Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2013, Article ID 585420, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/585420
Research Article

The Effects of Reusing Written Test Items: A Study Using the Rasch Model

1Department for Medical Education, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
2Institute of Medical Education, Curriculum Coordination & Students' Office, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 11, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Received 25 February 2013; Accepted 5 April 2013

Academic Editors: K. Capps and T. Hovardas

Copyright © 2013 Michaela Wagner-Menghin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Case and D. B. Swanson, Constructing Written Test Questions for the Basic and Clinical Sciences, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1998.
  2. R. Krebs, Anleitung zur Herstellung von MC-Fragen und MC-Prüfungen für die ärztliche Ausbildung [Guidelines for the Production of MC-Items and MC-Examinations in Medical Education], Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Abteilung für Ausbildungs-und Examensforschung, Bern, Swizerland, 2004.
  3. D. L. McCabe, K. D. Butterfield, and L. K. Treviño, “Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes, and proposed action,” Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 294–305, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. A. C. Teixeira and M. F. Rocha, “Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: an exploratory international assessment,” Higher Education, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 663–701, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Kreiter, M. W. Peterson, K. Ferguson, and S. Elliott, “The effects of testing in shifts on a clinical in-course computerized exam,” Medical Education, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 202–204, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. R. Burns, J. E. Garrett, and G. V. Childs, “A study of student performance on self-scheduled, computer-based examinations in a medical histology course: is later better?” Medical Teacher, vol. 29, no. 9-10, pp. 990–992, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. R. Raymond, S. Neustel, and D. Anderson, “Retest effects on identical and parallel forms in certification and licensure testing,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 367–396, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. J. Wood, “The effect of reused questions on repeat examinees,” Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 465–473, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. N. Wright and G. N. Masters, Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement, MESA Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1982.
  10. J. R. Boulet, D. W. McKinley, G. P. Whelan, and R. K. Hambleton, “The effect of task exposure on repeat candidate scores in a high-stakes standardized patient assessment,” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 227–232, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus