Table of Contents
ISRN Mathematical Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 264956, 19 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/264956
Research Article

Entanglement Dynamics of Second Quantized Quantum Fields

NanoScience Technology Center, Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32826, USA

Received 26 November 2013; Accepted 16 December 2013; Published 28 January 2014

Academic Editors: B. Bagchi, G. Berginc, and M. Sebawe Abdalla

Copyright © 2014 Mikhail Erementchouk and Michael N. Leuenberger. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. H. K. Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 865–942, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. D. Bouwmeester, A. K. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, The Physics of Quantum Information, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. View at MathSciNet
  3. L.-A. Wu, M. S. Sarandy, and D. A. Lidar, “Quantum phase transitions and bipartite entanglement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 25, Article ID 250404, 4 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. Y. H. Shih and C. O. Alley, “New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, pp. 2921–2924, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel, “Violation of Bell's inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. Y. Shih, “Entangled biphoton source—property and preparation,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1009–1044, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  8. S. Tanzilli, H. De Riedmatten, W. Tittel et al., “Highly efficient photon-pair source using periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide,” Electronics Letters, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 26–28, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. G. Kwiat, “New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, pp. 4337–4341, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. Edamatsu, G. Oohata, R. Shimizu, and T. Itoh, “Generation of ultraviolet entangled photons in a semiconductor,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7005, pp. 167–170, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. B. Altepeter, E. R. Jeffrey, and P. G. Kwiat, “Phase-compensated ultra-bright source of entangled photons,” Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 22, pp. 8951–8959, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. M. Stevenson, R. J. Young, P. Atkinson et al., “A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs,” Nature, vol. 439, pp. 179–182, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. R. J. Young, R. M. Stevenson, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, “Improved fidelity of triggered entangled photons from single quantum dots,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 8, article 29, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. N. Akopian, N. H. Lindner, E. Poem, Y. Berlatzky, J. Avron, and D. Gershoni, “Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, Article ID 130501, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. J. Shields, “Semiconductor quantum light sources,” Nature Photonics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 215–223, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Hayat, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “High-rate entanglement source via two-photon emission from semiconductor quantum wells,” Physical Review B, vol. 76, Article ID 035339, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. Oohata, R. Shimizu, and K. Edamatsu, “Photon polarization entanglement induced by biexciton: experimental evidence for violation of Bell’s inequality,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, Article ID 140503, 4 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Hayat, P. Ginzburg, and M. Orenstein, “Observation of two-photon emission from semiconductors,” Nature Photonics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 238–241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Erementchouk and M. N. Leuenberger, “Entanglement of photons due to nonlinear optical response of quantum wells,” Physical Review B, vol. 81, no. 19, Article ID 195308, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. V. Vedral, “Quantifying entanglement in macroscopic systems,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7198, pp. 1004–1007, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. O. T. Cunha, J. A. Dunningham, and V. Vedral, “Entanglement in single-particle systems,” Proceedings of The Royal Society of London A, vol. 463, no. 2085, pp. 2277–2286, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. A. M. Zagoskin, Quantum Theory of Many-Body Systems. Techniques and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. R. Paskauskas and L. You, “Quantum correlations in two-boson wave functions,” Physical Review A, vol. 64, Article ID 042310, 4 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. X.-G. Wang and B. C. Sanders, “Canonical entanglement for two indistinguishable particles,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 38, p. L67, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. N. N. Chung and L. Y. Chew, “Dependence of entanglement dynamics on the global classical dynamical regime,” Physical Review E, vol. 80, no. 1, Article ID 016204, 7 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. S. D. Bartlett and H. M. Wiseman, “Entanglement constrained by superselection rules,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 9, Article ID 097903, 4 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. M. A. Can, A. Klyachko, and A. Shumovsky, “Single-particle entanglement,” Journal of Optics B, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. L1–L3, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. S. J. van Enk, “Single-particle entanglement,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, Article ID 064306, 3 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Drezet, “Comment on “Single-particle entanglement”,” Physical Review A, vol. 74, Article ID 026301, 2 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Pawłowski and M. Czachor, “Degree of entanglement as a physically ill-posed problemml: the case of entanglement with vacuum,” Physical Review A, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 042111, 7 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at MathSciNet
  32. J.-P. Gazeau, Coherent States in Quantum Physics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
  33. W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, “Coherent states: theory and some applications,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 867–927, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. A. N. Boto, P. Kok, D. S. Abrams, S. L. Braunstein, C. P. Williams, and J. P. Dowling, “Quantum interferometric optical lithography: exploiting entanglement to beat the diffraction limit,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, pp. 2733–2736, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. X. Wang, B. C. Sanders, and S.-H. Pan, “Entangled coherent states for systems with SU(2) and SU(1,1) symmetries,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 33, no. 41, pp. 7451–7467, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. B. C. Sanders, “Review of entangled coherent states,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 45, no. 24, Article ID 244002, 22 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. H. Makela and K.-A. Suominen, “Inert States of Spin-S Systems,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, Article ID 190408, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. D. J. H. Markham, “Entanglement and symmetry in permutation-symmetric states,” Physical Review A, vol. 83, Article ID 042332, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1994.
  40. W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, pp. 2245–2248, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. H. Georgi, Lie Algebras in Particle Physics, WestView Press, Boulder, Colo, USA, 1999.
  42. H. Aschauer, J. Calsamiglia, M. Hein, and H. J. Briegel, “Local invariants for multi-partite entangled states allowing for a simple entanglement criterion,” Quantum Information & Computation, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 383–395, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  43. A. A. Klyachko, B. Oztop, and A. S. Shumovsky, “Quantification of entanglement via uncertainties,” Physical Review A, vol. 75, Article ID 032315, 6 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. A. Klyachko, “Dynamical symmetry approach to entanglement,” in Physics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 7, pp. 25–54, IOS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. T.-C. Wei, “Maximal entanglement versus entropy for mixed quantum states,” Physical Review A, vol. 67, Article ID 022110, 12 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. M. Mathur and I. Raychowdhury, “SU(N) coherent states and irreducible Schwinger bosons,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 3, Article ID 035203, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  47. M. Mathur, I. Raychowdhury, and R. Anishetty, “SU(N) irreducible Schwinger bosons,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 51, no. 9, Article ID 093504, 14 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. V. Vedral, “Entanglement in the second quantization formalism,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 2, pp. 289–306, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. B. He and J. A. Bergou, “Coherent-states engineering with linear optics: possible and impossible tasks,” Physical Review A, vol. 77, Article ID 053818, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  50. B. C. Sanders, “Quantum dynamics of the nonlinear rotator and the effects of continual spin measurement,” Physical Review A, vol. 40, pp. 2417–2427, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. K. Tara, G. S. Agarwal, and S. Chaturvedi, “Production of Schrödinger macroscopic quantum-superposition states in a Kerr medium,” Physical Review A, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 5024–5029, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, “Squeezed spin states,” Physical Review A, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 5138–5143, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Melikidze, V. V. Dobrovitski, H. A. De Raedt, M. I. Katsnelson, and B. N. Harmon, “Parity effects in spin decoherence,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 1, Article ID 014435, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Lages, V. V. Dobrovitski, M. I. Katsnelson, H. A. De Raedt, and B. N. Harmon, “Decoherence by a chaotic many-spin bath,” Physical Review E, vol. 72, no. 2, Article ID 026225, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Yuan, M. I. Katsnelson, and H. De Raedt, “Origin of the canonical ensemble: thermalization with decoherence,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 78, no. 9, Article ID 094003, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. O. Gittsovich, P. Hyllus, and O. Guhne, “Multiparticle covariance matrices and the impossibility of detecting graph-state entanglement with two-particle correlations,” Physical Review A, vol. 82, Article ID 032306, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. S. J. van Enk, “Entanglement capabilities in infinite dimensions: multidimensional entangled coherent states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 1, Article ID 017902, 4 pages, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. F. Iachello, Lie Algebras and Applications, vol. 708 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at MathSciNet
  59. S.-B. Zheng, “One-step synthesis of multiatom Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, Article ID 230404, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Klein and E. R. Marshalek, “Boson realizations of Lie algebras with applications to nuclear physics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 375–558, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  61. F. Iachello and R. D. Levine, Algebraic Theory of Molecules, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  62. E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Systems, vol. 82, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1991. View at MathSciNet
  63. B. C. Berndt and R. J. Evans, “The determination of Gauss sums,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 107–129, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  64. B. C. Berndt, R. J. Evans, and K. S. Williams, Gauss and Jacobi Sums, Wiley-Interscience, Toronto, Canada, 1997. View at MathSciNet
  65. B. W. Shore and P. L. Knight, “The Jaynes-Cummings model,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1195–1238, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  66. M. Scully and M. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.
  67. M. Erementchouk and M. N. Leuenberger, “Complex dynamics of photon entanglement in the two-mode Jaynes-Cummings model,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 27, Article ID 274019, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, “Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 910–913, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Hein, J. Eisert, and H. J. Briegel, “Multiparty entanglement in graph states,” Physical Review A, vol. 69, no. 6, Article ID 062311, 20 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet