Table of Contents
ISRN Genetics
Volume 2013, Article ID 810120, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2013/810120
Research Article

Detection of Fetal Aneuploidies by QF-PCR in Transcervical Cell Samples

Maternity Ward, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy

Received 10 November 2012; Accepted 3 December 2012

Academic Editors: K.-M. Hsiao, D. Radojkovic, and A. Yamamoto

Copyright © 2013 Riccardo Cioni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Wilson, B. McGillivray, D. Kalousek et al., “Multicentre randomised clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8628, pp. 1–6, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. W. Bianchi, “Prenatal diagnosis by analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 847–856, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. M. D. Lo, “Fetal DNA in maternal plasma: biology and diagnostic applications,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1903–1906, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. B. Shettles, “Use of the Y chromosome in prenatal sex determination,” Nature, vol. 230, no. 5288, pp. 52–53, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Adinolfi and J. Sherlock, “First trimester prenatal diagnosis using transcervical cells: an evaluation,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 383–392, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Cioni, C. Bussani, B. Scarselli, S. Bucciantini, M. Marchionni, and G. Scarselli, “Comparison of two techniques for transcervical cell sampling performed in the same study population,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 198–202, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Cioni, C. Bussani, B. Scarselli et al., “Detection of fetal cells in intrauterine lavage samples collected in the first trimester of pregnancy,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 52–55, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Ergİn, V. Baltaci, H. B. Zeyneloǧlu, E. Hakan Duran, M. H. Ergenelİ, and S. Batioǧlu, “Non-invasive early prenatal diagnosis using fluorescent in situ hybridization on transcervical cells: comparison of two different methods for retrieval,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. Bussani, R. Cioni, B. Scarselli et al., “Strategies for the isolation and detection of fetal cells in transcervical samples,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1098–1101, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Bussani, B. Scarselli, R. Cioni, S. Bucciantini, and G. Scarselli, “Use of the quantitative fluorescent-PCR assay in the study of fetal DNA from micromanipulated transcervical samples,” Molecular Diagnosis, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 259–263, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Cioni, C. Bussani, S. Bucciantini, and G. Scarselli, “Fetal cells in a transcervical cell sample collected at 5 weeks of gestation,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 271–273, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Cirigliano, G. Voglino, A. Marongiu et al., “Rapid prenatal diagnosis by QF-PCR: evaluation of 30,000 consecutive clinical samples and future applications,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1075, pp. 288–298, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. Cirigliano, M. Ejarque, C. Fuster, and M. Adinolfi, “X chromosome dosage by quantitative fluorescent PCR and rapid prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1042–1045, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Z. Bischoff and J. L. Simpson, “Endocervical fetal trophoblast for prenatal genetic diagnosis,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 216–220, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Tutschek, J. Sherlock, A. Halder, J. Delhanty, C. Rodeck, and M. Adinolfi, “Isolation of fetal cells from transcervical samples by micromanipulation: molecular confirmation of their fetal origin and diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 951–960, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Sherlock, A. Halder, B. Tutschek, J. Delhanty, C. Rodeck, and M. Adinolfi, “Prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidies using transcervical cell samples,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 302–305, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Adinolfi, A. Davies, S. Sharif, P. Soothill, and C. Rodeck, “Detection of trisomy 18 and Y-derived sequences in fetal nucleated cells obtained by transcervical flushing,” The Lancet, vol. 342, no. 8868, pp. 403–404, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Maggi, F. Berdusco, R. Liuti et al., “First-trimester chromosome diagnosis by lavage of the uterine cavity,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 823–827, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Massari, G. Novelli, A. Colosimo et al., “Non-invasive early prenatal molecular diagnosis using retrieved transcervical trophoblast cells,” Human Genetics, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S.-D. Chang, S.-L. Lin, K.-K. Chu, and B.-L. Hsi, “Minimally-invasive early prenatal diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization on samples from uterine lavage,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1019–1025, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar