Review Article

Risk of Cancer in Diabetes: The Effect of Metformin

Table 1

Cancer risks in diabetes.

First author, year of publicationStudy method [reference]SampleRisk of cancer among DM participants (95% CI)

Noto, 2011Meta-analysis [2]12 cohort studiesMen RR = 1.14 (1.06–1.23)
Women RR = 1.18 (1.08–1.28)
Deng, 2012Systematic review and meta-analysis [3]8 case-control studies
16 cohort studies
RR = 1.26 (1.20–1.31)
Jiang, 2011Systematic review and meta-analysis [4]30 cohort studiesSummary RR = 1.27 (1.21–1.34)
Krämer, 2012Meta-analysis [5]8 case-control studies
21 cohort studies
Men RR = 1.29 (1.19–1.140)
Women RR = 1.34 (1.22–1.47).
Boyle, 2012Meta-analysis [6]Summary RR = 1.27 (1.16–1.39)
Hardefeldt, 2012Meta-analysis [7]43 studiesMen RR = 1.40 (1.10–1.79)
Women RR = 1.24 (1.15–1.35)
Tian, 2012Meta-analysis [8]7 case-control studies
18 cohort studies
Summary RR = 1.11 (1.00–1.24)
Ge, 2011Meta-analysis [9]4 case-control studies 17 cohort studiesSummary RR = 1.09 (0.98–1.22)
Women Summary RR = 1.18 (1.01–1.39)
Stevens, 2007Systematic review and meta-analysis [10]6 case-control studies
3 cohort studies
RR = 2.00 (1.37–3.01)
Ben, 2011Meta-analysis [11]35 cohort studiesSummary RR = 1.94 (1.66–2.27)
Larsson, 2011Meta-analysis [12]9 cohort studiesMen RR = 1.26 (1.06–1.49)
Women RR = 1.70 (1.47–1.97)
Bansal, 2013Meta-analysis [13]16 case-control studies
29 cohort studies
RR = 0.86 (0.80–0.92)
Peairs, 2011Systematic review and meta-analysis [14]8 studiesHR = 1.49 (1.35–1.65)
Noto, 2010Systematic review and meta-analysis [15]1 case-control study
4 cohort studies
Men RR = 1.25 (1.06–1.46)
Women RR = 1.23 (0.97–1.56)