International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 938543 |

Imran Mahmud, Md Khirul Islam, Sanjib Saha, Apurba Kumar Barman, Md Mustafizur Rahman, Md Anisuzzman, Taufiq Rahman, Abdullah Al-Nahain, Rownak Jahan, Mohammed Rahmatullah, "Pharmacological and Ethnomedicinal Overview of Heritiera fomes: Future Prospects", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2014, Article ID 938543, 12 pages, 2014.

Pharmacological and Ethnomedicinal Overview of Heritiera fomes: Future Prospects

Academic Editor: Magdalena Labieniec-Watala
Received14 Apr 2014
Revised25 May 2014
Accepted27 May 2014
Published22 Jul 2014


Mangrove plants are specialized woody plants growing in the swamps of tidal-coastal areas and river deltas of tropical and subtropical parts of the world. They have been utilized for medicinal and other purposes by the coastal people over the years. Heritiera fomes Buch. Ham. (family: Sterculiaceae) commonly known as Sundari (Bengali) is a preeminent mangrove plant occurring in the Sundarbans forest located in the southern part of Bangladesh and adjoining West Bengal province of India. The plant has applications in traditional folk medicine as evidenced by its extensive use for treating diabetes, hepatic disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, goiter, and skin diseases by the local people and traditional health practitioners. A number of investigations indicated that the plant possesses significant antioxidant, antinociceptive, antihyperglycemic, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities. Phytochemical analyses have revealed the presence of important chemical constituents like saponins, alkaloids, glycosides, tannins, steroids, flavonoids, gums, phytosterols, and reducing sugars. The present study is aimed at compiling information on phytochemical, biological, pharmacological, and ethnobotanical properties of this important medicinal plant, with a view to critically assess the legitimacy of the use of this plant in the aforementioned disorders as well as providing directions for further research.

1. Introduction

Finding healing power in plants is an ancient idea. Man has always been in search for agents to cure various ailments. Since antiquity, medicinal plants and herbs have been in use for the eradication of diseases and human sufferings. According to some estimates, almost 80% of the present day medicines are directly or indirectly obtained from medicinal plants [1]. In developing countries, medicinal plants constitute a precious natural wealth and contribute a great deal to its health care programs. They play an important role in ensuring primary health care facilities and services to countryside people. They also serve as important healing agents as well as vital raw materials for the preparation of conventional and modern medicines.

Mangrove forest contains specialized plant species that grow up at the edge between sea and land in subtropical and tropical regions of the world where they exist in high temperature, strong winds, extreme tides, high salinity, and anaerobic soil. No other group of plant species exists in this universe with such physiological and morphological adaptations to severe conditions. The unique ecology, morphological characteristics, and traditional uses of mangrove plants have drawn the attention of researchers over the years. Mangroves are distributed in 112 countries and territories. Global coverage of mangroves is almost 18 million hectares [2]. They are biochemically unique in nature and considered as a source of novel natural products. Usually mangroves are rich in polyphenols and tannins [3]. Mangrove leaves contain phenols and flavonoids that serve as ultraviolet (UV) screen compounds. Substances in mangroves have long been used in folk medicines to treat diseases [4]. Extracts of various parts of mangrove plants have significant activity against animal, human, and plant viruses including human immunodeficiency virus [5].

Mangrove plant species are atypical from common terrestrial plants in that they can tolerate high salt concentration and remain submerged in saline water. Because of the scant distribution of the mangrove forests, mangrove plant species are still almost unacquainted to a vast population. Ancient people used mangrove plant species scarcely because they could hardly enter these areas [6]. However, at present a vast population lives beside these forested areas and they are heavily dependent on the mangrove forests to earn their livelihood as well as for healthcare. These areas are quite distinct from the cities and there are hardly any hospitals or doctors for their treatment. They are totally dependent on local traditional health practitioners (THPs) for eradicating various ailments and sufferings. Mangrove plant species are used extensively for their primary healthcare by the THPs and the rural people living in these areas. The comprehensive uses of various mangrove plant species in human sufferings provide strong evidence of their healing power and demands further research. But there is lack of sufficient data on mangrove plant species due to the scarcity of these species as well as difficulty in collection and identification. Moreover, adequate information about their ethnomedicinal uses is not available.

Heritiera fomes Buch. Ham. (Syn.: Heritiera minor or Amygdalus minor) (Figure 1) is an evergreen moderate size tree growing abundantly in Sundarbans [7]. The trees attain up to 25 m in height; trunk is about 50 cm in diameter at the base is prominently buttressed. The young branches of the trees are covered with shining golden-brown scales. H. fomes is an important mangrove species having ethnomedicinal uses in traditional medicines. The people living beside the Sundarbans (Figure 2) use this plant extensively for treating various ailments. It is used in gastrointestinal disorders including diarrhea, dysentery, constipation, indigestion, and stomachache. It is also recommended for skin diseases including dermatitis, rash, eczema, boils, itch, scabies, sores, infections, and hepatic disorders including jaundice, hepatitis. It is also useful for treating diabetes and goiter. It is a good insect repellent [8] and has wound healing activity [9].

H. fomes possesses significant antioxidant [10], antinociceptive, antihyperglycemic [11], antimicrobial [12], and anticancer activities [13]. It is also useful in cardiovascular diseases [14]. Moreover the plant is widely used by the coastal people for different purposes. The wood of the plant is used to make boats, making poles, and construction purpose [15].

It is relevant in this context to discuss also ethnomedicinal and pharmacological reports on other mangrove species, especially belonging to the Heritiera genus. Heritiera utilis is an evergreen tree. Seed oil obtained from seeds is reported as edible and used as aphrodisiac, while ground seeds are used to abscesses as a poultice. Bark decoction of H. utilis is used to skin affections occurred by leprosy and given orally as an aphrodisiac [16].

Seed extracts of H. littoralis are applied for the treatment of dysentery and diarrhea [17]. Traditionally, the leaves and stems also have been utilized against dysentery and diarrhea. The sap is proven to be various types of poison including fish poison, arrowhead, and spearhead poison [17, 18]. The leaves and seeds of this plant are taken as edible in the Nicobar and Andaman islands [19]. Sometimes, twig is used as chew sticks as well as tooth brushes [20].

This review aims to compile the pharmacological activities, ethnomedicinal, and phytochemical reports of H. fomes.

2. Botanical Features

2.1. Habitat

The plant is found abundantly in Sundarbans, which is the world’s largest mangrove forest located at the southern part of Bangladesh and Indian state of West Bengal. The forest encompasses a land area of 6017 sq·km of which 1874 sq·km is covered by river areas. The forest is surrounded by the Bay of Bengal in the south, while polders and agricultural lands border the forest in the north. The forest is flush and the maximum ground elevation is 3 meter above the mean sea level.

Through the subsidence and down wrapping of sediments, the land of the forest has developed. Sediments are being deposited to the soil through the flowing of river and sea water. The forest has interesting ecological characteristics with a temperature ranging from 20.4°C to 31.5°C. The annual rainfall is from 1640 to 2000 mm. As the land is on sea interface, the mangrove species are always associated with saline seawater. Unlike other mangrove species Heritiera fomes prefers extremely low saline condition (5–15 psu) [21]. There is a popular credence that the “Sundarbans” derived its name from the Sundari (Heritiera fomes) trees, a major component of the forest. It covers 52.7 percent of the area and constitutes about 63.8 percent of the standing volume [22].

2.2. Morphology

It is an evergreen medium sized tree, growing up to 25 m in height. The leaves are dark green and have short petioles of about 1 cm. They are grouped toward the ends of the branches. At the age of three years, the species begin to produce pneumatophores. The height of the pneumatophores is about 50 cm. H. fomes is the only Heritiera species which produces pneumatophores. Pneumatophores are one type of excessively branched roots that are negatively geotropic and come out of the mud surface to access the atmospheric oxygen. The sapwood is pinkish grey and heartwood dark to radish dark brown. Wood is hard, heavy, and durable. The flowers are unisexual and incorporated in panicles. They consist of 5 stamens fused to form cylinder dumbbell known as pistilloid. Usually the species flowers in March and April. Fruits are light green and become brown with ripening. They are single seeded with fleshy endosperm. Seed size varies between 3–5.5 cm long and 3.5–5 cm wide. Seed shedding occurs during June and July [23].

Another mangrove species named Heritiera littoralis possesses some similar morphological characteristics to H. fomes. H. littoralis (Sterculiaceae) is a tree attaining up to 25–30 feet. Leaves are dark green and occur 10 to 23 cm × 4 to 10 cm broadly elliptic with acute apex having cuneate base. Base may also be rounded or entirely covered beneath with minute silvery hairs. Petioles are brown coloured and become 1.1 to 2.5 cm long. Bark is longitudinally furrowed and young parts covered with stellate hairs. Long buttresses are seen on soil at the bottom of the bole. Flowers are small, much branched, unisexual in tomentose, druping, and axillary panicles in the upper axils. Male flowers are slightly smaller than female flowers. The species flowers from June to August. Fruits are one seeded, 6 to 9 cm long, and 5 to 6 cm wide. Mature fruits are collected during January to April [24].

3. Ethnomedicinal Reports

Ethnomedicine (sometimes synonym for traditional medicine) is known as a subclass of medical anthropology (study of human disease and health care systems), which not only concern with the relevant written documents but also those people whose practice, experience, and knowledge have been verbally transmitted to next generation over the future centuries. Drug discovery and anthropological research are carried out based on scientific ethnomedical studies.

The mangrove forest in Bangladesh is home to various species of fauna and flora and is economically valuable due to supplement of medicinal support besides providing wood and other resources like honey, crabs, and fish. H. fomes has a restricted distribution in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. This species is a well-known mangrove plant for its significant traditional use(s) by the local traditional health practitioners (THPs) against various diseases in the southern areas of Bangladesh. H. fomes leaves, roots, and stems are used by rural people for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, skin diseases, and hepatic disorders [13, 25]. Bark is taken for diabetes and goiter in rural areas [11]. This plant is also used as herbal medicine to cure pain and fever locally (Table 1). People settling in these regions are out of reach of modern medicine.

Part(s) usedMode of preparationMedicinal use(s) in common diseases and featuresDisease categoryReferences

Leaves and SeedsDecoction Diarrhea, dysentery, colic, acidity, indigestion, constipation, stomachache, bloating, and lack of appetiteGastrointestinal disorders [8, 9, 26]

WoodPowder PilesRectal diseases[27]

Stem barkpasteEczema, abscess, boils, acne, infections, scabies, itch, dermatitis, rash, sores, scar, and wartsSkin diseases[8, 26, 28]

BarkHot decoctionDiabetes and goiterDiabetes[11, 13]

TwigToothbrushToothache and oral infectionN/A[29]

According to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, this plant is facing danger and quickly disappearing in many regions because of coastal development. Due to excess-harvesting, diversions of water in Ganges Basin, and salinity fluctuations, this tree is threatened or is facing extinction [33]. This review has been done in attempt towards preservation of the ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal knowledge and in order to protect and document the biodiversity of the Sundarbans.

4. Phytochemical Constituents

Heritiera fomes is a promising mangrove species. In spite of having enormous potential, few reports are available on this species about its biological activities and the active principles accountable for such activities (Table 2). H. fomes contains 0.25% chlorophyll a, 0.09% chlorophyll b, 0.11% carotenoids, 39.45% polyphenols, 21.12% tannins, and titratable acid number (TAN) is 34.50 [30]. The presence of reducing sugars, saponins, alkaloids, glycosides, tannins, steroids, flavonoids, and gums has been demonstrated by phytochemical exploration of leaves extract [25]. Leaf contains 29.22% protein [30]. The bark of H. fomes contains 7–36% tannin [31] and a high content of proanthocyanidins [32]. According to their structures, tannins are distributed into two groups such as water soluble tannins (hydrolysable) and proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins) [34, 35]. Stem bark contains high amount of procyanidins. Trimeric, pentameric, and hexameric procyanidins have been identified from the plant. β-Sitosterol, stigmasterol, and stigmast-4-en-3-one (Figure 3) were also found from the NMR spectroscopy of CHCl3 extract of the H. fomes [12].

Plant PartsPhytochemical constituents reportedReferences

Leaves0.25% chlorophyll a [30]
0.09% chlorophyll b
0.11% carotenoids
39.45% polyphenols
21.12% tannins
29.22% proteins

Phytochemical exploration of leaf extractReducing sugars, saponins, alkaloids, glycosides, tannins, steroids, flavonoids, and gums [25]

Bark7–36% tannin, 
high content of proanthocyanidins
[31, 32]

Stem barkTrimeric, pentameric and hexameric procyanidins [12]

NMR spectroscopy of CHCl3 extract -Sitosterol, stigmasterol, and stigmast-4-en-3-one [12]

5. Pharmacological Activities of Heritiera fomes and Comparison with Other Mangrove Species

A literature survey showed that all plant parts of Heritiera fomes are used in the treatment of different ailments; leaves and seeds are reported for the gastrointestinal disorders (diarrhea, dysentery, constipation, acidity, indigestion, and stomachache) [8, 9, 26]. The bark and stem bark are well-reputed remedies for diabetes and skin diseases (dermatitis, eczema, boils, abscess, acne, sores, and rash) [8, 11, 26]. Local people are seen to use twig to clean teeth and relive cough [29].

Heritiera fomes possesses significant groups of phytochemical constituents that have been described in other plants to have a wide range of pharmacological activities. Plant saponins reportedly have some important biological activities such as spermicidal [36], molluscicidal [37], antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic activities [38, 39]. It has been established that flavonoids reportedly possess antioxidant activity toward a wide variety of oxidizable compound(s) [40]. Several in vitro studies established that flavonoids are able to scavenge various radicals such as hydroxyl, peroxyl, and superoxide radicals and thus block various steps in the arachidonate cascade via lipoxygenase cyclooxygenase-2 [41]. The presence of polyphenols in plant species may be responsible for the prevention of diseases. Actually polyphenols are one of the key constituents of the defense mechanism generated by medicinal plants [42]. They reportedly act as free radical scavengers, antimicrobial, and anticancer agents [43, 44]. Polyphenolic compounds also have the ability to inhibit human platelet aggregation [45].

Various biological activities such as antibacterial, antiherpetic, cytotoxic, antineoplastic, and anthelmintic are exhibited due to the presence of tannins and proanthocyanidins in plants, and they provide defense against herbivores and invading parasites [35, 46]. Proanthocyanidins are flavonoid polymers and supposed to have potential against diarrheal diseases [47, 48]. A number of studies have shown the efficacy of some flavonoids as antidiarrheal agents such as catechins, proanthocyanidins, and proanthocyanidin-rich extracts [49, 50]. They are good antioxidants and can inhibit dysentery caused by Entamoeba histolytica lectin [51] and Shigella dysenteriae toxin [52]. The above discussion provides the rationalization of the ethnomedicinal uses of this plant in various gastrointestinal disorders. So, this plant might be a potential source of antidiarrheal phytomedicines. Free radicals are detrimental because they can take part in various reactions adverse to the body due to their side chain properties. Many life processes produce free radicals [53], and as such, scavenging or reducing the amount of free radicals in the body through phytochemicals can lead to a healthier body system.

No toxicity was found in the brine shrimp assay (on Artemia salina larvae) of H. fomes extracts (10–1000 μg/mL) [12]. Several in vitro studies reveal that the plant possesses significant antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antinociceptive, and anticancer potentials (Table 3).

Solvent extraction and plant part(s) testedObserved activityTest methodReferences

EtOH extracts of leaves.Antinociceptive Hot plate, acetic acid-induced writhings in mice [25]
Antioxidant DPPH radical scavenging assay
Antimicrobial Disk diffusion assay

80% EtOH crude, CHCll3, EtOAc, BuOH, aqueous residue extracts of stem bark, and pure compoundsAntioxidant15-Lipoxygenase inhibition, total phenolic content, and DPPH radical scavenging assay [12]
80% EtOH crude, CHCl3, EtOAc, BuOH, aqueous residue, precipitate extracts of stem bark, and negative control (acetone, MeOH)AntimicrobialAgar disc diffusion method

MeOH extract of barkAntihyperglycemicLowering serum glucose level in hyperglycemic mice following of glucose loading [11]
AntinociceptiveAcetic-acid-induced writhings in mice

MeOH extract of both leaf and stem powderAnticancer activity In vitro cell viability and In vivo screening assay against B16 mouse melanoma and EAC (ehrlich ascites carcinoma) in mice model [13]
chromatography characterizationTLC (qualitative and quantitative DPPH assay), HPLC, 1H NMR, FTIR spectral analysis, and bioautography screening

EtOH extracts of pneumatophores Comparative antibacterial activityMinimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) method [54]

5.1. Antidiabetic Activity

The experimental study reported that bark extracts of Heritiera fomes are effective in mice at the dose of 250 and 500 mg/kg body wt. The extracts (at a dose of 250 mg/kg body weight) reduced the level of serum glucose up to 49.2% at 60 min in Swiss albino mice following glucose loading, while a standard, glibenclamide (at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight) reduced serum glucose by 43.5%. At the dose of 250 and 500 mg/kg body wt, the extracts of Heritiera fomes bark reduced serum glucose levels by 35.6 and 44.7%, respectively, following 120 min of glucose loading, while glibenclamide (at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight) reduced serum glucose level by 30.1% [11].

Daily oral administration of ethanolic extract of leaves of a mangrove species plant, Ceriops decandra, at 120 mg/kg for 30 days to alloxan-induced diabetic rats showed similar results on blood glucose, hemoglobin, acetylated hemoglobin, and liver glycogen similar to the standard antidiabetic drug, glibenclamide [55]. Antidiabetic effect in alloxan-induced diabetic rats has also been observed with extract of leaf powder of the mangrove species, Rhizophora mucronata, Rhizophora apiculata, and Rhizophora annamalayana [56]. A leaf suspension of the black mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum, also reportedly gave antidiabetic effects following administration to alloxan-induced diabetic rats, which effects included decreases in blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, decrease in activities of the enzymes, glucose-6 phosphatase and fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase, and increased activity of liver hexokinase [57].

5.2. Antimicrobial Activity

Heritiera fomes leaf (at doses of 250 μg/disc and 500 μg/disc) exhibited potent antimicrobial activity with the zones of inhibition against tested gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens covering from 3.92 to 7.63 mm; and 7.86 to 13.45 mm, respectively [25].

The bark extracts of H. fomes reported significant antibacterial activities against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, K. rhizophila, and B. subtilis [12].

In vitro, antibacterial comparative study between the pneumatophores of Xylocarpus moluccensis and H. fomes demonstrated similar antibacterial profiles in the most cases presenting the zone of inhibitions >10 mm. Extracts of pneumatophores of H. fomes exhibited a potent zone of inhibition against Enterobacter aerogenes. The diameter of zones of inhibition encompassed between 19 and 21 mm. The MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of H. fomes extract was evaluated by broth dilution method and showed significant minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC = 400 and 500 μg/mL) against Shigella boydii and Shigella sonnei, respectively [54].

5.3. Antioxidant Activity and Various Related Effects

Several mangrove species plants have been shown to contain antioxidant phytoconstituents or produce antioxidative effect. Leaves extract of Heritiera fomes was accessed for both quantitative and qualitative antioxidant activity. Quantitative assay technique was accomplished through DPPH assay (hydrogen donation assay) and qualitative assay was carried out through thin layer chromatographic technique followed by DPPH spray. Leaves extract exhibited significant antioxidant activity with the IC50 (50 percent inhibitory concentration) value of 26.30 μg/mL [25].

Bark extracts of Heritiera fomes showed potent antioxidant activity with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 22 μg/mL and effective concentration (EC50) value of 19.4 μg/mL, respectively [12].

Aqueous extract of bark of Rhizophora mangle has been shown to show a protective action against diclofenac-induced gastric ulcer in rats. The protective effect was attributed to antioxidant activity of the extract, since administration of the extract led to marked increases in glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity and inhibition of lipid peroxidation [58]. Antiulcer activity with bark extract of this plant has also been observed in acetic acid-induced gastric ulcer model in rodents [59]. Three dammarane triterpenes, bruguierins A–C, have been isolated from Bruguiera gymnorrhiza with antioxidative capacity. Additionally, bruguierin A inhibited phorbol ester-induced nuclear factor-κB activation and selectively inhibited cyclooxygenase-2 activity [60]. Butanolic fraction of bark extract of Rhizophora mangle has been shown to give protective action in rats against gastric damage induced by absolute ethanol and ischemia-reperfusion. The protective action has been attributed to polyphenols present in the fraction and their antioxidative effects [61].

Sulfated polysaccharides present in Rhizophora apiculata bark extract has been shown to play a protective role through their free radical scavenging properties against naphthalene-induced mitochondrial dysfunction [62]. Iridoid glucosides and flavones have been isolated from aerial parts of Avicennia marina with α,α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activities [63]. A new acetylated flavanol, 3,7-O-diacetyl (-)-epicatechin, and other flavanol derivatives have been reported from stems and twigs of Rhizophora stylosa. The compounds showed DPPH radical scavenging activities [64]. Flavan-3-ol glycosides and flavan-3-ols with DPPH scavenging activity have also been described from stems of this plant [65]. The total phenolic content and antioxidative activity of methanolic extract of leaves of Rhizophora mucronata have been reported to be very high [66].

Condensed tannins showing antioxidant activity have been isolated from the mangrove species, Kandelia candel and Rhizophora mangle [67]. A 70% acetone extract from the hypocotyls of K. candel and its various fractions of petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and water also reportedly showed DPPH free radical scavenging activity. Further analysis showed that phenolic compounds present within the extract and its various fractions were responsible for the observed activity and these compounds contained a large number of procyanidins and a small amount of prodelphinidins, and epicatechin was the main extension unit [68]. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects have been observed with leaf extract of Lumnitzera racemosa, which activities have been attributed to phenolic groups, terpenoids and alkaloids in the extract [69].

Antioxidant activities as measured by DPPH radical scavenging and other assays have been reported for bark extract of Bruguiera cylindrica and Ceriops decandra [70]. Antioxidant activities like restoring the levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) and the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), along with significant inhibition of both lipid peroxidation and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, have been seen with administration of methanolic extract of Acanthus ilicifolius leaf extract in different models of gastric ulceration. It has been hypothesized that gastroprotective action of the extract was due to its antioxidant properties [71]. Jacaranone analogs, marinoids F-1 (1–4) have been reported from fruits of Avicennia marina, with one of the isolates (4) showing good antioxidant activity [72].

5.4. Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Oral administration of Heritiera fomes bark extracts (at doses of 100, 250, and 500 mg/kg) significantly reduced the number of inhibition of acetic acid-induced writhings in mice by 8.5, 26.4, and 43.4%, respectively, while aspirin (250 mg/kg) used as reference drug showed 20.9% writhing inhibition [11].

Leaf extracts of Heritiera fomes (at the doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg body wt) significantly () showed 34.83% and 59.20% writhing inhibition, respectively, while diclofenac sodium (25 mg/kg) used as reference drug showed 70.65% writhing inhibition. In hot plate test method, leaf extracts (500 mg/kg) exhibited highest nociceptive inhibition and took more time for reaction that was comparable to morphine sulfate (standard drug) at the dose of 5 mg/kg [25].

Lupeol has been reported from the mangrove species, Sonneratia apetala [73]. Antinociceptive property has been described for this compound [74]. Betulinic acid has been reported from both Sonneratia apetala [73] and Ceriops tagal [75]. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyrexic effects of this compound isolated from Tetracera potatoria have been reported [76]. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) activity (which can result in analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis) has been reported for bruguierin A, isolated from Bruguiera gymnorrhiza [60]. The aqueous extract and polyphenolic fractions of Rhizophora mangle has also been shown to inhibit COX-2 activity [77].

Diterpenoids isolated from stems and twigs of Excoecaria agallocha showed anti-inflammatory potency to suppress expression of nuclear factor-κB and AP-1 targeted genes including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mouse macrophages Raw 264.7 cells [78]. The anti-inflammatory effect of Cerbera manghas methanol extract has been shown to be due to presence of kaempferol in the extract [79].

5.5. Anticancer Activity

Phytochemical assessment of the leaves extract of Heritiera fomes reported the existence of saponins, reducing sugars, alkaloids, glycosides, flavonoids, tannins, steroids, and gums [25]. In addition, proanthocyanidins (bioactive compounds, present in various medicinal plants including Heritiera fomes) reportedly possess antiviral, antibacterial, enzyme inhibiting, antioxidant, and anticarcinogen properties [53, 80, 81]. Both leaves and stems extract of Heritiera fomes demonstrated anticancer properties against B16 mouse melanoma (in vitro system) with 40% inhibition and EAC (Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma) in Swiss albino mice (in vivo system) [13].

Methanolic extract of Rhizophora apiculata has been evaluated for its anti-inflammatory and antitumor activity against B16F10 melanoma cells in BALB/c mice. Administration of extract led to inhibition of solid tumor development in mice. Extract treatment significantly reduced tumor cell GSH, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and nitric oxide (NO) levels in the tumor bearing animals. Analysis of the extract revealed presence of 4-pyrrolidinyl, pyrazole, and ketone derivatives [82].

Several other mangrove species have been reported with anticancer potential. Antitumor activity of 3-chlorodeoxylapachol, a naphthoquinone obtained from Avicennia germinans has been demonstrated [83]. Cytotoxicity of limonoids isolated from seeds of Xylocarpus granatum against P-388 and A-549 tumor cell lines has been reported [84]. Gedunin is a limonoid isolated from the same plant demonstrated inhibition of growth of CaCo-2 colon cancer cell line in vitro [85]. Another limonoid, xylomexicanin A, isolated from the same plant, demonstrated antiproliferative activity against human breast carcinoma, KT cells [86]. Black tea extract of Ceriops decandra has been shown to prevent dimethyl benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced buccal pouch carcinogenesis in hamsters [87].

Patriscabratine and tetracosane, isolated from the Bangladesh mangrove fern, Acrostichum aureum, reportedly showed moderately cytotoxic activity against AGS, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells, and AGS, MDA-MB-231, HT-29, and NIH 3T3 cells, respectively [88]. The sesquiterpene, (2R, 3S)-sulfated pterosin C, isolated from the same fern demonstrated an apoptotic effect on AGS cells within 24 hours of treatment [89]. Methanolic extract of Rhizophora apiculata reportedly inhibited B16F-10 melanoma induced lung metastasis in C57BL/6 mice [90]. Taken together, the various reports indicate that mangrove species plants may be good sources of potential anticancer drugs.

6. Future Prospects for Medicinal Discoveries

This review revealed that H. fomes possesses significant pharmacological potential and chemical constituents and rural people living beside the Sundarbans use this plant to treat a wide spectrum of human ailments. It is necessary to accumulate this indigenous knowledge by proper documentation and preserve it for future research. In spite of having promising biological and pharmacological potentials, there are only few reports are available on this plant. More research is required on the phytochemical constituents of this plant. This review will help the future researchers in discovering new therapeutic agents as the plant possesses propitious biological and pharmacological potentials.

Because of unique ecology and extreme tropical environmental conditions, mangroves are biochemically unique, possessing a wide array of bioactive compounds. They are the prime source of novel compounds having multifarious pharmacological activities. Compounds that are isolated from the mangrove species has the potential to act as lead compounds for drug discovery. In spite of having enormous ethnomedicinal and folklore applications, these plants remain unexplored.

Mangrove plants contain secondary metabolites like alkaloids, phenolics, steroids, and terpenoids with pharmacological, ecological, and toxicological importance, for instance, phytoconstituents (alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, phenolics and saponins of two mangrove species, Avicennia marina, and Avicennia officinalis, have reported antimicrobial properties) [91]. An in vitro investigation demonstrated the presence of saponins, flavonoids, phenols, polyphenols, tannins, and reducing sugars in Heritiera fomes. Some of these compounds like flavonoids, phenols, and polyphenols can act as antioxidants and scavenge free radicals [92, 93]. Some highly reactive free radicals like nitrogen and oxygen species (RNS, ROS) have the potential to cause oxidative injury to DNA, proteins, lipids, and resulting in various diseases [94]. Antioxidants give protection to cells against oxidative damage [95]. Proanthocyanidins and its metabolites and hydroxylated phenolic acids have high antioxidant activity [96, 97]. An investigation acknowledged that proanthocyanidin-rich products and proanthocyanidins possess substantial RNS/ROS scavenging activity [53]. Due to the presence of high amount of procyanidins, the plant (Heritiera fomes) can act both as radical scavenger and 15-LO inhibitor. A derivative of procyanidin B2 reportedly acted against human promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60) and melanoma cell line [98]. Mixture of procyanidins reportedly induced cytotoxic activity in human squamous cell carcinoma [99]. From the above discussion it is clear that the plant may serve as a good source of anticancer phytomedicines.

Since the plant possesses significant biological and pharmacological activity it should be explored for its medicinal value at molecular level by using various modern scientific techniques. The plant has a wide array of biological and pharmacological potentials and many of the isolated compounds and synthetic analogues of Heritiera fomes merit further research.

7. Conclusion

Several in vitro studies established that the plant possesses significant antioxidant, antinociceptive, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and anticancer activities. It is very necessary to isolate the bioactive compounds responsible for these activities. In this regard, systematic approaches such as bioassay-guided fractionation can be considered. The present study should serve as a basis and an important tool for future chemical screening and biological assays and should open new perspectives for new drug discovery.


DMBA:Dimethyl benz[a]anthracene
EAC:Ehrlich ascites carcinoma
GGT:γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase
GSH:Reduced glutathione
GPX:Glutathione peroxidase
HL-60:Human promyelocytic leukemia cells
IUCN:International Union for Conservation of Nature
NMR:Nuclear magnetic resonance
NO:Nitric oxide
RNS:Reactive nitrogen species
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
SOD:Superoxide dismutase
TAN:Titratable acid number
THPs:Traditional health practitioners
TNF-α:Tumor necrosis factor-α.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

All authors contributed to the paper draft, which was again read and edited by all authors. All authors approved the final version of the paper.


  1. A. Ghani, Medicinal Plants of Bangladesh: Chemical Constituents and Uses, Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1998.
  2. M. Spalding, “The global distribution and status of mangrove ecosystems,” in International News Letter of Coastal Management-Intercoast Network, pp. 20–21, 1st edition, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  3. K. Kathiresan and V. Ravi, “Seasonal changes in tannin content of mangrove leaves,” Indian Forester, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 390–392, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  4. W. M. Bandaranayake, “Traditional and medicinal uses of mangroves,” Mangroves and Salt Marshes, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 133–148, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Premanathan, H. Nakashima, K. Kathiresan, N. Rajendran, and N. Yamamoto, “In Vitro anti human immunodeficiency virus activity of mangrove plants,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 103, pp. 278–281, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. A. Shilpi, M. E. Islam, M. Billah et al., “Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic activity of mangrove plants: a mini review,” Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 2012, Article ID 576086, 7 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. K. Pasha and N. A. Siddiqui, “Sundarbans,” in Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh, I. Sirajul, Ed., Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. A. H. Mollik, M. S. H. Hossan, A. K. Paul, M. Taufiq-Ur-Rahman, R. Jahan, and M. Rahmatullah, “A comparative analysis of medicinal plants used by folk medicinal healers in three districts of Bangladesh and inquiry as to mode of selection of medicinal plants,” Ethnobotany Research and Applications, vol. 8, pp. 195–218, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. K. Patra and H. N. Thatoi, “Metabolic diversity and bioactivity screening of mangrove plants: a review,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1051–1061, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Wangensteen, M. Alamgir, G. M. Duong, T. E. Gronhaug, A. B. Samuelsen, and K. E. Malterud, “Chemical and biological studies of medicinal plants from the Sundarbans mangrove forest,” in Advances in Phytotherapy Research, M. Eddouks, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 59–78, Research Signpost, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Ali, K. Nahar, M. Sintaha et al., “An evaluation of antihyperglycemic and antinociceptive effects of methanol extract of Heritiera fomes Buch- Ham. (Sterculiaceae) barks in Swiss albino mice,” Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 116–121, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  12. H. Wangensteen, H. C. T. Dang, S. J. Uddin, M. Alamgir, and K. E. Malterud, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of the mangrove tree Heritiera fomes,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 371–376, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. K. Patra and H. Thatoi, “Anticancer activity and chromatography characterization of methanol extract of Heritiera fomes Buch. Ham., a mangrove plant from Bhitarkanika, India,” Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. A. H. Mollik, M. R. Faruque, M. Badruddaza, A. Chowdhury, and M. S. Rahman, “Medicinal plants from Sundarbans used for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: a pragmatic randomized ethnobotanical survey in Khulna division of Bangladesh,” European Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 231–232, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. Pattanaik, C. S. Reddy, N. K. Dhal, and R. Das, “Utilisation of mangrove forests in Bhitarkanika wildlife sanctuary, Orissa,” Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 598–603, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  16. H. M. Burkill, The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa. 2nd Edition. Volume 5, Families S-Z, Addenda, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK, 2000.
  17. S. Tewtrakul, P. Tansakul, C. Daengrot, C. Ponglimanont, and C. Karalai, “Anti-inflammatory principles from Heritiera littoralis bark,” Phytomedicine, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 851–855, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. H. Miles, D. Lho, A. A. De La Cruz, E. D. Gomez, J. A. Weeks, and J. L. Atwood, “Toxicants from mangrove plants. 3. Heritol, a novel ichthyotoxin from the mangrove plant Heritiera littoralis,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 2930–2932, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  19. N. Bhargava, “Ethnobotanical studies of the tribes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. I. Onge,” Economic Botany, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 110–119, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. F. Dahdouh-Guebas, S. Collin, D. Lo Seen et al., “Analysing ethnobotanical and fishery-related importance of mangroves of the East-Godavari Delta (Andhra Pradesh, India) for conservation and management purposes,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 2, p. 24, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Mitra and K. Banerjee, “Pigments of Heritiera fomes seedlings under different salinity conditions: perspective sea level rise,” Mesopotamian Journal of Marine Science, vol. 25, pp. 1–10, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. A. Rahman, “Diseases and disorders of mangroves and their management,” in Proceedings of the National Workshop on Management of Mangrove, Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, Chittagong, Bangladesh, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  23. N. A. Siddiqi, Mangrove Forestry in Bangladesh, Institute of Forestry & Environmental Science University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh, 2001.
  24. S. S. Shaikh, M. V. Gokhale, and N. S. Chavan, “A report on the existence of Heritiera littoralis Dryand. On the coast of Maharashtra,” The Bioscan, vol. 2, pp. 293–295, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. A. Hossain, S. Panthi, M. Asadujjaman, S. R. Khan, F. Ferdous, and S. K. Sadhu, “Phytochemical and pharmacological assessment of the ethanol leaves extract of Heritiera fomes Buch. Ham. (Family- Sterculiaceae),” Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines, vol. 2, pp. 95–101, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. H. Md. Mahabub Nawaz, M. Hossain, M. Karim, M. Khan, R. Jahan, and M. Rahmatullah, “An ethnobotanical survey of Jessore district in Khulna division, Bangladesh,” American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 238–243, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. Parikh and H. Datye, Sustainable Management of Wetlands: Biodiversity and Beyond, SAGE Publications, New Delhi, India, 2003.
  28. H. N. Thatoi and A. K. Biswal, “Mangroves of Orissa Coast: floral diversity and conservation status,” in Special Habitats and Threatened Plants of India, vol. 11, pp. 201–207, ENVIS Centre on Wildlife & Protected Areas, Uttarakhand, India, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. Rahmatullah, S. M. I. Sadeak, S. C. Bachar et al., “Brine shrimp toxicity study of different Bangladeshi medicinal plants,” Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–167, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  30. U. C. Basak, A. B. Das, and P. Das, “Chlorophylls, carotenoids, proteins and secondary metabolites in leaves of 14 species of mangrove,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 654–659, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  31. K. Naskar and D. N. Guhabakshi, Mangrove Swamps of Sunderbans, An Ecological Perspective, Naya Prakash, Calcutta, India, 1987.
  32. H. C. T. Dang, Antioxidants in Heritiera fomes, a medicinal plant from the Mangrove Forest of Bangladesh [M.S. thesis], School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 2007.
  33. W. Kotowski, T. Okruszko, M. Edward, J. Szatylowicz, and D. Miroslaw-Swiatek, “Wetlands: monitoring, modelling and management,” in Proceedings of the International Conference W3M Wetlands: Modelling, Monitoring, Management,, pp. 22–25, Taylor & Francis, Wierzba, Poland, September 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. Scalbert, “Antimicrobial properties of tannins,” Phytochemistry, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 3875–3883, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  35. H. A. Stafford, “Proanthocyanidins and the lignin connection,” Phytochemistry, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  36. B. S. Setty, V. P. Kamboj, H. S. Garg, and N. M. Khanna, “Spermicidal potential of saponins isolated from Indian medicinal plants,” Contraception, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 571–578, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. Marston and K. Hostettmann, “Review article number 6. Plant molluscicides,” Phytochemistry, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 639–652, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. B. Mahato, S. K. Sarkar, and G. Podder, “Triterpene saponins,” Phytochemistry, vol. 24, pp. 939–952, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. B. Mahato, S. K. Sarkar, and G. Poddar, “Triterpenoid saponins,” Phytochemistry, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 3037–3067, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  40. R. A. Larson, “The antioxidants of higher plants,” Phytochemistry, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 969–978, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  41. J. Alanko, A. Riutta, P. Holm, I. Mucha, H. Vapaatalo, and T. Metsä-Ketelä, “Modulation of arachidonic acid metabolism by phenols: relation to their structure and antioxidant/prooxidant properties,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 193–201, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. M. Bandaranayake, Economic, Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Mangroves, Australian Institute of Marine Science Townsville, Townsville , Australia, 1999.
  43. F. Shahidi and P. K. Wanasundara, “Phenolic antioxidants,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67–103, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  44. C. Sánchez-Moreno, J. A. Larrauri, and F. Saura-Calixto, “Free radical scavenging capacity and inhibition of lipid oxidation of wines, grape juices and related polyphenolic constituents,” Food Research International, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 407–412, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G.-J. Fan, B.-H. Han, Y.-H. Kang, and M.-K. Park, “Evaluation of inhibitory potentials of chinese medicinal plants on platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor binding,” Natural Product Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 33–37, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  46. H. H. S. Fong, M. Tin-Wa, and N. R. Farnsworth, “Phytochemical screening,” in Practical Manual For Phytochemical Screening, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  47. B. Adzu, S. Amos, M. B. Amizan, and K. Gamaniel, “Evaluation of the antidiarrhoeal effects of Zizyphus spina-christi stem bark in rats,” Acta Tropica, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 245–250, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. H. Atta and S. M. Mouneir, “Antidiarrhoeal activity of some Egyptian medicinal plant extracts,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 92, no. 2-3, pp. 303–309, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. E. Gabriel, S. E. Davenport, R. J. Steagall, V. Vimal, T. Carlson, and E. J. Rozhon, “A novel plant-derived inhibitor of cAMP-mediated fluid and chloride secretion,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. G58–G63, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. Schuier, H. Sies, B. Illek, and H. Fischer, “Cocoa-related flavonoids inhibit CFTR-mediated chloride transport across T84 human colon epithelia,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 135, no. 10, pp. 2320–2325, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  51. S. Rawal, S. Majumdar, V. Dhawan, and H. Vohra, “Entamoeba histolytica Gal/GalNAc lectin depletes antioxidant defences of target epithelial cells,” Parasitology, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 617–624, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Kaur, S. Singh, V. Dhawan, and N. K. Ganguly, “Shigella dysenteriae type 1 toxin induced lipid peroxidation in enterocytes isolated from rabbit ileum,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 178, no. 1-2, pp. 169–179, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. R. Beecher, “Proanthocyanidins: biological activities associated with human health,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 42, pp. 2–20, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Mondal, S. K. Paul, S. J. Uddin, L. Nahar, A. A. Auzi, and S. D. Sarker, “A comparative study on the in vitro antibacterial activity of the pneumatophores of Heritiera fomes and Xylocarpus moluccensis,” Ars Pharmaceutica, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  55. M. A. Nabeel, K. Kathiresan, and S. Manivannan, “Antidiabetic activity of the mangrove species Ceriops decandra in alloxan-induced diabetic rats,” Journal of Diabetes, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97–103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. N. M. Alikunhi, K. Kandasamy, C. Manoharan, and M. Subramanian, “Insulin-like antigen of mangrove leaves and its anti-diabetic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic rats,” Natural Product Research, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1161–1166, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Gurudeeban, K. Satyavani, T. Ramanathan, and T. Balasubramanian, “Antidiabetic effect of a black mangrove species Aegiceras corniculatum in alloxan-induced diabetic rats,” Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. B. Berenguer, L. M. Sánchez, A. Quílez et al., “Protective and antioxidant effects of Rhizophora mangle L. against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. F. M. De-Faria, A. C. A. Almeida, A. Luiz-Ferreira et al., “Mechanisms of action underlying the gastric antiulcer activity of the Rhizophora mangle L.,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 234–243, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Homhual, N. Bunyapraphatsara, T. Kondratyuk et al., “Bioactive dammarane triterpenes from the mangrove Plant Bruguiera gymnorrhiza,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 421–424, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. F. M. De-Faria, A. C. A. Almeida, A. Luiz-Ferreira et al., “Antioxidant action of mangrove polyphenols against gastric damage induced by absolute ethanol and ischemia-reperfusion in the rat,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 327071, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. Vijayavel, C. Anbuselvam, and M. P. Balasubramanian, “Free radical scavenging activity of the marine mangrove Rhizophora apiculata bark extract with reference to naphthalene induced mitochondrial dysfunction,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 163, no. 1-2, pp. 170–175, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Y. Feng, X. Li, X. Duan, and B. Wang, “Iridoid glucosides and flavones from the aerial parts of Avicennia marina,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 799–806, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. D. Li, X. Li, Z. Peng, and B. Wang, “Flavanol derivatives from Rhizophora stylosa and their DPPH radical scavenging activity,” Molecules, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1163–1169, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. K. Takara, A. Kuniyoshi, K. Wada, K. Kinjyo, and H. Iwasaki, “Antioxidative flavan-3-ol glycosides from stems of Rhizophora stylosa,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 2191–2194, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. N. Suganthy, P. Kesika, S. K. Pandian, and K. P. Devi, “Mangrove plant extracts: radical scavenging activity and the battle against food-borne pathogens,” Forschende Komplementarmedizin, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Zhang, Y. Lin, H. Zhou, S. Wei, and J. Chen, “Condensed tannins from mangrove species Kandelia candel and Rhizophora mangle and their antioxidant activity,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 420–431, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. D. Wei, H. C. Zhou, and Y. M. Lin, “Antioxidant activities of extract and fractions from the hypocotyls of the mangrove plant Kandelia candel,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 4080–4093, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. Ravikumar and M. Gnanadesigan, “Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of a mangrove plant Lumnitzera racemosa,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 348–352, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Krishnamoorthy, J. M. Sasikumar, R. Shamna, C. Pandiarajan, P. Sofia, and B. Nagarajan, “Antioxidant activities of bark extract from mangroves, Bruguiera cylindrica (L.) Blume and Ceriops decandra Perr,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 557–562, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. K. T. M. Senthil Kumar, Z. Puia, S. K. Samanta et al., “The gastroprotective role of Acanthus ilicifolius: a study to Unravel the underlying mechanism of anti-ulcer activity,” Scientia Pharmaceutica, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 701–717, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. X. X. Yi, Y. Chen, W. P. Xie et al., “Four new jacaranone analogs from the fruits of a Beibu Gulf mangrove Avicennia marina,” Marine Drugs, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2515–2525, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Q. Ji, W. Lin, J. Li et al., “Chemical investigation of Chinese mangrove Sonneratia apetala II,” Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 1258–1260, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  74. F. O. de Lima, V. Alves, J. M. B. Filho et al., “Antinociceptive effect of lupeol: evidence for a role of cytokines inhibition,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1557–1563, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y. Zhang, Z. Deng, T. Gao, H. Fu, and W. Lin, “Chemical constituents from the mangrove plant Ceriops tagal,” Yaoxue Xuebao, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 935–939, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  76. B. O. Oyebanji, A. B. Saba, and O. A. Oridupa, “Studies on the anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyrexic activities of betulinic acid derived from Tetracera potatoria,” The African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 11, pp. 30–33, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  77. E. Marrero, J. Sánchez, E. de Armas et al., “COX-2 and sPLA2 inhibitory activity of aqueous extract and polyphenols of Rhizophora mangle (red mangrove),” Fitoterapia, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 313–315, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Y. Li, J. Liu, S. Yu, P. Proksch, J. Gu, and W. Lin, “TNF-α inhibitory diterpenoids from the Chinese mangrove plant Excoecaria agallocha L.,” Phytochemistry, vol. 71, no. 17-18, pp. 2124–2131, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. H. Y. Jeong, G. H. Sung, J. H. Kim et al., “Syk and Src are major pharmacological targets of a Cerbera manghas methanol extract with kaempferol-based anti-inflammatory activity,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 960–969, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. P. M. Aron and J. A. Kennedy, “Flavan-3-ols: nature, occurrence and biological activity,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 79–104, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. X. Han, T. Shen, and H. Lou, “Dietary polyphenols and their biological significance,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 950–988, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. V. Vinod Prabhu and C. Guruvayoorappan, “Anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor activity of the marine mangrove Rhizophora apiculata,” Journal of Immunotoxicology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 341–352, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. W. P. Jones, T. Lobo-Echeverri, Q. Mi et al., “Antitumour activity of 3-chlorodeoxylapachol, a naphthoquinone from Avicennia germinans collected from an experimental plot in southern Florida,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1101–1108, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Yin, X. Wang, C. Fan, L. Lin, J. Ding, and J. Yue, “Limonoids from the seeds of the marine mangrove Xylocarpus granatum,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 682–685, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. J. Uddin, L. Nahar, J. A. Shilpi et al., “Gedunin, a limonoid from Xylocarpus granatum, inhibits the growth of CaCo-2 colon cancer cell line in vitro,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 757–761, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. L. Shen, M. Dong, D. Guo et al., “Xylomexicanins A and B, new Δ14,15-mexicanolides from seeds of the Chinese mangrove Xylocarpus granatum,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung C, vol. 64, no. 1-2, pp. 37–42, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  87. N. Sithranga Boopathy, K. Kathiresan, and Y. J. Jeon, “Effect of mangrove black tea extract from Ceriops decandra (Griff.) on hematology and biochemical changes in dimethyl benz[a]anthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 193–200, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. J. Uddin, D. Grice, and E. Tiralongo, “Evaluation of cytotoxic activity of patriscabratine, tetracosane and various flavonoids isolated from the Bangladeshi medicinal plant Acrostichum aureum,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1276–1280, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. S. J. Uddin, T. L. H. Jason, K. D. Beattie, I. D. Grice, and E. Tiralongo, “(2S,3S)-sulfated pterosin C, a cytotoxic sesquiterpene from the Bangladeshi mangrove fern Acrostichum aureum,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 2010–2013, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. V. Vinod Prabhu and C. Guruvayoorappan, “Inhibition of metastatic lung cancer in C57BL/6 mice by marine mangrove Rhizophora apiculata,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1833–1840, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. R. Shanmugapriya, T. Ramanathan, and G. Renugadevi, “Phytochemical characterization and antimicrobial efficiency of mangrove plants Avicennia marina and Avicennia officinalis,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biological Archive, vol. 3, pp. 348–351, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  92. Y. Song, S. W. Jeong, W. S. Lee et al., “Determination of polyphenol components of Korean prostrate spurge (Euphorbia supina) by using liquid chromatography—Tandem mass spectrometry: overall contribution to antioxidant activity,” Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2014, Article ID 418690, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. W. Xi, B. Fang, Q. Zhao, B. Jiao, and Z. Zhou, “Flavonoid composition and antioxidant activities of Chinese local pummelo (Citrus grandis Osbeck.) varieties,” Food Chemistry, vol. 161, pp. 230–238, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. D. Bagchi, M. Bagchi, S. J. Stohs et al., “Free radicals and grape seed proanthocyanidin extract: importance in human health and disease prevention,” Toxicology, vol. 148, no. 2-3, pp. 187–197, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. B. Halliwell, J. M. C. Gutteridge, and C. E. Cross, “Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?” Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 598–620, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  96. C. A. Rice-Evans, N. J. Miller, and G. Paganga, “Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 933–956, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. W. Bors and C. Michel, “Chemistry of the antioxidant effect of polyphenols,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 957, pp. 57–69, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  98. C. Santos-Buelga and A. Scalbert, “Proanthocyanidins and tannin-like compounds-Nature, occurrence, dietary intake and effects on nutrition and health,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1094–1117, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  99. H. Ito, E. Kobayashi, Y. Takamatsu et al., “Polyphenols from Eriobotrya japonica and their cytotoxicity against human oral tumor cell lines,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 687–693, 2000. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Imran Mahmud et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.