Research Article  Open Access
Generalized Nuclear WoodsSaxon Potential under Relativistic Spin Symmetry Limit
Abstract
By using the Pekeris approximation, we present solutions of the Dirac equation with the generalized WoodsSaxon potential with arbitrary spinorbit coupling number under spin symmetry limit. We obtain energy eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfunctions in closed forms. Some numerical results are given too.
1. Introduction
The Dirac equation, which describes the motion of a spin 1/2 particle, has been used in solving many problems of nuclear and highenergy physics. One of the most important concepts for understanding the traditional magic numbers in stable nuclei is the spin symmetry breaking [1–4]. On the other hand, the spin symmetry observed originally almost 40 years ago as a mechanism to explain different aspects of the nuclear structure is one of the most interesting phenomena in the relativistic quantum mechanics. Within the framework of Dirac equation, spin symmetry used to feature deformed nuclei, superdeformation, and to establish an effective shell model [5–8], whereas spin symmetry is relevant for mesons [9, 10]. Spin symmetry occurs when and pseudospin symmetry occurs when , [11, 12], where is scalar potential and is vector potential. Pseudospin symmetry is exact under the condition of , and spin symmetry is exact under the condition of [13]. For the first time, the spin symmetry tested in the realistic nuclei [14], and then this symmetry is investigated by examining the radial wave functions [15–17]. The pseudospin symmetry refers to a quasidegeneracy of single nucleon doublets with nonrelativistic quantum numbers and , where , , and are single nucleon radial, orbital, and total angular quantum numbers, respectively. The total angular momentum is , where is pseudoangular momentum and is pseudospin angular momentum [12, 18–20].
On the other hand, some typical physical models have been studied like harmonic oscillator [19, 20], WoodsSaxon potential [21, 22], Morse potential [23–25], Eckart potential [26–28], PöschlTeller potential [29], ManningRosen potential [30], and so forth [31–36].
The interactions between nuclei are commonly described by using a potential that consists of the Coulomb and the nuclear potentials. These potentials are usually taken to be of the WoodsSaxon form. The Coulomb plus WoodsSaxon potentials are well known as modified WoodsSaxon potential that plays a great role in nuclear physics. Fusion barriers for a large number of fusion reactions from light to heavy systems can be described well with this potential [37–40]. But the modified WoodsSaxon potential has no exact or approximate solutions. The generalized WoodsSaxon is near the modified WoodsSaxon potential, and therefore we can solve the generalized WoodsSaxon instead of the modified WoodsSaxon potential. The form of the generalized WoodsSaxon potential is as follows [41, 42]: where and determine the potential depth, is the width of the potential, is the surface thickness, and MeV [42]. In Figure 1, we illustrated the shape of the WoodsSaxon potential () and its generalized form in (1) ().
The purpose of this work is devoted to studying the spin symmetry solutions of the Dirac equation for arbitrary spinorbit coupling quantum number with the generalized WoodsSaxon potential, which was not considered before.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly introduced the Dirac equation with scalar and vector potential with arbitrary spinorbit coupling number under spin symmetry limit. The generalized parametric NikiforovUvarov method is presented in Section 3. The energy eigenvalue equations and corresponding eigenfunctions are obtained in Section 4. In this section, some remarks and numerical results are given too. Finally, conclusion is given in Section 5.
2. Dirac Equation under Spin and Pseudospin Symmetry Limit
The Dirac equation with scalar potential and vector potential is where is the relativistic energy of the system and is the threedimensional momentum operator. and are the usual Dirac matrices given as where is Pauli matrix and is unitary matrix. The total angular momentum operator and spinorbit operator , where is orbital angular momentum operator and commutes with Dirac Hamiltonian. The eigenvalues of spinorbit coupling operator are and for unaligned spin and the aligned spin , respectively. can be taken as a complete set of the conservative quantities. Thus, the Dirac spinors can be written according to radial quantum number and spinorbit coupling number as follows: where is the upper (large) component and is the lower (small) component of the Dirac spinors. and are the spherical harmonic functions coupled to the total angular momentum and its projection on the axis. Substituting (4) into (2) with the usual Dirac matrices, one obtains two coupled differential equations for the upper and the lower radial wave functions and as
where
Eliminating and from (5a) and (5b), we obtain the following secondorder Schrödingerlike differential equations for the upper and lower components of the Dirac wave functions, respectively:
where and .
2.1. Spin Symmetry Limit
In the spin symmetry limit or constant [14], then (7b) becomes where and for and , respectively. In (8), can be taken as generalized WoodsSaxon potential, and it is reduced to where
For the solution of (9), we will use the NikiforovUvarov method which is briefly introduced in the following section.
2.2. PekerisType Approximation to the SpinOrbit Coupling Term
Because of the spinorbit coupling term, that is, , (9) cannot be solved analytically, except for . Therefore, we shall use the Pekeris approximation [43] in order to deal with the spinorbit coupling terms, and we may express the spinorbit term as follows: In addition, we may also approximately express it in the following way: where , , and is constant () [44–48]. If we expand the expression of (12) around up to the secondorder term and next compare it with (11), we can obtain expansion coefficients , , and as follows: Now, we can take the potential (12) instead of the spinorbit coupling potential (11).
3. The Parametric Generalization NikiforovUvarov Method
This powerful mathematical tool solves secondorder differential equations. Let us consider the following differential equation [49–51]: According to the NikiforovUvarov method, the eigenfunctions and eigenenergies, respectively, are where In the rather more special case of [50, 51],
and, from (15), we find for the wave function
4. Bound States of the Generalized WoodsSaxon Potential with Arbitrary
Substituting (12) into (9) and using transformation , we find the following second order deferential equation for the upper component of the Dirac spinor as Comparing the previous equation with (14), one can find the following parameters: and also From (16), (21), and (22), we obtained the closed form of the energy eigenvalues for the generalized WoodsSaxon potential in spin symmetry as Recalling and from (10a) and (10b) the previous equation becomes a quadratic algebraic equation in . Thus, the solution of this algebraic equation with respect to can be obtained in terms of particular values of and . In Table 1, we have calculated some energy levels of the generalized WoodsSaxon potential under the spin symmetry limit for different values of . The empirical values that can be found in [52], as fm, fm, u, and (MeV), are used. Here, is the mass number of target nucleus, and . From Table 1, we can see that pairs ,, , , and so forth are degenerate. Thus, each pair is considered as spin doublet and has negative energy, and also when increases, the energy decreases. The reason is that when increases, the depth of the potential well becomes deeper and then the energy levels decrease. In Figure 2, the results are shown as a function of . As we saw in Table 1, when the depth of the potential well increases, then the energy levels decrease. In Figure 3, the results are presented as a function of width of the potential . Here, when the width of the potential increases, the energy levels decrease. Finally we showed the numerical results as a function of surface thickness in Figure 4, and one can observe that when the surface thickness increases, the energy levels decrease too.

To find corresponding wave functions, referring to (15), (21), and (22), we find the upper component of the Dirac spinor as or equivalently Finally, the lower component of the Dirac spinor can be calculated as where [20].
5. Conclusion
In this paper we have studied the spin symmetry of a Dirac nucleon subjected to scalar and vector generalized WoodsSaxon potentials. The quadratic energy equation and spinor wave functions for bound states have been obtained by parametric form of the NikiforovUvarov method. It is shown that there exist negativeenergy bound states in the case of exact spin symmetry (). We gave some numerical results of the energy eigenvalues too.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the kind referee for positive and invaluable suggestions, which improved this paper greatly.
References
 O. Haxel, J. H. D. Jensen, and H. E. Suess, “On the “magic numbers” in nuclear structure,” Physical Review, vol. 75, no. 11, p. 1766, 1949. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Goepper, “On closed shells in nuclei. II,” Physical Review, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1969–1970, 1949. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Zhang, J. Meng, S. Q. Zhang, L. S. Geng, and H. Toki, “Magic numbers for superheavy nuclei in relativistic continuum HartreeBogoliubov theory,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 753, no. 12, pp. 106–135, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Meng, H. Toki, S. G. Zhou, S. Q. Zheng, W. H. Long, and L. S. Geng, “Relativistic continuum Hartree Bogoliubov theory for groundstate properties of exotic nuclei,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 470–563, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetries in nuclei and hadrons,” Physics Reports, vol. 414, no. 45, pp. 165–261, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 A. Bohr, I. Hamamoto, and B. R. Mottelson, “Pseudospin in rotating nuclear potentials,” Physica Scripta, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 267, 1982. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Dudek, W. Nazarewicz, Z. Szymanski, and G. A. Leander, “Abundance and systematics of nuclear superdeformed states; relation to the pseudospin and pseudoSU_{3} symmetries,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 1405–1408, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Troltenier, C. Bahri, and J. P. Draayer, “Generalized pseudoSU_{3} model and pairing,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 586, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 P. R. Page, T. Goldman, and J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetry suppresses quark spinorbit splitting,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 204–207, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. T. Hect and A. Adler, “Generalized seniority for favored $J\ne 0$ pairs in mixed configurations,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 129–143, 1969. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Arima, M. Harvey, and K. Shimizu, “Pseudo LS coupling and pseudo SU_{3} coupling schemes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 517–522, 1969. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. N. Ginocchio, “Pseudospin as a relativistic symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 3, Article ID 439, 436 pages, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetries in nuclei and hadrons,” Physics Reports, vol. 414, no. 45, pp. 165–261, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 S. G. Zhou, J. Meng, and P. Ring, “Spin symmetry in the antinucleon spectrum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 26, Article ID 262501, 4 pages, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. T. He, S. G. Zhou, J. Meng, E. G. Zhao, and W. Scheid, “Test of spin symmetry in antinucleon spectra,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 265–269, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Y. Song, J. M. Yao, and J. Meng, “Spin symmetry for antilambda spectrum in atomic nucleus,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 26, no. 12, Article ID 122102, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Y. Song and J. M. Yao, “Polarization effect on the spin symmetry for antiLambda spectrum in ${}^{16}\text{O}+\overline{\lambda}$ system,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1425–1427, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Meng, K. SugawaraTanabe, S. Yamaji, P. Ring, and A. Arima, “Pseudospin symmetry in relativistic mean field theory,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. R628–R631, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, A. S. de Castro, P. Alberto, and M. Fiolhais, “Pseudospin symmetry and the relativistic harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, no. 2, Article ID 024319, 15 pages, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. S. de Castro, P. Alberto, R. Lisboa, and M. Malheiro, “Relating pseudospin and spin symmetries through charge conjugation and chiral transformations: the case of the relativistic harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review C, vol. 73, no. 5, Article ID 054309, 13 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. D. Woods and D. S. Saxon, “Diffuse surface optical model for nucleonnuclei scattering,” Physical Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 577–578, 1954. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Y. Guo and Z. Q. Sheng, “Solution of the Dirac equation for the WoodsSaxon potential with spin and pseudospin symmetry,” Physics Letters A, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 90–96, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 D. Agboola, “Spin symmetry in the relativistic qdeformed morse potential,” FewBody Systems, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 31–38, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. C. Qiang, R. S. Zhou, and Y. Gao, “Application of the exact quantization rule to the relativistic solution of the rotational Morse potential with pseudospin symmetry,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1677–1685, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 O. Bayrak and I. Boztosun, “The pseudospin symmetric solution of the Morse potential for any $\kappa $ state,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 36, pp. 11119–11127, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 A. Soylu, O. Bayrak, and I. Boztosun, “$\kappa $ state solutions of the Dirac equation for the Eckart potential with pseudospin and spin symmetry,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 41, no. 6, Article ID 065308, 8 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 C. S. Jia, P. Guo, and X. L. Peng, “Exact solution of the DiracEckart problem with spin and pseudospin symmetry,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 39, no. 24, pp. 7737–7744, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 L. H. Zhang, X. P. Li, and C. S. Jia, “Analytical approximation to the solution of the Dirac equation with the Eckart potential including the spinorbit coupling term,” Physics Letters A, vol. 372, no. 13, pp. 2201–2207, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Y. Xu, S. He, and C. S. Jia, “Approximate analytical solutions of the Dirac equation with the PöschlTeller potential including the spinorbit coupling term,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 41, no. 25, Article ID 255302, 8 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 G. F. Wei and S. H. Dong, “Approximately analytical solutions of the ManningRosen potential with the spinorbit coupling term and spin symmetry,” Physics Letters A, vol. 373, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 G. F. Wei and S. H. Dong, “Pseudospin symmetry in the relativistic ManningRosen potential including a Pekeristype approximation to the pseudocentrifugal term,” Physics Letters B, vol. 686, no. 45, pp. 288–292, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Aydodu and R. Sever, “Pseudospin and spin symmetry in the Dirac equation with WoodsSaxon potential and tensor potential,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Berkdemir, “Pseudospin symmetry in the relativistic Morse potential including the spinorbit coupling term,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 770, no. 12, pp. 32–39, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact spin and pseudospin symmetry solutions of the Dirac equation for Mietype potential including a coulomblike tensor potential,” FewBody Systems, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact pseudospin symmetry solution of the Dirac equation for spatiallydependent mass Coulomb potential including a Coulomblike tensor interaction via asymptotic iteration method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 374, no. 42, pp. 4303–4307, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exactly complete solutions of the dirac equation with pseudoharmonic potential including linear plus coulomblike tensor potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 26, no. 78, pp. 1363–1374, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 J. L. Tian, N. Wang, and Z. X. Li, “Spread and quoteupdate frequency of the limitorder driven Sergei Maslov model,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 24, no. 8, p. 905, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Wang, K. Zhao, W. Scheid, and X. Wu, “Fusionfission reactions with a modified WoodsSaxon potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 014603, 11 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Wang and W. Scheid, “Quasielastic scattering and fusion with a modified WoodsSaxon potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, no. 1, Article ID 014607, 7 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Boztosun, “New results in the analysis of ${}^{16}\text{O}+{}^{28}\text{S}\text{i}$ elastic scattering by modifying the optical potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 024610, 6 pages, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Fakhri and J. Sadeghi, “Supersymmetry approaches to the bound states of the generalized WoodsSaxon potential,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 615–625, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 C. Berkdemir, A. Berkdemir, and R. Sever, “Editorial Note: polynomial solutions of the Schrödinger equation for the generalized WoodsSaxon potential [Phys. Rev. C 72, 027001 (2005)],” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 039902, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. L. Pekeris, “The rotationvibration coupling in diatomic molecules,” Physical Review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 1934. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. H. Badalov, H. I. Ahmadov, and A. I. Ahmadov, “Analytical solutions of the schrödinger equation with the WoodsSaxon potential for arbitrary l state,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 631–641, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. H. Badalov, H. I. Ahmadov, and S. V. Badalov, “Any lstate analytical solutions of the KleinGordon equation for the WoodsSaxon potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1463–1475, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Aydodu and R. Sever, “Pseudospin and spin symmetry in the Dirac equation with WoodsSaxon potential and tensor potential,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. R. Pahlavani and S. A. Alavi, “Solutions of WoodsSaxon potential with spinorbit and centrifugal terms through NikiforovUvarov method,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 739, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. R. Pahlavani and S. A. Alavi, “Study of nuclear bound states using meanfield WoodsSaxon and spinorbit potentials,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 27, no. 29, Article ID 125016, 13 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Berlin, Germany, 1988. View at: MathSciNet
 C. Tezcan and R. Sever, “A general approach for the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 337–350, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 S. M. Ikhdair, “Rotational and vibrational diatomic molecule in the KleinGordon equation with hyperbolic scalar and vector potentials,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 1563, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. M. Perey, F. G. Perey, J. K. Dickens, and R. J. Silva, “11MeV proton opticalmodel analysis,” Physical Review, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 1460–1475, 1968. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 M. Hamzavi and A. A. Rajabi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.