Table of Contents
ISRN Ecology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 527052, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/527052
Research Article

Distributional Patterns of Alien Plants in China: The Relative Importance of Phylogenetic History and Functional Attributes

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4

Received 27 May 2013; Accepted 15 July 2013

Academic Editors: A. Chappelka and P. Rey

Copyright © 2013 Youhua Chen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. A. Tecco, S. Díaz, M. Cabido, and C. Urcelay, “Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land-use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them?” Journal of Ecology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Ordonez, I. J. Wright, and H. Olff, “Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison,” Functional Ecology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1353–1361, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Knapp and I. Kühn, “Origin matters: widely distributed native and non-native species benefit from different functional traits,” Ecology Letters, vol. 15, pp. 696–703, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Ricotta, S. Godefroid, and D. Rocchini, “Invasiveness of alien plants in Brussels is related to their phylogenetic similarity to native species,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 655–662, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Ricotta, D. Heathfield, Godefroid, and S. Mazzoleni, “The effects of habitat filtering on the phylogenetic structure of the urban flora of Brussels (Belgium),” Community Eology, vol. 13, pp. 97–101, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. C. Ricotta, F. A. La Sorte, P. Pyšek, G. L. Rapson, L. Celesti-Grapow, and K. Thompson, “Phyloecology of urban alien floras,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1243–1251, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. W. Cadotte, M. A. Hamilton, and B. R. Murray, “Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 481–488, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Safi, M. V. Cianciaruso, R. D. Loyola, D. Brito, K. Armour-Marshall, and J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, “Understanding global patterns of mammalian functional and phylogenetic diversity,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 366, no. 1577, pp. 2536–2544, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, M. V. Cianciaruso, T. F. Rangel, and L. M. Bini, “Eigenvector estimation of phylogenetic and functional diversity,” Functional Ecology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 735–744, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Swenson, D. Erickson, and X. Mi, “Phylogenetic and functional alpha and beta diversity in temperate and tropical tree communities,” Ecology, vol. 93, pp. S112–S125, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. V. Devictor, D. Mouillot, C. Meynard, F. Jiguet, W. Thuiller, and N. Mouquet, “Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world,” Ecology Letters, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1030–1040, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. F. B. Flynn, N. Mirotchnick, M. Jain, M. I. Palmer, and S. Naeem, “Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity- Ecosystem-function relationships,” Ecology, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 1573–1581, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. W. Cadotte, J. Cavender-Bares, D. Tilman, and T. H. Oakley, “Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 5, Article ID e5695, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. W. Seabloom, C. D. Benfield, E. T. Borer, A. G. Stanley, T. N. Kaye, and P. W. Dunwiddie, “Provenance, life span, and phylogeny do not affect grass species' responses to nitrogen and phosphorus,” Ecological Applications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2129–2142, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Weber, S.-G. Sun, and B. Li, “Invasive alien plants in China: diversity and ecological insights,” Biological Invasions, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1411–1429, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. J. Prentis, J. R. U. Wilson, E. E. Dormontt, D. M. Richardson, and A. J. Lowe, “Adaptive evolution in invasive species,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 288–294, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Clements and A. Ditommaso, “Climate change and weed adaptation: can evolution of invasive plants lead to greater range expansion than forecasted?” Weed Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 227–240, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. O. Webb, D. D. Ackerly, M. A. McPeek, and M. J. Donoghue, “Phylogenies and community ecology,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 33, pp. 475–505, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Ricotta, S. Godefroid, and D. Rocchini, “Invasiveness of alien plants in Brussels is related to their phylogenetic similarity to native species,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 655–662, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Gerhold, M. Pärtel, O. Tackenberg et al., “Phylogenetically poor plant communities receive more alien species, which more easily coexist with natives,” American Naturalist, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 668–680, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. C. Davis, C. G. Willis, R. B. Primack, and A. J. Miller-Rushing, “The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 365, no. 1555, pp. 3202–3213, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. D. Parker, D. E. Burkepile, M. J. Lajeunesse, and E. M. Lind, “Phylogenetic isolation increases plant success despite increasing susceptibility to generalist herbivores,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Harvey, D. Nipperess, D. Britton, and L. Hughes, “Australian family ties: does a lack of relatives help invasive plants escape natural enemies?” Biological Invasions, vol. 14, pp. 2423–2434, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. O. L. Petchey and K. J. Gaston, “Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition,” Ecology Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 402–411, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z.-B. Wang, Y.-F. Chen, and Y.-H. Chen, “Functional grouping and establishment of distribution patterns of invasive plants in china using self-organizing maps and indicator species analysis,” Archives of Biological Sciences, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Liu, S.-C. Liang, F.-H. Liu, R.-Q. Wang, and M. Dong, “Invasive alien plant species in China: regional distribution patterns,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. X. Yan, H. Shou, and J. Ma, “The problem and status of the alien invasive plants in China,” Plant Diversity and Resources, vol. 34, pp. 287–313, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. X. Wu, J. Luo, J. Chen, and B. Li, “Spatial patterns of invasive alien plants in China and its relationship with environmental and anthropological factors,” Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 30, pp. 576–584, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. Ackerly, “Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 19699–19706, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. A. Hamilton, B. R. Murray, M. W. Cadotte et al., “Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales,” Ecology Letters, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1066–1074, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. O. Webb, D. D. Ackerly, and S. W. Kembel, “Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution,” Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 2098–2100, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Pagel, “Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution,” Nature, vol. 401, no. 6756, pp. 877–884, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. P. Blomberg, T. Garland Jr., and A. R. Ives, “Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile,” Evolution, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 717–745, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Q.-Q. Huang, G.-X. Wang, Y.-P. Hou, and S.-L. Peng, “Distribution of invasive plants in China in relation to geographical origin and life cycle,” Weed Research, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 534–542, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. N. Barney, T. H. Whitlow, and A. J. Lembo Jr., “Revealing historic invasion patterns and potential invasion sites for two non-native plant species,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 2, Article ID e1635, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. García-Berthou, C. Alcaraz, Q. Pou-Rovira, L. Zamora, G. Coenders, and C. Feo, “Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 453–463, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. O. Webb and M. J. Donoghue, “Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics,” Molecular Ecology Notes, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 181–183, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Bremer, K. Bremer, M. W. Chase et al., “An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 105–121, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Huang, B. Chen, C. Liu, J. Lai, J. Zhang, and K. Ma, “Identifying hotspots of endemic woody seed plant diversity in China,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 18, pp. 673–688, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S.-B. Zhang, J. W. F. Slik, J.-L. Zhang, and K.-F. Cao, “Spatial patterns of wood traits in China are controlled by phylogeny and the environment,” Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 241–250, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. Wikström, V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase, “Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 268, no. 1482, pp. 2211–2220, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. G. Swenson, “Phylogenetic beta diversity metrics, trait evolution and inferring the functional beta diversity of communities,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e21264, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Trindade-Filho, F. L. Sobral, M. V. Cianciaruso, and R. D. Loyola, “Using indicator groups to represent bird phylogenetic and functional diversity,” Biological Conservation, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. N. Meynard, V. Devictor, D. Mouillot, W. Thuiller, F. Jiguet, and N. Mouquet, “Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France?” Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 893–903, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. Pei, J.-Y. Lian, D. L. Erickson et al., “Exploring tree-habitat associations in a Chinese subtropical forest plot using a molecular phylogeny generated from DNA barcode loci,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e21273, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Zhang, N. Swenson, S. Chen et al., “Phylogenetic beta diversity in tropical forests: implications for the roles of geographical and environmental distance,” Journal of Systematics and Evolution, vol. 51, pp. 71–85, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. H. Tuomisto and K. Ruokolainen, “Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis,” Ecology, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 2697–2708, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. K. Ruokolainen and H. Tuomisto, “Beta-diversity in tropical forests,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5586, pp. 1439–1439, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus