Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2014, Article ID 757325, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/757325
Research Article

Considering District and School Factors and Their Relationship to ACT Performance in North Carolina: An Examination of the ACT Pilot Results

Fayetteville State University, USA

Received 6 November 2013; Accepted 18 January 2014; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editors: T. Carvalho, B. Marlow, and G. Sideridis

Copyright © 2014 Theodore S. Kaniuka. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Trani, “The relationship between student achievement, school district economies of scale, and student achievement,” 2009, http://gradworks.umi.com/3405770.pdf.
  2. T. J. Bowles and R. Bosworth, “Scale economies in public education: evidence from school level data,” Journal of Education Finance, pp. 285–299, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Driscoll, D. Halcoussis, and S. Svorny, “School district size and student performance,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 193–201, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Heinesen, “Determinants of local public school expenditure: a dynamic panel data model,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 429–453, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Tajalli and C. Opheim, “Strategies for closing the gap: predicting student performance in economically disadvantaged schools,” Educational Research Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 44–54, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Coladarci, “School size, student achievement, and the “power rating” of poverty: substantive finding or statistical artifact?” Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 14, pp. 1–23, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Harmston, A. M. Pliska, R. L. Ziomek, and D. G. Hackmann, The Relationship Between Schedule Type and ACT Assessment Scores: A Longitudinal Study, ACT, Inc., 2003.
  8. M. Iacovou, “Class size in the early years: is smaller really better?” Education Economics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 261–290, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. V. Rainey and O. Murova, “Factors influencing education achievement,” Applied Economics, vol. 36, no. 21, pp. 2397–2404, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. Ma and D. A. Klinger, “Hierarchical linear modelling of student and school effects on academic achievement,” Canadian Journal of Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. R. Sirin, “Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 417–453, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Coleman, Equality of Educational Opportunity Study, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Boonen, S. Speybroeck, J. de Bilde, C. Lamote, J. Van Damme, and P. Onghena, “Does it matter who your schoolmates are? An investigation of the association between school composition, school processes and mathematics achievement,” British Educational Research Journal, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. N. Hoffman and M. Webb, “Early-college high school: modest experiment or national movement? Education Week,” 2009, http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2009/06/11/35hoffman.html.
  15. Jobs for the Future, “Life Beyond Early College: Strategies for Success,” 2011, http://www.jff.org/publications/education/life-beyond-early-college-strategies-suc/1208.
  16. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, “What's in this packet?” 2013, http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/ready/resources/spring2012/2012regional-handouts.pdf.
  17. J. Allen and J. Sconing, Using ACT Assessment Scores to Set Benchmarks for College Readiness, ACT Inc., 2005.
  18. United States Department of Education, A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  19. K. Field, “Spellings panel spurred progress but failed to remake higher education,” Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 8, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. Klasik, “The college application gauntlet: a systematic analysis of the steps to four-year college enrollment,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, pp. 506–549, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, “New school accountability model focuses on career and college readiness,” 2012, http://www.ncpublicschools.org/newsroom/news/2012-13/20120824-01.
  22. ACT, “What are ACT's college readiness benchmarks?” 2013, http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/benchmarks.pdf.
  23. J. M. Richards and S. W. Lutz, “Predicting student accomplishment in college from the ACT assessment,” Journal of Educational Measurement, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Sawyer, Validating the Use of ACT Assessment Scores and High School Grades for Remedial Course Placement in College, American College Testing program, 1989.
  25. J. Noble, Predicting College Grades from ACT Assessment Scores and High School Course Work and Grade Information, vol. 91, American College Testing Program, 1991.
  26. J. Noble and R. Sawyer, Predicting Different Levels of Academic Success in College Using High School GPA and ACT Composite Score, American College Testing program, 2002.
  27. D. Klasik, “The ACT of enrolment: the college enrolment effects of state-required college entrance exam testing,” Educational Researcher, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 151–160, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. American Council on Education, “Students of color make dramatic gains in college enrollment but still trail whites in the rate at which they attend college,” 2006, http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/Gender-Equity-in-Higher-Education-2006.pdf.
  29. North Carolina New Schools Project, “Early college high schools,” 2012, http://ncnewschools.org/earlycollege/.
  30. Early College High School Initiative, “Schools,” 2012, http://www.earlycolleges.org/schools.html.
  31. S. W. Raudenbush and A. S. Bryk, Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2001.
  32. J. Hannaway and K. Kimball, Big Isn't always Bad: School District Size, Poverty, and Standards-Based Reform, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  33. S. Caldas, “Reexamination of input and process factor effects on academic achievement,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 86, pp. 206–214, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  34. E. A. Hanushek, “Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 141–164, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Weick, “Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Abbott, J. Joireman, and H. Stroh, The Influence of District Size, School Size and Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement in Washington: A Replication Study Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Washington School Research Center, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2002.
  37. T. S. Kaniuka and M. Vickers, “Lessons learned: how early college high schools offer a pathway for high school reform,” NASSP Bulletin, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 165–183, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Kaniuka, “Narrowing the achievement gap on a statewide scale: student success in North Carolina early colleges,” International Journal of Research Studies in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 115–126, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. A. Edmunds, L. Bernstein, E. Glennie et al., “Preparing students for college: the implementation and impact of the early college high school model,” Peabody Journal of Education, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 348–364, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Avery and T. Kane, “Student perceptions of college opportunities: the Boston COACH program,” in College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay, C. M. Hoxby, Ed., pp. 355–391, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  41. A. F. Cabera and S. M. La Nasa, Understanding the College Choice Process New Directions for Institutional Research, Josey Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2000.
  42. J. E. Kahne, S. E. Sporte, M. De La Torre, and J. Q. Easton, “Small high schools on a larger scale: the impact of school conversions in Chicago,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 281–315, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus