Table of Contents
ISRN Chemical Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 591546, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/591546
Research Article

Kinetics and Product Selectivity (Yield) of Second Order Competitive Consecutive Reactions in Fed-Batch Reactor and Plug Flow Reactor

Process Engineering, Arch Pharmalabs Ltd, 541A Marol Maroshi Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai 400059, India

Received 27 May 2013; Accepted 19 June 2013

Academic Editors: C. Chen, J. A. A. González, C.-T. Hsieh, and Y. Otsubo

Copyright © 2013 Subash Chandra Bose Selvamony. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1998.
  2. J. F. Richardson and D. G. Peacock, Coulson and Richardson's Chemical Engineering: Chemical and Biochemical Reactors and Process Control, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Mass, USA, 3rd edition, 1994.
  3. S. I. A. Shah, L. W. Kostiuk, and S. M. Kresta, “The effects of mixing, reaction rates, and stoichiometry on yield for mixing sensitive reactions—part I: model development,” International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 750162, 16 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. I. A. Shah, L. W. Kostiuk, and S. M. Kresta, “The effects of mixing, reaction rates, and stoichiometry on yield for mixing sensitive reactions—part II: design protocols,” International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 654321, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. R. Bourne, “Mixing and the selectivity of chemical reactions,” Organic Process Research and Development, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 471–508, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Bałdyga, J. R. Bourne, and S. J. Hearn, “Interaction between chemical reactions and mixing on various scales,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 457–466, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. G. Anderson, “Practical use of continuous processing in developing and scaling up laboratory processes,” Organic Process Research and Development, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 613–621, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Brechtelsbauer and F. Ricard, “Reaction engineering evaluation and utilization of static mixer technology for the synthesis of pharmaceuticals,” Organic Process Research and Development, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 646–651, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Anxionnaz, M. Cabassud, C. Gourdon, and P. Tochon, “Heat exchanger/reactors (HEX reactors): concepts, technologies: state-of-the-art,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2029–2050, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Barthe, C. Guermeur, O. Lobet et al., “Continuous multi-injection reactor for multipurpose production—part I,” Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1146–1154, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Patel and G. Gasparini, “Reactor technology: flow reactors and dynamic mixing,” Specialty Chemicals Magazine, 2009.
  12. X. W. Ni, “Continuous oscilatory baffled reactor technology,” in Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology—Manufacturing, pp. 90–96, 2006, http://www.iptonline.com/pdf_viewarticle.asp?cat=5&article=392. View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Proctor, “Continuous chemical processing,” in Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology, pp. 84–88, http://www.iptonline.com/pdf_viewarticle.asp?cat=5&article=290.