Research Article  Open Access
Practical Aspects of Broken Rotor Bars Detection in PWM VoltageSourceInverterFed SquirrelCage Induction Motors
Abstract
Broken rotor bars fault detection in inverterfed squirrel cage induction motors is still as difficult as the dynamics introduced by the control system or the dynamically changing excitation (stator) frequency. This paper introduces a novel fault diagnosis techniques using motor current signature analysis (MCSA) to solve the problems. Switching function concept and frequency modulation theory are firstly used to model fault current signal. The competency of the amplitude of the sideband components at frequencies () as indices for broken bars recognition is subsequently studied in the controlled motor via openloop constant voltage/frequency control method. The proposed techniques are composed of five modules of antialiasing signal acquisition, optimalslipestimation based on torquespeed characteristic curve of squirrel cage motor with different load types, fault characteristic frequency determination, nonparametric spectrum estimation, and fault identification for achieving MCSA efficiently. Experimental and simulation results obtained on 3 kW threephase squirrelcage induction motors show that the model and the proposed techniques are effective and accurate.
1. Introduction
Squirrelcage induction motors have dominated the field of electromechanical energy conversion. They consume more than 60% of the electrical energy produced and are present in the main industrial applications [1, 2]. Although still considered proverbially robust, all components of induction machines are subject to increased stress, particularly when operated in a controlled mode and with repeated load cycles [3]. According to studies, broken rotor bars and cracked endring faults in the rotor cage are responsible for about 5–10% of all breakdowns and incipient detection of these events remains a key issue [4, 5]. The main reason why early detection is important is that although broken rotor bars may not cause immediate failure, there can be serious secondary effects associated with their presence [6, 7]. If faults are undetected, they may lead to potentially catastrophic failures. Thus, healthmonitoring techniques to prevent the induction motor failures are of great concern in the industry and are gaining an increasing attention.
Motor current signature analysis (MCSA) has been successfully applied to detect brokenrotor bar faults by investigating the sideband components around the supplied current fundamental frequency (i.e., the line frequency) where are the sideband frequencies associated with the broken rotor bars and is the per unit motor slip [4, 8, 9]. Some quantitative conclusion based on the left sideband values (LSB) of the amplitudefrequency spectrum plot of a motor phase current even recommends −50 dB~−35 dB of the sideband harmonics as the threshold level for generating a warning or alarm [10]. In addition, MCSA has been tested in many industrial cases since the 1980s with good results [11–16].
Even though numerous successful mainfed motor fault detection methods are reported in the literature, bibliography relative to inverterfed motors on this topic seems to be poor. With the increased emphasis on energy conservation and lower cost, induction machines are supplied and controlled by inverters, and the use of inverter drives increases day by day. As a result, dynamic performance is excellent due to all kinds of control methods and the next steps in drive development are going to be driven by attempts to increase reliability and reduce maintenance costs. By using the current sensor feedback and microprocessing unit, the new tread for lowcost protection applications seems to be driveintegrated fault diagnosis systems without using any external hardware. Thus, it becomes more demanding to detect faults by using MCSA in these drives.
The introduction of voltagesourceinverterfed (VSIfed) motors has produced significant changes in the field of diagnosis and control, needing further research in order to overcome various challenges. Contrary to the motor line current taken directly from the main, the inverterfed motor line current includes remarkable noise (inherent floor noise which reduces the possibility of true fault pattern recognition using line current spectrum) due to the highfrequency switching devices, EMI and EMC effects, and so forth. The current signal for rotor fault diagnosis needs precise and high resolution information, which means the diagnosis system demands additional hardware such as a lowpass filter, highprecision AD converter, and additional software. Moreover, closedloop control in IM drives introduces new difficulties in broken rotor bar detection, as traditional fault indicators tend to be masked by a control algorithm. Therefore, the methods developed for an openloop operation are not able to produce adequate and reliable information on the extent of the fault and have to be adapted [4, 17, 18]. All these influences complicate the utilization of frequency analysis methods. VSIfed motor faults have been analyzed, and the initial results are given in the literature but further investigation is still required.
The classic MCSA method works well under constant load torque and with highpower motors, and it has mainly been designed for fixed frequency supply, such as for machines connected to the electrical grid. To obtain satisfactory test results, in [7], recommendations are given from the author’s experience. As stated in this paper, literally, “the load on the motor should be sufficiently high to produce at least 35% of rated full load rotor slip for a reliable singletest broken bar analysis.” and “if the motor to be tested is fed from a variablespeed converter drive, the frequency of the drive should be locked at the 50/60 Hz power supply frequency for the test.” Yet, difficulties emerge when invertedfed motors are applied to drive fans, pumps, or other mechanisms involving speed control for energysaving purpose. In these cases, the excitation frequency will truly depend on the speed reference and the load applied to the system. Therefore, unlike the utilitydriven case, the stator excitation frequency will dynamically change and the position of the current harmonics appearing on the statorcurrent spectrum due to electrical faults is highly dependent on the mechanical motor load and excitation frequency, which affects the slip frequency. As a consequence, the conventional MCSA must be amended to accommodate the new scenarios. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, in the published literatures there is no research work on this subject.
In this context, following explicitly derivation from a simplified fault signal model, a new online fault diagnosis technique based on MCSA for inverterfed squirrelcage induction motors is present. Compared with traditional MCSA, the novelty of the proposed method is that broken rotor bars fault in the controlled motor via openloop constant voltage/frequency control method could be identified even if the motor operates at different excitation frequencies. To do this, oversampling signal acquisition technique is used to suppress significantly noise contained in the invertedfed motor line current, and faultindicative frequencies with variable excitation frequency are determined by torquespeed characteristic curve of squirrelcage motor with different load types. To obtain satisfactory results, nonparametric spectrum estimation algorithm and fault identification are subsequently presented. Including this introductory section, this paper is organized into six sections. Section 2 presents a theoretical analysis model of stator current of inverterfed squirrelcage motor, which is based on switching function concept and modulation theory. A detailed description of the harmonic components contained in current is given. Section 3 elaborates the new broken rotor bars fault diagnosis techniques. In Section 5, the proposed techniques are validated by laboratory tests; the method is applied to different stator currents obtained from healthy and faulty machines. Experimental and simulation results as well as the corresponding analysis and discussion are presented in Section 4. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are presented in the last section.
2. Analytic Model of Stator Current Signature for SquirrelCage Induction Motor with Constant VoltperHertz Control Technique
2.1. Analytic Model of Stator Current Signature for NoFault SquirrelCage Induction Motor
Switching function concept is a powerful tool in understanding and optimizing the performance of the converter [19, 20]. In [20], an analytical approach for characterizing the current harmonics and interharmonics of the VSIfed ASD injected into the supply system in steady is presented using the switching function concept, applicable to PWM VSI that is studied in this paper. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of a typical PWM VSIfed adjustable speed drive, where , , and represent the rectifier converter current switching functions that correlate the threephase AC source currents , , and and the inverter input DC current , , , and represent the inverter voltage switching functions that correlate inverter dc input voltage and output phase voltages , and , is the impedance operator seen from the inverter output terminals corresponding to the neutral point of induction motor. In order to calculate and analyse the harmonic currents generated by the VSIfed ASD, an analytical model based on the modulation theory and switching function concept is proposed and expressed by (2)~(6). After obtaining the phase currents of PWM VSIfed motor, the harmonic components of the current might be extracted by the use of a certain spectrum analysis method as follows:
As shown in Figure 1, for the twolevel natural sampled PWM with a triangular wave of carrier signal, the threephase voltage switching functions , and can be expressed as the following double Fourier series, as follows:
For a hypothetical ideal motor supplied from a balanced threephase source of sinusoidal voltages and driving a constant load, the following waveform of selected phasea stator current may be assumed by substituting (7) into (5) and (6), where the commutation effect is ignored and proper origin of coordination selected for convenience of analysis is as follows: where is amplitude modulation index, is frequency of the modulation waveform (reference) (rad/s), ; is frequency of the carrier signal (rad/s); ratio of the carrier frequency to the modulation frequency, ; and are Bessel functions of the first kind with order 0 and order , respectively.
2.2. Analytic Model of Stator Current Signature for Faulty SquirrelCage Induction Motor
When broken rotor bar or cracked endring faults develop in the rotor cage, the current, torque, and speed of the motor are affected, typically, in a periodic manner. In the case of periodic disturbances, all three line currents , , and are simultaneously modulated with the fundamental frequency of the faultinduced oscillation of motor variables. If only amplitude modulation and fundamental frequency are considered, current in phasea of the supply line may now be expressed as where denotes the modulation depth (modulation index) and . The value of the modulation index depends on the severity of the abnormality and motor loads.
Substituting (8) in (9) yields indicating that the spectrum of stator current for inverterfed healthy squirrelcage motor contains, apart from the fundamental equal to the inverter excitation (stator) frequency, harmonics at the carrier frequency and multiples of the carrier frequency and harmonics in the sidebands around each multiple of the carrier frequency. When a bar breaks, a rotor asymmetry occurs. The result is that it induces in the stator current additional frequency at , , and around harmonics frequency depicted above. The amplitude of faultindicative frequencies , , and depends on faulty severity, loads and excitation (stator) frequency, and the distance between , , and and corresponding harmonics frequency , , is equal to . The amplitude of and can be considered negligible compared to that of; as a result, are adopted as faultindicative frequencies.
In practice, the current is modulated with respect to not only the amplitude but also the phase, and the modulation process is more complex than that described by (9), but the derived equation (10) provides an adequate basis for qualitative assessment of diagnostic media.
3. Diagnosis Techniques of Broken Rotor Bars for SquirrelCage Induction Motor with Constant Voltage/Frequency Control Method
3.1. Principles of Diagnosis
A motor diagnosis technique, which contains the five processing modules illustrated in Figure 2, is presented, based on model of squirrelcage induction motor stator current signature depicted in Section 2. The current flowing in single phase of the induction motor is sensed by antialiasing signal acquisition module and sent to spectrum estimation module, where the obtained timedomain signal can be decomposed into components of different frequency using Welch’s periodogram method. In optimalslipestimation module, based on the real speed, the inverter excitation frequency, and torquespeed characteristic curve of squirrelcage motor with different load types, the motor slip is calculated and the consequent optimal slip estimation value is transmitted to fault characteristic frequency determination module, where characteristic frequencies of broken rotor bars are calculated. Depending on whether the characteristic frequencies of could be found in power spectrum obtained in spectrum estimation module, the conclusion of failure or not could be drawn, this work is done in fault identification module.
3.2. Method of Antialiasing Signal Acquisition
When carrying out diagnostic analysis one of the key elements to obtain good results is to properly choose acquisition parameters: the sampling frequency and the number of samples. There are two different constraints: analysis signal bandwidth and frequency resolution for the spectrum analysis.
It must be considered, when capturing the stator current signal, that the sampling frequency plays an important role. Generally, statistical bands of faultindicative frequencies can be ascertained from theory analysis and many MCSA experiments [2, 8, 21–23]. Table 1 summarizes the range of sideband frequencies in terms of faulty types. We see in Table 1 that the spectral analysis of stator currents might be done in low frequency range (typically between 0 and 2 kHz) to focus on the significant phenomena [24], and in the case of broken rotor bars fault, the faultindicative frequencies are under 400 Hz. Thus, taking into account the Nyquist criterion, a very high sampling frequency value is not mandatory in case that the motors are supplied by the ac grid. Sampling frequencies of 2k or 5k samples/s (standard in data acquisition devices) enable good resolution analysis.

In contrast, for the inverterfed motors, sampling procedure is more demanding. As it is known, stator current contains highorder frequency harmonics, in this case, due to switching frequencies in modern inverter, typically above 10 kHz. Thus, aliasing may occur due to wrong sampling. Antialiasing techniques have to be used in order to have a correct current spectrum and prevent a false failure alert.
For decreasing alias to an acceptable level, it is common to design a sharpcutoff lowpass antialiasing filter and sample the signal at a frequency lower than the dominant frequency components such as the fundamental and the switching frequencies [25]. However, such sharpcutoff analog filters are difficult and expensive to implement, and if the system is to operate with a variable sampling rate, adjustable filters would be required. Furthermore, sharpcutoff analog filters generally have a highly nonlinear phase response, particularly at the passband edge. In our proposed method, oversampling as an alternative technique is used. The principle of oversampling is briefly reviewed as follows (see [26] for details). A very simple antialiasing filter that has a gradual cutoff with significant attenuation is firstly applied to prefilter the motor stator phasea current. Next, implement the A/D conversion at a higher sampling rate. After that, downsampling the obtained signal with a lower sampling frequency is implemented using a digital lowpass filter.
As for the inverter supply, several harmonics could be mixed up in case that low resolution of the band side was chosen. In general, one can take the following steps to select data acquisition parameters in order to achieve the correct resolution needed.(1)Definition of sampling frequency. For antialiasing purpose, has limitation as , where is the highest faultindicative frequency.(2)Selection of required frequency resolution .(3)Specification of the number of samples .(4)Determination of sampling time .
3.3. Calculation of Slip and FaultIndicative Frequencies with Variable Excitation Frequency
From Section 2, broken rotor bars can be detected by monitoring the stator current spectral components , where harmonic frequencies are a function of slip and excitation frequency . In case of broken rotor bars fault, excitation frequency and the corresponding slip must be firstly determined in order to find harmonic frequencies. The result of a motor diagnosis using MCSA is incorrect if the detected slip has an error [8, 27]. One of the most popular ways to obtain the information of the slip frequency is to use speed sensor. In our proposed method, slip is calculated in optimalslipestimation module, based on the real measured speed and torquespeed characteristic curve of squirrelcage motor.
The torquespeed characteristic curve of different load types is shown in Figure 3. Curves (1), (2) and (3) are inherent characteristic curves of squirrelcage motor corresponding to different excitation frequency . For ease of analysis, it is assumed that torque characteristic curves (1), (2) and (3) intersect mechanical characteristic curve at nominal operating point and only excitation frequency is considered (if , motor operates at point of curve ). In Figure 3, the value of slip corresponding to point is . The noload speedes corresponding to different excitation frequency can be expressed as and , where denotes the number of polepairs.
If motor works with constant torque load, the operate point shifts from to , the slip corresponding to is equal to . Considering the congruent relationship between and , we can deduce the specific slip formula as follows: .
If motor works with fans/pump load, the operating point shifts from to and the slip corresponding to is equal to . Considering the similarity of to and relationship of between speed and torque of fans/pump, we can deduce the specific slip formula as follows: .
3.4. Nonparametric Spectrum Estimation Algorithms
MCSA techniques include parametric and nonparametric spectrum analysis of the motor current in general [28]. Among the nonparametric algorithms, we use Welch’s periodogram algorithms based on DFT to compute the power spectrum of the phasea motor current data.
Let be a discrete time signal, which is obtained by sampling the phasea motor current signal for a duration of sampling time . To reduce the variance of power spectrum estimate, the point data sequence, , is first partitioned into overlapping segments. The length of each segment consists of samples and these segments can be overlapping on each other with () overlapping samples, where is the number of points to shift between segments. Thereafter, the periodogram of each segment is calculated and the obtained periodograms are then averaged to give the power spectrum estimate.
The length of segment is dependent on the required resolution. In order to increase the quality of power spectrum estimates, the signal segments can be windowed before calculating FFT. The proposed methods permit reduce the variance of the estimate at the expense of a decreased frequency resolution. However, it is difficult to trade off between the frequency resolution and the estimate variance. It has been noted that the use of 50% overlapping percentage among the partitioned segments leads to efficient implementation of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm and in this case the relationship between and of segment as follows .
Algorithm 1.
Step 1. Subdividing point sampled data sequence, , into overlapping segments; the th segment data , and , is as follows: Segment 1: ; Segment 1: ; Segment : .
Step 2. Weighting th segment, denote rectangular window function:
Step 3. Calculating power spectrum of the th segment data:
where denote DFT of the th segment data and denote normalization factor.
Step 4. Averaging all segments power spectrum:
4. Experiment Setup and Signal Acquisition Methods
4.1. Experiment Setup
Schematic diagram of the experiment setup is shown in Figure 4. This system can be used to sample line current and line voltage (if necessary, it can be arranged to sample the other line currents and and line voltages and , too), and speed signals. The main components of the experiment setup are as follows.(1)Threephase 3 kW SCIM (see Table 2 for details).(2)Digital stroboscope coupled with the shaft of the SCIM as angularspeed sensor to measure and record the time variation of the speed.(3)DC generator coupled with the SCIM to provide its adjustable load.(4)Mechanical coupling between SCIM and dc generator.(5)Variable resistor bank as a variable load of the generator: the load of the generator and, consequently, the induction motor can be adjusted by varying this resistance and/or regulating the excitation current of the generator by relevant variable resistor. The resistance of this variableresistor bank can be selected step by step by a selector on the bank. In the operating motor, a suitable position of the selector is selected and consequently the induction motor is loaded. By regulating the output voltage of the generator inserted in the excitation current path, the load level is regulated precisely.(6)Inductionmotor drive system type Simens440 with rating values in accordance with that of the SCIM: this drive has been mainly designed and built for openloop scalar controller in constant voltage/frequency (CV/) method.(7)Threephase changeover switch to exchange the motor connections from the mains for the drive output.(8)Signal conditioning circuits: since the used DAQ card accepts only voltage signals with maximum amplitudes of ±10 V, the type and amplitude of the signals are prepared before connection to the card. At the first stage, TBC300LTP Halleffect current transformer is used to prepare the current signal and isolate it from the power circuit. Secondary side current is then converted to proportional voltage signals by current shunts. Then, all signals are transmitted to the DAQ card using a special shielded cable.(9)PC equipped with a selfmade data acquisition card for sampling the electrical data at a certain adjustable frequency and storing them in the memory.

Experiment setup to collect motor data and broken rotor used in the tests are illustrated in Figure 5.
(a)
(b)
4.2. Signal Acquisition Requirements
The experiments involved collecting the phasea stator current and speed data of the induction motor for different load conditions and different excitation frequencies of 20Hz, 32Hz, 40Hz and 50Hz, with three brokenrotorbar fault and without any fault. The load conditions of the motor are 25%, 50%, 75%, and 94% full load, respectively. These load condition percentages are determined according to the motor nameplate information given in Table 2.
Signal oversampling method has been chosen in order to avoid aliasing. The stator current of motor was sampled with a frequency of 2 kHz for mainfed and 40 kHz for inverterfed case. In the inverterfed case, software filters have been implemented in order to avoid aliasing. More specifically, an 8order antialiasing digital butterworth filter was implemented and resampling of the signal has been done at 2 kHz. In our case, thirty seconds long data is acquired from all two motors for each load condition at each frequency mentioned above. Thus, the analyzed frequencies vary from 0 to 1 kHz with a resolution of 0.03 Hz. For the feature extraction and discriminant analysis, starting with the first sample, the acquired data is processed with a sliding window size of 30,000 samples at a slide amount of 10,000, resulting in 60 different data sets all together.
Figure 6 illustrates the intercept parts of 50 Hz stator current signal from the (a) mainfed and (b) inverterfed healthy squirrelcage motors. An expert inspection of these waveforms reveals that the inverterfed motor current waveform is heavily contaminated by the noiselike additive waveform due to PWM switching of the voltage source inverter. If we were to use this motor current waveform data to extract necessary features for fault detection and classification, we need to preprocess the data.
(a)
(b)
5. Experimental Results
5.1. Experiment 1
A nominally healthy squirrelcage motor was firstly tested and the power spectrum of the stator current centered on the fundamental component supplied by (a) main and (b) inverter is shown in Figure 7. The results confirm that the motor rotor is healthy since the sidebands are not present. Comparisons of Figures 7(a) and 7(b) shows that a large amount of harmonic components is included in Figure 7(b) and the inverter supply does affect the spectrumidentifiability. Figure 8 indicates power spectrum of the stator current around the fundamental component for (a) mainfed and (b) inverterfed fault squirrelcage motors with three broken bars and full load. The annotations appearing in the figure denote the main sideband components around the supply frequency and corresponding amplitudes. Comparison of Figures 7 and 8 indicates that sideband components appear, which demonstrates the broken bars occurred. Although more frequency information appears, one could still identify in Figure 8(b) broken rotor bars harmonics at 45 Hz and 55 Hz using our proposed method. Comparison of Figures 8(a) and 8(b) also indicates that, for the same level of damage at the same load, the spectrum sidebands have the same amplitude for different supply.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
5.2. Experiment 2
The second experiment involved fault squirrelcage motor operating at different excitation frequency of inverter with three broken basr and full load. Figure 9 gives the power spectrum of the stator current around the excitation frequencies of 45 Hz, 40 Hz, 32 Hz, and 20 Hz. As expected, the sideband components , depending on excitation frequency and load are present. Comparison of Figures 9(a), 9(b), 9(c), and 9(d) indicates that the left sideband harmonic component varies from (41 Hz,−36 dB) to (18 Hz,−42 dB) and right harmonic from (49 Hz,−39 dB) to(22 Hz,−42 dB), when excitation frequency varies from 45 Hz to 20 Hz. An expert inspection of these spectrums reveals that are always located around the excitation frequency and the distance from the excitation frequency is . It also can be seen from Figure 9 that the amplitude of left sideband harmonic component decreases with the excitation frequency, which is the result that when excitation frequency decreases the output voltage becomes lower and much smaller current is drawn by motor.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
5.3. Experiment 3
In Experiment 3, additional experiments were performed with the faulty motor at different excitation frequencies (32 Hz, 50 Hz) under two different loads (25%, 50%) to assess the performance of the proposed method over the full range of motor loads. Using the proposed diagnosis method, the collected phase current data of the fault motor with three broken bars were analyzed. Figures 10(a) and 10(b) show the results with 32 Hz excitation frequency at different loads and it can be seen that the fault characteristic frequency of broken rotor bars is exposed clearly. With the increase of load, the components of characteristic frequency become more and more significant, such as in Figure 10(a) of 25% load and Figure 10(b) of 50% load. The similar results could be received for fault motor with 50 Hz excitation frequency at different loads; see Figure 10(c) of 25% load and Figure 10(d) of 50% load.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
6. Conclusion
Openloop voltagesourceinverterfed squirrelcage motors with constant voltage/frequency control method are widely used to drive fans, pumps, or other mechanisms involving speed control for energysaving purpose. In these cases, the motor operates steadily with different excitation frequencies. Unlike the utilitydriven case, the position of the current harmonics appearing on the statorcurrent spectrum due to broken rotor bar faults is highly dependent on the mechanical motor load and excitation frequency, which affects the slip frequency. As a consequence, the reliable identification and isolation of faults remains an open issue.
In this paper, a simplified fault current signal model is firstly established using switching function concept and frequency modulation theory. It is demonstrated that the inverterfed motor current is heavily contaminated due to PWM switching of the voltage source inverter. However, the broken rotor bars fault characteristic frequency , depending on faulty severity, loads, and excitation frequency, is always located around the excitation frequency and the distance from the excitation frequency is . Novel broken rotor bar fault diagnosis techniques using motor current signature analysis (MCSA) for openloop voltagesourceinverterfed squirrelcage induction motors with constant voltage/frequency control method are subsequently proposed. Experimental results obtained on selfmade 3 kW threephase squirrelcage induction motors are discussed. It is shown that experimental and simulation results are consistent with those of the model revealed and the proposed techniques are effective and accurate.
The method described works well under constant load torque, but some difficulties appear with regard to closedloop controloperated machines, when and vary almost simultaneously and it is impossible to employ the proposed method to diagnose broken rotor bar fault. At the moment, further research is carried out for the features, advantages, limitations, and improvements of the proposed techniques.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Chinese academy of Sciences Key Deployment Project under Grant no. KGZDEW302.
References
 M. E. H. Benbouzid and G. B. Kliman, “What stator current processingbased technique to use for induction motor rotor faults diagnosis?” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 238–244, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Cusido, L. Romeral, J. A. Ortega, J. A. Rosero, and A. G. Espinosa, “Fault detection in induction machines using power spectral density in wavelet decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 633–643, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. M. Wolbank, P. Nussbaumer, H. Chen, and P. E. Macheiner, “Monitoring of rotorbar defects in inverterfed induction machines at zero load and speed,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1468–1478, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bellini, F. Filippetti, C. Tassoni, and G. A. Capolino, “Advances in diagnostic techniques for induction machines,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 4109–4126, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. H. Bonnett and C. Yung, “Increased efficiency versus increased reliability,” IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Cusido, L. Romeral, J. A. Ortega, A. Garcia, and J. R. Riba, “Wavelet and PDD as fault detection techniques,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 915–924, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Culbert and W. Rhodes, “Using current signature analysis technology to reliably detect cage winding defects in squirrel cage induction motors,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference, pp. 95–101, September 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 J. H. Jung, J. J. Lee, and B. H. Kwon, “Online diagnosis of induction motors using MCSA,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1842–1852, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. H. Kia, H. Henao, and G. A. Capolino, “A highresolution frequency estimation method for threephase induction machine fault detection,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2305–2314, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Matic, F. Kulić, M. PinedaSánchez, and I. Kamenko, “Support vector machine classifier for diagnosis in electrical machines: application to broken bar,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 8681–8689, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. E. H. Benbouzid, “A review of induction motors signature analysis as a medium for faults detection,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 984–993, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. F. Cabanas, F. Pedrayes, M. G. Melero et al., “Unambiguous detection of broken bars in asynchronous motors by means of a flux measurementbased procedure,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 891–899, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. A. Gupta, A. K. Wadhwani, and S. R. Kapoor, “Early estimation of faults in induction motors using symbolic dynamicbased analysis of stator current samples,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 102–114, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. T. Thomson and M. Fenger, “Case histories of current signature analysis to detect faults in induction motor drives,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC '03), 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Choi, B. Akin, M. M. Rahimian, and H. A. Toliyat, “Implementation of a faultdiagnosis algorithm for induction machines based on advanced digitalsignalprocessing techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 937–948, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Akin, S. B. Ozturk, H. A. Toliyat, and M. Rayner, “DSPbased sensorless electric motor fault diagnosis tools for electric and hybrid electric vehicle powertrain applications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 2150–2159, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bellini, “Closedloop control impact on the diagnosis of induction motors faults,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1318–1329, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. M. A. Cruz and A. J. M. Cardoso, “Diagnosis of rotor faults in closedloop induction motor drives,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 41st IAS Annual Meeting on Industry Applications, pp. 2346–2353, October 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. K. Lee and M. Ehsani, “A simplified functional simulation model for threephase voltagesource inverter using switching function concept,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 309–321, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. W. Chang and S. K. Chen, “An analytical approach for characterizing harmonic and interharmonic currents generated by VSIfed adjustable speed drives,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2585–2593, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Nandi, H. A. Toliyat, and X. D. Li, “Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical motors—a review,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 719–729, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Eltabach and A. Charara, “Comparative investigation of electric signal analyses methods for mechanical fault detection in induction motors,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1161–1180, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Eltabach, J. Antoni, and M. Najjar, “Quantitative analysis of noninvasive diagnostic procedures for induction motor drives,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 2838–2856, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Yazidi, H. Henao, G. A. Capolino, M. Artioli, and F. Filippetti, “Improvement of frequency resolution for threephase induction machine fault diagnosis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 40th IAS Annual Meeting on Industry Applications, vol. 1, pp. 20–25, October 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. P. Georgakopoulos, E. D. Mitronikas, and A. N. Safacas, “Detection of induction motor faults in inverter drives using inverter input current analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4365–4373, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, and J. R. Buck, DiscreteTime Signal Processing, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2nd edition, 2005.
 J. Faiz and B. M. Ebrahimi, “A new pattern for detecting broken rotor bars in induction motors during startup,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 4673–4683, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Ayhan, M. Y. Chow, and M. H. Song, “Multiple discriminant analysis and neuralnetworkbased monolith and partition faultdetection schemes for broken rotor bar in induction motors,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1298–1308, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Hongyu Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.