Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Addiction
Volume 2017, Article ID 6748948, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6748948
Research Article

A Prototypical First-Generation Electronic Cigarette Does Not Reduce Reports of Tobacco Urges or Withdrawal Symptoms among Cigarette Smokers

1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
2Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
3Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
4Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Arit M. Harvanko; ude.yku@h.tira

Received 14 December 2016; Revised 21 February 2017; Accepted 6 March 2017; Published 26 March 2017

Academic Editor: Elisardo Becona

Copyright © 2017 Arit M. Harvanko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Yingst, S. Veldheer, S. Hrabovsky, T. T. Nichols, S. J. Wilson, and J. Foulds, “Factors associated with electronic cigarette users' device preferences and transition from first generation to advanced generation devices,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1242–1246, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Bullen, H. McRobbie, S. Thornley, M. Glover, R. Lin, and M. Laugesen, “Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial,” Tobacco Control, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. R. Vansickel, C. O. Cobb, M. F. Weaver, and T. E. Eissenberg, “A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic ‘cigarettes’: nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1945–1953, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. R. Vansickel, M. F. Weaver, and T. Eissenberg, “Clinical laboratory assessment of the abuse liability of an electronic cigarette,” Addiction, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1493–1500, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Dawkins, J. Turner, and E. Crowe, “Nicotine derived from the electronic cigarette improves time-based prospective memory in abstinent smokers,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 377–384, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. R. Hughes and D. Hatsukami, “Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 289–294, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. S. Cox, S. T. Tiffany, and A. G. Christen, “Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. D. Blank, C. Sams, M. F. Weaver, and T. Eissenberg, “Nicotine delivery, cardiovascular profile, and subjective effects of an oral tobacco product for smokers,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 417–421, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. R. McLeod, R. R. Griffiths, G. E. Bigelow, and J. Yingling, “An automated version of the digit symbol substitution test (DSST),” Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 463–466, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. T. Fillmore, C. A. Marczinski, and A. M. Bowman, “Acute tolerance to alcohol effects on inhibitory and activational mechanisms of behavioral control,” Journal of Studies on Alcohol, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 663–672, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Hochberg, “A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance,” Biometrika, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 800–802, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. K. J. Norton, K. M. June, and R. J. O'Connor, “Initial puffing behaviors and subjective responses differ between an electronic nicotine delivery system and traditional cigarettes,” Tobacco Induced Diseases, vol. 12, no. 1, article 17, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Z. Behar, M. Hua, and P. Talbot, “Puffing topography and nicotine intake of electronic cigarette users,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID e0117222, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus