Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2013, Article ID 857916, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/857916
Research Article

Multigranular Uncertain Linguistic Prioritized Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making

1Institute of Quality Development, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
2School of Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150040, China

Received 23 January 2013; Accepted 20 March 2013

Academic Editor: Frank Werner

Copyright © 2013 Ding-Hong Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Degani and G. Bortolan, “The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 143–162, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Delgado, J. L. Verdegay, and M. A. Vila, “On aggregation operations of linguistic labels,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 351–370, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Bordogna, M. Fedrizzi, and G. Pasi, “A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 126–132, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. F. Herrera, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 337–364, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. J. F. Pang and J. Y. Liang, “Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information,” Omega, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 294–301, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Martínez and F. Herrera, “An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges,” Information Sciences, vol. 207, pp. 1–18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. F. Herrera and L. Martinez, “A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 746–752, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  9. Z. S. Xu, “EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 791–810, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. Z. S. Xu, “A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations,” Information Sciences, vol. 166, no. 1–4, pp. 19–30, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. Y. C. Dong, Y. F. Xu, and S. Yu, “Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 603–623, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. Y. C. Dong, Y. F. Xu, H. Y. Li, and B. Feng, “The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 455–463, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Z. S. Xu, “Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment,” Information Sciences, vol. 168, no. 1–4, pp. 171–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Z. S. Xu, “Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making,” Information Fusion, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 231–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. S. Xu, “An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 488–499, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. S. Xu, “Correlated linguistic information aggregation,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 633–647, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. G. W. Wei, “Uncertain linguistic hybrid geometric mean operator and its application to group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 251–267, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. J. H. Park, M. G. Gwak, and Y. C. Kwun, “Uncertain linguistic harmonic mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making,” Computing, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. H. M. Zhang, “The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 27–35, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. S.-M. Chen and L.-W. Lee, “Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on the ILLOWA operator and likelihood-based comparison relations,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 115–129, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. S.-M. Chen, L.-W. Lee, S.-W. Yang, and T.-W. Sheu, “Adaptive consensus support model for group decision making systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 12580–12588, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  22. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martínez, “A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, “A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Herrera-Viedma, L. Martínez, F. Mata, and F. Chiclana, “A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 644–658, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z. F. Chen and D. Ben-Arieh, “On the fusion of multi-granularity linguistic label sets in group decision making,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 526–541, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. P. Jiang, Z. P. Fan, and J. Ma, “A method for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1098–1109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. Mata, L. Martínez, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z. S. Xu, “An interactive approach to multiple attribute group decision making with multigranular uncertain linguistic information,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. X. H. Yu, Z. S. Xu, and X. M. Zhang, “Uniformization of multigranular linguistic labels and their application to group decision making,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 257–276, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. P. Fan and Y. Liu, “A method for group decision-making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 4000–4008, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Y. Gao and D. H. Peng, “Consolidating SWOT analysis with nonhomogeneous uncertain preference information,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 796–808, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Z. Zhang and C. H. Guo, “A method for multi-granularity uncertain linguistic group decision making with incomplete weight information,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 26, pp. 111–119, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  33. E. Herrera-Viedma and A. G. López-Herrera, “A model of an information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1197–1214, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martínez, “A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 354–370, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. J. Cabrerizo, S. Alonso, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 109–131, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. R. Yager, “Modeling prioritized multicriteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 2396–2404, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  37. R. R. Yager, “Prioritized aggregation operators,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 263–274, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. R. R. Yager, “Prioritized OWA aggregation,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 245–262, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. R. R. Yager, G. Gumrah, and M. Z. Reformat, “Using a web personal evaluation tool—PET for lexicographic multi-criteria service selection,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 929–942, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. J. Yu, Y. Y. Wu, and T. Lu, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application in group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 30, pp. 57–66, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  41. R. R. Yager, “On prioritized multiple-criteria aggregation,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1297–1305, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  42. Z. S. Xu, “Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix,” Journal of System Engineering, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  43. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183–190, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  44. R. R. Yager, “Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–73, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus