Review Article

Functional Performance Testing and Patient Reported Outcomes following ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Scoping Review

Table 3

The Critical Appraisal Skills Program results (CASP).

The criteria(1) Ageberg et al., 2008 [23](2) Baltaci et al., 2013 [24](3)Zouita Ben Moussa et al., 2009 [25](4) Beynnon et al., 2005 [26](5) Beynnon et al., 2011 [27](6) Delahunt et al., 2013 [28](7) Halinen et al., 2006 [29](8) Halinen et al., 2009 [30](9) Hartigan et al., 2010 [31](10) Lindström et al., 2013 [32](11) McDevitt et al., 2004 [33](12) Moksnes and Risberg, 2009 [34](13) Risberg et al., 2007 [35](14) Salmon et al., 2006 [36](15) Shaw et al., 2005 [37](16) Trulsson et al., 2010 [38]

Study design NYNYYYYNYYYYYYYY
Focused question YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Appropriate design YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Population definedYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Recruitment methods
acknowledged
YYYYYNYNYYYYYYYY
Sample size defined by power YNNNYNNYYYNNYYNN
Study setting described YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYN
Interventions described (surgery)YYYYYNYYYYYYYYYN
Rehabilitation describedNYNYNNNNNYNNYNYN
Outcome measures defined YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Observers definedYNNYYYNNYYYYYYYY
Statistical methods described YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Variance described NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Inferential statistics employed YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Confidence intervals presentedYNNNNYNNNNNYNYNN
Appropriate interpretation YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
GeneralizabilityYYYYYYNNYYYYYYYY
Relevance to present evidence baseYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Clinical relevance discussedYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

The score16151316161413121617151617171613