Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2008, Article ID 835380, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/835380
Research Article

On the Asymptotic Approach to Thermosolutal Convection in Heated Slow Reactive Boundary Layer Flows

1Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Venda, Private Bag x5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
2School of Mathematical Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
3Mathematics Department, University of Swaziland, Private Bag 4, Kwaluseni, Swaziland

Received 22 April 2008; Revised 14 July 2008; Accepted 12 August 2008

Academic Editor: Jacek Rokicki

Copyright © 2008 Stanford Shateyi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The study sought to investigate thermosolutal convection and stability of two dimensional disturbances imposed on a heated boundary layer flow over a semi-infinite horizontal plate composed of a chemical species using a self-consistent asymptotic method. The chemical species reacts as it diffuses into the nearby fluid causing density stratification and inducing a buoyancy force. The existence of significant temperature gradients near the plate surface results in additional buoyancy and decrease in viscosity. We derive the linear neutral results by analyzing asymptotically the multideck structure of the perturbed flow in the limit of large Reynolds numbers. The study shows that for small Damkohler numbers, increasing buoyancy has a destabilizing effect on the upper branch Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) instability waves. Similarly, increasing the Damkohler numbers (which corresponds to increasing the reaction rate) has a destabilizing effect on the TS wave modes. However, for small Damkohler numbers, negative buoyancy stabilizes the boundary layer flow.

1. Introduction

Convection in which the buoyancy forces are due to both temperature and chemical concentration gradients are referred to as thermosolutal or double diffusive convection. Ostrach [1] pointed out that different modes of such convection exist depending on how the temperature and concentration gradients are oriented relative to one another. Some natural convection flows in the atmosphere and micrometeorological phenomena are often thermosolutal. The heating of the earth by the sun causes atmospheric thermal convection which is usually modified by the presence of moisture evaporated from the ground.

In lakes and oceans, thermosolutal convection is caused by stable vertical concentration distribution with heating from the side or from the top. The stability theory has been used to explain the occurrence of layered structures observed in oceans as explained by Turner [2].

Studies on natural convection flows caused by the simultaneous diffusion of thermal energy and chemical species were carried out by Gebhart and Pera [3]. They considered small species concentration levels and showed that the species Boussinesq approximation led to similarity solutions similar in form to those for single buoyancy mechanism flows.

The effect of heat transfer on the upper-branch stability of Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities (TSIs) in accelerating boundary layer over a rigid surface in incompressible flows was investigated by Mureithi et al. [4]. The study indicated that buoyancy has destabilizing effect on rigid bodies. Their analysis also showed that in the presence of strong buoyancy forces, the five-zone asymptotic structure alters but for moderate buoyancy, the five-zone structure of Smith and Bodonyi [5] remains with very few alterations.

Shateyi et al. [6] considered the effect of fluid buoyancy and chemical reaction between the chemical species and the fluid on the linear stability of two dimensional disturbances wave modes. They extended the theory of boundary layer flows over horizontal surfaces to include a chemical species and the effect of the Damkohler number. Results showed that when the wave number and speed number are varied against the scaled Damkohler number, the effect of increasing buoyancy was destabilizing in agreement with assertions by Motsa et al. [7]. It was shown that increasing reaction kinematics (thus, reducing the density and viscosity) has destabilizing effects on the TS waves.

Pons and Le Quéré [8] showed that Boussinesq equations do not exactly represent buoyancy—induced natural convection. The study observed that thermodynamic consistency is retrieved when both the work due pressure forces and the heat generated by viscous friction are accounted for in the heat equation. The study recommended that any theoretical study of buoyancy-induced natural convection should be done with the thermodynamic Boussinesq model and not with the usual Boussinesq approximations. However, in spite of this weakness, the usual Boussinesq equations are still very useful (see, e.g., Azizi et al. [9]). To that end in this study, we will use the Boussinesq approximations.

The present work presents an asymptotic analysis of the flow induced by buoyancy effects due to both temperature and chemical concentration gradients near the flat surface. This paper is a direct extension of the earlier work in Shateyi et al. [6] to include the effects of temperature differences within the boundary-layer. The flow has uniform surface conditions with the buoyancy effects primarily away from the surface. Our analysis is limited to processes which occur at low concentration gradients. We give an asymptotic investigation of the interactions between the reaction kinematics and the fluid hydrodynamics with the Damkohler number (the ratio of the hydrodynamic time scale to the reaction time scale) as the parameter of primary interest. In the limit of large Damkohler numbers, the reaction kinematics proceed at a much faster rate compared to the fluid hydrodynamics. If the Damkohler number is close to zero, the chemical reactions are slow compared to the motion of the fluid. In this case, a nonreactive fluid can be assumed. The greatest interaction between reaction kinematics and fluid dynamics occurs when the Damkohler is of .

In the study, we focus attention on the case when the Damkohler number is small (that is, less than unity). The case for large Damkohler numbers was investigated by Shateyi et al. [6]. The aim is to determine the influence of small Damkohler numbers on the stability characteristics of the upper-branch TS instability waves. The major difference between the current work and that of Mureithi et al. [4] arises from the introduction of reaction kinematics. The absence of wall compliance and the presence of a chemical species makes the current work different from that of Motsa et al. [7]. The presence of wall heating or cooling and small Damkohler numbers makes the current work different from Shateyi et al. [6]. The current approach provides asymptotic solutions to the linearised Navier-Stokes rather the numerical solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation.

2. Mathematical Formulation

We consider a two-dimensional, incompressible fluid flow over a heated horizontal plate which is composed of a chemical species maintained at a fixed concentration. The chemical species diffuses into the nearby fluid inducing a buoyancy force. A change in the temperature of the fluid near the plate surface due to exogenous heating effects also results in additional buoyancy.

The governing nondimensional unsteady Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible fluid under a Boussinesq-type approximation are as follows: However, (2.1)–(2.5) have been nondimensionalised such that the space coordinates are given by , the velocity components are , the pressure is , and the time is , where is the characteristic length scale (e.g., the distance measured from the leading edge of the plate). The species chemical concentration and the temperature are, respectively, where the asterisks in these relations denote dimensional quantities and the subscripts “" and “" refer to the conditions at the wall and the free stream values, respectively. For purposes of this study, the important parameters are the Damkohler number that is defined as the ratio of the flow time scale to the chemical time scale and the buoyancy terms and , where and are, respectively, the Grashof numbers for mass and thermal diffusion, is the coefficient of expansion with respect to mass transfer, and is the volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion

The other parameters and variables in (2.1)–(2.5) are the Prandtl number , the flow Reynolds number , and the Schmidt number , where is the binary diffusion coefficient, is the coefficient of dynamic viscosity, is the density of the fluid, is the coefficient of kinematic viscosity, and is the acceleration due to gravity.

The momentum boundary conditions are the no-slip conditions: We assume that the horizontal plate is maintained at a prescribed temperature and uniform concentration . In the far field, we assume that the fluid temperature, species chemical concentration, and the fluid velocity approach their free stream values.

The basic boundary-layer flow is given by where is the boundary coordinate. For general pressure gradient boundary layers, the following properties hold: The coefficients and are, respectively, the skin friction and curvature of the basic flow profile. The coefficients and are the heat transfer coefficients and and are the concentration transfer coefficients.

Disturbances to the basic flow of amplitude factor are introduced and these spread through the boundary layer. The Reynolds number is large while the amplitude of the spatially growing disturbances is assumed to be sufficiently small for linear theory to hold. The TSI grows by extracting energy from the mean flow to the disturbance within the boundary layer (see, e.g., Carpenter and Gajjar [10]).

The asymptotic structure of the boundary layer is now well known and described (e.g., Smith and Bodonyi [5] and Mureithi et al. [4]). It consists of the five regions (see Figure 1) where is the main part of the boundary layer with thickness , is a thinner inviscid adjustment region of thickness containing the viscous critical layer the wall layer of thickness , and the outer potential flow of thickness . Consistent with earlier work on linear analysis, the viscous critical layer is ignored in the present theory except in so far as it produces a phase shift in the boundary layer pressure and velocity.

835380.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic sketch of flow structure showing the multilayered nature of the boundary layer and the relative positioning of the five regions.

The disturbances are taken to be in the form of a modulated wave train periodic in where, for the upper branch of the neutral stability curve, the scaled streamwise and temporal variables are , , and is a small parameter. The neutral wave number and phase speed of the disturbances are and , respectively. We thus expand and as where and are the scaled real wave number and real phase speed of the travelling wave disturbances. The derivatives and are then replaced by and , respectively. The other important scalings (see also Shateyi et al. [6]) are and when the TS eigenrelation is significantly altered for the first time by the effects of fluid buoyancy.

3. Stability Analysis

Information on the disturbance expansions relevant to the upper-branch stability of boundary layers is now well documented in the literature (see, e.g., Gajjar and Smith [11], Motsa et al. [7], and the references therein). Only the details necessary to obtain the linear dispersion relations will be given. In the main part of the boundary layer, region , we define the coordinate , where , and introduce a small disturbance of size into the basic flow. The expand disturbance quantities are then expanded as where , and so forth are functions of the boundary layer variable and of the scaled streamwise variable , and is the amplitude of the disturbance which is very much smaller than unity so that terms quadratic in are ignored thereby restricting the analysis to linear stability theory. Substituting (3.1)–(3.5) into the governing equations and solving the resulting system of leading-order equations yields the following first-order solutions: At the next order, we obtain the solutions where and are unknown functions representing the displacement and the pressure amplitudes. In the results above, we set (where denotes the complex conjugate). The lower limit of the integrals, , is a non-zero constant introduced for convenience, whose value does not alter the eventual results for wave numbers and frequencies.

In region , we define with and the expansions follow from : Substituting these equations into the governing equations and solving the resulting equations yield the following first-order solutions: where . At the next order, the velocity and pressure terms are The solutions in this region possess both logarithmic and algebraic singularities as . These singularities are smoothed out by the introduction of the critical layer consisting of a thin viscous region situated in the neighbourhood of the critical level where and are the phase-shift terms introduced to connect the solutions in the normal velocity and pressure, respectively, on either side of the critical layer.

Solutions in the other regions (namely, the wall layer and the outer potential-flow layer follow in a straightforward manner, and the important solutions of the wall layer are given by where , , and is an coordinate.

In region , we set , where . The leading-order solutions are given by where is an unknown function which describes the disturbance pressure at the outer extreme of the boundary layer. At the next order, the important solutions are where is an unknown function which describes the disturbance pressure at the outer extreme of the boundary layer.

4. Linear Neutral Results and Eigenrelations

In this section, we asymptotically match the solutions in their respective overlap regimes. We will be matching the normal velocities and pressures of the same orders in these respective overlapping regions. The first eigenrelation is found by matching the first-order solutions across the entire boundary layer flow regime to be The matching of second-order pressure components between (as ) and (as ) yields where and . The constants and for are defined in the appendix.

Matching the pressure terms across (as ) and (as ) gives where and . Matching the pressure terms across (as ) and (as ) gives Matching the normal velocity components between (as ) and (as ) at the second order gives Matching the normal velocity across regions and yields where the constants and for are defined in the appendix. Lastly, a matching of the normal velocity between and gives The relations (4.1)–(4.7) above may be used to eliminate , , , to obtain a relation which determines the higher-harmonic components of . If we restrict our attention to the components, then, after some algebra, (4.1)–(4.7) lead to where and are defined in the appendix. The results for linear theory are now well known and are derived by taking the jump across the critical layer, to be equal to . Taking the real parts of equation (4.8) then gives where . However, (4.1) and (4.9) are the crucial eigenvalue relations which fix the neutral wave number to the neutral wave speed.

5. Results and Discussion

To obtain a clearer understanding of the effects of fluid buoyancy and the chemical reaction on the linear stability of the two-dimensional disturbance wave modes, we consider a number of limiting cases when the fluid buoyancy parameters are either large and small and the Damkohler numbers are small. This allows for a detailed examination of the linear eigenrelations (4.1) and (4.9).

We first investigate the limiting behaviour of the neutral eigenrelations as the buoyancy parameters This limiting case corresponds to the increase in the buoyancy force due to an increase in the density difference caused by temperature and chemical concentration differences. Solving the eigenrelations (4.1) and (4.9), we obtain, in the limit with , These results agree with those obtained by Motsa et al. [7] for the case and with those of Shateyi et al. [6] when and help to quantify the effects of the combined buoyancy on the normal modes. The results show that, depending on whether the buoyancy terms reinforce or cancel out (e.g., in the case of an endothermic reaction), the normal modes may grow without limit thus hastening the transition to turbulence. A viable transition delay mechanism would be to ensure that the buoyancy terms act contrary to each other so as to reduce the growth of the disturbances.

Solving the eigenrelations (4.1) and (4.9) in the limit with we get The results correspond to the case when the chemical time scale is much more pronounced than the flow time scale. The asymptotic limit predicts that the disturbances would grow without limit with increasing Damkohler numbers.

Solving the eigenrelations (4.1) and (4.9) in the limit, with we get The limit tends to infinity and corresponds to the increase in the buoyancy force through, for example, an increase in the density difference between the reacted fluid and the unreacted fluid.

In Figures 24, we show the response of the two-dimensional disturbances to changes in parametric values. Figure 2(a) gives a comparison between the predictions from the full eigenrelation and the limiting case for when . For small buoyancy, the flow is stabilized by the presence of a solute. However, as the buoyancy increases, the stabilizing effects of the solute are overcome by destabilizing effects of large buoyancy values. When , the asymptotic results match with the response curve for the full eigenrelation.

fig2
Figure 2: Comparison of (a) the growth of the wave number, and (b) wave speed with increasing buoyancy for the limiting case and the full eigenrelation when .
fig3
Figure 3: Full eigenrelation prediction of (a) the linear neutral wave number, and (b) the linear neutral wave speed , with , and 1.
fig4
Figure 4: Linear neutral (a) wave number and (b) wave speed against the buoyancy parameters when and .

Figure 3(a) shows the response of the wave number to increasing Damkohler numbers for different buoyancy parameter values. For large Damkohler numbers, these results are in line with the predictions of (5.2) and show that both and increase without limit. In this instance, the flow is highly destabilized and increasing buoyancy serves to compound this destabilization. For small buoyancy 0.1), the neutral wave number and phase speeds initially decreased before steadily increasing. However, for large buoyancy 0.5), the neutral wave number rises steeply to a maximum value before it steadily grows to infinity.

The introduction of the second buoyancy parameter results in a further destabilization of the flow giving larger wave numbers and wave speeds at any fixed Damkohler number. For fixed buoyancy values, the Damkohler number on its own has weakly destabilizing effects on the fluid flow. Similar trends are observed in Figure 3(b) for the buoyancy effects on the phase speed.

Figure 4 shows the response of the wave number and speed to increasing buoyancy for small Damkohler numbers. In Figure 4(a), three distinct branches are observed, a branch for negative buoyancy and two branches for positive buoyancy, one of these branches is a slow traveling wave with small wave numbers. For small positive buoyancy, the instability wave starting at the origin is stabilized by increasing buoyancy with wave numbers rapidly reducing to zero when . The second instability forms an open loop whose turning point is at progressively smaller wave numbers for increasing Damkohler numbers. In the case of moderate negative buoyancy values, reducing the Damkohler numbers has a stabilizing effect on the boundary layer flow.

Figure 4(b) shows the response of the wave speed to increasing buoyancy when the chemical reaction is slow in comparison to the other fluid dynamical processes. The instability has three branches when , one branch when buoyancy is negative and two branches when the buoyancy is positive. By raising the Damkohler number to , only two branches associated with positive buoyancy remain. Large negative buoyancy impacts positively on the boundary layer flow by stabilizing the flow. Increasing buoyancy values in the positive sense leads to a convergence of the instability curves obtained when to a single curve such as those shown in Figure 3(b). The value gives the greatest interaction between the chemical kinematics and the fluid dynamics. The increase in buoyancy is confirmed to be destabilizing for all Damkohler numbers. For a fixed buoyancy parameter value, the wave speed increases with increases in the Damkohler number in the case of the branch of the instability with larger wave numbers. However, the wave speed decreases with increasing Damkohler numbers for the part of the graph with lower wave speed. Only one branch of the instability remains if the Damkohler number is raised to values greater or equal to one. The boundary layer flow is relatively stabilized by small Damkohler numbers, that is, .

Figure 5 shows the destabilizing nature of buoyancy. Both the neutral wave number and phase speed increase with increasing positive buoyancy.

fig5
Figure 5: Variation of the linear neutral (a) wave number and (b) wave speed against the Damkohler number for increasing buoyancy parameters.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, we have considered the hydrodynamic stability of two-dimensional flow. We considered two factors that affect the onset of transition to turbulence. We investigated the effects of fluid buoyancy and slow chemical reaction kinematics (as measured by the Damkohler number) on the linear stability of disturbance wave modes in a two-dimensional boundary layer flow using self-consistent asymptotic methods. Physically, since the Damkohler number is the ratio of the flow time scale of the fluid to that of the chemical reaction time scale, the limit of large Damkohler numbers means that chemical kinematics proceed at much faster rate compared to fluid hydrodynamics. If the Damkohler number is close to zero, as is the case in this study, the chemical reactions are slow compared to the motion of the fluid. In such a phenomenon, the system is said to be kinematically controlled. Examples of such processes are low-temperature reactors and bioreactors.

The effect of increasing fluid buoyancy was shown to be destabilizing confirming the earlier findings by, for example, Motsa et al. [7] and Shateyi et al. [6]. By extending the work of Shateyi et al. [6], we have shown that the presence of an extra heat source term further destabilizes the boundary layer flow. With this extra source term, the instability has three branches when instead of the one branch found in Shateyi et al. [6]. However, increasing the reaction kinematics so that the Damkohler number is equal to one collapses the branches to just one. We have further shown that the boundary layer flow can be stabilized by slowing down the reaction kinematics so that the Damkohler number is small 0.03). It is understood that if the onset of transition is delayed, then, among other factors, drag will be reduced.

Appendix

The constants as used in the article are

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the University of Venda and the National Research Foundation (NRF) for their financial support.

References

  1. S. Ostrach, “Natural convection with combined buoyancy forces,” Physico Chemical Hydrodynamics, vol. 1, pp. 233–247, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. S. Turner, “Double-diffusive phenomena,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 6, pp. 37–54, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  3. B. Gerbhart and L. Pera, “The nature of vertical natural convection flows resulting from the combined buoyancy effects of thermal and mass diffusion,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2025–2050, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  4. E. W. Mureithi, J. P. Denier, and J. A. K. Stott, “The effect of buoyancy on upper-branch Tollmien-Schlichting waves,” IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 19–50, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. F. T. Smith and R. J. Bodonyi, “Nonlinear critical layers and their development in streaming-flow stability,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 118, pp. 165–185, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. S. Shateyi, P. Sibanda, and S. S. Motsa, “An asymptotic analysis of convection in boundary layer flows in the presence of a chemical reaction,” Archives of Mechanics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. S. Motsa, J. S. B. Gajjar, and P. Sibanda, “The effect of heating/cooling on the upper-branch stability of boundary layer flows over a compliant boundary,” Computer Assisted Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–181, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  8. M. Pons and P. Le Quéré, “Modeling natural convection with the work of pressure-forces: a thermodynamic necessity,” International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 322–332, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Azizi, B. Benhamou, N. Galanis, and M. El-Ganaoui, “Buoyancy effects on upward and downward laminar mixed convection heat and mass transfer in a vertical channel,” International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 333–353, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. W. Carpenter and J. S. B. Gajjar, “A general theory for two- and three-dimensional wall-mode instabilities in boundary layers over isotropic and anisotropic compliant walls,” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 349–378, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. J. S. B. Gajjar and F. T. Smith, “On the global instability of free disturbances with a time-dependent nonlinear viscous critical layer,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 157, pp. 53–77, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet