UncertaintyBased Design Optimization in Engineering: Model, Algorithm, and Application
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Guohua Cao, Dan Shan, "The Effect of Exit Strategy on Optimal Portfolio Selection with Birandom Returns", Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 236579, 6 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/236579
The Effect of Exit Strategy on Optimal Portfolio Selection with Birandom Returns
Abstract
The aims of this paper are to use a birandom variable to denote the stock return selected by some recurring technical patterns and to study the effect of exit strategy on optimal portfolio selection with birandom returns. Firstly, we propose a new method to estimate the stock return and use birandom distribution to denote the final stock return which can reflect the features of technical patterns and investors' heterogeneity simultaneously; secondly, we build a birandom safetyfirst model and design a hybrid intelligent algorithm to help investors make decisions; finally, we innovatively study the effect of exit strategy on the given birandom safetyfirst model. The results indicate that (1) the exit strategy affects the proportion of portfolio, (2) the performance of taking the exit strategy is better than when the exit strategy is not taken, if the stoploss point and the stopprofit point are appropriately set, and (3) the investor using the exit strategy become conservative.
1. Introduction
During decades of development of Chinese stock market, plentiful practice has proved that some technical patterns occur repeatedly in stock market. Stocks with some technical patterns are much more likely to profit than those with other technical patterns. Douglas [1] pointed out that investors should distinguish the recurring technical patterns, summarize the laws, and use them to choose stocks, which can greatly improve the performance of profit. If investors can consider the features of technical patterns and investors’ heterogeneity in estimating the stock return, then they can not only enhance the accuracy of estimation but also make it conform to the actual decisionmaking process of investors more. So a natural question is how to reflect the features of these technical patterns and investors’ heterogeneity in the stock return? To the best of our knowledge, there has been no literature in this respect. In this paper, we try to answer this question for the first time.
Estimating the stock return has always been one of the theoretical hot issues, and much progress has been made in this area. The stock return was assumed to follow the normal distribution [2], which had been verified not to coincide with the facts by a great deal of afterward researches. In order to describe the stock return better, the Logistic distribution [3], Student distribution [4], and stable Paretian distribution [5] were put forward. Later, fuzzy random distribution [6] and random fuzzy distribution [7] were used separately via combining randomness with fuzziness. In [8, 9], the stock return was assumed to follow birandom distribution. All of the above distributions have certain theoretical meaning, but there are two limitations: one is that they do not consider the stock’s technical patterns, thus hiding the particularity of technical patterns, and the other is that investors’ heterogeneity cannot be reflected from the above distributions. In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the stock return and the stock return gained finally can be indicated with a birandom variable and thus solving the above two limitations well.
After the stock return being determined, it is important to choose a portfolio model to help investors make decisions. Roy [10] proposed the safetyfirst model. The main point was investors would try to make the probability of a disaster smallest when allocating asset. Pyle and Turnovsky [11] summarized the three forms of the safetyfirst rule. A safetyfirst chance constrained model [12] was proposed by combining the safetyfirst rule with chance constraint. Based on the safetyfirst rule, a birandom chance constrained model [8] and a birandom expected value model [9] were put forward when the stock return follows birandom distribution. However, the model in [8] just takes the budget constraint into consideration without considering the effect of a disaster. The model in [9] uses the expected value to describe the profit, but the expected value model is only applied to risk neutral investors not to risk aversion and risk loving ones. In this paper, a birandom safetyfirst model is acquired by combining the two models in [8, 9]. In fact, the new model not only considers the effect of disaster, but also can apply to all investors through parameters adjustment.
As we all know, there are two important parts in investment process: how to buy and how to sell. The theory of portfolio selection is widely used to help us decide the proportion of portfolio, which to solve the problem of how to buy. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no research on the effect of selling strategy on portfolio selection. Exit strategy proposed in behavioral finance has been proved to be an effective selling strategy, and we try to study the effect of exit strategy on birandom portfolio selection in this paper.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, we illustrate how to describe the stock return using a birandom variable. In Section 3, we propose a birandom safetyfirst model, a hybrid intelligent algorithm, and a numerical example. In Section 4, we study the effect of exit strategy on birandom portfolio selection. Finally, in Section 5, we draw the conclusion.
2. Estimate the Stock Return
In the following paragraphs, firstly we will introduce the birandom theory, secondly show how to describe the stock return using a birandom variable, and finally give a numerical example.
2.1. Birandom Theory
Definition 1 (Jin and BaoDing [13]). A birandom variable is a mapping from a probability space to a collective of random variables such that for any subsets of the real line , the induced function is a measure function with respect to .
Example 2. Let , and , . Assume that is a function on as follows: where and are random variables. Then is a birandom variable according to Definition 1. In Example 2, represents stock, represents stock rising, represents stock falling, and represent the probabilities of stock rising and falling, respectively, and represents profit distribution, represents loss distribution.
Definition 3 (Jin and BaoDing [13]). Let be a birandom vector on and be a vectorvalued measurable function. Then the primitive chance of birandom event characterized by is a function from (0,1] to , defined as
2.2. Method to Estimate the Stock Return
Assuming that an investor selects stock in accordance with technical pattern , a new method is proposed to estimate the return distribution of stock . The specific steps are listed as follows.
Step 1. Calculate the probabilities of stock rising and falling after the appearance of technical pattern . The method is to select representative stocks and inspect the occurrence number of technical pattern of the stocks during a certain period, and then figure out the numbers of price rising and falling separately. When the sample size is large enough, it is reasonable to substitute the frequencies of stock rising and falling for the probabilities of stock rising and falling. Through the comparison of probabilities, the technical patterns can be divided into three types where the probability of rising is larger than, equal to, and smaller than the probability of falling. What we care for is the first type, and it is named as the advanced technical pattern.
Step 2. Because stock has the features of technical pattern , we substitute its probabilities of rising and falling by the corresponding probabilities in Step 1. Thus , in Example 2 are obtained.
Step 3. When stock rises, we estimate the profit distribution of stock . When stock falls, we estimate the loss distribution of stock . Thus and in Example 2 are obtained. Here the following two things should be emphasize.(1) and can be obtained from the investors’ experience, the stock historical data, and the existing stock forecast methods. In this paper, we assume that and are random variables.(2) Different investors have different opinions and judgments on the stock market; therefore, different assumptions of and can demonstrate the heterogeneity of investors.
From the above, the stock return is quantified by the birandom variable in Example 2. Among them, the formulas , demonstrate the features of technical patterns and the distributions of and reflect the investors’ heterogeneity.
2.3. A Numerical Example
Because stock follows the birandom distribution in Example 2, we can calculate , , , and in the following steps.
Step 1 (calculate and ). Suppose that we select fifty representative stocks and the appearance numbers of technical pattern of the fifty stocks are equal to one hundred during the last year. If price goes up 60 times and down 40 times, then the probabilities of stock rising and falling are equal to 0.6 and 0.4, respectively, so and .
Step 2 (the determination of and ). After selecting stock based on technical pattern , the investor concludes, by various analytical methods such as fundamental analysis and technical analysis, that the profit of stock should be distributed uniformly in the interval . Therefore, the profit distribution can be assumed to follow the uniform distribution . Similarly, we can also assume that the loss distribution follows the uniform distribution .
Remark 4. The detailed statistic process in Step 1 is not included in the paper.
Remark 5. and can be arbitrary random variable and different distributions of and have no effect on the validity of the model and the algorithm given in the following paragraphs. Here, the assumption of uniform distribution is to simplify calculation.
Now we get the distribution of stock . The distribution is given by the following.
Example 6. ( represents stock , represents stock rising, and represents stock falling), and , , where follows and follows .
3. Birandom SafetyFirst Model
3.1. Assumptions of the Birandom SafetyFirst Model
The investor selects stocks based on kinds of technical patterns. Let and denote the th stock and the investment proportion of the th stock, , respectively. And the return of stock follows the birandom distribution in Example 2. Stocks can be infinite subdivision. the market does not allow shorting and there is no limitation on the transaction cost.
3.2. Measures of the Profit and Risk
In this paper, the chance that return of total asset (RTA) is no less than some value is used to measure the profit which is given by
The chance that RTA is no less than a disaster level is regarded to measure the risk which is given by
3.3. Birandom SafetyFirst Model
Using the measures of the profit and risk given above, the birandom safetyfirst model is given by where represents the profit, represents the disaster level, and represent the investor’s tolerance, and is the lower bound of the chance that RTA is not less than some disaster level when the tolerance is .
The economic meanings of model (6) are listed as follows.(1) The constraint condition means that the capital cannot exceed the budget.(2) The constraint condition means that the market does not allow shorting.
Remark 7. Model (6) can be used for all investors as long as choosing the right parameters , , , , .
Remark 8. When the values of and are fixed, the value of is in inverse ratio with the risk tolerance ability. (Proof is described in the appendix.)
Remark 9. In the case that the return distribution of stock is a random variable, model (6) is reduced to the special one:
3.4. Hybrid Intelligent Algorithm
Because of the uncertainty of birandom variable, it is hard to analytically solve model (6). To provide a general solution to model (6), we design a hybrid intelligent algorithm integrating genetic algorithm (GA) and birandom simulation.
3.4.1. Birandom Simulation
The technique of birandom simulation is applied to compute (4) and (5). The specific steps are listed as follows.
Algorithm 10 (birandom simulation for (4)).
Step 1. Generate from according to the probability measure .
Step2. Compute the probability for , respectively, by stochastic simulation.
Step 3. Set as the integer part of .
Step 4. Return the th largest element in ().
Step 5. is the value of (4).
Algorithm 11 (birandom simulation for (5)).
Step 1. Set .
Step 2. Generate from according to the probability measure .
Step 3. Compute the probability for , respectively, by stochastic simulation.
Step 4. Set as the integer part of .
Step 5. Return the th largest element in ().
Step 6. If is larger than , then , else .
Step 7. If , then return Yes, else return No. Here, Yes means the investment proportion satisfies (5), and No means that does not satisfy (5).
3.4.2. Genetic Algorithm
The specific steps of genetic algorithm are described in [8].
3.4.3. Hybrid Intelligent Algorithm
Step 1. Initialize chromosomes.
Step 2. Calculate the values of (4) for all chromosomes by birandom simulation.
Step 3. Give the rank order of the chromosomes according to the values of (4), and define the rankbased evaluation function of the chromosomes.
Step 4. Compute the value of each chromosome according to the rankbased evaluation function.
Step 5. Select the chromosomes by spinning the roulette wheel.
Step 6. Update the chromosomes by crossover and mutation operations.
Step 7. Repeat the second step to the sixth step for a given number of cycles.
Step 8. Take the best chromosome as the solution of portfolio selection.
3.5. A Numerical Example
According to in Section 3.1, an investor picks three stocks based on three kinds of technical patterns (the probability of rising is larger than, equal to, and smaller than the probability of falling). The stock return follows birandom distribution and the corresponding parameters of each stock are shown in Table 1. Besides, the investor takes , , , , and .

Remark 12. In Table 1, , , , represent the probability of stock rising, the probability of falling, profit distribution, and loss distribution of stock , respectively.
So model (6) that satisfies the above investment goals is given by
In order to compare model (6) with the models in [8, 9], the models in [8, 9] are listed as below:
The parameters of the hybrid intelligent algorithm are taken as , the crossover probability = 0.3, the mutation probability = 0.5, the evaluate function based on the order , and the number of cycles is equal to 1000. After repeating the hybrid intelligent algorithm 10 times and taking the average value of the results, the optimal solutions of models (9)–(11) are shown in Table 2.
From result 1 in Table 2, it can be seen that model (10) and the hybrid intelligent algorithm are of great applicability, even if stock has the advanced technical pattern, not all investors will buy it using their total asset. Some investors prefer to buy the highrisk and highinterest stock.
From result 2 in Table 2, it can be seen that the proportion of stock is very large. This is because model (11) uses the expected value to measure the profit and stock has the largest expected value, so the investor will select stock as many as possible, while the constraints are met. However, model (11) is only suitable for riskneutral investors, so it is restricted in real application.
From result 3 in Table 2, it can be seen that the objective function value of model (12) is larger than it of model (10). This is because model (12) does not consider the risk, so consequently, model (12) has a larger solution space than model (10). Despite achieving the high yield, model (12) is unpractical in application because it ignores the risk.
Through the comparisons of models (10)–(12), it can be concluded that model (10) is more practical than model (11) and model (12), because model (10) not only considers the effect of disaster, but also can apply to all investors through parameters adjustment.
4. The Effect of Exit Strategy on the Optimal Portfolio Selection
Exit strategy is a selling strategy including the stoploss strategy and the stopprofit strategy. If an investor sets the stopprofit point and the stoploss point for each stock, he will sell the stocks when the stocks’ actual profit exceeds or the actual loss exceeds . Now we want to ask whether result 1 in Table 2 is still available if the investor set and for each stock.
we know that in the simulation process of result 1, the stock return of each stock can be any sample point following corresponding birandom distribution. However, in practice, the cases that actual stock return is over 4% or below −5% will not occur due to the setting of the stoploss point and the stopprofit point. Thus the calculation of result 1 is inconsistent with the investor’s decisionmaking process. In other words, result 1 cannot reach the investor’ objective in theory, which causes the failure of model (10).
In order to solve the above conflict, we should adjust the stock return based on the stoploss point and the stopprofit point. Considering the assumptions of model (10), we revise the calculation in the following ways.
Step 1. The investor should adjust the stock return according to the stopprofit point and the stoploss point. Adjustment method is to take the stopprofit point as stock return when stock return exceeds the stopprofit point and to take the stoploss point as stock return when stock return is less than the stoploss point. Take stock in Table 1 as an example, if an investor set the stopprofit point as 4% and the stoploss points as −5%, the part exceeding 4% in is treated as 4% and the part below −5% in is considered as −5%.
Step 2. Because of the adjustment of the stock return, we also should modify the steps of birandom simulation. The adjustment method is that if the sample point exceeds the stopprofit point or is less than the stoploss point, we take the stopprofit point or the stoploss point as the sample point. The rest of the steps of the hybrid intelligent algorithm remain unchanged. Take stock in Table 1 as an example. when samples are selected from , the part which is more than 4% is looked upon as 4% and when samples are selected from , the part which is below −5% is considered as −5%.
Through the above adjustment, the calculated value can reach the investor’s goal in theory. The revised result of model (10) is
It can be seen from result (13) that(1) because the objective function value in result (13) is larger than it in result 1, the performance of taking the exit strategy is better than when the exit strategy is not taken, if the stoploss point is equal to −5% and the stopprofit point is equal to 4%;(2) the exit strategy affects the buying strategy and the investor should adjust the stock return according to the stoploss point and the stopprofit point, otherwise the portfolio model will become invalid;(3) the investor using exit strategy become conservative. This is because he is concerned with the accumulated probability of stock price exceeding the stopprofit point not the higher stock return any more.
5. Conclusion
In this paper we propose a new method to estimate the stock return and use a birandom variable to denote the final stock return which can reflect the features of technology forms and investors’ heterogeneity simultaneously. Besides, we build a birandom safetyfirst model and design a hybrid intelligent algorithm to help investors make a decision. Moreover, we innovatively study the effect of exit strategy on the given birandom safetyfirst model. The results indicate that the performance of taking the exit strategy is better than when the exit strategy is not taken, if the stoploss point and the stopprofit point are appropriately set.
Appendix
Proof of Remark 8
Let represent the solution space which satisfies
Let represent the solution space which satisfies and .
For any . If satisfies
then we can obtain that also satisfies
So if satisfies
then we can obtain satisfies
Since (A.6) is equivalent to (A.2), so . Hence, . That is to say, the value of is in inverse ratio with the range of solution space.
Since when the range of solution space is enlarged, an investor has a larger decision range, which means he/she can try some investments that others dare not try, so the risk tolerance ability is increased vice versa.
So the range of solution space is in direct ratio to risk tolerance ability; therefore, the value of is in inverse ratio with risk tolerance ability.
References
 M. Douglas, Trading in the Zone, Prentice Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2000. View at: Zentralblatt MATH
 H. Markowitz, “Portfolio selection,” Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 1952. View at: Google Scholar
 D. DaYong and J. WeiDong, “A subjective model of the distribution of returns and empirical analysis,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 15, pp. 112–120, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 L. MeiYan, X. HongGang, and Z. FengQun, “Statisticsal analysis of return rates of shanghai stock market price integrated index,” Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 14, pp. 115–119, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 F. JianQiang and W. FuXin, “A research on return distribution function of chinese stockmarket,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 11, pp. 82–90, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Li, J. Xu, and M. Gen, “A class of multiobjective linear programming model with fuzzy random coefficients,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 44, no. 1112, pp. 1097–1113, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 X. Huang, “A new perspective for optimal portfolio selection with random fuzzy returns,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 23, pp. 5404–5414, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 L. MeiYan, “Chanceconstrained portfolio selection with birandom returns,” Modern Applied Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 161–165, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 L. MeiYan, “One type of optimal portfolio selection in birandom environments,” Modern Applied Science, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 121–126, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 A. D. Roy, “Safetyfirst and the holding of assets,” Econometrica, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 431–449, 1952. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH
 D. H. Pyle and S. J. Turnovsky, “Safetyfirst and expected utility maximization in meanstandard deviation portfolio analysis,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 75–81, 1970. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. YongFen, “Based on the safety first chance constrained dynamic portfolio research problems,” Modern Economic Information, vol. 18, pp. 32–33, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Jin and L. BaoDing, “Birandom variables and birandom programming,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 433–453, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Guohua Cao and Dan Shan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.