Table of Contents
ISRN Ophthalmology
Volume 2014, Article ID 903084, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/903084
Clinical Study

Effects of Ocular Dominance on Contrast Sensitivity in Middle-Aged People

1Ophthalmology Department, Pamukkale University, Kınıklı, 20070 Denizli, Turkey
2Beyoğlu Eye Research and Training Hospital, 34420 Istanbul, Turkey
3Denizli State Hospital, Eye Clinic, 20125 Denizli, Turkey

Received 7 November 2013; Accepted 13 February 2014; Published 9 March 2014

Academic Editors: F. Giansanti and I.-J. Wang

Copyright © 2014 Gökhan Pekel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. P. Mapp, H. Ono, and R. Barbeito, “What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review,” Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 310–317, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Suttle, J. Alexander, M. Liu, S. Ng, J. Poon, and T. Tran, “Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. Seijas, P. Gómez de Liaño, R. Gómez de Liaño, C. J. Roberts, E. Piedrahita, and E. Diaz, “Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 209–216, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. P. Ginsburg, “Contrast sensitivity and functional vision,” International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Plainis, A. G. Anastasakis, and M. K. Tsilimbaris, “The value of contrast sensitivity in diagnosing central serous chorioretinopathy,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 296–298, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Owsley, “Contrast sensitivity,” Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171–177, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. E. Ross, D. D. Clarke, and A. J. Bron, “Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Handa, K. Shimizu, K. Mukuno, T. Kawamorita, and H. Uozato, “Effects of ocular dominance on binocular summation after monocular reading adds,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1588–1592, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Yang, R. Blake, and J. E. McDonald II, “A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 588–593, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Kromeier, S. P. Heinrich, M. Bach, and G. Kommerell, “Ocular prevalence and stereoacuity,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. L. Roth, A. N. Lora, and K. M. Heilman, “Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 2023–2035, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Y. Cheng, M. Y. Yen, H. Y. Lin, W. W. Hsia, and W. M. Hsu, “Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 2856–2860, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. M. Krasnov, S. E. Avetisov, N. V. Makashova, and V. R. Mamikonian, “The effect of radial keratotomy on contrast sensitivity,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 651–654, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. P. Ginsburg, R. P. Osher, K. Blauvelt, and E. Blosser, “The assessment of contrast and glare sensitivity in patients having cataracts,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 397, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  15. H. Nomura, F. Ando, N. Niino, H. Shimokata, and Y. Miyake, “Age-related change in contrast sensitivity among Japanese adults,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 299–303, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. E. Schefrin, S. J. Tregear, L. O. Harvey Jr., and J. S. Werner, “Senescent changes in scotopic contrast sensitivity,” Vision Research, vol. 39, no. 22, pp. 3728–3736, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. E. Sloane, C. Owsley, and S. L. Alvarez, “Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance,” Vision Research, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1235–1246, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Farid and R. F. Steinert, “Patient selection for monovision laser refractive surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 251–254, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Handa, K. Mukuno, H. Uozato et al., “Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 769–774, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Schor, L. Landsman, and P. Erickson, “Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision,” American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 723–730, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. M. Horn, “Monovision and LASIK,” Journal of the American Optometric Association, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Pesudovs, C. A. Hazel, R. M. L. Doran, and D. B. Elliott, “The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus