Review Article

Returning for HIV Test Results: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators

Table 2

(a) Quality assessment of cross-sectional studies. (b) Quality assessment of longitudinal studies.
(a)

StudySelection ComparabilityOutcomeTotal (/10)
Representativeness Sample sizeNonrespondentsAscertaining of exposureAssessment of outcome Statistical test

Bell et al. (1997) [42]3
Bergenstrom et al. (2007) [14]6
Catania et al. (1990) [15]6
Chan et al. (2007) [41]7
Dinh et al. (2005) [17]6
Ellen et al. (2004) [18]7
Erbelding et al. (2004) [19]8
Healey et al. (2010) [20]5
Hong et al. (2011) [8]8
Kawichai et al. (2006) [43]8
Kinsler et al. (2007) [22]8
Laanani et al. (2015) [10]8
Mmbaga et al. (2009) [26]8
Molitor et al. (1999) [27]8
Pahlavan et al. (2015) [11]7
Sesay and Chien (2012) [30]7
Slutsker et al. (1992) [12]8
Sorin et al. (1996) [31]8
Melo et al. (2012) [32]9
Stein and Nyamathi (2000) [33]6
Sullivan et al. (2004) [34]8
Tao et al. (1999) [35]7
Valdiserri et al. (1993) [36]8
Van De Ven et al. (2000) [37]4
Wiley et al. (1998) [38]7
Wimonsate et al. (2011) [13]8

(b)

StudySelectionComparabilityOutcomeTotal (/9)
RepresentativenessSelection of nonexposed cohortAscertaining of exposurePresence of outcomeAssessment of outcome Follow-upAdequacy of follow-up

Cartoux et al. (1998) [40]9
Desai and Rosenheck (2004) [16]7
Hightow et al. (2003) [21]9
Ladner et al. (1996) [23]9
Lazebnik et al. (2001) [24]7
Machekano et al. (2000) [25]8
Msuya et al. (2006) [28]7
Sahlu et al. (1999) [29]7
Xu et al. (2011) [9]7
Ziek et al. (2000) [39]7