Table of Contents
International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7061391, 24 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7061391
Research Article

Computational Acoustic Beamforming for Noise Source Identification for Small Wind Turbines

1Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1
2Defence R&D Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Stn Main, P.O. Box 4000, Medicine Hat, AB, Canada T1A 8K6

Correspondence should be addressed to Ping Ma; moc.liamg@gnipamylno

Received 28 September 2016; Accepted 10 January 2017; Published 9 March 2017

Academic Editor: Francesco Zirilli

Copyright © 2017 Ping Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Vanhaeverbeke, Simulation of aeroacoustic emission for small wind turbines [Project thesis], Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2007.
  2. T. Cho, C. Kim, and D. Lee, “Acoustic measurement for 12% scaled model of NREL Phase VI wind turbine by using beamforming,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. S320–S325, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Bale and D. A. Johnson, “The application of a MEMS microphone phased array to aeroacoustics of small wind turbines,” Wind Engineering, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 637–657, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. E. Bale, The application of MEMS microphone arrays to aeroacoustic measurements [M.S. thesis], University of Waterloo, 2011.
  5. C. S. Li, Computational acoustic beamforming of noise source on wind turbine airfoil [M.S. thesis], University of Waterloo, 2014.
  6. F. Hutcheson and T. Brooks, “Effects of angle of attack and velocity on trailing edge noise determined using microphone array measurements,” International Journal of Aeroacoustics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–66, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Devenport, R. A. Burdisso, H. Camargo et al., “Aeroacoustic testing of wind turbine airfoils,” Tech. Rep. NREL/SR-500-43471, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  8. T. F. Brooks and W. M. Humphreys, “Effect of directional array size on the measurement of airframe noise components,” in Proceedings of the Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit (AIAA/CEAS '99), Bellevue, Wash, USA, May 1999. View at Scopus
  9. E. Sarradj, C. Schulze, and A. Zeibig, “Aspects of source separation in beamforming,” in Proceedings of the 1st Berlin Beamforming Conference, Berlin, Germany, November 2006.
  10. M. Wang, J. B. Freund, and S. K. Lele, “Computational prediction of flow-generated sound,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 38, pp. 483–512, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. E. Garnier, N. Adams, and P. Sagaut, Large Eddy Simulation for Compressible Flows, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009.
  12. J. Smagorinsky, “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: part I, the basic experiment,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 99–164, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. E. R. Van Driest, “On turbulent flow near a wall,” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1007–1011, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. R. Spalart, S. Deck, M. L. Shur, K. D. Squires, M. K. Strelets, and A. Travin, “A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 181–195, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. P. Spalart and S. Allmaras, “A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows,” Tech. Rep. AIAA-92-0439, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. L. Shur, M. K. Strelets, A. K. Travin, and P. R. Spalart, “Turbulence modeling in rotating and curved channels: assessing the Spalart-Shur correction,” AIAA Journal, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 784–792, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. L. Rumsey, D. O. Allison, R. T. Biedron et al., “CFD sensitivity analysis of a modern civil transport near buffet-onset conditions,” Tech. Rep. NASA/TM-2001-211263, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. E. Ffowcs Williams and D. L. Hawkings, “Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 264, no. 1151, pp. 321–342, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. J. Christensen and J. Hald, “Technical review—beamforming,” Tech. Rep., Brüel & Kjær Sound & Vibration Measurement, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Kern and H. Opfer, “Enhancement of the dynamic range in acoustic photos by modified time domain beamforming,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Berlin Beamforming Conference, Berlin, Germany, February 2008.
  21. R. P. Dougherty, “Advanced time-domain beamforming techniques,” in Proceedings of the Collection of Technical Papers-10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May 2004. View at Scopus
  22. P. Migliore and S. Oerlemans, “Wind tunnel aeroacoustic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines,” in Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Manchester, UK, May 2004.
  23. N. Gregory and C. L. O'Reilly, “Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 aerofoil sections, including the effects of upper-surface roughness simulation hoar frost,” Tech. Rep. ARC/R&M-3726, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. L. Ladson, “Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds Numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section,” Technical Report NASA TM 4074, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  25. T. Rossing, Ed., Springer Handbook of Acoustics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2015.
  26. K. S. Patel, S. B. Patel, U. B. Patel, and P. A. Ahuja, “CFD analysis of an aerofoil,” International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 154–158, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. P. Ma, F. Lien, and E. Yee, “Coarse-resolution numerical prediction of small wind turbine noise with validation against field measurements,” Renewable Energy, vol. 102, pp. 502–515, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Liu, Acoustic Measurement of WINForce 10 kW Wind Turbine, Intertek Testing Services Ltd, Shanghai, China, 2012.
  29. J. Tu, G. H. Yeoh, and C. Liu, Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Approach, Butterworth-Heinermann, Oxford, UK, 2012.
  30. International Electrotechnical Commission, “Wind turbine generator systems—part 11: acoustic noise measurement techniques,” IEC 61400-11 Ed 2.1 2006-11, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  31. American Wind Energy Association, “Acoustic sound testing,” in AWEA Small Wind Turbine Performance and Safety Standard, AWEA Standard 9.1—2009, AWEA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  32. G. C. Waller, “Prediction of flap-edge noise using STAR-CD,” in Proceedings of the 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), British Columbia, Canada, May 2008. View at Scopus
  33. R. C. Ramachandran, H. Patel, G. Raman, and R. P. Dougherty, “Localization of wind turbine noise sources using a compact microphone array with advanced beamforming algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 4th Berlin Beamforming Conference, Berlin, Germany, February 2012.
  34. S. Oerlemans and J. G. Schepers, “Prediction of wind turbine noise and validation against experiment,” Tech. Rep. NLR-TP-2009-402, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  35. E. J. Simley, Development of an acoustic array for wind turbine aeroacoustic noise analysis [M.S. thesis], University of Colorado, 2010.
  36. K. B. Ginn and K. Haddad, “Noise source identification techniques: simple to advanced applications,” in Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012, Nantes, France, April 2012.