Table of Contents
ISRN Mechanical Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 686402, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/686402
Research Article

A Functional Representation Model Facilitating Design Space Expansion

School of Electromechanical Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710071, China

Received 5 June 2013; Accepted 1 August 2013

Academic Editors: O. P. Gandhi and X.-J. Liu

Copyright © 2013 Wei Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Chandrasekaran, “Representing function: relating functional representation and functional modeling research streams,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 65–74, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. S. Erden, H. Komoto, T. J. Van Beek, V. D'Amelio, E. Echavarria, and T. Tomiyama, “A review of function modeling: approaches and applications,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 147–169, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Rodenacker, Methodisches Konstruieren, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1971.
  4. G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998.
  5. J. Hirtz, R. B. Stone, D. A. McAdams, S. Szykman, and K. L. Wood, “A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 65–82, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Kitamura and R. Mizoguchi, “Ontology-based description of functional design knowledge and its use in a functional way server,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. S. Gero, “Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design,” AI Magazine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 26–36, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Qian and J. S. Gero, “Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 289–312, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. S. Gero and V. Kazakov, “Adaptive enlargement of state spaces in evolutionary designing,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. S. Gero and U. Kannengiesser, “The situated function-behaviour-structure framework,” Design Studies, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 373–391, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Umeda, M. Ishii, M. Yoshioka, Y. Shimomura, and T. Tomiyama, “Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 275–288, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y.-M. Deng, “Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 343–362, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y.-M. Deng, S. B. Tor, and G. A. Britton, “Abstracting and exploring functional design information for conceptual mechanical product design,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–52, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Shimomura, M. Yoshioka, H. Takeda, Y. Umeda, and T. Tomiyama, “Representation of design object based on the functional evolution process model,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Chandrasekaran and J. R. Josephson, “Function in device representation,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 162–177, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Iwasaki, M. Vescovi, and R. Fikes, “Causal functional representation language with behavior-based semantics,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–31, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Sasajima, Y. Kitamura, M. Ikeda, and R. Mizoguchi, “A representation language for behavior and function: FBRL,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 471–479, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Szykman, J. W. Racz, and R. D. Sriram, “The representation of function in computer-based design,” in Proceedings of the 1999 SAME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, September 1999.
  19. G. Altschuller, Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problem Solving, Gordon & Breach Science, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  20. G. Altshuller, The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, Mass, USA, 1999.
  21. W. Zhou, Z. T. Liu, and Q. P. Kong, “A survey of event-based knowledge processing,” Chinese Journal of Computer Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 160–162, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. N. Whitehead, Process and Reality, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  23. A. Jansen and P. Niyogi, “Point process models for spotting keywords in continuous speech,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1457–1470, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Poshyvanyk, Y. Guéhéneuc, A. Marcus, G. Antoniol, and V. Rajlich, “Feature location using probabilistic ranking of methods based on execution scenarios and information retrieval,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 420–432, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Kara, Ö. Alan, O. Sabuncu, S. Akpnar, N. K. Cicekli, and F. N. Alpaslan, “An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing,” Information Systems, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 294–305, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Bai, S. Lao, A. F. Smeaton, N. E. O'Connor, D. Sadlier, and D. Sinclair, “Semantic analysis of field sports video using a petri-net of audio-visual concepts,” Computer Journal, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 808–823, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. X. Wang, G. Hripcsak, M. Markatou, and C. Friedman, “Active computerized pharmacovigilance using natural language processing, statistics, and electronic health records: a feasibility study,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 328–337, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. A. Buur, Theoretical approach to mechatronics design [Ph.D. thesis], Institute for Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1990.
  29. C. T. Hansen, “An approach to simultaneous synthesis and optimization of composite mechanical systems,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 249–266, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  30. C. F. Kirschman, G. M. Fadel, and C. Jara-Almonte, “Classifying functions for mechanical design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 475–482, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. J. Miller, “Introduction to wordnet: an on-line lexical database,” International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 235–312, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Z. D. Dong and Q. Dong, “Construction of a knowledge system and its impact on Chinese research,” Chinese Journal of Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Chung and A. Timberlake, “Tense, aspect, and mood,” Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, pp. 202–258, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  34. C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky, “Events and the semantics of opposition,” in Proceedings of Events as Grammatical Object, CSLI Publications, Stanford, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. Allan, R. Papka, and V. Lavrenko, “On-line new event detection and tracking,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  36. Y. Yang, J. G. Carbonell, and R. D. Brown, “Learning approaches for detecting and tracking news events,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 32–43, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. Filatova and V. Hatzivassiloglou, “Event-based extractive summarization,” in Proceedings of the ACL-2004 Workshop on Summarization, Barcelona, Spain, July 2004.