Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2014, Article ID 747168, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/747168
Research Article

Multiple Mini-Interviews (MMI) and Semistructured Interviews for the Selection of Family Medicine Residents: A Comparative Analysis

1Faculty Family Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi 3500, Pakistan
2Consultant Family Medicine, Prince Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk 71411, Saudi Arabia
3Faculty Departement of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan

Received 6 March 2014; Revised 8 May 2014; Accepted 12 May 2014; Published 5 August 2014

Academic Editor: Ravi Shankar

Copyright © 2014 Marie Andrades et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Patterson and P. Lane, “Assessment for recruitment,” in Assessment in Medical Education and Training, N. Jackson, F. Jamieson, and A. Khan, Eds., pp. 62–73, Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Benbassat and R. Baumal, “Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school,” Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 509–521, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. W. Eva, J. Rosenfeld, H. I. Reiter, and G. R. Norman, “An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview,” Medical Education, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 314–326, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Dowell, B. Lynch, H. Till, B. Kumwenda, and A. Husbands, “The multiple mini-interview in the UK context: 3 years of experience at Dundee,” Medical Teacher, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 297–304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Blouin, G. A. Day, and A. Pavlov, “Comparative reliability of structured versus unstructured interviews in the admission process of a residency program,” Journal of Graduate Medical Education, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 517–523, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Hofmeister, J. Lockyer, and R. Crutcher, “The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education,” Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 573–579, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. W. Eva, H. I. Reiter, K. Trinh, P. Wasi, J. Rosenfeld, and G. R. Norman, “Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees,” Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 767–775, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Hofmeister, J. Lockyer, and R. Crutcher, “The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection,” Family Medicine, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 734–740, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. L. Dore, S. Kreuger, M. Ladhani et al., “The reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions,” Academic Medicine, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. S60–S63, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Aga Khan University Post Graduate Medical Education Department, Residency Program in Family Medicine, 2010.
  11. G. Norman, “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics,” Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 625–632, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Dawes, “Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales,” International Journal of Market Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 61–104, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Blouin, “Reliability of a structured interview for admission to an emergency medicine residency program,” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 246–250, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. O'Brien, J. Harvey, M. Shannon, K. Lewis, and O. Valencia, “A comparison of multiple mini-interviews and structured interviews in a UK setting,” Medical Teacher, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 397–402, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Rosenfeld, H. I. Reiter, K. Trinh, and K. W. Eva, “A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews,” Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Roberts, M. Walton, I. Rothnie et al., “Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school,” Medical Education, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 396–404, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. McAndrew and J. Ellis, “An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students,” British Dental Journal, vol. 212, no. 7, pp. 331–335, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Razack, S. Faremo, F. Drolet, L. Snell, J. Wiseman, and J. Pickering, “Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison,” Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 993–1000, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Humphrey, S. Dowson, D. Wall, V. Diwakar, and H. M. Goodyear, “Multiple mini-interviews: opinions of candidates and interviewers,” Medical Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 207–213, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus