Table of Contents
ISRN Otolaryngology
Volume 2013, Article ID 973401, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/973401
Clinical Study

Pilot Study to Evaluate Hearing Aid Service Delivery Model and Measure Benefit Using Self-Report Outcome Measures Using Community Hearing Workers in a Developing Country

1Unit I, Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632001, India
2Department of CHAD, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632001, India

Received 8 December 2012; Accepted 30 December 2012

Academic Editors: A. D. Rapidis and M. Reiß

Copyright © 2013 Lingamdenne Paul Emerson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “Disease incidence, prevalence and disability,” http://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/global, burden disease/GBD report, 2004.
  2. A. Davis, British MRC Institute of Hearing Research, http://www.hear-it.org/.
  3. S. Patel, “An empirical study of causes of disability in India,” The Internet Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 6, no. 2, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. WHO, “Prevention and causes of deafness and hearing impairment in the South East Asia region,” in State of Hearing and Ear Care in the South East Asia Region, pp. 9–10, WHO, New Delhi, India, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Suneela, C. Shelly, M. Sumit, and A. K. Agarwal, “Deafness: Burden, prevention and control in India,” National Medical Journal of India, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 79–81, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. E. Mohr, J. J. Feldman, J. L. Dunbar et al., “The societal costs of severe to profound hearing loss in the United States,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1120–1135, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. K. Kuk, T. Harper, and K. Doubek, “Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels,” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Mason and G. R. Popelka, “Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 218–226, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. A. Studebaker, “Hearing aid selection: an overview,” in The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report, G. A. Studebaker and F. H. Bess, Eds., pp. 147–155, Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, Upper Darby, Pa, USA, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. E. Demorest and S. A. Erdman, “Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 129–143, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. M. Cox and C. Gilmore, “Development of the profile of hearing aid performance (PHAP),” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 343–357, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. M. Cox and G. C. Alexander, “The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Davis, P. Smith, M. Ferguson, D. Stephens, and I. Gianopoulos, “Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 11, no. 42, pp. 1–294, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Hojan, K. Sworek, and A. Furmann, “Abbreviated profile of aid benefit (APHAB),” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 11, pp. 31–38, 2000 (Polish). View at Google Scholar
  15. R. M. Cox, G. C. Alexander, and G. A. Gray, “Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB,” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 361–371, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus