Research Article | Open Access

# Dynamic Behavior of a One-Dimensional Wave Equation with Memory and Viscous Damping

**Academic Editor:**Y. Dimakopoulos

#### Abstract

We study the dynamic behavior of a one-dimensional wave equation with both exponential polynomial kernel memory and viscous damping under the Dirichlet boundary condition. By introducing some new variables, the time-variant system is changed into a time-invariant one. The detailed spectral analysis is presented. It is shown that all eigenvalues of the system approach a line that is parallel to the imaginary axis. The residual and continuous spectral sets are shown to be empty. The main result is the spectrum-determined growth condition that is one of the most difficult problems for infinite-dimensional systems. Consequently, an exponential stability is concluded.

#### 1. Introduction

It is known that viscoelastic materials have been widely used in mechanics, chemical engineering, architecture, traffic, information, and so on. More and more researchers have paid close attention to the dynamic behavior and control of vibration for elastic structures with viscoelasticity over the past several decades. The most widely used models for viscoelasticity are the Boltzmann model and Kelvin-Voigt model. For instance, the results concerning the exponential asymptotic stability of a linear hyperbolic integrodifferential equation in Hilbert space are established in [1], which is an abstract version of the equation of motion for dynamic linear viscoelastic solids. In [2, 3], the exponential stabilities of a vibrating beam with one segment made of viscoelastic material of a Kelvin-Voigt type and a vibrating string with Boltzmann damping are proved under certain hypotheses of the smoothness and structural condition of the coefficients of the system. In [4], the global existence and exponential decay of solutions of a nonlinear unidimensional wave equation with a viscoelastic boundary condition are analyzed under some assumptions. Spectral analyses of a wave equation with internal Kelvin-Voigt damping and Boltzmann damping are considered in [5, 6], respectively. The Riesz basis property of the generalized eigenfunctions of a one-dimensional hyperbolic system which is a heat equation incorporating the effect of thermomechanical coupling and the effect of inertia is studied in [7]. In [8], a detailed spectral analysis for a heat equation system which is derived from a thermoelastic equation with memory type is presented and the spectrum-determined growth condition and strong exponential stability are then concluded. Similar studies from different aspects for elastic structures with viscoelasticity can also be found in [9â€“14] and the references therein.

In this paper, we are interested in the following one-dimensional wave equation with viscoelastic damping under the Dirichlet boundary condition: where and are positive constants and the kernel is taken as the finite sum of exponential polynomials: and we assume that, for simplicity,

Our interest is to investigate the dynamic behavior of (1)-(2), particularly the large time behavior. The asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues of the system is discussed in detail. It is shown that the system operator is of compact resolvent and hence its spectrum consists of isolated eigenvalues of finite algebraic multiplicity only. All eigenvalues approach a line that is parallel to the imaginary axis. The main result is the spectrum-determined growth condition which is one of the most difficult problems for infinite-dimensional systems. Consequently, a strongly exponential stability is concluded.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some new variables so that the system (1) with kernel (2) is reduced to be a time-invariant one. Section 3 is devoted to the detailed spectral analysis of the newly formulated system. The main result is the spectrum-determined growth condition that is presented in Section 4; finally, a strongly exponential stability is obtained.

#### 2. System Operator Setup

Introduce Then satisfies Thus, we can rewrite the systems (1) and (2) as Obviously, the system (6) is a time-invariant system. The energy function of (6) is given by Motivated by the energy function, it is natural to consider the system (6) in the following Hilbert space equipped with the inner product, , Now, define the system operator by Then (6) can be formulated as an abstract evolution equation in as where is the state variable and is the initial value.

Lemma 1. *Let be defined by (10). Then exists and hence , the resolvent set of . Moreover, generates a -semigroup on .*

*Proof. *Let . Solve for ; that is,
to give
Set , together with the boundary condition to obtain
where
Collecting (13), (15), and (16), we get the unique solution to (12). Hence, and exists, or .

Now, we show that can generate a -semigroup on . Actually, for any , we have
where we have used the fact . Let
Then we have
And, hence, . Therefore, by the Lumer-Phillips theorem [15, p.14, Theorem 4.3], generates a -semigroup of contractions on ; thus is an infinitesimal generator of a -semigroup by the perturbation theory of semigroup [15, p.76, Theorem 1.1].

#### 3. Spectral Analysis of System Operator

In this section, we investigate the distribution of spectrum of in the complex plane. Firstly, we consider the eigenvalue problem.

Suppose that for and ; that is,

Proposition 2. *Let be defined as in (10). Then , are eigenvalues of , which are corresponding to eigenfunctions , respectively, where is a constant function whose element is the th element of the canonical basis of . Moreover, each of these eigenvalues is algebraically simple.*

*Proof. *We only give the proof for because other cases can be treated similarly. Let and the eigenvalue problem becomes
From the third equation of (22), it has . This in turn, together with the fourth equation of (22), yields
and, by (3), we arrive at
By the first and the second equations of (22), these yield
Therefore, is an eigenfunction of corresponding to . Further computation of , where , yields
We claim that (26) has no solution since must satisfy
which is impossible. Hence is algebraically simple. The proof is complete.

When , it follows from (21) that And satisfies

Lemma 3. *Let be defined by (10); then for any and , .*

*Proof. *Firstly, we show that Re. When , (29) gives
Multiply by , the conjugate of , and integrate over with respect to for the equation to give
That is,
Replace in the above formula to get
Let the real and imaginary parts of the equation equal zero to obtain
If , from the first equation of (34), then it has
If , from the second equation of (34), then we have
so

Secondly, we prove that . We use contradiction argument. Suppose that ; letting , from (34), we have
From the second equation, we obtain or . If holds, it has ; then, from (28), we have . Hence, it has only . This is a contradiction. The proof is complete.

Now, we give the asymptotic fundamental solutions of (29) as .

Lemma 4. *Suppose that and , , where stands for the point spectrum set of . Then and are linearly independent fundamental solutions of , and
**
as has the following asymptotic fundamental solutions:
**
where
*

*Proof. *The first claim is trivial. We only need to show that (40) is the asymptotic fundamental solution of (39). This can be done along the same way of Birkhoff [16] and Naimark [17]. Here we present briefly a simple calculation to (40). Let
where and , , are some functions to be determined, and
Substitute and into , respectively, to yield
where
Moreover, there exists some positive constant such that
Thus, letting the coefficients of and be zero gives
where is given by (41).

Now, use the condition , to get
These are the expressions of (41). When is large enough, we can obtain the linearly independent asymptotic fundamental solutions of (39) given by (40) (see [16]):
The proof is complete.

Assume that and , and let where , are given by (40). Then substitute the above into the boundary conditions of (29) to obtain where Hence (29) admits nontrivial solution if and only if and the eigenvalues of (29) are the zeros of (53). Notice that where and is given in Lemma 4.

Therefore produces which further leads to At last, the solutions of are Apply the RouchÃ© theorem to (57) to give the solutions of (57) as follows:

We summarize the above analysis as the following Theorem.

Theorem 5. *The eigenvalues of (29) have the following asymptotic expressions:
**
especially,
**
That is, is the asymptote of the eigenvalues given by (60). Furthermore, the corresponding eigenfunctions , have the asymptotic expressions
**
Moreover, and are approximately normalized in in the sense that there exist positive constants and independent of such that, for ,
*

*Proof. *From above statement, (60) has been proved. We only need to show (62)-(63) to be valid. Since , , in view of (52) and (60), Lemma 4, and some facts in linear algebra, the eigenfunction corresponding to the eigenvalue is given by
Owing to the fact of (60) that
(62) is hence proved by taking
Finally,
These give (63). The proof is complete.

The following result is the consequence of Theorem 5 and Proposition 2.

Theorem 6. *Let be defined as in (10). Then*(i)* has the eigenvalues
*â€‰*where have the asymptotic expressions (60),*(ii)*the eigenfunction corresponding to is for any ;*(iii)*the eigenfunctions corresponding to and are given by
**for , respectively, where and is given by
*

Concerning about , we have Theorem 7.

Theorem 7. *Let be defined as in (10). Then and are empty sets, where and denote the set of residual and continuous spectrum of , respectively.*

*Proof. *We need only to prove that , when . Letting , then . Solve for and ; that is,
to get
and so
Set
Then we can write (71) as
where
Hence (75) can be rewritten as the following first-order system of differential equations:
Let
Then it has
where
and is given by
The general solution of (77) is then found to be
Since , it has
When , (83) and (84) reduce to the eigenvalue problem
So, when , , if and only if , that is,
which yields
This is the characteristic determinant of , which has the asymptotic form given by (60).

Now, since , it has
By the boundary condition , we have
Hence is uniquely determined by (83) and . Once is known, and are also uniquely determined by (72). So