Table of Contents
ISRN High Energy Physics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 987632, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/987632
Research Article

Generalized Nuclear Woods-Saxon Potential under Relativistic Spin Symmetry Limit

Physics Department, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran

Received 28 January 2013; Accepted 13 February 2013

Academic Editors: C. Ahn and C. A. de S. Pires

Copyright © 2013 M. Hamzavi and A. A. Rajabi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Haxel, J. H. D. Jensen, and H. E. Suess, “On the “magic numbers” in nuclear structure,” Physical Review, vol. 75, no. 11, p. 1766, 1949. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Goepper, “On closed shells in nuclei. II,” Physical Review, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1969–1970, 1949. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W. Zhang, J. Meng, S. Q. Zhang, L. S. Geng, and H. Toki, “Magic numbers for superheavy nuclei in relativistic continuum Hartree-Bogoliubov theory,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 753, no. 1-2, pp. 106–135, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Meng, H. Toki, S. G. Zhou, S. Q. Zheng, W. H. Long, and L. S. Geng, “Relativistic continuum Hartree Bogoliubov theory for ground-state properties of exotic nuclei,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 470–563, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetries in nuclei and hadrons,” Physics Reports, vol. 414, no. 4-5, pp. 165–261, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. A. Bohr, I. Hamamoto, and B. R. Mottelson, “Pseudospin in rotating nuclear potentials,” Physica Scripta, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 267, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Dudek, W. Nazarewicz, Z. Szymanski, and G. A. Leander, “Abundance and systematics of nuclear superdeformed states; relation to the pseudospin and pseudo-SU3 symmetries,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 1405–1408, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Troltenier, C. Bahri, and J. P. Draayer, “Generalized pseudo-SU3 model and pairing,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 586, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. R. Page, T. Goldman, and J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetry suppresses quark spin-orbit splitting,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 204–207, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. T. Hect and A. Adler, “Generalized seniority for favored J0 pairs in mixed configurations,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 129–143, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Arima, M. Harvey, and K. Shimizu, “Pseudo LS coupling and pseudo SU3 coupling schemes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 517–522, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. N. Ginocchio, “Pseudospin as a relativistic symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 3, Article ID 439, 436 pages, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. N. Ginocchio, “Relativistic symmetries in nuclei and hadrons,” Physics Reports, vol. 414, no. 4-5, pp. 165–261, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. S. G. Zhou, J. Meng, and P. Ring, “Spin symmetry in the antinucleon spectrum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 26, Article ID 262501, 4 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. X. T. He, S. G. Zhou, J. Meng, E. G. Zhao, and W. Scheid, “Test of spin symmetry in anti-nucleon spectra,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 265–269, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Y. Song, J. M. Yao, and J. Meng, “Spin symmetry for anti-lambda spectrum in atomic nucleus,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 26, no. 12, Article ID 122102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Y. Song and J. M. Yao, “Polarization effect on the spin symmetry for anti-Lambda spectrum in O16+λ¯ system,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1425–1427, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Meng, K. Sugawara-Tanabe, S. Yamaji, P. Ring, and A. Arima, “Pseudospin symmetry in relativistic mean field theory,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. R628–R631, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, A. S. de Castro, P. Alberto, and M. Fiolhais, “Pseudospin symmetry and the relativistic harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review C, vol. 69, no. 2, Article ID 024319, 15 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. S. de Castro, P. Alberto, R. Lisboa, and M. Malheiro, “Relating pseudospin and spin symmetries through charge conjugation and chiral transformations: the case of the relativistic harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review C, vol. 73, no. 5, Article ID 054309, 13 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. D. Woods and D. S. Saxon, “Diffuse surface optical model for nucleon-nuclei scattering,” Physical Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 577–578, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Y. Guo and Z. Q. Sheng, “Solution of the Dirac equation for the Woods-Saxon potential with spin and pseudospin symmetry,” Physics Letters A, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 90–96, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. D. Agboola, “Spin symmetry in the relativistic q-deformed morse potential,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 31–38, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. W. C. Qiang, R. S. Zhou, and Y. Gao, “Application of the exact quantization rule to the relativistic solution of the rotational Morse potential with pseudospin symmetry,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1677–1685, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. O. Bayrak and I. Boztosun, “The pseudospin symmetric solution of the Morse potential for any κ state,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 36, pp. 11119–11127, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. A. Soylu, O. Bayrak, and I. Boztosun, “κ state solutions of the Dirac equation for the Eckart potential with pseudospin and spin symmetry,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 41, no. 6, Article ID 065308, 8 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. C. S. Jia, P. Guo, and X. L. Peng, “Exact solution of the Dirac-Eckart problem with spin and pseudospin symmetry,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 39, no. 24, pp. 7737–7744, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  28. L. H. Zhang, X. P. Li, and C. S. Jia, “Analytical approximation to the solution of the Dirac equation with the Eckart potential including the spin-orbit coupling term,” Physics Letters A, vol. 372, no. 13, pp. 2201–2207, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  29. Y. Xu, S. He, and C. S. Jia, “Approximate analytical solutions of the Dirac equation with the Pöschl-Teller potential including the spin-orbit coupling term,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 41, no. 25, Article ID 255302, 8 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. G. F. Wei and S. H. Dong, “Approximately analytical solutions of the Manning-Rosen potential with the spin-orbit coupling term and spin symmetry,” Physics Letters A, vol. 373, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. G. F. Wei and S. H. Dong, “Pseudospin symmetry in the relativistic Manning-Rosen potential including a Pekeris-type approximation to the pseudo-centrifugal term,” Physics Letters B, vol. 686, no. 4-5, pp. 288–292, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. O. Aydodu and R. Sever, “Pseudospin and spin symmetry in the Dirac equation with Woods-Saxon potential and tensor potential,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C. Berkdemir, “Pseudospin symmetry in the relativistic Morse potential including the spin-orbit coupling term,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 770, no. 1-2, pp. 32–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact spin and pseudospin symmetry solutions of the Dirac equation for Mie-type potential including a coulomb-like tensor potential,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exact pseudospin symmetry solution of the Dirac equation for spatially-dependent mass Coulomb potential including a Coulomb-like tensor interaction via asymptotic iteration method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 374, no. 42, pp. 4303–4307, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. M. Hamzavi, A. A. Rajabi, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exactly complete solutions of the dirac equation with pseudoharmonic potential including linear plus coulomb-like tensor potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 26, no. 7-8, pp. 1363–1374, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. J. L. Tian, N. Wang, and Z. X. Li, “Spread and quote-update frequency of the limit-order driven Sergei Maslov model,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 24, no. 8, p. 905, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. N. Wang, K. Zhao, W. Scheid, and X. Wu, “Fusion-fission reactions with a modified Woods-Saxon potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 014603, 11 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. N. Wang and W. Scheid, “Quasi-elastic scattering and fusion with a modified Woods-Saxon potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, no. 1, Article ID 014607, 7 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. I. Boztosun, “New results in the analysis of O16+S28i elastic scattering by modifying the optical potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 024610, 6 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. H. Fakhri and J. Sadeghi, “Supersymmetry approaches to the bound states of the generalized Woods-Saxon potential,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 615–625, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  42. C. Berkdemir, A. Berkdemir, and R. Sever, “Editorial Note: polynomial solutions of the Schrödinger equation for the generalized Woods-Saxon potential [Phys. Rev. C 72, 027001 (2005)],” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 039902, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. L. Pekeris, “The rotation-vibration coupling in diatomic molecules,” Physical Review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 1934. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. V. H. Badalov, H. I. Ahmadov, and A. I. Ahmadov, “Analytical solutions of the schrödinger equation with the Woods-Saxon potential for arbitrary l state,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 631–641, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. V. H. Badalov, H. I. Ahmadov, and S. V. Badalov, “Any l-state analytical solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation for the Woods-Saxon potential,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1463–1475, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. O. Aydodu and R. Sever, “Pseudospin and spin symmetry in the Dirac equation with Woods-Saxon potential and tensor potential,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. R. Pahlavani and S. A. Alavi, “Solutions of Woods-Saxon potential with spin-orbit and centrifugal terms through Nikiforov-Uvarov method,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 739, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. M. R. Pahlavani and S. A. Alavi, “Study of nuclear bound states using mean-field Woods-Saxon and spin-orbit potentials,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 27, no. 29, Article ID 125016, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Berlin, Germany, 1988. View at MathSciNet
  50. C. Tezcan and R. Sever, “A general approach for the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 337–350, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  51. S. M. Ikhdair, “Rotational and vibrational diatomic molecule in the Klein-Gordon equation with hyperbolic scalar and vector potentials,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 1563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. C. M. Perey, F. G. Perey, J. K. Dickens, and R. J. Silva, “11-MeV proton optical-model analysis,” Physical Review, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 1460–1475, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar