Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2013, Article ID 906743, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/906743
Research Article

Developing Common Set of Weights with Considering Nondiscretionary Inputs and Using Ideal Point Method

1Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
2Department of Mathematical Sciences, Kent State University, Burton, OH 44021-9500, USA

Received 22 August 2013; Accepted 3 November 2013

Academic Editor: Mark A. Petersen

Copyright © 2013 Reza Kiani Mavi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  3. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, M. Sanei, and M. Fallah Jelodar, “Review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 29-32, pp. 1431–1448, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. D. K. Despotis and Y. G. Smirlis, “Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 24–36, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. V. Rezaie, G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, and M. Khanmohammadi, “Ranking DMUs by ideal points in DEA,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 3, no. 17-20, pp. 919–929, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, N. Shoja, A. G. Abri, M. F. Jelodar, and K. J. Firouzabadi, “Proposing a new model on data envelopment analysis by considering non discretionary factors and a review on previous models,” Mathematical and Computational Applications, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 344–353, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  7. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, M. Khanmohammadi, M. Kazemimanesh, and V. Rezaie, “Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 7483–7488, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Ramón, J. L. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent, “Common sets of weights as summaries of DEA profiles of weights: with an application to the ranking of professional tennis players,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 4882–4889, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. R. Jahanshahloo and S. Abbasian-Naghneh, “Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 61-64, pp. 3089–3106, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498–509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. W. W. Cooper, K. S. Park, and J. T. Pastor, “RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–42, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, and L. M. Seiford, Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Mass, USA, 1994.
  13. F. H. Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and M. Esmaeili, “Non-discretionary factors and imprecise data in DEA,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 1, no. 5-8, pp. 237–246, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. P. Anderson and N. C. Petersen, “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1261–1264, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Mehrabian, M. R. Alirezaee, and G. R. Jahanshahloo, “A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 261–266, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. W. D. Cook, M. Kress, and L. M. Seiford, “Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 319–323, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  17. G. R. Jahanshahloo, H. V. Junior, F. H. Lotfi, and D. Akbarian, “A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 331–337, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  18. F.-H. F. Liu and H. Hsuan Peng, “Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1624–1637, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  19. W. D. Cook and M. Kress, “A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  20. W. D. Cook and M. Kress, “Data envelopment model for aggregating preference ranking,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1302–1310, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  21. Y. Roll, W. D. Cook, and B. Golany, “Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis,” IIE Transactions, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–9, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Roll, “Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA,” Omega, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. A. Ganley and S. A. Cubbin, Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992.
  24. Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez, and A. Barboy, “Academic departments efficiency via DEA,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 543–556, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  25. M. D. Troutt, “A maximum decisional efficiency estimation principle,” Management Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 76–82, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. L. Friedman and Z. Sinuany-Stern, “Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 629–637, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Sinuany-Stern and L. Friedman, “DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 470–478, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  28. C. I. Chiang and G. H. Tzeng, “A new efficiency measure for DEA: efficiency achievement measure established on fuzzy multiple objectives programming,” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 369–388, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. K. Despotis, “Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 314–323, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. A. Hashimoto and D.-A. Wu, “A DEA-compromise programming model for comprehensive ranking,” Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 73–81, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. C. Kao and H.-T. Hung, “Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1196–1203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  32. G. R. Jahanshahloo, A. Memariani, F. H. Lotfi, and H. Z. Rezai, “A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 265–281, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. W. D. Cook and J. Zhu, “Within-group common weights in DEA: an analysis of power plant efficiency,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 207–216, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  34. A. Makui, A. Alinezhad, R. Kiani Mavi, and M. Zohrehbandian, “A goal programming method for finding common weights in DEA with an improved discriminating power for efficiency,” Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 293–303, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  35. F.-H. Franklin Liu and H. H. Peng, “A systematic procedure to obtain a preferable and robust ranking of units,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1012–1025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  36. Y.-M. Wang, Y. Luo, and L. Liang, “Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 469–484, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. Y.-M. Wang and K.-S. Chin, “A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3666–3675, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. M. Hatefi and S. A. Torabi, “A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators,” Ecological Economics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 114–120, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y.-M. Wang, Y. Luo, and Y.-X. Lan, “Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 9122–9128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. I. Chiang, M. J. Hwang, and Y. H. Liu, “Determining a common set of weights in a DEA problem using a separation vector,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 54, no. 9-10, pp. 2464–2470, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. A. Davoodi and H. Z. Rezai, “Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problem,” Central European Journal of Operations Research (CEJOR), vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 355–365, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. J. Sun, J. Wu, and D. Guo, “Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 6301–6310, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. K. Cullinane and T. Wang -F, “Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and improving container port efficiency,” in Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 17, pp. 517–566, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  44. W. Cook, Y. Roll, and A. Kazakov, “A DEA model for measuring the relative efficiencies of highway maintenance patrols,” INFOR, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 113–124, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  45. R. D. Banker and R. C. Morey, “Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 513–521, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Ruggiero, “Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 461–469, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus