Table of Contents
ISRN High Energy Physics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 595070, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/595070
Research Article

Initial Systematic Investigations of the Landscape of Low-Layer NAHE Variation Extensions

EUCOS-CASPER, Department of Physics, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76978, USA

Received 3 June 2013; Accepted 8 July 2013

Academic Editors: C. A. D. S. Pires, A. Koshelev, and M. Masip

Copyright © 2013 Timothy Renner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, “Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,” The Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 06, article 006, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. S. K. Ashok and M. R. Douglas, “Counting flux vacua,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 01, article 60, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. T. P. T. Dijkstra, L. R. Huiszoon, and A. N. Schellekens, “Supersymmetric standard model spectra from RCFT orientifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 710, no. 1-2, pp. 3–57, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. R. Donagi, Y.-H. He, B. A. Ovrut, and R. Reinbacher, “The spectra of heterotic standard model vacua,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 06, article 070, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. R. Valandro, Phenomenology from the landscape of string vacua,” [Ph.D. thesis], http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0584.
  6. V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, and A. Naqvi, “Statistical predictions from anarchic field theory landscapes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 682, pp. 476–483, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. O. Lebedev, H. P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sánchez, M. Ratz, and P. K. S. Vaudrevange, “Heterotic mini-landscape (II): completing the search for MSSM vacua in a Z6 orbifold,” Physics Letters B, vol. 668, no. 4, pp. 331–335, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. F. Gmeiner and G. Honecker, “Millions of standard models on Z6?” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 07, aticle 052, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. K. R. Dienes and M. Lennek, “Correlation classes on the landscape: to what extent is string theory predictive?” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 10, Article ID 106003, 12 pages. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Gabella, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, “An abundance of heterotic vacua,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 12, article 027, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. R. Donagi and K. Wendland, “On orbifolds and free fermion constructions,” Journal of Geometry and Physics, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 942–968, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. I. Antoniadis, C. P. Bachas, and C. Kounnas, “Four-dimensional superstrings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. 87–108, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. I. Antoniadis and C. Bachas, “4d fermionic superstrings with arbitrary twists,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 298, no. 3, pp. 586–612, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S.-H. H. Tye, “Construction of fermionic string models in four dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. 1–76, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, J. A. Schwartz, and S.-H. H. Tye, “The spin structure construction of string models and multiloop modular invariance,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 299, no. 3, pp. 431–470, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. G. Cleaver, A. Faraggi, D. Nanopoulos, and J. Walker, “A minimal superstring standard model II: a Phenomenological Study,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 593, no. 3, pp. 471–504, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Lopez, D. Nanopoulos, and K. Yuan, “The search for a realistic flipped SU(5) string model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 399, no. 2-3, pp. 654–688, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. Yuan, “A standard-like model in the four-dimensional free fermionic string formulation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 335, no. 2, pp. 347–362, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. E. Faraggi, “Construction of realistic standard-like models in the free fermionic superstring formulation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 387, no. 2, pp. 239–262, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. I. Antoniadis, G. K. Leontaris, and J. Rizos, “A three-generation SU(4) x O(4) string model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. 161–168, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. K. Leontaris and J. Rizos, “N=1 supersymmetric SU (4)× SU (2)L× SU (2)R effective theory from the weakly coupled heterotic superstring,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 554, no. 1-2, pp. 3–49, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. A. E. Faraggi, “A new standard-like model in the four dimensional free fermionic string formulation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 278, no. 1-2, pp. 131–139, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. E. Faraggi, “Aspects of non-renormalizable terms in a superstring derived standard-like model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 403, no. 1-2, pp. 101–121, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. A. E. Faraggi, “Generation mass hierarchy in superstring derived models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 407, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. E. Faraggi, “Hierarchical top-bottom mass relation in a superstring derived standard-like model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 274, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. E. Faraggi, “Yukawa couplings in superstring-derived standardlike models,” Physical Review D, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 5021–5028, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. E. Faraggi, “Top quark mass prediction in superstring derived standard-like models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 377, no. 1–3, pp. 43–47, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. A. E. Faraggi, “Calculating fermion masses in superstring derived standard-like models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 487, no. 1-2, pp. 55–92, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. G. B. Cleaver, “Advances in old-fashioned heterotic string model building,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 62, no. 1–3, pp. 161–170, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. G. B. Cleaver and A. E. Faraggi, “On the anomalous U(1) in free fermionic superstring models,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 2335–2356, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. G. Cleaver, M. Cvetič, J. R. Espinosa, L. Everett, and P. Langacker, “Classification of flat directions in perturbative heterotic superstring vacua with anomalousU(1),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 525, no. 1-2, pp. 3–26, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. G. Cleaver, M. Cvetič, J. R. Espinosa, L. Everett, and P. Langacker, “Flat directions in three-generation free-fermionic string models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 545, no. 1–3, pp. 47–97, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. G. Cleaver, M. Cvetič, J. Espinosa, L. Everett, P. Langacker, and J. Wang, “Physics implications of flat directions in free fermionic superstring models I. Mass spectrum and couplings,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 5, Article ID 055005, 21 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G. Cleaver, M. Cvetič, J. Espinosa, L. Everett, P. Langacker, and J. Wang, “Physics implications of flat directions in free fermionic superstring modelsII. Renormalization group analysis,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 11, Article ID 115003, 18 pages. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. G. B. Cleaver, “Quark masses and flat directions in string models,” in Proceeding of the 4th workshop on QCD, Paris, France, June 1998, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9812262.
  36. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “String derived MSSM and M-theory unification,” Physics Letters B, vol. 455, no. 1–4, pp. 135–146, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “A minimal superstring standard model. I. Flat directions,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 425–482, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. G. Cleaver, A. Faraggi, D. Nanopoulos, and J. Walke, “Phenomenological study of a minimal superstring standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 593, no. 3, pp. 471–504, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. G. B. Cleaver, “M-fluences on string model building,” submitted, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9901203.
  40. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos, and J. W. Walker, “Non-Abelian flat directions in a minimal superstring standard model,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 15, no. 18, p. 1191, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, and C. Savage, “Left-right symmetric heterotic-string derived models,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 6, Article ID 066001, 22 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos, and J. W. Walker, “Phenomenology of non-abelian flat directions in a minimal superstring standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 620, no. 1-2, pp. 259–289, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. G. B. Cleaver, D. J. Clements, and A. E. Faraggi, “Flat directions in left-right symmetric string derived models,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 10, Article ID 106003, 11 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, and S. E. M. Nooij, “NAHE-based string models with SU(4)×SU(2)×U(1)SO(10),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 672, no. 1-2, pp. 64–86, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  45. G. Cleaver, “Parameter space investigations of free fermionic heterotic models,” Proceedings of the 1st International conference on string phenomenology, Oxford, UK, July 2002, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0210093.
  46. G. Cleaver, V. Desai, H. Hanson, J. Perkins, D. Robbins, and S. Shields, “Possibility of optical unification in heterotic strings,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 2, Article ID 026009, 8 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. J. Perkins, B. Dundee, R. Obousy et al., “Stringent phenomenological investigation into heterotic string optical unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 2, Article ID 026007, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Perkins, B. Dundee, R. Obousy et al., “Stringent phenomenological investigation into heterotic string optical unification,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 2, Article ID 026007, 17 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. G. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, E. Manno, and C. Timirgaziu, “Quasi-realistic heterotic-string models with vanishing one-loop cosmological constant and perturbatively broken supersymmetry?” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 4, Article ID 046009, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  50. J. Greenwald, D. Moore, K. Pechan, T. Renner, T. Ali, and G. Cleaver, “Note on a NAHE Variation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 850, no. 3, pp. 445–462, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. A. E. Faraggi, “MSHSM-minimal standard eeterotic string models,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 58, no. 7–9, pp. 733–737, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens, “Asymmetric Gepner models (revisited),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 841, no. 1-2, pp. 100–129, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  53. B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens, “Asymmetric Gepner models II. Heterotic weight lifting,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 846, no. 3, pp. 429–468, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  54. B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens, “Asymmetric Gepner models III. B-L lifting,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 847, no. 3, pp. 532–548, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  55. M. Maio and A. N. Schellekens, “Permutation orbifolds of heterotic Gepner models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 848, no. 3, pp. 594–628, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  56. B. Assel, K. Christodoulides, A. E. Faraggi, C. Kounnas, and J. Rizos, “Classification of heterotic Pati-Salam models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 844, no. 3, pp. 365–396, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  57. G. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, G. Greenwald et al., “Investigation of quasi-realistic heterotic string models with reduced Higgs spectrum,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, p. 1842, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  58. T. Renner, J. Greenwald, D. Moore, and G. Cleaver, “Initial systematic investigations of the landscape of low layer NAHE extensions,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, p. 2167, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. R. N. Mohapatra and L. Vigdor Teplitz, “Structures in the mirror universe,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 478, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. R. Mohapatra and V. Teplitz, “Mirror matter MACHOs,” Physics Letters B, vol. 462, no. 3-4, pp. 302–309, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. R. Mohapatra and V. Teplitz, “Mirror dark matter,” in Proceedings of the 14th International symposium on sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe, Marina del Rey, Calif, USA, February 2004, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0004046.
  62. R. Mohapatra, S. Nussinov, and V. Teplitz, “Mirror matter as self-interacting dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 063002, 2002. View at Google Scholar