International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 629640 |

Fortunatus C. Ezebuo, Sabinus Oscar O. Eze, Colin B. Lukong, Ferdinand C. Chilaka, "Interaction of Normal and Sickle Hemoglobins for Sodium Dodecylsulphate and Hydrogen Peroxide at pH 5.0 and 7.2", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2013, Article ID 629640, 5 pages, 2013.

Interaction of Normal and Sickle Hemoglobins for Sodium Dodecylsulphate and Hydrogen Peroxide at pH 5.0 and 7.2

Academic Editor: E. Cobos
Received08 Jul 2013
Accepted29 Aug 2013
Published10 Oct 2013


Clinical manifestations of malaria primarily result from proliferation of the parasite within the hosts’ erythrocytes. The malaria parasite digests hemoglobin within its digestive vacuole through a sequential metabolic process involving multiple proteases. The activities of these proteases could lead to the production of ROS which could lead to the death of the parasites due to the destruction of their membrane. The action of SDS on hemoglobins can be likened to the way malarial proteases destabilizes host hemoglobin. Hence, the study was designed to determine the binding parameters of SDS and H2O2 for normal, sickle trait carrier and sickle hemoglobins at pH 5.0 and 7.2 using UV-VIS Titration Spectrophotometry. Hb-SDS interactions were significantly different at pH 5.0 but were not at pH 7.2. Also, Hb-H2O2 interactions were statistically different at pH 5.0 and 7.2. The interactions suggest that HbA and HbS are easily destabilized than HbAS and that HbAS has more affinity for H2O2. These suggest a production of more ferryl intermediates or hydroxyl radicals. All these interactions may hinder the development of the malaria parasite at the intraerythrocytic stage and could likely account for a significant proportion of the mechanism that favours the resistance to malaria by individuals with HbAS.

1. Introduction

Malaria is one of the most important infectious disease problems of humans, particularly in developing countries. Plasmodium falciparum, the most virulent human malaria parasite, is responsible for hundreds of millions of illnesses and more than one million deaths each year [1]. Clinical manifestations of malaria primarily result from proliferation of the parasite within the hosts’ erythrocytes. During this process, hemoglobin is utilized as the predominant source of nutrition. This is because during the intraerythrocytic development and proliferation, the parasites ingest more than 75% of the hosts’ hemoglobin and digest them within the digestive vacuole—an acidic organelles with estimated pH of 5.0–5.4—through a sequential metabolic process involving multiple proteases [2, 3], and action of sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) on hemoglobins can be likened to the way proteases secreted by malaria parasites destabilizes host hemoglobin for their homeostasis. Hydrogen peroxide is a major reactive oxygen species in living organisms and can produce reactive hydroxyl radicals or ferryl intermediate [Fe(IV)=O]2+ by Fenton or Fenton like reaction [4]. Hanspal et al. [5] reported that Plasmodium falciparum-derived cysteine protease, falcipain-2, cleaves host erythrocyte hemoglobin at acidic pH and specific components of the membrane skeleton at neutral pH. Invasion of erythrocytes by plasmodium merozoites is a complex multistep process which is mediated by specific molecular interactions between host receptors and parasite ligands. A clear understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in erythrocyte invasion and proliferation of the parasite could lead to the development of novel approaches to inhibit invasion, limit blood-stage parasite growth, and protect against malaria [6].

Molecular recognition lies at the heart of biological processes, and much effort is being made by biological chemist to understand the molecular details of macromolecule-ligand interactions of which hemoglobin-SDS and hemoglobin-H2O2 are not exception. Also, medical chemists are trying to exploit this understanding in developing useful pharmaceutics [7]. Dissociation constant () is a reciprocal of binding constant (), and it is a useful way to present the affinity of a ligand for a macromolecule. This is because its value quickly tells us the concentration of ligand that is required to yield a significant amount of interaction with the macromolecule. The precise mechanism by which sickle cell trait imparts resistance to malaria is unknown. Hence, investigation was carried out on affinities of hemoglobins for SDS and H2O2, which could provide insight to mechanism that favours the resistance to malaria by individuals with HbAS variant.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) and other chemicals used in this work obtained from BDH, England and Sigma, Germany are of analytical grade. All reagents were freshly prepared unless otherwise stated.

2.2. Methods

Four milliliters (4 mL) of blood samples were collected from each of the identified individuals of genotype AA, AS, and SS after informed consent. In each case, the blood sample was collected with an ethylene di-amine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) vial.

2.2.1. Isolation and Purification of Hemoglobin

Each of the blood samples was combined with normal saline in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2) in the ratio of 2 : 3 and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at 4000 rpm [8]. Thereafter, the supernatants were removed by aspiration. The centrifugation was repeated for 2–4 times until a clear supernatant is gotten in each case. The clear supernatants were removed and the resulting pellets in the case were made up to 5 mL with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2). The red cells were lysed and 5% NaCl was added to the resulting volume and centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm to remove inorganic phosphates and other ions. The crude hemoglobins were collected with separate vials and labeled appropriately. Each of the crude hemoglobins (HbA, HbAS, or HbS) was dialyzed at 4°C for 24 hr against 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2. The dialyzed hemoglobins were collected and stored at –20°C for further experiments.

2.2.2. UV-Visible Titration

One hundred microliters (100 μL) of 0.01 mM of each of the hemoglobins calculated on heme basis by using ε415 =  M−1 cm−1 [9], or ε523 = 7.12 mM−1 cm−1 [10] were scanned from 250–650 nm using JENWAY 6405 UV-VIS Spectrophotometer in the absence and presence of different concentrations of ligands (sodium dodecylsulphate and hydrogen peroxide) in 50 mM buffers of pH 5.0 and 7.2 after appropriate buffer baselines. The titrations were done by fixing 0.1 mL of the hemoglobins in 3 mL cuvette containing a fixed volume of the buffer (2.1 mL each for SDS and H2O2) then various volumes (0 to 0.4 mL) corresponding to different in situ concentrations of SDS and H2O2 (0 to 0.748 mM) were added in stepwise manner from stock concentration of SDS or H2O2 (5.0 mM) mixed and scanned from 250–650 nm. Spectrum readings were recorded at each titration point (after each addition of SDS or H2O2).

2.2.3. Calculation of Dissociation Constant

The binding of Sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) or Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to hemoglobin can be represented as follows: where Hb represents HbA, HbAS, or HbS; L represents SDS or H2O2; also known as represents number of binding sites of SDS or H2O2 for hemoglobin.

, the dissociation constant is defined as where and are the concentrations of free hemoglobin and ligands (SDS or H2O2) and is the concentration of the complex. The ratio of the concentration of the complexed ligand (SDS or H2O2), [HbLn], versus the total concentration of the hemoglobin,is denoted as :

In this experiment,is fixed. From (2),, hence,

Dividing both numerator and denominator of (4) byand multiplying by gives

From (5), a plot of versus gives a hyperbolic graph. When. To determine the for Hb-SDS and Hb-H2O2 interactions, the increase in absorbance intensity at 415 nm upon addition of SDS (pH 5.0) or the decrease in absorbance intensity at 415 nm upon addition of SDS (pH 7.2) or H2O2 (pH 5.0 and 7.2), absorbance difference () was used as an indication of the formation of complex. The value of for Hb-SDS interaction at pH 5.0 was calculated as while that for Hb-SDS (pH 7.2) and Hb-H2O2 (pH 5.0 and 7.2) interactions were calculated as . Whereis absorbance at zero concentration of ligand and is absorbance at th concentration of the ligand.

The value of was determined from where is the maximum change in the absorption intensity at 415 nm when SDS or H2O2 is saturated with Hb. It represents a fraction of a limiting compound of the system (in this case Hb) that binds to a compound with surplus concentration (in this case SDS or H2O2):

Because the experiment was performed using a concentration of ligand (SDS or H2O2) in the range,, the total concentration of SDS or H2O2. This allows a simple approximation by substituting [L] with, and (7) can be modified to

A plot of versus was used to estimate . Then, was used for calculating values according to (6). The actual concentration of L in each titration can be calculated from from (3), . is known, thus,and [L] can be calculated accordingly [11]. The direct plot ofversus [L] according to (7) was used for the determination of using nonlinear least-square regression analysis , a statistical package in GraphPad Prism version 5.04.

3. Results and Discussion

Titration of 0.1 mL of 0.01 mM of hemoglobins with SDS or H2O2 (0–0.748 mM) was monitored by absorption spectroscopy as shown in Figure 1. The titration was performed at pH 5.0 and 7.2. The absorption peak of hemoglobin at Soret [(hem-hem interaction), 400–420 nm] and aromatic (250–280 nm) bands increased upon adding increasing concentrations (0–0.748 mM) of SDS (pH 5.0) while the absorption peak decreased upon adding increasing concentrations (0–0.748 mM) of SDS or H2O2 (pH 5.0 and 7.2) (Figure 2). The increase in the absorbance of the aromatic band refers to dynamic motion of the molecule and its deviation from normal structure and function [12, 13], or unfolding of the hemoglobins [14, 15]. These can be likened to destabilization of hemoglobin structure by proteases such as plasmepsins and falcipains in the acidic environment of malaria parasite food vacuole as a result of malaria parasite infection. This unfolding exposes the heme moiety and buried aromatic amino acids of the proteins which explains the increase in absorbance observed at the soret and aromatic bands of the hemoglobins by SDS (pH 5.0). The decrease in absorbance on these bands by SDS at pH 7.2 suggests that the hemoglobins are folding while that by H2O2 (pH 5.0 and 7.2) suggests depletion of their heme content.

The value of , , and were determined from the plot of versus the concentration of free ligand, L, ([SDS] or [H2O2]) as shown in Figure 3. The data were analyzed at according to (7) using nonlinear least-square regression, a statistical package in GraphPad. The calculated values of , , and are shown in Table 1. At pH 5.0, the of HbAS-SDS interaction was higher than that of HbA-SDS and HbS-SDS interactions. Action of SDS on hemoglobins can be likened to the way proteases secreted by malaria parasites destabilizes host hemoglobin for their homeostasis, therefore the result suggests that malaria parasite proteases easily destabilize HbA and HbS than HbAS at acidic pH. At pH 7.2, the values calculated for HbA-SDS, HbAS-SDS and HbS-SDS were apparently the same (Table 1). The apparently same values and decrease in absorption intensity at the soret band observed at increasing concentrations of SDS, pH 7.2 (Figure 1) suggests that malaria proteases dose does not destabilize (unfold) host hemoglobin (HbA, HbAS or HbS) at physiologic pH.

Hemoglobin sample

SDS, pH 5.0 1.000 ± 0.0055771.000 ± 0.0063711.000 ± 0.05466
( )4.081 ± 2.3824.954 ± 2.0256.050 ± 4.771
(mM)0.05641 ± 0.0060.07368 ± 0.00970.05977 ± 0.0072

SDS, pH 7.2 0.9963 ± 0.0440.9951 ± 0.14480.9945 ± 0.09589
( )2.232 ± 0.23841.481 ± 0.27501.824 ± 0.3063
(mM)0.2325 ± 0.0160.2873 ± 0.072460.2547 ± 0.03908

H2O2, pH 5.0 0.9959 ± 0.068820.9968 ± 0.052200.9965 ± 0.08263
( )1.552 ± 0.29061.558 ± 0.31351.428 ± 0.3145
(mM)0.1329 ± 0.018740.08883 ± 0.010050.1242 ± 0.02161

H2O2, pH 7.2 0.9954 ± 0.20020.9946 ± 0.083530.9963 ± 0.3365
( )1.123 ± 0.17061.570 ± 0.21381.121 ± 0.2203
(mM)0.4310 ± 0.16810.2364 ± 0.035100.5772 ± 0.3536

At pH 5.0 and 7.2, the calculated values for HbAS-H2O2 interactions were smaller when compared with those calculated for HbA-H2O2 and HbS-H2O2 interactions (Table 1). Since smaller means higher affinity, it implies that HbAS has more affinity for H2O2 than HbA and HbS at pH 5.0 and 7.2 with the affinity being more at pH 5.0. This suggests that HbAS-H2O2 interaction at pH 5.0 could produce more ferryl intermediate [Fe(IV)=O]2+ or hydroxyl radical () by fenton or fenton-like reaction which may kill the malaria parasites at the intraerythrocytic stage of their development. This may not be the case with HbS due to hemolytic crisis which can even lead to invasion of more tissues by the malaria parasites.

Hb-SDS interactions (pH 5.0 and 7.2) and Hb-H2O2 interaction (pH 5.0) show positive cooperativity with Hb-SDS interactions at pH 5.0 being more cooperative while Hb-H2O2 interaction at pH 7.2 show no cooperativity (Table 1). This implies that binding of SDS or H2O2 to Hb at pH 5.0 or 7.2 brings about binding of more SDS or H2O2 to Hb while the binding of H2O2 to Hb at pH 7.2 does not cause binding of more H2O2 to Hb. It was also observed that calculated for both Hb-SDS and Hb-H2O2 were approximately the same (Table 1).

4. Conclusion

Action of SDS on hemoglobins can be likened to the way proteases secreted by malaria parasites destabilizes host hemoglobin for their homeostasis. The higher for HbAS-SDS interaction (pH 5.0) suggest that HbA and HbS are easily destabilize more than HbAS while the higher affinity of HbAS for H2O2 (pH 5.0) suggests the production of more ferryl intermediates or hydroxyl radicals. All these interactions may hinder the development of the malaria parasite at the intraerythrocytic stage and could likely account for a significant proportion of the mechanism that favours the resistance to malaria by individuals with the HbAS hemoglobin variant.


The authors are grateful to Mrs Eze Fransisca O. of dean’s office, faculty of biological sciences for typing the paper.


  1. P. S. Sijwali, K. Kato, K. B. Seydel et al., “Plasmodium falciparum cysteine protease falcipain-1 is not essential in erythrocytic stage malaria parasites,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 23, pp. 8721–8726, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. L. Tekwani and L. A. Walker, “Targeting the hemozoin synthesis pathway for new antimalarial drug discovery: technologies for in vitro β-hematin formation assay,” Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Chugh, V. Sundararaman, and S. Kumar, “Protein complex directs hemoglobin-to-hemozoin formation in Plasmodium falciparum,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 14, pp. 5392–5397, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. Prousek, “Fenton chemistry in biology and medicine,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 2325–2338, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Hanspal, M. Dua, Y. Takakuwa, A. H. Chishti, and A. Mizuno, “Plasmodium falciparum cysteine protease falcipain-2 cleaves erythrocyte membrane skeletal proteins at late stages of parasite development,” Blood, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1048–1054, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Singh, M. M. Alam, I. Pal-Bhowmick, J. A. Brzostowski, and C. E. Chitnis, “Distinct external signals trigger sequential release of apical organelles during erythrocyte invasion by malaria parasites,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 2, Article ID e1000746, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Fielding, “NMR methods for the determination of protein-ligand dissociation constants,” Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 219–242, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. R. Denninghoff, R. A. Chipman, and L. W. Hillman, “Oxyhemoglobin saturation measurements by green spectral shift,” Optics Letters, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 924–926, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Gebicka and E. Banasiak, “Flavonoids as reductants of ferryl hemoglobin,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 509–513, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. D. Vandegriff, A. Malavalli, C. Minn et al., “Oxidation and haem loss kinetics of poly(ethylene glycol)-conjugated haemoglobin (MP4): dissociation between in vitro and in vivo oxidation rates,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 399, no. 3, pp. 463–471, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. Chenprakhon, J. Sucharitakul, B. Panijpan, and P. Chaiyen, “Measuring binding affinity of protein-ligand interaction using spectrophotometry: binding of neutral red to riboflavin-binding protein,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 87, no. 8, pp. 829–831, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Ibrahim, M. I. El-Gohary, N. A. Saleh, and M. Y. Elashry, “Spectroscopic study on the oxidative reactions of normal and pathogenic hemoglobin molecules,” Romanian Journal Biophys, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  13. K. B. Samir and M. J. Marcolina, “Hyperhemolysis during the evolution of uncomplicated acute painful episodes in patients with sickle cell anemia,” Transfusion, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. X. Schmid, “Spectral methods of charactering protein conformation and conformational changes,” in Protein Structure: A Practical Approach, T. E. Creighton, Ed., pp. 251–284, IRL Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Matsui, A. Nakahara, A. Takatsu, K. Kato, and N. Matsuda, “Insitu observation of the state and stability of hemoglobin adsorbed onto glass surface by slab optical waveguide (SOWG) spectroscopy,” International Journal of Chemical and Biological Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 72–75, 2008. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Fortunatus C. Ezebuo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are experiencing issues with article search and journal table of contents. We are working on a fix as to remediate it and apologise for the inconvenience.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.