An Investigation on the Nonlinear Free Vibration Analysis of Beams with Simply Supported Boundary Conditions Using Four Engineering Theories

<table>Nonlinear frequency versus nondimensional amplitude for different slenderness ratios (- - -) Bernoulli-Euler’s, <svg height="13.45" id="M141" style="vertical-align:-2.21957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 27.612499 13.45" width="27.612499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,13.45)">
<g transform="translate(72,-61.24)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">(</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="4.1634989" y="0">⋯</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="17.816774" y="0">)</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> Rayleigh’s, (-·-) shear, and (—) Timoshenko’s beam models.</table>

Journal of Applied Mathematics

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: An Investigation on the Nonlinear Free Vibration Analysis of Beams with Simply Supported Boundary Conditions Using Four Engineering Theories 

Figure 4 | An Investigation on the Nonlinear Free Vibration Analysis of Beams with Simply Supported Boundary Conditions Using Four Engineering Theories 