Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2014, Article ID 752862, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/752862
Clinical Study

The Effect of the Gelatinous Lactulose for Postoperative Bowel Movement in the Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Japan

Received 13 July 2014; Revised 22 September 2014; Accepted 8 October 2014; Published 29 October 2014

Academic Editor: Tobias Keck

Copyright © 2014 Daisuke Shigemi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Kehlet and K. Holte, “Review of postoperative ileus,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 3S–10S, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Voskuijl, F. de Lorijn, W. Verwijs et al., “PEG 3350 (Transipeg) versus lactulose in the treatment of childhood functional constipation: a double blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1590–1594, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force, “An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 100, supplement 1, pp. S1–S4, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. T. Blei and J. Córdoba, “Hepatic encephalopathy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 1968–1976, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Garcia-Tsao and J. Lim, “Management and treatment of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: recommendations from the department of veterans affairs hepatitis C resource center program and the national hepatitis C program,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 1802–1829, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. C. Sharma, P. Sharma, A. Agrawal, and S. K. Sarin, “Secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy: an open-label randomized controlled trial of lactulose versus placebo,” Gastroenterology, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 885–e1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Akiteru and M. Yusuke, “Clinical experiences of Piarle DS 95% on stimulating bowel function after surgery in the Obstetrics and Gynecology,” Journal of New Remedies & Clinics, vol. 45, pp. 113–124, 1996 (Japanese). View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Masazumi, T. Yoshihiko, I. Tomiko et al., “Study on the effect of ML-P for bowel dysfunction after abdominal surgery in the obstetrics and gynecology,” Rinsho Fujinka Sanka, vol. 51, pp. 1359–1364, 1997 (Japanese). View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Bennett and K. G. Eley, “Intestinal pH and propulsion: an explanation of diarrhoea in lactase deficiency and laxation by lactulose,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 192–195, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. G. Wolff, E. R. Viscusi, C. P. Delaney, W. Du, and L. Techner, “Patterns of gastrointestinal recovery after bowel resection and total abdominal hysterectomy: pooled results from the placebo arms of alvimopan phase III North American clinical trials,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Jørgensen, J. Wetterslev, S. Møiniche, and J. B. Dahl, “Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, Article ID CD001893, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. G. Mythen, “Postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 196–204, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus