Table of Contents
ISRN Construction Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 656742, 10 pages
Research Article

A Framework to Reconcile Green Goals with Budget Reality

1College of Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 202 W. Boyd Street, Room 107, Norman, OK 73019-0631, USA
2Iowa State University, 494 Town Engineering Building, Ames, IA 50011-3232, USA

Received 31 March 2013; Accepted 23 April 2013

Academic Editors: T. Bilir, S. P. Low, and V. Yepes

Copyright © 2013 Rachel Mosier and Douglas D. Gransberg. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. State of Oklahoma, Indebtedness for Purchase, Construction or Repair of Public Utilities, Article X, 27, Oklahoma Constitution, 1988.
  2. P. S. Dunston, J. F. McManus, and J. A. Gambatese, Cost/Benefits of Constructability Reviews, NCHRP, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, Project 20-7.
  3. M. A. Ellicott, “Best-value contracting,” in Proceedings, Area Engineers Conference, Transatlantic Division, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Winchester, Virginia, 1994.
  4. A. R. Lapinski, M. J. Horman, and D. R. Riley, “Lean processes for sustainable project delivery,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 132, no. 10, pp. 1083–1091, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. R. Molenaar, N. Sobin, D. D. Gransberg et al., Sustainable, High Performance Projects and Project Delivery Methods: A state-of the practice Report, White Paper, Charles Pankow Foundation, Ontario, Canada, 2009.
  6. B. J. Jackson, Construction Management Jump Start, John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2004.
  7. M. Bresnen and N. Marshall, “Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 587–598, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. S. Dunston, J. F. McManus, and J. A. Gambatese, Cost/Benefits of Constructability Reviews, TRB, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, NCHRP Project 20-7, Task 124.
  9. D. Langdon, The Cost and Benefit of Achieving Green Buildings, White Paper, Davis, Langdon & Seah International, Australia, 2007.
  10. S. Rawlinson, Sustainability Offices, Building Magazine Davis Langdon, 2007.
  11. K. M. Fowler and E. M. Rauch, Assessing Green Building Performance: A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of 12 GSA Buildings, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2008, PNNL-17393.
  12. O. Tatari and M. Kucukvar, “Cost premium prediction of certified green buildings: a neural network approach,” Building and Environment, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1081–1086, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Kats, Greening America's Schools: Costs and Benefits, Capital E Research Report, 2006.
  14. M. L. Nilson, Quantifying the cost impacts of LEED-NC gold construction in New York City [Senior Honors thesis], Lafayette College, Easton, Pa, USA, 2005.
  15. N. Stegall, Cost Implications of LEED Silver Certification For New House Residence Hall at Carnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2004, Senior Honors Research Project.
  16. Packard Foundation, Building for sustainability report: six scenarios for the David and Lucile Packard foundation, Los Altos.
  17. A. J. Hoffman and R. Henn, “Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building,” Organization and Environment, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 390–419, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. U. S. Green Building Council, LEED For New Construction and Major Renovations V2.2, 2005.
  19. D. R. Riley, B. E. Diller, and D. Kerr, “Effects of delivery systems on change order size and frequency in mechanical construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 953–962, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Korkmaz, Piloting evaluation metrics for high performance green building project delivery [Ph.D. dissertation], Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA, 2007.
  21. J. Smetanka, CIties Pass Up Green Stamp of Approval, Say it Costs Too Much, Star Tribune, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, 2011.
  22. M. G. Syal, S. Mago, and D. Moody, “Impact of LEED-NC credits on contractors,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 174–179, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Matthiessen and P. Morris, Costing Green: A Comprehensive Cost database and Budgeting Methodology, Davis Langdon White Paper, 2004.
  24. Green Building Certification Institute, LEED Project Registration and Certification Fees, 2011.
  25. N. Howard and R. Watson, Special LEED Section: An Update on LEED 2. 1, Environmental Design and Construction, 2002.
  26. D. D. Gransberg, J. E. Koch, and K. R. Molenaar, Preparing for Design-Build Projects: A Primer for Owners, Engineers, and Contractors, ASCE Press, Reston, Va, USA, 2006.
  27. “Building Code,” in Code of Ordinances, Chapter 12, Oklahoma City, Stillwater, Okla, USA, 2010.
  28. G. Augenbroe, A. R. Pearce, B. Guy, and C. J. Kibert, “Sustainable construction in the United States of America: a perspective to the year 2010,” in CIB-W82 Report, pp. 1–32, Georgia Institute of Technology, Construction Research Center, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  29. Xenergy Inc. and SERA Architects, Green City Buildings: Applying the LEED Rating System, Portland Energy Office, Portland, Ore, USA, 2000.
  30. U.S. Green Building Council, Policy and Government Resources, 2011.
  31. A. Nalewaik and V. Venters, “Cost benefits of building green,” Cost Engineering, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  32. Oklahoma Public Competitive Bidding Act, 61 Oklahoma Statutes, 101 et seq., 1974.
  33. D. D. Gransberg and E. Windel, “Communicating design quality requirements for public sector design/build projects,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 105–110, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. D. Gransberg, “A framework for performance-based contractor prequalification,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2151, pp. 46–54, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus