Abstract

The Merrifield-Simmons index 𝑖(𝐺) of a graph 𝐺 is defined as the number of subsets of the vertex set, in which any two vertices are nonadjacent, that is, the number of independent vertex sets of 𝐺 The Hosoya index 𝑧(𝐺) of a graph 𝐺 is defined as the total number of independent edge subsets, that is, the total number of its matchings. By 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆) we denote the set of graphs with 𝑛 vertices, 𝑘 cycles, the length of every cycle is 𝜆, and all the edges not on the cycles are pendant edges which are attached to the same vertex. In this paper, we investigate the Merrifield-Simmons index 𝑖(𝐺) and the Hosoya index 𝑧(𝐺) for a graph 𝐺 in 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆).

1. Introduction

Let 𝐺=(𝑉(𝐺),𝐸(𝐺)) denote a graph whose set of vertices and set of edges are 𝑉(𝐺) and 𝐸(𝐺), respectively. For any 𝑣𝑉(𝐺), we denote the neighbors of 𝑣 as 𝑁𝐺(𝑣), and [𝑣]=𝑁𝐺(𝑣){𝑣}. By 𝑛, we denote the number of vertices of 𝐺. All graphs considered here are both finite and simple. We denote, respectively, by 𝑆𝑛, 𝑃𝑛, and 𝐶𝑛 the star, path, and cycle with 𝑛 vertices. For other graph-theoretical terminology and notation, we refer to [1]. By 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆) we denote the set of graphs with 𝑛 vertices, 𝑘 cycles, the length of every cycle is 𝜆 and all the edges not on the cycles are pendant edges which are attached to the same vertex, where 𝑛1=𝑛[(𝜆1)𝑘+1]0 and the vertex 𝑣 denotes the central vertex of the graphs, as shown in Figure 1. The Merrifield-Simmons index 𝑖(𝐺) of a graph 𝐺 is defined as the number of subsets of the vertex set, in which any two vertices are nonadjacent, that is, the number of independent vertex sets of 𝐺. The Hosoya index 𝑧(𝐺) of a graph 𝐺 is defined as the total number of independent edge subsets, that is, the total number of its matchings. In particular, the Merrifield-Simmons index, and Hosoya index of the empty graph are 1.

The Merrifield-Simmons index was introduced by Merrifield and Simmons [2] in 1989, and the Hosoya index was introduced by Hosoya [3] in 1971. They are one of the topological indices whose mathematical properties turned out to be applicable to several questions of molecular chemistry. For example, the connections with physicochemical properties such as boiling point, entropy or heat of vaporization are well studied.

Several papers deal with the Merrifield-Simmons index and Hosoya index in several given graph classes. Usually, trees, unicyclic graphs, and certain structures involving pentagonal and hexagonal cycles are of major interest [412].

In this paper, we investigate the Merrifield-Simmons index 𝑖(𝐺) and the Hosoya index 𝑧(𝐺) for a graph 𝐺 in 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆).

2. Some Lemmas

In this section, we gather notations which are used throughout this paper and give some necessary lemmas which will be used to prove our main results.

If 𝐸𝐸(𝐺) and 𝑊𝑉(𝐺), then 𝐺𝐸 and 𝐺𝑊 denote the subgraphs of 𝐺 obtained by deleting the edges of 𝐸 and the vertices of 𝑊, respectively. By 𝑥 denote the smallest positive integer not less than 𝑥. By 𝑓(𝑛) we denote the 𝑛th Fibonacci number, where 𝑛, 𝑓(𝑛)+𝑓(𝑛+1)=𝑓(𝑛+2) with initial conditions 𝑓(0)=0 and 𝑓(1)=1.

The following lemma is obvious.

Lemma 2.1. Let 𝑛𝑁. (i)If 𝑛6, then 𝑓(𝑛)2𝑛3. (ii)If 𝑛2, then 𝑓(𝑛)𝑛/2.

We will make use of the following two well-known lemmas on the Merrifield-Simmons index and Hosoya index.

Lemma 2.2. Let 𝐺=(𝑉(𝐺),𝐸(𝐺)) be a graph. (i)If 𝐺1,𝐺2,,𝐺𝑚 are the components of the graph 𝐺, then 𝑖(𝐺)=𝑚𝑖=1𝑖(𝐺𝑖) (see [10, Lemma 1]).(ii)If 𝑥𝑉(𝐺), then 𝑖(𝐺)=𝑖(𝐺{𝑥})+𝑖(𝐺[𝑥]) (see [10, Lemma 1]).(iii)𝑖(𝑆𝑛)=2𝑛1+1; 𝑖(𝑃𝑛)=𝑓(𝑛+2) for any 𝑛; 𝑖(𝐶𝑛)=𝑓(𝑛1)+𝑓(𝑛+1) for any 𝑛3 (see [13]).

Lemma 2.3. Let 𝐺=(𝑉(𝐺),𝐸(𝐺)) be a graph. (i)If 𝐺1,𝐺2,,𝐺𝑚 are the components of the graph 𝐺, then 𝑧(𝐺)=𝑚𝑖=1𝑧(𝐺𝑖) (see [10, Lemma 1]).(ii)If 𝑒=𝑥𝑦𝐸(𝐺), then 𝑧(𝐺)=𝑧(𝐺{𝑒})+𝑧(𝐺{𝑥,𝑦}) (see [14]).(iii)If 𝑥𝑉(𝐺), then 𝑧(𝐺)=𝑧(𝐺{𝑥})+𝑦𝑁𝐺(𝑥)𝑧(𝐺{𝑥,𝑦}) (see [10, Lemma 1]). (iv)𝑧(𝑆𝑛)=𝑛; 𝑧(𝑃𝑛)=𝑓(𝑛+1) for any 𝑛; 𝑧(𝐶𝑛)=𝑓(𝑛1)+𝑓(𝑛+1) for any 𝑛3 (see [14]).

3. The Merrifield-Simmons Index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆)

In this section, we will give the Merrifield-Simmons index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆) and their order.

Theorem 3.1. Let 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆1), 𝜆3. Then 𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆))=2[𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘1]𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘+𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘.(3.1)

Proof. By Lemma 2.2 and an elementary calculating, we have [𝑣]𝑃𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆))=𝑖(𝐺{𝑣})+𝑖(𝐺)=𝑖1[𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘1]𝑖(𝑃𝜆1)𝑘+𝑖𝑃𝜆3𝑘=2[𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘1]𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘+𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘.(3.2)

Theorem 3.2. Let 3𝜆(𝑛1)/𝑘0+1, 𝑘01, 𝑛5. Then 𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆+1))<𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆)).

Proof. Let 3𝜆(𝑛1)/𝑘0+1. We have Δ1𝐶=𝑖𝑛,𝑘0𝐶,𝜆+1𝑖𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆=2(𝑛𝜆𝑘01)𝑓(𝜆+2)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02[𝑛𝑘0(𝜆1)1]𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0=2(𝑛𝜆𝑘01)𝑓(𝜆+2)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0.(3.3)
Obviously, 2(𝑛𝜆𝑘01)1 by 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆+1)) be exist. Again by 𝑓(𝜆+2)<2𝑓(𝜆+1), we have 2(𝑛𝜆𝑘01)𝑓(𝜆+2)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+2)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0.(3.4) Thus Δ1𝑓(𝜆+2)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0=[]𝑓(𝜆+1)+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0=𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆)++𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0<2𝑘01𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0=𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+2𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0[]=𝑓(𝜆)+𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0+2𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0<𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0+2𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0+2𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0=2𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0+𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0(by𝑓(𝜆)<2𝑓(𝜆1))=(2𝑓(𝜆1))𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0<0.(3.5)
By Theorem 3.2, we obtain the order of the Merrifield-Simmons index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆).

Corollary 3.3. Let 3𝜆(𝑛1)/𝑘0+1, 𝑘01, 𝑛5. Then 𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,3))>𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,4))>𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,5))>, and 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,3) has the largest Merrifield-Simmons index among the graphs in 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆).

Theorem 3.4. Let 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆01), 𝜆03, 𝑛3. Then 𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘+1,𝜆0))<𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0)).

Proof. Let 𝑘1, 𝑛3. If 𝜆0=3, then Δ2=𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘+1,3))𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,3))=2[𝑛2(𝑘+1)1]𝑓(4)𝑘+1+𝑓(2)𝑘+12[𝑛2𝑘1]𝑓(4)𝑘𝑓(2)𝑘=2𝑛134𝑘+12𝑛134𝑘=2𝑛134𝑘14<0.(3.6) If 𝜆0=4, then Δ3=𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘+1,4))𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,4))=2[𝑛3(𝑘+1)1]𝑓(5)𝑘+1+𝑓(3)𝑘+12[𝑛3𝑘1]𝑓(5)𝑘𝑓(3)𝑘=2𝑛3𝑘45𝑘(3)+2𝑘35𝑘+2𝑘<0.(3.7) If 𝜆05, then Δ4𝐶=𝑖𝑛,𝑘+1,𝜆0𝐶𝑖𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0=2[𝑛(𝜆01)(𝑘+1)1]𝑓𝜆0+1𝑘+1𝜆+𝑓01𝑘+12[𝑛(𝜆01)𝑘1]𝑓𝜆0+1𝑘𝜆𝑓01𝑘=2[𝑛(𝜆01)(𝑘+1)1]𝑓𝜆0+1𝑘𝑓𝜆0+12𝜆01𝜆+𝑓01𝑘+1𝜆𝑓01𝑘.(3.8) Obviously, 2[𝑛(𝜆01)(𝑘+1)1]1 by 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘+1,𝜆0)) exists. Again by Lemma 2.1(i), we have 𝑓𝜆0+12𝜆01𝜆𝑓0+10.(3.9) Thus Δ4𝜆𝑓0+1𝑘𝑓𝜆0+12𝜆01𝜆+𝑓01𝑘+1𝜆𝑓01𝑘𝜆𝑓0+1𝑘𝜆𝑓0𝜆+1+𝑓01𝑘+1𝜆𝑓01𝑘𝑓𝜆=0+1𝑘+1𝜆𝑓01𝑘+1𝜆𝑓01𝑘<0.(3.10)
By Theorem 3.4, we obtain the order of the Merrifield-Simmons index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0).

Corollary 3.5. Let 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆01), 𝑛3. Then 𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,1,𝜆0))>𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,2,𝜆0))>𝑖(𝐶(𝑛,3,𝜆0))>, and 𝐶(𝑛,1,𝜆0) has the largest Merrifield-Simmons index of among the graphs in 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0).

4. The Hosoya Index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆)

In this section, we will give the Hosoya index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆) and their order.

Theorem 4.1. Let 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆1) and 𝜆3. Then []𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆))=𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘𝑓(𝜆)𝑘+2𝑘𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘1.(4.1)

Proof. For all 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆1) and 𝜆3, according to Lemma 2.3, we have the following: 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆))=𝑧(𝐺{𝑣})+𝑥𝑁𝐺(𝑣)=𝑧(𝐺{𝑥,𝑣})𝑧(𝑃𝜆1)𝑘+[]𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘1𝑧(𝑃𝜆1)𝑘+2𝑘𝑧(𝑃𝜆2),𝑧(𝑃𝜆1)𝑘1=𝑓(𝜆)𝑘+[]𝑓𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘1(𝜆)𝑘+2𝑘𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘1=[]𝑓𝑛(𝜆1)𝑘(𝜆)𝑘+2𝑘𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘1.(4.2)

Theorem 4.2. Let 3𝜆(𝑛1)/𝑘0+1, 𝑘01 and 𝑛5. Then 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆))<𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆+1)).

Proof. Let 3𝜆(𝑛1)/𝑘0+1, 𝑘01 and 𝑛5. We have Δ5𝐶=𝑧𝑛,𝑘0𝐶,𝜆+1𝑧𝑛,𝑘0=,𝜆𝑛𝜆𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0+2𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘01𝑛𝜆𝑘0+𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01=𝑛𝜆𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0+2𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘01𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01.(4.3)
Obviously, (𝑛𝜆𝑘0)1 by 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆+1)) exists. We have 𝑛𝜆𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0=[𝑓](𝜆)+𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0+𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0=𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1),2𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑓(𝜆+1)𝑘01=2𝑘0𝑓[](𝜆)𝑓(𝜆)+𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘012𝑘0𝑓𝑓(𝜆)(𝜆)𝑘01+𝑘0𝑓1(𝜆)𝑘02𝑓(𝜆1)=2𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0+2𝑘0𝑘01𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1).(4.4)
Thus Δ5𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1)+2𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0+2𝑘0𝑘01𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1)𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘02𝑘0𝑓(𝜆1)𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01=𝑘0𝑓(𝜆)𝑘0+2𝑘0𝑘032𝑓(𝜆)𝑘01𝑓(𝜆1)>0.(4.5)
By Theorem 4.2, we obtain the order of the Hosoya index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆).

Corollary 4.3. Let 3𝜆(𝑛1)/𝑘0+1, 𝑘01, 𝑛5. Then 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,3))<𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,4))<𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,5))<, and 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,3) has the smallest Hosoya index among the graphs in 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘0,𝜆).

Theorem 4.4. Let 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆01), 𝜆03, 𝑛3. Then 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0))<𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘+1,𝜆0)).

Proof. Let 𝑘1, 𝜆03, 𝑛3, Δ6𝐶=𝑧𝑛,𝑘+1,𝜆0𝐶𝑧𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0=𝜆𝑛0𝑓𝜆1(𝑘+1)0𝑘+1𝜆+2(𝑘+1)𝑓0𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆𝑛0𝑘𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆2𝑘𝑓0𝑓𝜆10𝑘1=𝜆𝑛0𝜆1(𝑘+1),𝑓0𝑘+1𝜆𝑓0𝑘𝜆0𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆+2𝑘𝑓0𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆𝑓0𝑘1𝜆+2𝑓0𝑓𝜆10𝑘.(4.6)
Obviously, 𝑛(𝜆01)(𝑘+1)1 by 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,𝑘+1,𝜆0)) exists. We have 𝜆𝑛0𝑓𝜆1(𝑘+1)0𝑘+1𝜆𝑓0𝑘𝜆0,2𝑘𝑓0𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆𝑓0𝑘1>0.(4.7)
Thus Δ6𝜆>2𝑓0𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆0𝑓𝜆10𝑘𝜆=𝑓0𝑘𝜆2𝑓0𝜆1010(byLemma2.1(ii)).(4.8)
By Theorem 4.4, we obtain the order of the Hosoya index of 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0).

Corollary 4.5. Let 1𝑘(𝑛1)/(𝜆01), 𝜆03, 𝑛3. Then 𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,1,𝜆0))<𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,2,𝜆0))<𝑧(𝐶(𝑛,2,𝜆0))<, and 𝐶(𝑛,1,𝜆0) has the smallest Hosoya index of among the graphs in 𝐶(𝑛,𝑘,𝜆0).

Acknowledgments

Project 10871205 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation China and the Research Fund of Tianjin Polytechnic University. The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referee for his valuable comments and suggestions, which led to an improvement of the original paper.