Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2012, Article ID 270823, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270823
Research Article

Peculiarities of Bounds on States through the Concept of Linear Superposition

Department of Mathematics, Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri College, 30, Prince Anwar Shah Road, Kolkata 700033, India

Received 2 May 2012; Accepted 11 June 2012

Academic Editor: Shan Zhao

Copyright © 2012 Amit Bhar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. H. Zurek, “Quantum cloning: Schrödinger's sheep,” Nature, vol. 404, pp. 130–131, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. M. A. Nielsen, “Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 436–439, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, Eds., The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation and Quantum Computation, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  4. M. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, A. Sen, and U. Sen, “Common origin of no-cloning and no-deleting principles conservation of information,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2041–2049, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. J. van Enk, “Relations between cloning and the universal NOT derived from conservation laws,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 1, Article ID 010502, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Bruß, D. P. DiVincenzo, A. Ekert, C. A. Fuchs, C. Macchiavello, and J. A. Smolin, “Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning,” Physical Review A, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2368–2378, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Dieks, “Communication by EPR devices,” Physics Letters A, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 271–272, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Linden, S. Popescu, and J. A. Smolin, “Entanglement of superpositions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 10, Article ID 100502, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. P. Yuen, “Amplification of quantum states and noiseless photon amplifiers,” Physics Letters A, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 405–407, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Gisin and S. Popescu, “Spin flips and quantum information for antiparallel spins,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 432–435, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. S. Yu, X. X. Yi, and H. S. Song, “Concurrence of superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 75, no. 2, Article ID 022332, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. C. Ou and H. Fan, “Bounds on negativity of superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 2, Article ID 022320, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Niset and N. J. Cerf, “Tight bounds on the concurrence of quantum superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 4, Article ID 042328, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Cavalcanti, M. O. Terra Cunha, and A. Acín, “Multipartite entanglement of superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 4, Article ID 042329, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. Song, N. L. Liu, and Z. B. Chen, “Bounds on the multipartite entanglement of superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 5, Article ID 054303, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. S. Yu, X. X. Yi, and H. S. Song, “Bounds on bipartitely shared entanglement reduced from superposed tripartite quantum states,” The European Physical Journal D, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 273–278, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. Gour, “Reexamination of entanglement of superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 5, Article ID 052320, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 2245–2248, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation and concurrence,” Quantum Information and Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–44, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  20. K. Chen, S. Albeverio, and S.-M. Fei, “Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 4, Article ID 040504, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Peres, “Separability criterion for density matrices,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1413–1415, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  22. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, “Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions,” Physics Letters A, vol. 223, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. B. Plenio, “Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 9, Article ID 090503, 4 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, “Computable measure of entanglement,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 3, Article ID 032314, 11 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Rényi, “On measures of entropy and information,” in Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 547–561, Berkeley, Calif, USA, June 1960.
  26. S. M. Giampaolo and F. Elluminati, “Influence of friction on granular segregation,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, Article ID 042301, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Fan, K. Matsumoto, and H. Imai, “Quantify entanglement by concurrence hierarchy,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 4151–4158, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  28. G. Vidal and R. Tarrach, “Robustness of entanglement,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 141–155, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  30. S. Bandyopadhyay, V. Roychowdhury, and U. Sen, “Classification of nonasymptotic bipartite pure-state entanglement transformations,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 5, Article ID 052315, 4 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Gour and A. Roy, “Entanglement of subspaces in terms of entanglement of superpositions,” Physical Review A, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 012336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. Chattopadhyay and D. Sarkar, “Classes of impossible operations through the existence of incomparable states,” Quantum Information and Computation, vol. 6, pp. 93–99, 2007. View at Google Scholar