Table of Contents
ISRN Agronomy
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 978780, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/978780
Research Article

Deterministic Imputation in Multienvironment Trials

1Departamento de Ciências Exatas, Universidade de São Paulo/ESALQ, Cx.P.09, CEP. 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
2College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences Harrison Building, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK

Received 26 June 2013; Accepted 16 August 2013

Academic Editors: A. Escobar-Gutierrez and W. P. Williams

Copyright © 2013 Sergio Arciniegas-Alarcón et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. G. Gauch Jr., “Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE,” Crop Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1488–1500, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. A. van Eeuwijk, M. Malosetti, X. Yin, P. C. Struik, and P. Stam, “Statistical models for genotype by environment data: from conventional ANOVA models to eco-physiological QTL models,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 883–894, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. A. van Eeuwijk, M. Malosetti, and M. P. Boer, “Modelling the genetic basis of response curves underlying genotype environment interaction,” in Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research: Gene-Plant-Crop Relations, J. H. J. Spiertz, P. C. Struik, and H. H. van Laar, Eds., Wageningen UR Frontier Series, pp. 115–126, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. I. Romagosa, J. Voltas, M. Malosetti, and F. A. van Eeuwijk, “Interaccíon Genotipo por Ambiente,” in La Adaptación Ambiente y Los Estreses Abióticos en la Mejora Vegetal, C. M. Avila, S. G. Atienza, M. T. Moreno, and J. I. Cubero, Eds., pp. 107–136, Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera; Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Arciniegas-Alarcón and C. T. S. Dias, “AMMI analysis with imputed data in genotype × environment interaction experiments in cotton,” Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1391–1397, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. S. Kang, M. G. Balzarini, and J. L. L. Guerra, “Genotype-by-environment interaction,” in Genetic Analysis of Complex Traits Using SAS, A. M. Saxton, Ed., pp. 69–96, SAS Institute nc, Cary, NC, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  7. G. H. Freeman, “Analysis of interactions in incomplete two-ways tables,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. G. Gauch Jr. and R. W. Zobel, “Imputing missing yield trial data,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 753–761, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. J. R. Godfrey, G. R. Wood, S. Ganesalingam, M. A. Nichols, and C. G. Qiao, “Two-stage clustering in genotype-by-environment analyses with missing data,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. J. R. Godfrey, Dealing with Sparsity in Genotype × Environment Analysis [Dissertation], Massey University, 2004.
  11. B. M. K. Raju, “A study on AMMI model and its biplots,” Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, vol. 55, pp. 297–322, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Mandel, “The analysis of two-way tables with missing values,” Applied Statistics, vol. 42, pp. 85–93, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  13. F. A. van Eeuwijk and P. M. Kroonenberg, “Multiplicative models for interaction in three-way ANOVA, with applications to plant breeding,” Biometrics, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1315–1333, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. B. Denis, “Ajustements de modèles linéaires et bilinéaires sous contraintes linéaires avec données manquantes,” Revue de Statistique Appliquée, vol. 39, pp. 5–24, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Caliński, S. Czajka, J. B. Denis, and Z. Kaczmarek, “EM and ALS algorithms applied to estimation of missing data in series of variety trials,” Biuletyn Oceny Odmian, vol. 24-25, pp. 7–31, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. B. Denis and C. P. Baril, “Sophisticated models with numerous missing values: the multiplicative interaction model as an example,” Biuletyn Oceny Odmian, vol. 24-25, pp. 33–45, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Caliński, S. Czajka, J. B. Denis, and Z. Kaczmarek, “Further study on estimating missing values in series of variety trials,” Biuletyn Oceny Odmian, vol. 30, pp. 7–38, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. H. P. Piepho, “Methods for estimating missing genotype-location combinations in multilocation trials: an empirical comparison,” Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie in Medizin und Biologie, vol. 26, pp. 335–349, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. G. C. Bergamo, C. T. S. Dias, and W. J. Krzanowski, “Distribution-free multiple imputation in an interaction matrix through singular value decomposition,” Scientia Agricola, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 422–427, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Arciniegas-Alarcón, Data Imputation in Trials with Genotype by Environment Interaction: An Application on Cotton Data [Dissertation], University of São Paulo, 2008.
  21. S. Arciniegas-Alarcón and C. T. S. Dias, “Data imputation in trials with genotype by environment interaction: an application on cotton data,” Revista Brasileira de Biometria, vol. 27, pp. 125–138, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Arciniegas-Alarcón, M. García-Peña, C. T. S. Dias, and W. J. Krzanowski, “An alternative methodology for imputing missing data in trials with genotype-by-environment interaction,” Biometrical Letters, vol. 47, pp. 1–14, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. B. M. K. Raju and V. K. Bhatia, “Bias in the estimates of sensitivity from incomplete GxE tables,” Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, vol. 56, pp. 177–189, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  24. B. M. K. Raju, V. K. Bhatia, and V. V. Kumar, “Assessment of sensitivity with incomplete data,” Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, vol. 60, pp. 118–125, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  25. B. M. K. Raju, V. K. Bhatia, and L. M. Bhar, “Assessing stability of crop varieties with incomplete data,” Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, vol. 63, pp. 139–149, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. G. Pereira, J. T. Mexia, and P. C. Rodrigues, “Robustness of joint regression analysis,” Biometrical Letters, vol. 44, pp. 105–128, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. P. C. Rodrigues, D. G. S. Pereira, and J. T. Mexia, “A comparison between joint regression analysis and the additive main and multiplicative interaction model: the robustness with increasing amounts of missing data,” Scientia Agricola, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 679–705, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. J. C. Rodrigues, New Strategies to Detect and Understand Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and QTL-by-Environment Interactions [Dissertation], Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2012.
  29. R. Bro, K. Kjeldahl, A. K. Smilde, and H. A. L. Kiers, “Cross-validation of component models: a critical look at current methods,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 390, no. 5, pp. 1241–1251, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Wold, “Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models,” Technometrics, vol. 20, pp. 397–405, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  31. H. T. Eastment and W. J. Krzanowski, “Cross-validatory choice of the number of components from a principal component analysis,” Technometrics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Arciniegas-Alarcón, M. García-Peña, and C. T. S. Dias, “Data imputation in trials with genotype × environment interaction,” Interciencia, vol. 36, pp. 444–449, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Smilde, R. Bro, and P. Geladi, Multi-Way Analysis with Applications in the Chemical Sciences, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 2004.
  34. W. J. Krzanowski, “Missing value imputation in multivariate data using the singular value decomposition of a matrix,” Biometrical Letters, vol. 25, pp. 31–39, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  35. I. J. Good, “Applications of the singular decomposition of a matrix,” Technometrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 823–831, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, G. Sherlock, M. Eisen, P. Brown, and D. Botstein, “Imputing missing data for gene expression arrays,” Technical Report, Division of Biostatistics, Standford University, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  37. D. Hedderley and L. Wakeling, “A comparison of imputation techniques for internal preference mapping, using Monte Carlo simulation,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 281–297, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Josse, J. Pagès, and F. Husson, “Multiple imputation in principal component analysis,” Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 231–246, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. T. S. Dias and W. J. Krzanowski, “Model selection and cross validation in additive main effect and multiplicative interaction models,” Crop Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 865–873, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. L. Bello, “Choosing among imputation techniques for incomplete multivariate data: a simulation study,” Communications in Statistics, vol. 22, pp. 853–877, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  41. T. Caliński, S. Czajka, Z. Kaczmarek, P. Krajewski, and W. Pilarczyk, “Analyzing the genotype-by-environment interactions under a randomization-derived mixed model,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, vol. 14, pp. 224–241, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  42. F. J. C. Farias, Selection Index in Upland Cotton Cultivars [Dissertation], University of São Paulo, 2005.
  43. F. Flores, M. T. Moreno, and J. I. Cubero, “A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G×E interaction,” Field Crops Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 271–286, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. L. Bello, “Imputation techniques in regression analysis: looking closely at their implementation,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 22, pp. 853–877, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing. R Foundation For Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012, http://www.R-project.org/.
  46. H. G. Gauch, “Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction,” Biometrics, vol. 44, pp. 705–715, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  47. H. G. Gauch, Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992.
  48. K. R. Gabriel, “Le biplot-outil d'exploration de données multidimensionelles,” Journal de la Societe Francaise de Statistique, vol. 143, pp. 5–55, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  49. C. T. S. Dias and W. J. Krzanowski, “Choosing components in the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) models,” Scientia Agricola, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 169–175, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. García-Peña and C. T. S. Dias, “Analysis of bivariate additive models with multiplicative interaction (AMMI),” Revista Brasileira de Biometria, vol. 27, pp. 586–602, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  51. K. Hongyu, Empirical Distribution of Eigenvalues Associated with the Interaction Matrix of the AMMI Models by Non-Parametric Bootstrap Method [Dissertation], University of São Paulo, 2012.
  52. P. Sprent and N. C. Smeeton, Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 2001.
  53. H. G. Gauch Jr., H.-P. Piepho, and P. Annicchiarico, “Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations,” Crop Science, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 866–889, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. P. C. Rodrigues, S. Mejza, and J. T. Mexia, “Structuring genotype × environment interaction: an overview,” Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, vol. 250, pp. 225–236, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  55. J. L. Schafer and J. W. Graham, “Missing data: our view of the state of the art,” Psychological Methods, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–177, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. L. Bello, “A bootstrap method for using imputation techniques for data with missing values,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 36, pp. 453–464, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  57. R. J. Little and D. B. Rubin, Statistical Analysis With Missing Data, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  58. H.-P. Piepho and J. Möhring, “Selection in cultivar trials: is it ignorable?” Crop Science, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus