A Novel Nearest Level Modulation Method with Increased Output Voltage Quality for Modular Multilevel Converter Topology

Kurtoğlu, Mehmet; Vural, Ahmet Mete

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2169357

International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 2169357 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2169357

A Novel Nearest Level Modulation Method with Increased Output Voltage Quality for Modular Multilevel Converter Topology

Mehmet Kurtoğlu^1,2and Ahmet Mete Vural¹

Academic Editor: Muhammad Mansoor Alam

Received08 Oct 2021

Revised08 Dec 2021

Accepted14 Dec 2021

Published31 Jan 2022

Abstract

The modular multilevel converter (MMC) topology is gaining more interest because of its modular design, high efficiency, and scalable voltage levels in medium- and high-power industrial applications, where the nearest level modulation (NLM) method is frequently preferred. In this paper, a novel NLM method is proposed with increased output voltage quality for MMC topology. In conventional NLM (C-NLM), output voltage is obtained as N + 1 levels, where N is the number of submodules (SMs) per arm. The output voltage is increased to 2N + 1 levels by the proposed NLM method without using any additional SMs. The proposed NLM method is based on the offset term injection, which is optimally determined in terms of the best output performance of MMC. Also, trapezoidal reference signal is used instead of sinusoidal reference, which provides better output voltage quality and controls the modulation process. The proposed NLM method presents simple implementation as in the C-NLM, and it is implemented to the upper and lower arms of the MMC; then, arm voltages are successfully controlled. Furthermore, output voltage returns the value of zero in the C-NLM process for low-modulation-ratio applications in relatively small amount of SM usage of MMC design. However, the proposed NLM method gives promising results instead of zero voltage. In order to validate the superior performance of the proposed NLM method, a comparative study is presented with C-NLM and third-harmonic injected NLM method in terms of total harmonic distortion (THD) and magnitude of the output voltage and current. THD of output waveforms of MMC is significantly reduced, and DC voltage utilization is remarkably increased, thanks to the proposed NLM method. In addition, capacitor voltage balancing for the proposed NLM method is accomplished to keep the capacitor voltage of each SM of MMC constant. Simulation results are presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed NLM method under various case studies. Finally, experimental validation is carried out using a field programmable gate array (FPGA)-based hardware implementation on the laboratory prototype to show the applicability of the proposed NLM method.

1. Introduction

1.1. Overview

Voltage source converters (VSCs) have been increasingly adopted in medium-/high-power industrial applications as a key power electronic interface for decades. In comparison with the two-level and three-level VSCs, the multilevel converters (MCs) have the advantages such as high output voltage and current quality, reduced output filter size, and high availability and efficiency. MCs are also operated in higher voltage/power levels [1–5]. As a new type of MCs, the modular multilevel converter (MMC) was first designed by Lesnicar and Marquardt in 2003 [6]. Since the invention of the MMC, it has been used as an attractive power converter topology due to its distinguished benefits in terms of availability, high efficiency, and scalability in many industrial applications [7–9]. The main application areas of MMC include high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems [10], battery energy storage systems with electrical vehicles [11–13], high-power motor drives [14], static synchronous compensator [15], renewable energy system integrations incorporating wind energy conversion system [16] and solar photovoltaic system [17], power electronic transformer [18], and electrical ship and railway traction implementation [19, 20]. Recently, scholars have attempted research by focusing the mathematical modeling [21], circuit topology [22], modulation techniques [23], control objectives [24], capacitor voltage balancing [25], precharging for start-up [26] issues, arm current control [27], and circulating current suppression [28] for MMC-based applications.

1.2. Literature Review

Over the years, various modulation methods have been introduced to control the MMCs such as phase-shifted pulse width modulation (PWM) [29], level-shifted PWM [2], space vector modulation [30], selective harmonic elimination [31], and nearest level modulation (NLM) [32]. These methods are investigated by the researchers in a comparative way in the literature [33, 34]. NLM, which is known as carrier-less method, receives wider acceptance over the carrier-based methods, thanks to the flexible and easy implementation in MMC-based power electronic applications. However, the conventional NLM (C-NLM) is mostly adopted by MMC applications with a relatively large number of SMs for the reason of providing satisfactory output quality [35, 36]; on the contrary, it gives poorer output waveforms for MMC with a low number of submodules (SMs). To improve the output voltage quality using the NLM method, several publications have been presented in the existing literature. Most of them have been tested for MMC with a large number of SMs. In [37], output voltage quality can be boosted by combining the NLM and carrier-based PWM method, which causes increase in the switching losses compared with the C-NLM method. The main objective of [38] is to introduce a new NLM method for improving output performance of MMC with increase in the level number. Feasibility of the proposed method is confirmed by simulation results by comparing it with C-NLM for MMC with a large number of SMs. Another NLM method is suggested to increase the voltage level using sinusoidal signal reference and modified rounding function in [39]. The developed method is verified by both simulation and experiment using 10 SMs per arm for high modulation ratio. Research presented in [40] addresses the third-harmonic injection-based total harmonic distortion (THD) reduction scheme by comparing it with C-NLM. Simulation study and hardware in the loop-based experimental system are used to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed scheme using 30 SMs per arm for high modulation ratio. In the meantime, the authors of [41] develop an improved NLM method by considering a system of first-order two-variable equations for circulating current suppression with a low number of SMs. The proposed method is tested by the simulation and experimental prototype in a single-phase MMC system. Moreover, an enhanced NLM method is presented by adding a small offset in [42], which is based on alternating at the double fundamental frequency to the reference signals and shown using 8 SMs per arm for high modulation ratio in simulation and experimental hardware. Although methods for harmonic reduction are studied in [43, 44], they need more computations for the modulation of MMCs.

Aforementioned NLM methods can boost the level number of the output voltage and keep the switching frequency unaffected. On the other hand, they lead to some difficulties such as increasing the capacitor voltage ripple of each SM, arm inductor voltage peak, and computation complexity. Also, they do not consider the low-modulation-ratio applications for MMC with a low number of SMs.

1.3. Key Contributions

Considering the issues mentioned in the Literature Review section, this paper develops a novel NLM method with increased output voltage quality for MMC topology. The proposed NLM method is based on the offset term injection, which is optimally determined in terms of the best output performance of MMC. Trapezoidal reference signal is implemented instead of sinusoidal reference, which ensures better output voltage quality and controls the modulation process. The main contributions of the proposed NLM method are listed as follows:(1)The output voltage waveform is boosted to 2N + 1 levels without using any additional SMs.(2)The proposed NLM method presents simple implementation as in the C-NLM, and it is implemented to the upper and lower arms of the MMC topology; then, arm voltages are successfully controlled.(3)Compared with the C-NLM and third-harmonic injected NLM method, THD of MMC output parameters is significantly mitigated and DC voltage utilization is considerably increased, thanks to the proposed NLM method.(4)The proposed NLM method gives convincing results instead of zero voltage in contrast to C-NLM process in low-modulation-ratio applications for MMC with a low number of SMs.(5)Capacitor voltage balancing for the proposed NLM method is succeeded to keep the capacitor voltage of each SM of MMC constant.

The remaining part of the paper proceeds as follows: Section 2 describes the MMC circuit topology. C-NLM and the proposed NLM method are provided in detail in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Section 5 presents the findings of the research to show the acceptability of the proposed NLM method under various cases in the simulation environment. In Section 6, experimental results are provided using a field programmable gate array (FPGA)-based hardware implementation on the laboratory prototype to demonstrate the practicality of the proposed NLM method. Finally, the conclusions of the research are given in Section 7.

2. Modeling and Operation of the MMC Topology

A three-phase circuit structure of the MMC is depicted in Figure 1. The MMC circuit has a DC link, which can be fed from a DC voltage source or a renewable energy source. In the MMC topology, there are three phases (legs) and two arms per phase called as the upper and lower arm. N series-connected identical SMs and an arm inductor are included in each arm as shown in Figure 1. The DC capacitor and two switching components with antiparallel diodes are placed in each SM, which is defined as half-bridge SM (HBSM) and represented in Figure 2. HBSM is frequently used in MMC-based applications owing to the easy control capability [45, 46]. In HBSM, two outputs are available as V_C and 0. Table 1 describes the switching logics of HBSM, where i_ij denotes the arm current. Power switching devices S₁ and S₂ operate in the opposite manner. According to this operation, if switch S₁ is conducting, SM becomes ON and gives V_C in the output. Conversely, if switch S₂ is conducting, SM becomes OFF and gives 0 in the output. In this regard, arm voltages are controlled by regulating N_ON, where it expresses the number of active (ON) SMs in the upper and lower arm. In the event of all capacitor voltages in each SM being balanced and equal to V_C, the actual arm voltage is computed by the equation as follows:where p and n denote the upper and lower arm in phase j, respectively. Applying Kirchhoff’s current law to the MMC circuit, the output AC current can be obtained as

The half of the summation of the upper and lower arm current corresponds to the circulating current in phase j, which is expressed as

The circulating current does not affect the DC and AC side of the MMC circuit. However, the voltage ripple of the SM capacitors and arm current can increase if it is too high. When arm energy balancing is efficiently achieved, thanks to the capacitor voltage balancing and suitable sized arm inductor used on the upper and lower arm, no problem arises owing to the circulating current. Applying Kirchhoff’s voltage law to the MMC circuit, after the simplifications, the output AC voltage can be defined as

The voltage drops on the arm inductors are negligible, which results in the output voltage as follows:

3. Conventional NLM Method

Staircase modulation is the other name of the NLM, which is preferred for MMC applications due to its flexible and simple implementation [47, 48]. Figure 3 shows the basic principle of the C-NLM. Each arm could be controlled separately by using this method. The control scheme of the C-NLM is represented in Figure 4. Another NLM method discussed in the literature is the third-harmonic injected NLM method, which is implemented by injecting the third-harmonic component to the reference waveform [49, 50]. In C-NLM, output performance of MMC is more preferable when the number of SMs in the upper and lower arm is more than enough count. Otherwise, when a few SMs are used in the arms for low modulation ratios, no output voltage is obtained on the AC side of MMC since round function continuously gives the same value during the operation of the NLM process. Therefore, according to equation (5), the output voltage is obtained as nearly zero.

The single-phase circuit structure of MMC is given in Figure 5. Mathematical modeling required for the modulation of phase-a of MMC is presented in the following formulas. Arm voltages can be defined as

If the arm inductor voltages are symbolized with , the arm equations can be expressed as follows:where denotes the voltage drop on the arm inductor. The phase voltage for single-phase MMC topology can be formulated bywhere , , and are the modulation index, fundamental angular frequency, and phase angle, respectively. Arm voltages are stated for the upper and lower arm using equations (7a), (7b), and (8) as

SM capacitor voltage can be expressed using the design principle of MMC as

Replacing (10) into (9a) and (9b) giveswhere denotes the step value of output voltage. After normalization, general forms are deduced for upper and lower arm voltage as

The voltage level of instantaneous arm voltage of the upper and lower arm is obtained using round function at each sampling cycle as follows:

Round function can be expressed in a mathematical form bywhere denotes the largest integer less than while represents the smallest integer greater than .

4. The Proposed NLM Method

In the proposed NLM method, a trapezoidal signal is used instead of sinusoidal signal as a reference waveform to obtain improved output quality and control the modulation process. A trapezoidal waveform can be considered as an intermediate shape between a square and a triangular wave [51]. A typical representation of a trapezoidal signal is given in Figure 6. There are four main parts including rise time (), high time (), fall time (), and low time () in this waveform. While the signal remains at its maximum level () during , it remains at its minimum level () during . Also, the signal increases linearly from the minimum level to the maximum level during , whereas it decreases linearly from the maximum level to minimum level during . Fundamental period () of the trapezoidal signal is formed by the summation of these four parts:

In symmetrical waveform of the trapezoidal signal, these parts satisfy the following relations:

While a square wave signal is obtained when meaning that a triangular signal is captured when meaning that . A trapezoidal waveform is obtained in all other cases. Eventually, trapezoidal reference signals abbreviated to “tra” for a three-phase MMC topology can be described as

In addition, in the proposed NLM method, a constant offset term is injected to the reference signal as given in the following:where is the corresponding offset value for the reference signal. In order to obtain the optimal value, different values of k-term are tested in terms of output performance of the MMC under the condition that exactly the same model including circuit parameters and capacitor voltage sorting and selection procedure is applied for each k-term. Accordingly, suitable selection of k-term is supposed as nearly . Because, the required SM number received from the NLM process for modulation is held between 0 and N in this range. More precise calculation could be carried out within this range in the modulation process. Also, selection of the suitable SM/SMs is simply done to provide capacitor voltage balancing in a fundamental period in this range. A different capacitor voltage balancing method may be required since the reference values change for the upper and lower arm outside of the defined k-term range. The proposed NLM method operates for both positive and negative k-terms. Normalized output voltage forms of the upper and lower arm are expressed as

The voltage level of instantaneous arm voltage of the upper and lower arm is described at each sampling interval as follows:

Figure 7 depicts the voltage waveforms of the proposed NLM method in a fundamental period for N = 6. Upper and lower reference signals are symmetrical to each other. As can be deduced from this principle, output waveform is obtained as 2N + 1 voltage level.

Both positive and negative k-terms are evaluated for N = 4 under various MI values in terms of THD and fundamental voltage magnitude of output as shown in Figure 8 to exhibit the differences of k-terms. A better output performance in terms of THD and DC voltage utilization for output voltage than the C-NLM is obtained in this interval. THD of output voltage is almost symmetrical with respect to the zero value of k-term for positive and negative k-terms as shown in Figure 8(a). In general, negative k-terms provide better performance for different modulation ratios. In addition, Figure 8(b) depicts the DC voltage utilization performance, which is also generally better for negative k-terms. As the k-term moves away from zero, the voltage level increases so that 2N + 1 voltage level is established around ±0.1. If the k-term is not properly selected, the output voltage quality may not be increased at the desired level. In order to overcome this risk, Figure 8 is provided to determine the k-term under various modulation ratios in terms of THD of output voltage and magnitude of output fundamental voltage. As a result of this analysis, depending on the application area of MMC topology, any k-term could be chosen for the best utilization.

(a)

(b)

In high-modulation-ratio applications and if the number of SMs in the arms are more than enough (i.e., N = 10 or more), the output voltage is generally in the desired form. On the other hand, in low-modulation-ratio applications and when the number of SMs is relatively few, C-NLM yields no output voltage owing to the modulation process as mentioned before. As an example, when the number of SMs in each arm is equal to four (i.e., N = 4), the result of equations (13a) and (13b) is two and it is continuously same for MI ≤ 0.2 during the operation. This repeated outcome gives no voltage on the output of MMC as can be derived from equation (5). In order to solve this problem, the proposed NLM method enables to obtain an output voltage, thanks to the trapezoidal signal manipulation. In the proposed NLM method, if the output voltage is zero for low modulation indexes, main parts of modulation signal are changed by from . Time durations of trapezoidal signal are determined by changing the rise and fall time in low modulation indexes during the operation, which provides nonzero value on the output of MMC. The mentioned time durations are optimally determined using simulation works for the various time parts of the trapezoidal signal. Consequently, when the output voltage is zero during a fundamental period, different modulation processes as stated by the following equations are implemented to obtain the normalized output voltage forms of the upper and lower arm:

Then, the voltage level of instantaneous voltage of arms is expressed aswhere is a more precise calculation increased by the absolute value of k-term compared to the conventional rounding function. Resultantly, Figure 9 describes the overall control scheme of the proposed NLM method. The normal process of the proposed NLM method can be operated in all modulation ratios. On the other hand, time durations of trapezoidal reference signal is changed as shown in Figure 9 with more precise calculation when no output voltage is formed during a fundamental period. The general control block diagram representation of the proposed NLM method is presented in Figure 10. Accordingly, first of all, depending on the modulation ratio, trapezoidal signal as a reference waveform is created by determining the main parts of it as given in Figure 9. In order to obtain the nearest voltage level, while directly rounding for equations (21a) and (21b) is used, round_|k| with precise calculation for equations (23a) and (23b) is implemented. Following this step, capacitor voltages of SMs are balanced using the capacitor voltage balancing feedback system as pointed out in the next paragraph.

In order to complete the modulation process, capacitor voltage control is also necessary to balance the capacitor voltages at a nominal value in each SM of the upper and lower arm. For this reason, the capacitor voltage balancing algorithm is applied to the upper and lower arm as shown in Figure 11 and it is based on the principle of measuring and sorting the SM capacitor voltages and selecting the suitable SMs. After measurement of the capacitor voltages and arm currents, depending on the direction of the arm current, capacitor voltages are sorted in the ascending or descending order. Considering the required number of SMs received from the modulation process, convenient capacitors are chosen; then, capacitor voltages are balanced and kept constant.

5. Simulation Study

In order to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed NLM method, a simulation study is carried out in this section. C-NLM, third-harmonic injected NLM method, and the proposed NLM method are compared in terms of the output voltage performance of MMC including number of voltage levels, THD and DC voltage utilization, and low modulation ratio performance under various case studies. THD is calculated until 50th harmonic component in all results. Circuit parameters of the designed single-phase MMC model are given in Table 2.

5.1. Case Study 1: Verification of the Amount of Voltage Level Increment

In this case study, the amount of voltage level increment from N + 1 to 2N + 1 without using any additional SMs is shown by comparing the proposed NLM method with the C-NLM method. Upper and lower arm voltages are illustrated in Figure 12(a), while the output voltage and current waveform are presented in Figure 12(b) when MI = 1 using the C-NLM method, which is obtained as N + 1 levels (7 levels). Under the completely same conditions and when k-term = -0.11, the number of the voltage levels is increased to 2N + 1 levels (13 levels) through the proposed NLM method. Figures 13(a) and 13(b) depict the upper and lower arm voltage with the obtained output voltage and current waveform. Moreover, balanced capacitor voltages of the upper and lower arm in the proposed NLM method are given in Figures 14(a) and 14(b), respectively. Average values of them are around 230 V. As a result, this case study shows the satisfactory performance of the proposed NLM method by presenting the voltage level increment without using any extra SMs.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

5.2. Case Study 2: Comparison in terms of the THD and DC Voltage Utilization

To show the better performance of the proposed NLM method than C-NLM and third-harmonic injected NLM method, these methods are compared in terms of the THD and DC voltage utilization in this case. In Figure 15, THD performances of these methods are presented for output voltage and current under variation of the modulation index. In this regard, according to Figure 15, both voltage and current THD values are significantly mitigated in all modulation ranges. The THD value of the output voltage is mitigated from 11.35% to 7.78%, thanks to the proposed NLM method for MI = 1. Furthermore, magnitudes of output voltages are compared and exhibited in Figure 16 under different modulation ratios. For almost all modulation index values, DC voltage utilization of the proposed NLM method is better than of the C-NLM and third-harmonic injected NLM method, which causes the increased output voltage and current. The magnitude of the fundamental voltage of the output voltage is boosted from 640.9 V to 713.3 V with the aid of the proposed NLM method for MI = 1. Herewith, according to the comparison results, the acceptability of the proposed NLM method is evident by the reduced voltage and current THD and increased voltage and current magnitude.

5.3. Case Study 3: Verification of Superior Performance under Low Modulation Ratios

A case study is presented to show the feasibility of the proposed NLM method in low-modulation-ratio applications and for MMC with a low number of SMs in this section. When the number of SMs in each arm is equal to four (i.e., N = 4), no output voltage is obtained in C-NLM since equations (13a) and (13b) return the value of two and it is continuously same for MI ≤ 0.2 during the operation. It is resulted that no voltage occurs at the output of MMC as can be extracted from equation (5). In order to overcome this problem, the proposed NLM method provides an AC output voltage owing to changing the main parts of trapezoidal signal. In this context, Figure 17 represents the obtained constant rounding values for the upper and lower arm in C-NLM when N = 4 and MI = 0.2. and are equal to two during the whole simulation. Therefore, output voltage returns the value of zero as illustrated in Figure 18, which is previously determined in theory. On the other hand, under the completely same conditions and when k-term = 0.11, the calculated rounding values for the upper and lower arm in the proposed NLM method are shown in Figure 19. and are variable during the simulation. The output voltage and current waveform are obtained and presented in Figure 20, thanks to the variation of the rounding values for the upper and lower arm. The same results could be deduced for N = 4 and MI = 0.1. Obviously, superiority of the proposed NLM method over C-NLM is proved for low-modulation-ratio applications in this case study.

6. Experimental Study

In order to validate the superior performance of the proposed NLM method, a laboratory prototype of a single-phase MMC circuit consisting of four SMs per arm is designed and established as seen in Figure 21. Aforementioned simulation case studies are experimentally confirmed in this section. Table 3 gives the circuit parameters used for the experiment. In the experimental setup, the main DC source is utilized at the DC side to supply the MMC topology and the power unit feeds the experiment boards. Atmel ARM Cortex-M3-based microcontroller board [52] and Xilinx SPARTAN-6 FPGA digital circuit development platform at the clock frequency of 100 MHz [53] are used to control the MMC system. ISE design suite software is used to supervise and control the experiment in real time. MMC SMs consist of isolated gate drivers, MOSFET semiconductors, and capacitor cards with current protection. The voltage and current sensors employed in the measurement cards sense the capacitor voltage and arm currents and send them to the microcontroller analog ports. The microcontroller is responsible for receiving the voltage and current sensor data and processing these data for C-NLM and proposed NLM method including capacitor voltage balancing algorithm. Then, it transfers the required information for the switching of semiconductor devices via communication interface with serial line to the FPGA board. Meanwhile, the FPGA platform simultaneously generates the switching pulses for the MMC SMs. It should be noted that the microcontroller completes the required calculations given in Figures 10 and 11 and sends necessary information to the FPGA in each sampling cycle which is 5 kHz (0.2 ms). The output voltage and current waveform are monitored by a Tektronix TPS2024 digital oscilloscope and stored to a host PC via the computer program of the oscilloscope. The voltage and current are measured by differential probes and current probes, respectively. Resistive and inductive loads whose values are specified in Table 3 are employed at the output of the MMC topology for all cases. In addition, a dead time of 200 ns is used for switching of MOSFETs. The THD of output waveforms is computed until the 50th harmonic component as done in the simulation.

First of all, the amount of voltage level increment is experimentally shown by comparing the proposed NLM method with the C-NLM method. Upper (channel (3)) and lower (channel (4)) arm voltages are illustrated in Figure 22(a), while the output voltage (channel (1)) and current (channel (2)) waveform are presented in Figure 22(b) when MI = 1 using the C-NLM method, which is obtained as N + 1 levels (5 levels). Under the completely same conditions and when k-term = -0.11, the number of the voltage levels is increased to 2N + 1 levels (9 levels) using the proposed NLM method. Figures 23(a) and 23(b) indicate the upper (channel (3)) and lower (channel (4)) arm voltage with the obtained output voltage (channel (1)) and current (channel (2)) waveform. Also, balanced capacitor voltages of the upper and lower arm in the proposed NLM method are visualized in Figures 24(a) and 24(b), respectively. In both figures, capacitor voltages are monitored by different and the same horizontal positions. In the screenshot, all four channels from 1 to 4 correspond to the capacitors from 1 to 4, respectively, for the upper and lower arm. Average values of them are around 10.8 V.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Secondly, good performance of the proposed NLM method in terms of the THD and DC voltage utilization is supported here by the experimental results. In Figure 25, THD results are compared for the output voltage and current under different modulation ratios. In this context, according to Figure 25, both voltage and current THD values are significantly reduced in all modulation ranges. The THD value of the output voltage is reduced from 15.65% to 9.05% through the proposed NLM method for MI = 1. Moreover, magnitudes of output voltages are presented in Figure 26 under variable modulation ratios. The magnitude of the fundamental voltage of the output voltage is increased from 15.06 V to 16.77 V, thanks to the proposed NLM method for MI = 1.

Finally, the suitability of the proposed NLM method in low-modulation-ratio applications is presented. With the C-NLM, Figure 27 represents the output voltage, which returns the value of zero. In addition, when k-term = 0.11, output voltage (channel (1)) and current (channel (2)) waveform are obtained and shown in Figure 28, thanks to the variation of the rounding values for the upper and lower arm in the proposed NLM method.

Ultimately, all simulation cases are supported and validated by the experimental results and applicability of the proposed NLM method is comprehensively demonstrated in this section.

7. Conclusion

A novel NLM method has been developed with increased output voltage quality for MMC topology in this paper. The output voltage has been boosted to 2N + 1 levels by the proposed NLM method without using any additional SMs. The proposed NLM method has been implemented to the upper and lower arms of the MMC; then, arm voltages have been controlled. In addition, satisfactory results have been obtained for low-modulation-ratio applications in relatively small amount of SM usage of MMC design. In order to present the good performance of the proposed NLM method, a comparison has been made with the C-NLM and third-harmonic injected NLM method in terms of THD and magnitude of the output voltage and current. The THD value of the output voltage has been mitigated from 11.35% to 7.78% and 15.65% to 9.05%, in the simulation and experiment, respectively. The magnitude of the fundamental voltage of the output voltage has been increased from 640.9 V to 713.3 V and 15.06 V to 16.77 V in the simulation and experiment, respectively. In addition, capacitor voltage balancing for the proposed NLM method has been achieved to keep the capacitor voltage of each SM of MMC constant. To show the appropriateness of the proposed NLM method, simulation case studies have been verified by the experimental results using FPGA-based hardware implementation on the laboratory prototype. As a future work, the proposed NLM method could be implemented for MMC-based industrial applications.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

S. Kouro, M. Malinowski, K. Gopakumar et al., “Recent advances and industrial applications of multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2553–2580, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Hasan, N. Rosmin, D. A. A. Osman, and A. H. Musta, “Reviews on multilevel converter and modulation techniques,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 80, pp. 163–174, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rodríguez, S. Bernet, B. Wu, J. O. Pontt, and S. Kouro, “Multilevel voltage-source-converter topologies for industrial medium-voltage drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2930–2945, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Li, G. Konstantinou, H. R. Wickramasinghe, and J. Pou, “Operation and control methods of modular multilevel converters in unbalanced AC grids: a review,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1258–1271, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Perez, S. Ceballos, G. Konstantinou, J. Pou, and R. P. Aguilera, “Modular multilevel converters: recent achievements and challenges,” IEEE Open Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 2, pp. 224–239, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Lesnicar and R. Marquardt, “An innovative modular multilevel converter topology suitable for a wide power range,” IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 272–277, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhang, Y. Zou, J. Yu et al., “Modeling, control, and protection of modular multilevel converter-based multi-terminal HVDC systems: a review,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 340–352, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kurtoğlu, F. Eroğlu, A. O. Arslan, and A. M. Vural, “Recent contributions and future prospects of the modular multilevel converters: a comprehensive review,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 29, p. e2763, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Hu, D. Jiang, Y. Zhou, Y. Liang, J. Guo, and Z. Lin, “Energy-balancing control strategy for modular multilevel converters under submodule fault conditions,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 5021–5030, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mehrasa, E. Pouresmaeil, S. Zabihi, and J. P. S. Catalao, “Dynamic model, control and stability analysis of MMC in HVDC transmission systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1471–1482, Jun. 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Quraan, P. Tricoli, S. D Arco, and L. Piegari, “Efficiency assessment of modular multilevel converters for battery electric vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2041–2051, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Eroǧlu, M. Kurtoǧlu, and A. M. Vural, “Bidirectional DC–DC converter based multilevel battery storage systems for electric vehicle and large-scale grid applications: a critical review considering different topologies, state-of-charge balancing and future trends,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 915–938, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Goetz, Z. Li, X. Liang, C. Zhang, S. M. Lukic, and A. V. Peterchev, “Control of modular multilevel converter with parallel connectivity-application to battery systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 8381–8392, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Jae-Jung Jung, H. J. Hak-Jun Lee, and S. K. Seung-Ki Sul, “Control strategy for improved dynamic performance of variable-speed drives with Modular Multilevel Converter,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. Mohammadi and M. T. Bina, “A transformerless medium-voltage STATCOM topology based on extended modular multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1534–1545, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Tzelepis, A. O. Rousis, A. Dyśko, C. Booth, and G. Strbac, “A new fault-ride-through strategy for MTDC networks incorporating wind farms and modular multi-level converters,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 92, pp. 104–113, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gupta, “Influence of solar photovoltaic array on operation of grid-interactive fifteen-level modular multilevel converter with emphasis on power quality,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 1053–1065, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Briz, M. Lopez, A. Rodriguez, and M. Arias, “Modular power electronic transformers: modular multilevel converter versus cascaded H-bridge solutions,” IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 6–19, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Z. Li, S. Zhao, X. Wei, and Y. Kang, “Design and implementation of a modular multilevel converter with hierarchical redundancy ability for electric ship MVDC system,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 189–202, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ma, Q. Xu, Z. He et al., “A railway traction power conditioner using modular multilevel converter and its control strategy for high-speed railway system,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 96–109, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. N. Abildgaard and M. Molinas, “Modelling and control of the modular multilevel converter (MMC),” Energy Procedia, vol. 20, pp. 227–236, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Parida and A. Das, “A new modular multilevel converter circuit topology with reduced number of power cells for DC to AC applications,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 123, p. 106256, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Edpuganti and A. K. Rathore, “Optimal pulsewidth modulation for common-mode voltage elimination scheme of medium-voltage modular multilevel converter-fed open-end stator winding induction motor drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 848–856, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. R. Disfani, L. Fan, Z. Miao, and Y. Ma, “Fast model predictive control algorithms for fast-switching modular multilevel converters,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 129, pp. 105–113, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Peng, R. Xie, K. Wang, Y. Deng, X. He, and R. Zhao, “A capacitor voltage balancing method with fundamental sorting frequency for modular multilevel converters under staircase modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 7809–7822, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Du, B. Wu, and N. R. Zargari, “A startup method for flying-capacitor modular multilevel converter (FC-MMC) with effective damping of LC oscillations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 5827–5834, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liang, J. Liu, T. Zhang, and Q. Yang, “Arm current control strategy for MMC-HVDC under unbalanced conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 125–134, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, E. A. Jones, and F. Wang, “Circulating current suppressing control's impact on arm inductance selection for modular multilevel converter,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 182–188, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wei, Y. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Kang, and Y. Cui, “Design and implementation of the low computational burden phase-shifted modulation for DC–DC modular multilevel converter,” IET Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 256–269, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Dekka, B. Wu, N. R. Zargari, and R. L. Fuentes, “A space-vector PWM-based voltage-balancing approach with reduced current sensors for modular multilevel converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2734–2745, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. António-Ferreira, C. Collados-Rodríguez, and O. Gomis-Bellmunt, “Modulation techniques applied to medium voltage modular multilevel converters for renewable energy integration: a review,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 155, pp. 21–39, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Wang, C. Hu, R. Ding, L. Xu, C. Fu, and E. Yang, “A nearest level PWM method for the MMC in DC distribution grids,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 9209–9218, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Moranchel, F. Huerta, I. Sanz, E. Bueno, and F. J. Rodríguez, “A comparison of modulation techniques for modular multilevel converters,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 12, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Darus, G. Konstantinou, J. Pou, S. Ceballos, and V. G. Agelidis, “Comparison of phase-shifted and level-shifted PWM in the modular multilevel converter,” in Proceedings of the Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Hiroshima 2014 - ECCE-ASIA), pp. 3764–3770, Hiroshima, Japan, May 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Wu and L. Peng, “Characteristics of nearest level modulation method with circulating current control for modular multilevel converter,” IET Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 155–164, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, K. Ma, and X. Cai, “Flexible nearest level modulation for modular multilevel converter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Li, P. Wang, H. Zhu, Z. Chu, and Y. Li, “An improved pulse width modulation method for chopper-cell-based modular multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 3472–3481, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Si, J. Zhu, Y. Lei, L. Jia, and Y. Zhang, “An enhanced level-increased nearest level modulation for modular multilevel converter,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Hu and D. Jiang, “A level-increased nearest level modulation method for modular multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1836–1842, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Anupom, D. C. Shin, and D. M. Lee, “Scheme for reducing harmonics in output voltage of modular multilevel converters with offset voltage injection,” Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1496–1504, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. H. Nguyen and S. Kwak, “Nearest-level control method with improved output quality for modular multilevel converters,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 110237–110250, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lin, Y. Lin, Z. He, Y. Chen, J. Hu, and W. Li, “Improved nearest-level modulation for a modular multilevel converter with a lower submodule number,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 5369–5377, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Tu and Z. Xu, “Impact of sampling frequency on harmonic distortion for modular multilevel converter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 298–306, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhong Du, L. M. Tolbert, J. N. Chiasson, and B. Ozpineci, “Reduced switching-frequency active harmonic elimination for multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1761–1770, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rodrigues, A. Papadopoulos, E. Kontos, T. Todorcevic, and P. Bauer, “Steady-State loss model of half-bridge modular multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2415–2425, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Elserougi, A. M. Massoud, and S. Ahmed, “Arrester‐less DC fault current limiter based on pre‐charged external capacitors for half‐bridge modular multilevel converters,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 93–101, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Meshram and V. B. Borghate, “A simplified nearest level control (NLC) voltage balancing method for modular multilevel converter (MMC),” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 450–462, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Konstantinou, J. Pou, S. Ceballos, R. Darus, and V. G. Agelidis, “Switching frequency analysis of staircase-modulated modular multilevel converters and equivalent PWM techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, J. E. Fletcher, and B. W. Williams, “Influence of third harmonic injection on modular multilevel converter ‐based high‐voltage direct current transmission systems,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2764–2770, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhou, Y. Dong, H. Yang et al., “Common‐mode voltage injection‐based nearest level modulation with loss reduction for modular multilevel converters,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 798–806, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Sotorrio-Ruiz, F. J. Sanchez-Pacheco, F. M. Perez-Hidalgo, and J. R. Heredia-Larrubia, “Modulation of a trapezoidal signal: improving signal quality and reducing costs in power inverters,” IET Power Electronics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 568–576, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Atmel, SMART ARM-Based MCU, Atmel Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA, 2015.
Digilent Inc, Nexys 3TM FPGA Board Reference Manual, Digilent Inc., Pullman, WA, USA, 2016.

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Mehmet Kurtoğlu and Ahmet Mete Vural. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1483

Downloads

694

Citations