Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 863282, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/863282
Research Article

Factors Associated with the Recent Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate at a Japanese Perinatal Center

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, 5-11-12 Tateishi, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 124-0012, Japan

Received 29 April 2013; Accepted 8 June 2013

Academic Editors: N. A. Ginsberg, H. D. Modanlou, and K. Yang

Copyright © 2013 Shunji Suzuki and Mariyo Nakata. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. L. Barber, L. S. Lundsberg, K. Belanger, C. M. Pettker, E. F. Funai, and J. L. Illuzzi, “Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Menacker and B. E. Hamilton, “Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States,” NCHS Data Brief, no. 35, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Boyle and U. M. Reddy, “Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 36, pp. 308–314, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. K. Srinivas, C. Fager, and S. A. Lorch, “Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1007–1013, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 450–463, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. C. Lee, Y. Y. El-Sayed, and J. B. Gould, “Delivery mode by race for breech presentation in the US,” Journal of Perinatology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 147–153, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Perinatal Committee Report (in Japanese), “Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology,” http://www.jsog.or.jp/.
  8. H. Takahashi, N. Watanabe, R. Sugibayashi et al., “Increased rate of cesarean section in primiparous women aged 40 years or more: a single-center study in Japan,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 285, no. 4, pp. 937–941, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Suzuki, “Trends in mode of delivery of breech presentation over a 5-year period,” Journal of Perinatology, vol. 27, no. 7, article 464, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “ACOG committee opinion No. 265: mode of term singleton breech delivery,” Obstetricians and Gynecologists, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1189–1190, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Nakata-Konishi, H. Miyake, and S. Suzuki, “Trial of labor after cesarean delivery as an independent risk factor for intrapartum asphyxia in singleton deliveries beyond 37 weeks' gestation,” Journal of Nippon Medical School, vol. 79, pp. 362–366, 2012. View at Google Scholar