66, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Roland Rieke, Maria Zhdanova, Jurgen Repp, Romain Giot, and Chrystel Gaber, “Fraud Detection in Mobile Payments Utilizing Process Behavior Analysis,” 2013 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 662–669, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Linqing Yang, Shun Li, Wei Chen, Kai Lei, and Tengjiao Wang, “PBI: A Path-Based Bitmap Index for Efficient Process Analysis in Cloud Computing Environment,” 2017 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, (HPSC) and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS), pp. 57–62, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Steven Alter, “How Should Business Informatics Integrate Service, Process, Work System, and Enterprise Orientations?,” 2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics, pp. 165–172, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Pierre-Aymeric Masse, Nassim Laga, Mohammed Oussama Kherbourche, and Jacques Simonin, “An approach based on ontology for discovering data impacting the execution of a business process,” 2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), pp. 216–221, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rafael T. de Sousa, Flavio de Deus, Bruno Aires, Gabriela Ribeiro, Aleteia P. F. Araujo, Maristela Holanda, Sandra S. A. N. Vidal, Renan M. G. dos Santos, and Fabiano P. Cortes, “Business process modelling: A study case within the Brazilian Ministry of Planning, Budgeting and Management,” 2014 9th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marcio Fuckner, Jean-Paul Barthes, and Edson Emilio Scalabrin, “Selecting and combining services using goals: A step towards goal-driven processes,” 2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), pp. 182–187, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tao Peng, Chi-Hung Chi, Annamaria Chiasera, Giampaolo Armellin, Marco Ronchetti, Cristina Matteotti, Cristhian Parra, Aleksey Oleksiy Kashytsa, and Alessio Varalta, “Business process assignment and execution in mobile environments,” 2014 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. 267–274, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Chalyi Sergii, Levykin Ihor, Petrychenko Aleksandr, and Bogatov Ievgen, “Causality-based model checking in business process management tasks,” 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT), pp. 453–458, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paolo Bocciarelli, Andrea D'Ambrogio, Emiliano Paglia, and Andrea Giglio, “An HLA-based BPMN extension for the specification of business process collaborations,” 2017 IEEE/ACM 21st International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT), pp. 1–8, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Patrick Lubbecke, Markus Reiter, Peter Fettke, and Peter Loos, “Simulation-Based Decision Support for the Reduction of the Energy Consumption of Complex Business Processes,” 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 866–875, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jessica Lasch de Moura, Andrea Schwertner Charao, Joao Carlos Damasceno Lima, and Benhur de Oliveira Stein, “Test case generation from BPMN models for automated testing of Web-based BPM applications,” 2017 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), pp. 1–7, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jianyi Wang, Lihong Jiang, and Hongming Cai, “Scenario-Based Method for Business Process Analysis and Improvement in SOA,” 2014 IEEE 11th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, pp. 19–25, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Asma Mejri, Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi, Ricardo Martinho, and Feteh Elhadj, “Enhancing business process flexibility in an emergency care process,” 2016 IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 1–6, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Lederer, Juliane Knapp, and Peter Schott, “The digital future has many names—How business process management drives the digital transformation,” 2017 6th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), pp. 22–26, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Dusanka Dakic, Darko Stefanovic, Teodora Lolic, Srdjan Sladojevic, and Andras Anderla, “Production planning business process modelling using UML class diagram,” 2018 17th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH), pp. 1–6, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Khubaib Amjad Alam, Rodina Binti Ahmad, and Maria Akhtar, “Change Impact analysis and propagation in service based business process management systems preliminary results from a systematic review,” 2014 8th. Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC), pp. 7–12, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Fabiano Dalpiaz, Evellin Cardoso, Giulia Canobbio, Paolo Giorgini, and John Mylopoulos, “Social specifications of business processes with Azzurra,” 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 7–18, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Grace Park, Lawrence Chung, Latifur Khan, and Sooyong Park, “A modeling framework for business process reengineering using big data analytics and a goal-orientation,” 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 21–32, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Guangchang Hu, Budan Wu, and Junliang Chen, “The Mining of Activity Dependence Relation Based on Business Process Models,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 450–458, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Latifa Ilahi, Ricardo Martinho, Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi, Dulce Domingos, and Rui Rijo, “Towards a Business Process Management Governance Approach Using Process Model Templates and Flexibility,” 2016 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES), pp. 27–34, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jorg Lenhard, Matthias Geiger, and Guido Wirtz, “On the Measurement of Design-Time Adaptability for Process-Based Systems,” 2015 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering, pp. 1–10, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Geiger, Simon Harrer, Jorg Lenhard, and Guido Wirtz, “On the Evolution of BPMN 2.0 Support and Implementation,” 2016 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE), pp. 101–110, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • P. Bocciarelli, A. D'ambrogio, A. Giglio, E. Paglia, and D. Gianni, “A Transformation Approach to Enact the Design-Time Simulation of BPMN Models,” 2014 IEEE 23rd International WETICE Conference, pp. 199–204, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paolo Bocciarelli, Andrea D'Ambrogio, Andrea Giglio, and Emiliano Paglia, “Simulation-based performance and reliability analysis of business processes,” Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014, pp. 3012–3023, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Aliraza Khowaja, “Process mining techniques: an application to time management,” Ninth International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP 2017), pp. 187, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Moufida Aouachria, Abdessamed Réda Ghomari, and Rachid Seghir, “Towards a Repository for the Reuse of Business Process Models from a Requirements Analysis Perspective,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing, Security and Advanced Communication - IPAC '15, pp. 1–5, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Lederer, Stefanie Betz, Matthias Kurz, and Werner Schmidt, “Some say Digitalization - others say IT-enabled Process Management thought through to the End,” Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management - S-BPM ONE '17, pp. 1–10, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Swapnil Shrivastava, and Supriya N. Pal, “A Big Data Analytics Framework for Enterprise Service Ecosystems in an e-Governance Scenario,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '17, pp. 5–11, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Unknown, Simon Harrer, Jörg Lenhard, Oliver Kopp, Vincenzo Ferme, and Cesare Pautasso, “A Pattern Language for Workflow Engine Conformance and Performance Benchmarking,” Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs - EuroPLoP '17, pp. 1–46, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Lederer, Stefanie Betz, and Werner Schmidt, “Digital Transformation, Smart Factories, and Virtual Design,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Subject-Oriented Business Process Management - S-BPM One '18, pp. 1–10, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • David Kruger, “Application of Business Process Reengineering as a Process Improvement Tool: A Case Study,” 2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), pp. 1–9, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Michael Westergaard, and Hajo A. Reijers, “Beautiful Workflows: A Matter of Taste?,” The Beauty of Functional Code, vol. 8106, pp. 211–233, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Aitor Murguzur, Karmele Intxausti, Aitor Urbieta, Salvador Trujillo, and Goiuria Sagardui, “Process Flexibility in Service Orchestration: A Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 23, no. 03, pp. 1430001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Julio Clempner, “Verifying soundness of business processes: A decision process Petri nets approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 5030–5040, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Patrick Afflerbach, Gregor Kastner, Felix Krause, and Maximilian Roeglinger, “The Business Value of Process Flexibility,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 203–214, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Steinhorst, Hanns-Alexander Dietrich, Patrick Delfmann, and Jörg Becker, “The Generic Model Query Language GMQL – Conceptual Specification, Implementation, and Runtime Evaluation,” Information Systems, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • W. M. P. van der Aalst, “Business process management as the “Killer App” for Petri nets,” Software & Systems Modeling, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Manuel Bolsinger, “Bringing value-based business process management to the operational process level,” Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Dominic Breuker, Patrick Delfmann, Hanns-Alexander Dietrich, and Matthias Steinhorst, “Graph theory and model collection management: conceptual framework and runtime analysis of selected graph algorithms,” Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jörg Becker, Patrick Delfmann, Hanns-Alexander Dietrich, Matthias Steinhorst, and Mathias Eggert, “Business process compliance checking – applying and evaluating a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models in the financial sector,” Information Systems Frontiers, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sebastian Görg, and Ralph Bergmann, “Social Workflows - Vision and Potential Study,” Information Systems, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hoa Khanh Dam, and Aditya Ghose, “Mining version histories for change impact analysis in business process model repositories,” Computers in Industry, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Stavros T. Ponis, Sotiris P. Gayialis, Ilias P. Tatsiopoulos, Nikolaos A. Panayiotou, Dimitrios-Robert I. Stamatiou, and Athanasia C. Ntalla, “An application of AHP in the development process of a supply chain reference model focusing on demand variability,” Operational Research, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Marcello La Rosa, and Flavia Maria Santoro, “BPM Use Cases - Structuring the Business Process Management Discipline,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 309–310, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Thushari Silva, Ma Jian, and Yang Chen, “Process Analytics Approach for R&D Project Selection,” ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–34, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • W.M.P. van der Aalst, “Geschäftsprozessmodellierung: Die ,,Killer-Applikation“ für Petrinetze,” Informatik-Spektrum, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 191–198, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Weidong Zhao, Haitao Liu, Weihui Dai, and Jian Ma, “An entropy-based clustering ensemble method to support resource allocation in business process management,” Knowledge and Information Systems, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Haizhou Li, François Pinet, and Farouk Toumani, “Towards The Use of Probabilistic Spatial Relation Databases in Business Process Modeling,” International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 50–62, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Khubaib Amjad Alam, Rodina Ahmad, Adnan Akhunzada, Mohd Hairul Nizam Md Nasir, and Samee U. Khan, “Impact Analysis and Change Propagation in Service-oriented Enterprises: A Systematic Review,” Information Systems, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Manuel Bolsinger, Anna Elsäßer, Caroline Helm, and Maximilian Röglinger, “Process improvement through economically driven routing of instances,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 353–378, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Lihong Jiang, Jianyi Wang, Nazaraf Shah, Hongming Cai, Chengxi Huang, and Ray Farmer, “A process-mining-based scenarios generation method for SOA application development,” Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jan Recker, and Jan Mendling, “The State of the Art of Business Process Management Research as Published in the BPM Conference,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Martin Berner, Jino Augustine, and Alexander Maedche, “The Impact of Process Visibility on Process Performance,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rob J. B. Vanwersch, Khurram Shahzad, Irene Vanderfeesten, Kris Vanhaecht, Paul Grefen, Liliane Pintelon, Jan Mendling, Godefridus G. van Merode, and Hajo A. Reijers, “A Critical Evaluation and Framework of Business Process Improvement Methods,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • David Simões, Nguyen Hoang Thuan, Lalitha Jonnavithula, and Pedro Antunes, “Modelling Sensible Business Processes,” Future Data and Security Engineering, vol. 9446, pp. 165–182, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil van der Aalst, and Ernesto Damiani, “Processes Meet Big Data: Connecting Data Science with Process Science,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 810–819, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Raffaele Conforti, Sven Fink, Jonas Manderscheid, and Maximilian Röglinger, “PRISM – A Predictive Risk Monitoring Approach for Business Processes,” Business Process Management, vol. 9850, pp. 383–400, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hodjat Soleimani Malekan, Mohammmad H. Rezazade Mehrizi, and Hamideh Afsarmanesh, “Positioning Collaboration in Business Process Model Consolidation in VOs,” Collaboration in a Hyperconnected World, vol. 480, pp. 110–123, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Verena Geist, Christa Illibauer, Christine Natschläger, and Robert Hutter, “Supporting Customizable Business Process Models Using Graph Transformation Rules,” International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 51–71, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Thai-Minh Truong, and Lam-Son Lê, “Towards a Formal Framework for Business Process Re-Design Based on Data Mining,” Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, vol. 248, pp. 250–265, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tiexin Wang, Sebastien Truptil, and Frederick Benaben, “An automatic model-to-model mapping and transformation methodology to serve model-based systems engineering,” Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Simone Kriglstein, Maria Leitner, Sonja Kabicher-Fuchs, and Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, “Evaluation Methods in Process-Aware Information Systems Research with a Perspective on Human Orientation,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ralf Elbert, Holger Pontow, and Alexander Benlian, “The role of inter-organizational information systems in maritime transport chains,” Electronic Markets, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Chii Chang, Satish Narayana Srirama, and Rajkumar Buyya, “Mobile Cloud Business Process Management System for the Internet of Things,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1–42, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, and Sebastian Sardina, “Intelligent Process Adaptation in the SmartPM System,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–43, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jiankun Lei, Rufan Bai, Lipeng Guo, and Liang Zhang, “Towards a Scalable Framework for Artifact-Centric Business Process Management Systems,” Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2016, vol. 10042, pp. 309–323, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Evellin Cardoso, Katsiaryna Labunets, Fabiano Dalpiaz, John Mylopoulos, and Paolo Giorgini, “Modeling Structured and Unstructured Processes: An Empirical Evaluation,” Conceptual Modeling, vol. 9974, pp. 347–361, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ratul Saha, Madhavan Mukund, and R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, “Time-Bounded Statistical Analysis of Resource-Constrained Business Processes with Distributed Probabilistic Systems,” Dependable Software Engineering: Theories, Tools, and Applications, vol. 9984, pp. 297–314, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Marcello La Rosa, and Flávia Maria Santoro, “Business Process Management,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Asma Mejri, Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi, and Ricardo Martinho, “Representing Business Process Flexibility using Concept Maps,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 100, pp. 1260–1268, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sebastian Bräuer, Ralf Knackstedt, Hendrik Scholta, Martin Matzner, Thorsten Schoormann, Erik Kolek, and Matthias Strotmeier, “Cooperation Experience-Modellierungsmethode,” Planung koordinierter Wertschöpfungspartnerschaften, pp. 59–155, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nico Clever, Florian Runschke, Jan C. Dageförde, Hendrik Scholta, Sebastian Bräuer, Matthias Strotmeier, Patrick Jähne, Max Riffel, and Arthur Winter, “Cooperation Experience-Prototypen zur Werkzeugunterstützung,” Planung koordinierter Wertschöpfungspartnerschaften, pp. 159–276, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jana Hanudelova, and Lenka Prochazkova, “Organizational Service Management as an Umbrella for Information Business,” Agile Information Business, pp. 177–216, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Pedro Antunes, and Jocelyn Cranefield, “Coordination and simplexity in modelling air traffic control as a service: The case of NAV Portugal,” Knowledge and Process Management, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christoph Duelli, Robert Keller, Jonas Manderscheid, Andreas Manntz, Maximilian Röglinger, and Marco Schmidt, “Enabling Flexible Laboratory Processes: Designing the Laboratory Information System of the Future,” Business Process Management Cases, pp. 361–379, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Roque O. Bezerra, Maiara H. Cancian, and Ricardo J. Rabelo, “Enhancing Network Collaboration in SOA Services Composition via Standard Business Processes Catalogues,” Collaboration in a Data-Rich World, vol. 506, pp. 421–431, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Martin Lehnert, Maximilian Röglinger, and Johannes Seyfried, “Prioritization of Interconnected Processes,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Andrea Marrella, and Yves Lespérance, “A planning approach to the automated synthesis of template-based process models,” Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christian Zeyen, Gilbert M?ller, and Ralph Bergmann, “Conversational Process-Oriented Case-Based Reasoning,” Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, vol. 10339, pp. 403–419, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil M. P. van der Aalst, “Responsible Data Science: Using Event Data in a ?People Friendly? Manner,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 291, pp. 3–28, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Steven Mertens, Frederik Gailly, and Geert Poels, “Towards a decision-aware declarative process modeling language for knowledge-intensive processes,” Expert Systems with Applications, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ahmet Coşkunçay, Özge Gürbüz, Onur Demirörs, and Erdem Eser Ekinci, “PROMPTUM Toolset: Tool Support for Integrated Ontologies and Process Models,” Business Process Management Workshops, vol. 281, pp. 93–105, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Katherine Chengli, and Liam Peyton, “An OLAP Rule Environment for Reactive Performance Monitoring,” E-Technologies: Embracing the Internet of Things, vol. 289, pp. 205–212, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Farah Bellaaj, Mohamed Sellami, Sami Bhiri, and Zakaria Maamar, “Obstacle-Aware Resource Allocation in Business Processes,” Business Information Systems, vol. 288, pp. 207–219, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Banu Aysolmaz, and Hajo A. Reijers, “Use Cases for Understanding Business Process Models,” Advanced Information Systems Engineering, vol. 10253, pp. 428–442, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • David Simões, Pedro Antunes, and Luis Carriço, “Eliciting and Modeling Business Process Stories,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Artem Polyvyanyy, Chun Ouyang, Alistair Barros, and Wil M.P. van der Aalst, “Process Querying: Enabling Business Intelligence through Query-Based Process Analytics,” Decision Support Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Martin Lehnert, Alexander Linhart, and Maximilian Roeglinger, “Exploring the intersection of business process improvement and BPM capability development,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 275–292, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jens Ohlsson, Shengnan Han, and Harry Bouwman, “The prioritization and categorization method (PCM) process evaluation at Ericsson: a case study,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 377–398, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Faiz ul Muram, Huy Tran, and Uwe Zdun, “Systematic Review of Software Behavioral Model Consistency Checking,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1–39, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Niels Martin, Marijke Swennen, Benoît Depaire, Mieke Jans, An Caris, and Koen Vanhoof, “Retrieving batch organisation of work insights from event logs,” Decision Support Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wolfgang Kratsch, Jonas Manderscheid, Daniel Reißner, and Maximilian Röglinger, “Data-driven Process Prioritization in process networks,” Decision Support Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Shaya Pourmirza, Sander Peters, Remco Dijkman, and Paul Grefen, “A Systematic Literature Review on the Architecture of Business Process Management Systems,” Information Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ronaldo Bernardo, Simone Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina, and Silvia Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, “The BPM lifecycle,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 155–175, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Konstantīns Gusarovs, and Oksana Ņikiforova, “Workflow Generation from the Two-Hemisphere Model,” Applied Computer Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mirjana Pejić Bach, Vesna Bosilj Vukšić, and Dalia Suša Vugec, “Individual’s Resistance Regarding BPM Initiative: Case Study of the Insurance Company,” Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, vol. 63, no. 4, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil van der Aalst, “Spreadsheets for Business Process Management: Using process mining to deal with "events" rather than "numbers"?,” Business Process Management Journal, pp. 00–00, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marie-Sophie Denner, Louis Christian Püschel, and Maximilian Röglinger, “How to Exploit the Digitalization Potential of Business Processes,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Darko Etinger, Tihomir Orehovački, and Snježana Babić, “Applying Process Mining Techniques to Learning Management Systems for Educational Process Model Discovery and Analysis,” Intelligent Human Systems Integration, vol. 722, pp. 420–425, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jens Ohlsson, Shengnan Han, Jens Ohlsson, and Shengnan Han, “Knowledge Base,” Prioritising Business Processes, pp. 11–27, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jens Ohlsson, Shengnan Han, Jens Ohlsson, and Shengnan Han, “The Prioritisation and Categorisation Method—PCM,” Prioritising Business Processes, pp. 29–36, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Lisa Grumbach, and Ralph Bergmann, “Using Constraint Satisfaction Problem Solving to Enable Workflow Flexibility by Deviation (Best Technical Paper),” Artificial Intelligence XXXIV, vol. 10630, pp. 3–17, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bilgin Avenoğlu, and P. Erhan Eren, “A context-aware and workflow-based framework for pervasive environments,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Juan Boubeta-Puig, Gregorio Díaz, Hermenegilda Macià, Valentín Valero, and Guadalupe Ortiz, “MEdit4CEP-CPN: An Approach for Complex Event Processing Modeling by Prioritized Colored Petri Nets,” Information Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ana Rocío Cárdenas Maita, Lucas Corrêa Martins, Carlos Ramón López Paz, Laura Rafferty, Patrick C. K. Hung, Sarajane Marques Peres, and Marcelo Fantinato, “A systematic mapping study of process mining,” Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 1–45, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Eike Best, Thomas Hujsa, and Harro Wimmel, “Sufficient conditions for the marked graph realisability of labelled transition systems,” Theoretical Computer Science, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Carlo Combi, Barbara Oliboni, Alessandro Zardini, and Francesca Zerbato, “A Methodological Framework for the Integrated Design of Decision-Intensive Care Pathways—an Application to the Management of COPD Patients,” Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paul Johannesson, Maria Bergholtz, and Owen Eriksson, “CreatingWorlds with Words: Ontology-guided Conceptual Modeling for Institutional Domains,” Conceptual Modeling Perspectives, pp. 169–184, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Steven Alter, “A work system perspective on organizational design and enterprise engineering,” Organizational Design and Enterprise Engineering, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Geiger, Simon Harrer, Jörg Lenhard, and Guido Wirtz, “BPMN 2.0: The state of support and implementation,” Future Generation Computer Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Johannes H. Glitsch, and Petra Schubert, “IRESS: Identification of Requirements for Enterprise Social Software,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 121, pp. 866–873, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Dennis M. Riehle, Sven Jannaber, Patrick Delfmann, Oliver Thomas, and Jörg Becker, “Automatically Annotating Business Process Models with Ontology Concepts at Design-Time,” Advances in Conceptual Modeling, vol. 10651, pp. 177–186, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marie-Sophie Denner, Maximilian Röglinger, Theresa Schmiedel, Katharina Stelzl, and Charlotte Wehking, “How Context-Aware Are Extant BPM Methods? - Development of an Assessment Scheme,” Business Process Management, vol. 11080, pp. 480–495, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rouven Poll, Artem Polyvyanyy, Michael Rosemann, Maximilian Röglinger, and Lea Rupprecht, “Process Forecasting: Towards Proactive Business Process Management,” Business Process Management, vol. 11080, pp. 496–512, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Salvatore Ammirato, Francesco Sofo, Alberto Michele Felicetti, and Cinzia Raso, “A methodology to support the adoption of IoT innovation and its application to the Italian bank branch security context,” European Journal of Innovation Management, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Simon Kratzer, Patrick Lohmann, Maximilian Roeglinger, Lea Rupprecht, and Michael zur Muehlen, “The role of the chief process officer in organizations,” Business Process Management Journal, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Praveen Choudhary, Monika Mital, Ashis Kumar Pani, Armando Papa, and Francesca Vicentini, “Impact of enterprise mobile system implementation on organizational ambidexterity mediated through BPM customizability,” Business Process Management Journal, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Asma Mejri, Sonia Ayachi-Ghannouchi, and Ricardo Martinho, “A quantitative approach for measuring the degree of flexibility of business process models,” Business Process Management Journal, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Monika Klun, and Peter Trkman, “Business process management – at the crossroads,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 786–813, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christian Fleig, Dominik Augenstein, and Alexander Maedche, “Tell Me What’s My Business - Development of a Business Model Mining Software,” Information Systems in the Big Data Era, vol. 317, pp. 105–113, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mattia Salnitri, Mahdi Alizadeh, Daniele Giovanella, Nicola Zannone, and Paolo Giorgini, “From Security-by-Design to the Identification of Security-Critical Deviations in Process Executions,” Information Systems in the Big Data Era, vol. 317, pp. 218–234, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Anat Goldstein, Thomas Johanndeiter, and Ulrich Frank, “Business process runtime models: towards bridging the gap between design, enactment, and evaluation of business processes,” Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • André Luiz Teixeira Vinci, Francisco Barbosa, Silvia Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, Rui Rijo, and Domingos Alves, “The process of outpatient care of children and adolescents in a tertiary-level hospital specializing in pediatrics: A case study focused on identifying opportunities for improvement with the aid of modeling using BPMN,” Knowledge and Process Management, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • F.B. Vernadat, F.T.S. Chan, A. Molina, S.Y. Nof, and H. Panetto, “Information systems and knowledge management in industrial engineering: recent advances and new perspectives,” International Journal of Production Research, pp. 1–7, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Arvi Kuura, and Rolf A. Lundin, “Process perspectives on entrepreneurship and projects,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Guangying Jin, and Frank Walter, “Execution and evaluation of enterprise models in IEM/MO2GO based on Petri net,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paul de Vrieze, and Lai Xu, “Resilience analysis of service-oriented collaboration process management systems,” Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wil M.P. van der Aalst, “Process discovery from event data: Relating models and logs through abstractions,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. e1244, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Simon Harrer, Oliver Kopp, and Jörg Lenhard, “Patterns for Workflow Engine Benchmarking,” Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing, vol. 707, pp. 151–163, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Alexander Seeliger, Michael Stein, and Max Mühlhäuser, “Can We Find Better Process Models? Process Model Improvement Using Motif-Based Graph Adaptation,” Business Process Management Workshops, vol. 308, pp. 230–242, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Maximilian Roeglinger, Johannes Seyfried, Simon Stelzl, and Michael zur Muehlen, “Cognitive Computing: What’s in for Business Process Management? An Exploration of Use Case Ideas,” Business Process Management Workshops, vol. 308, pp. 419–428, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Banu Aysolmaz, Mehmet Gürsul, Kathrin Kirchner, Ralf Laue, Robert Mertens, Felix Reher, Irene M. Schönreiter, Bernhard M. Turban, and Rüdiger Weißbach, “A Reflection on the Interrelations Between Business Process Management and Requirements Engineering with an Agility Perspective,” Business Process Management Workshops, vol. 308, pp. 669–680, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Piotr Wiśniewski, Krzysztof Kluza, Mateusz Ślażyński, and Antoni Ligęza, “Constraint-Based Composition of Business Process Models,” Business Process Management Workshops, vol. 308, pp. 133–141, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hodjat Soleimani Malekan, Katarzyna Adamiak, and Hamideh Afsarmanesh, “A systematic approach for business service consolidation in virtual organizations,” Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yinhua Tian, Yuyue Du, Maozhen Li, Dong Han, and Qiang Hu, “Reduced alignment based on Petri nets,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp. e4411, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Michael Arias, Rodrigo Saavedra, Maira R. Marques, Jorge Munoz-Gama, and Marcos Sepúlveda, “Human resource allocation in business process management and process mining,” Management Decision, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Meral Dülger, “Modern Approaches for Organizational Dynamism,” Enhancing Competitive Advantage With Dynamic Management and Engineering, pp. 1–30, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar