Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and History of Cervical Cancer among a US National Population

Table 2

Logistic regression analysis results for the presence of MetS and cervical cancer risk (𝑛 = 26,393,229).

	Univariate model			Multivariate model
	OR	95% CI	𝑃 value	AOR	95% CI	𝑃 value
MetS (≥3 components)	1.91	(1.06, 3.42)	0.0309	1.82	(1.02, 3.26)	0.0428
Increased waist circumference	1.25	(0.64, 2.44)	0.5106
Hypertension	1.23	(0.73, 2.07)	0.4296
Hypertriglyceridemia	1.61	(0.89, 2.93)	0.1172
Hyperglycemia	1.28	(0.75, 2.17)	0.3644
Low HDL	1.22	(0.70, 2.12)	0.4928
High number of lifetime sexual partners (≥10)				1.64	(0.89, 3.00)	0.1100
Multiparity (≥2 births)				1.12	(0.62, 2.02)	0.7085
History of hormonal contraceptive use				1.81	(0.68, 4.77)	0.2332
History of smoking (≥100 cigarettes in a lifetime)				2.16	(1.11, 4.21)	0.0232

MetS: metabolic syndrome. OR: odds ratios. CI: confidence interval. AOR: adjusted odds ratios.