Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2014, Article ID 807937, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/807937
Clinical Study

A Randomized Study Comparing Skin Staples with Subcuticular Sutures for Wound Closure at Caesarean Section in Black-Skinned Women

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adeoyo Maternity Teaching Hospital, Yemetu, Ibadan 200211, Nigeria
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200212, Nigeria
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, PMB 5116, Ibadan 200212, Nigeria

Received 25 June 2014; Accepted 30 August 2014; Published 29 October 2014

Academic Editor: Robert Lindeboom

Copyright © 2014 Rukiyat Adeola Abdus-Salam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. K. Deka, S. Kanagasabai, and L. Karanth, “Caesarean section incision in abdomen revisited,” Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 14, no. 1, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi, A. Gottardi, M. Cherubino, S. Uccella, and L. Valdatta, “Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 36.e1–36.e8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. F. Basket, A. A. Calder, and S. Arulkumaran, “Caesarean section,” in Munro Kerr's Operative Obstetrics, pp. 151–166, Saunders/Elsevier, Toronto, Canada, 11th edition, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Rousseau, K. Girard, L. Turcot-Lemay, and N. Thomas, “A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 265.e1–265.e4, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. O. Chigbu, I. V. Ezeome, and G. C. Iloabachie, “Cesarean section on request in a developing country,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 54–56, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. Berghella, J. K. Baxter, and S. P. Chauhan, “Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 5, pp. 1607–1617, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. L. Tajirian and D. J. Goldberg, “A review of sutures and other skin closure materials,” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 296–302, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. L. Basha, M. L. Rochon, J. N. Quiones, K. M. Coassolo, O. A. Rust, and J. C. Smulian, “Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 285.e1–285.e8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. S. H. Clay, C. A. Walsh, and S. R. Walsh, “Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 204, no. 5, pp. 378–383, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Alderdice, D. McKenna, and J. Dornan, “Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD003577, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. R. Anderson and S. Gates, “Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD004663, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. N. Frishman, T. Schwartz, and J. W. Hogan, “Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions: staples vs. subcuticular suture,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 627–630, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Lubowski and D. Hunt, “Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 405–406, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Gaertner, T. Burkhardt, and E. Beinder, “Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. O. Akinpelu and O. O. Olowe, “Correlative study of three pain rating scales among obstetric patients,” African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 123–126, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Beausang, H. Floyd, K. W. Dunn, C. I. Orton, and M. W. J. Ferguson, “A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1954–1961, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. J. Draaijers, F. R. H. Tempelman, Y. A. M. Botman et al., “The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1960–1965, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. W. Downie, P. A. Leatham, V. M. Rhind, V. Wright, J. A. Branco, and J. A. Anderson, “Studies with pain rating scales,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 378–381, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. O. Morhason-Bello, A. Oladokun, B. O. Adedokun, K. A. Obisesan, O. A. Ojengbede, and O. O. Okuyemi, “Determinants of post-caesarean wound infection at the university college hospital Ibadan Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus