Research Article | Open Access

Mercedes Pérez, Francisco P. Pérez, Emilio Jiménez, "Classification of the Quasifiliform Nilpotent Lie Algebras of Dimension 9", *Journal of Applied Mathematics*, vol. 2014, Article ID 173072, 12 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/173072

# Classification of the Quasifiliform Nilpotent Lie Algebras of Dimension 9

**Academic Editor:**Peter G. L. Leach

#### Abstract

On the basis of the family of quasifiliform Lie algebra laws of dimension 9 of 16 parameters and 17 constraints, this paper is devoted to identify the invariants that completely classify the algebras over the complex numbers except for isomorphism. It is proved that the nullification of certain parameters or of parameter expressions divides the family into subfamilies such that any couple of them is nonisomorphic and any quasifiliform Lie algebra of dimension 9 is isomorphic to one of them. The iterative and exhaustive computation with Maple provides the classification, which divides the original family into 263 subfamilies, composed of 157 simple algebras, 77 families depending on 1 parameter, 24 families depending on 2 parameters, and 5 families depending on 3 parameters.

#### 1. Introduction

The interest in classifying nilpotent Lie algebras is broad both within the academic community and the industrial engineering community, since they are applied in classical mechanical problems and current research in scientific disciplines as modern geometry, solid state physics, or particle physics [1–5]. Lie algebras classification consists in determining equivalence relations that subdivide the original set in equivalence classes defined by at least one element in each set, and it is usual to classify the algebras except for isomorphisms. The solvable Lie algebras classification problem comes down in a sense to the nilpotent Lie algebras classification [6] and computer algebra has been indispensable. However, the more the dimension increases, the more and more complex is the determination of exhaustive lists of Lie algebras, so new computation methodologies are a present field of research [7, 8] with current symbolic manipulation programs such as Reduce, Mathematica, or Maple [9].

The classification of nilpotent Lie algebras over the complex numbers experimented an important advance based on the works of Ancochéa-Bermúdez and Goze [10] introducing an invariant more potent than the previously existing: the characteristic sequence or Goze's invariant (defined in Section 2.1). Those authors were able, by using the characteristic sequence as an invariant, to classify the nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension 7 [11] and the filiform Lie algebras of dimension 8 [12]. Later, by using that invariant, Gomez and Echarte [13] classify the filiform Lie algebras of dimension 9. Afterward, Castro et al. [14] develop an algorithm for symbolic language for finding the generic families of filiform Lie algebras in any dimension with the restrictions required to the parameters.

Subsequent works about quasifiliform Lie algebras classification were centered on specific types of families or subclasses, obtaining results applicable to higher dimensions. For instance, the classifications of naturally graded [15] and graded by derivations [16] quasifiliform Lie algebras. These works extended to other algebras, with a high nilindex, the classification of graded filiform Lie algebras, studied initially by Vergne [17, 18], obtained from the gradation related to the filtration produced in a natural way by the descending central sequence.

In this paper we focus on a method of identification of the invariants that completely classify the nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension 9 over the complex numbers except for isomorphisms. With this aim, the dimensions of the subalgebras of its derived series, of its descending central series, and of its descending central series centralizers are used as class invariants. The exhaustive analysis has been developed with significant computational effort; the total code is 2820 pages in 37 files, summing more than 12000 lines of Maple code, and these programs have provided 3038 pages of results [19]. We strongly recommend the reading of Bäuerle and de Kerf [20], Benjumea et al. [21], and Sendra et al. [22] to become familiar with Lie algebras terminology and symbolic computation with Maple.

#### 2. The Subfamilies of Laws

##### 2.1. Preliminaries

Let be a nilpotent Lie algebra; the characteristic sequence of is denoted by , and for the lexicographic order is known as the Goze's invariant or characteristic sequence [23]. Obviously is an invariant for the isomorphisms and, by construction, there is at least one vector such that ; all vector verifying this condition is called characteristic vector of the algebra.

The abelian algebra of dimension is the only one with Goze's invariant , in metabelian algebras the characteristic series is , in Heisenberg algebras it is , in filiform algebras it is , and in quasifiliform algebras it is . A Lie algebra is nilpotent if and only if the characteristic polynomial of the matrix is , for every vector of . Anyway this condition is often difficult to be applied, so the moment in the process, when the nilpotence condition should be applied or, much better, when the condition should be applied for each vector, has to be chosen carefully. The condition of being quasifiliform can be also interpreted in terms of matrices. Thus the vectors candidate to characteristic vectors, that is, the vectors in , have to satisfy that the respective adjoint matrices do not have nonnull minors of order *⩽*7. As in the case of the nilpotence, this condition has to be applied with caution and in several stages.

Every quasifiliform Lie algebra of dimension 9 can have an adapted base such that

On the whole all the bracket products can be described by where are the algebra structure constants.

The laws of every complex quasifiliform Lie algebra (QFLA) of dimension 9 can be described by the following family with 16 parameters and 17 polynomial restriction equations [19] derived from the Jacobi identity:

subject to

with the application of the Jacobi identity to the 3-tuple , where , are base vectors different from vector. Table 1 shows the structure constants corresponding with the 16 parameters. From here forward the Lie Algebra Families will be denoted as .

Our objective is to study exhaustively the case of dimension 9; therefore the coefficients identification is tackled in an iterative and interactive way by imposing the Jacobi identity. Maple programs have been developed so that all the equations resulting from the application of the above-mentioned conditions are obtained, the simplest conditions are applied, and the process is repeated until there are no restrictions of simple application.

The exhaustiveness of the classification is developed by analyzing the possible combinations of values of the 16 parameters , which is summarized within the cases shown in the following subsections: case A.1 ( and ), A.2 ( and ), B.1.1 (, , and ), B.1.2 (, , and ), B.2.1 (, , and ), and B.2.2 ( , , and ). In all the cases the nonisomorphism is proved in the corresponding propositions.

##### 2.2. General Case

Proposition 1. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 and are nonisomorphic to the algebras with .*

*Proof. *For the family described by (3a)–(3o) and (4a)–(4q), its descending central series is , , , , , and so forth. Thus if and if . Therefore the nullity of constitutes the first classification criterion.

##### 2.3. Case A

.

Proposition 2. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with are nonisomorphic to the algebras with .*

*Proof. *If , from restrictions (4a)–(4q) it can be deduced that and . By computing the Jacobi equations, the family of laws is reduced to

without restrictions derived from the Jacobi identity (4a)–(4q). It can be observed that and are now central; thus the application of the elementary change of base
permits us to suppose that and . Then (5f), (5i), and (5j) are simplified and the derived series is , , and so forth. Thus if and if . Therefore the nullity of constitutes a new classification criterion.

In this subsection (case A), the notation to describe the parameters of the subfamily is reduced to for simplification. Figure 1 shows the classification in 19 subfamilies in the case A. They are classified with the criteria summarized in Figure 2 and detailed in the following cases.

###### 2.3.1. Case A.1

One has and .

Proposition 3. *Case A.1 permits us to suppose that .*

*Proof. *With the elementary change of base CB,
and then .

The subfamilies of laws with the structure (5a)–(5j) are with .

Let us denote, from here forward, by the new parameters obtained from the changes of base and the Lie algebra families depending on these new parameters (which in general depend on the 16 parameters ), in order to differentiate the new representation from the representation of the families depending in general on the 16 parameters .

Proposition 4. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with and can be classified in three nonisomorphic subfamilies with from 1 to 3, described in Figure 1, according to the conditions described in Figure 2.*

*Proof. *Let us apply the change of base:
The subfamilies of laws are . The determinant of the change matrix is ; thus and . Since the coefficient of and in must be null, then and . Let us apply (8) again and the only restriction is . Thus, with the coefficient identifications, the new parameters are
Let us select , , , and appropriately and the subfamilies of laws result in
The nullity of and the nullity of are invariants. It can be proved by substituting (9) and (13) in the expressions and ; then is in the denominator and since it must be nonnull, the nullity of those expressions is invariant for the change (8). Then four subcases are determined by the nullity of and . If , the subcases corresponding to nullity or nonnullity can be reduced to a subfamily of algebras with one parameter , with . If , in the subcase corresponding to , can be selected as since and imply . Thus , and the algebra is described by . Finally, the forth subcase is the algebra .

###### 2.3.2. Case A.2

One has and .

Proposition 5. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with , , and are nonisomorphic to the algebras with , , and .*

*Proof. *The derived series is , , and so forth; thus if and if . The nullity of constitutes a new classification criterion.

Proposition 6. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with , , and can be classified in ten nonisomorphic subfamilies with from 4 to 13, described in Figure 1, according to the conditions described in Figure 2.*

*Proof. *Let us apply the change of base (8). The subfamilies of laws are and the restrictions and . Thus, with the coefficient identifications, the new parameters are
Selecting and appropriately the subfamilies of laws result in . From (16), (17), and (20) the invariance of the nullities of , , and is clear. The nullity of is also invariant. It can be proved by substituting (16) and (20) in the expression considering the change restrictions. If , , , , , , and , selecting , , and , the subfamily is , with . If , , , , , , and , then is invariant, and the subfamily is . If , , , , , and , selecting and , the subfamily is . If , , , , , , and , selecting and , the subfamily is . If , , , , , , and , selecting , the nullity of is invariant. If , selecting , the subfamily is , else the subfamily is . If , , , , , and , selecting , the nullity of is invariant. If , selecting , the subfamily is ; else with the subfamily is . If , , , , and , selecting , , and , the subfamily is . If , , , , and , selecting and , the subfamily is .

Proposition 7. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with , , and can be classified in six nonisomorphic subfamilies with from 14 to 19, described in Figure 1, according to the conditions described in Figure 2.*

*Proof. *Let us apply the change of base (8). The subfamilies of laws are and the restrictions and . Thus, with the coefficient identifications, the new parameters are
Let us select and appropriately and the subfamilies of laws result in . From (22), (23), and (24) the invariance of the nullities of , and is clear. If , , , , and , selecting , , and , the subfamily is . If , , , , and , selecting and , the subfamily is . If , , , and , selecting , the nullity of is invariant. If and , the subfamily is . If the subfamily is . If , , , , and , selecting , the subfamilies are with , and with .

##### 2.4. Case B

One has .

Proposition 8. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 and and are nonisomorphic to the algebras with and .*

*Proof. *For the family described by (3a)–(3o) and (4a)–(4q), ; therefore its dimension is , if or , if , and the nullity of constitutes a new classification criterion.

###### 2.4.1. Case B.1

One has and .

Proposition 9. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with , , and are nonisomorphic to the algebras with , , and .*

*Proof. *If , it can be deduced that . By computing the Jacobi equations, the family of laws is reduced to
with two restrictions
Since , the application of the elementary change of base CB
permits us to suppose that . Then from (39), and . This implies that (33) and (37) are changed to and , respectively, and the subfamily of laws , with from 20 to 63, has no restrictions (4a)–(4q). Its derived series is , , and so forth. Thus if and if . Therefore the nullity of constitutes a new classification criterion.

*Case B.1.1: **, ** and **.* Figure 3 provides the classification in 18 subfamilies in this case.

*Case B.1.2: **, **, and **.* Figure 4 provides the classification in 26 subfamilies in this case.

###### 2.4.2. Case B.2

One has and .

The restrictions in the family (4a)–(4q) are reduced to

Proposition 10. *The nilpotent QFLA of dimension 9 with , , and are nonisomorphic to the algebras with , , and .*

*Proof. *Equations (43) and (46) imply that . By computing the Jacobi equations, the subfamily of laws is , with from 64 to 263, and the restrictions are reduced to 6. Its descending central series is , and so forth. Thus the nullity of constitutes a new classification criterion.

An exhaustive and extensive process of analysis with the same methodology shown in the previous subsections leads to the final subclassification, which is summarized in the following Figures.

*Case B.2.1: **, **, and **.* Figure 5 provides the classification in 55 subfamilies in this case.

*Case B.2.2: **, **, and **.* Figures 6 and 7 provide the classification in 145 subfamilies in this case.

#### 3. Concluding Remarks

Computational aid has been indispensable in this piece of research. A PC Pentium 4 of 2.4 GHz and the programming language Maple 6 have been used in the process. The library modules developed represent approximately 12,000 lines of code. In some cases, in this massive application of computational resources and looking for the simplification of some laws, procedures that perhaps can be considered of “inverse engineering” have been used in order to find some very complex changes of base, which have allowed us to eliminate some parameters in the laws involved. In any case, the massive application of changes of base and characteristic vector has allowed us to obtain the complete classification in 263 subfamilies of the QFLA laws of dimension 9.

The 263 families have been represented in the paper, consisting of 157 simple algebras, 77 families depending on 1 parameter, 24 families depending on 2 parameters, and 5 families depending on 3 parameters. The classification is complete since any couple of the obtained 263 families is nonisomorphic and any quasifiliform Lie algebra of dimension 9 is isomorphic to one of them. The nonisomorphism of the 263 Lie algebra families has been proved in the 10 propositions of the paper, and the completeness of the classification is proved by the “exhaustive” analysis of all the possible cases, depending on the combination of the values of the 16 parameters .

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgment

The authors appreciate the aid of José Ramón Gómez Martn, Professor of the University of Seville, advisor of the Ph.D. thesis of one of the authors, which constitutes the basis of these works.

#### References

- H. Georgi,
*Lie Algebras in Particle Physics: From Isospin to Unified Theories (Frontiers in Physics)*, Westview Press, Boulder, Colo, USA, 1999. - R. Gilmore,
*Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications*, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at: MathSciNet - W. A. De Graaf, “Constructing algebraic groups from their Lie algebras,”
*Journal of Symbolic Computation*, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1223–1233, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - R. J. Moitsheki and M. D. Mhlongo, “Classical Lie point symmetry analysis of a steady nonlinear one-dimensional fin problem,”
*Journal of Applied Mathematics*, vol. 2012, Article ID 671548, 13 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - K. S. Govinder, “Symbolic implementation of preliminary group classiffication for ordinary differential equations,”
*Journal of Applied Mathematics*, vol. 2013, Article ID 976271, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - M. Goze and Y. Khakimdjanov,
*Nilpotent Lie Algebras*, Kluwer Academic, New York, NY, USA, 1996. - D. Burde, B. Eick, and W. de Graaf, “Computing faithful representations for nilpotent Lie algebras,”
*Journal of Algebra*, vol. 322, no. 3, pp. 602–612, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - J. C. Benjumea, J. Núñez, and F. Tenorio, “Computing the law of a family of solvable Lie algebras,”
*International Journal of Algebra and Computation*, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 337–345, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - C. Schneider, “A computer-based approach to the classification of nilpotent Lie algebras,”
*Experimental Mathematics*, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - J. M. Ancochéa-Bermúdez and M. Goze, “Sur la classification des algèbres de Lie nilpotentes de dimension 7,”
*Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences. Série I. Mathématique*, vol. 302, no. 17, pp. 611–613, 1986. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - J. M. Ancochéa-Bermúdez and M. Goze, “Classification des algèbres de Lie nilpotentes complexes de dimension 7,”
*Archiv der Mathematik*, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - J. M. Ancochéa-Bermúdez and M. Goze, “Classification des algèbres de Lie filiformes de dimension 8,”
*Archiv der Mathematik*, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 511–525, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - J. R. Gomez and F. J. Echarte, “Classification of complex filiform nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension 9,”
*Rendiconti del Seminario della Facoltà di Scienze dell'Università di Cagliari*, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 1991. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - F. J. Castro, J. R. Gomez, A. Jiménez-Merchan, N. Nunez, and G. Valeiras, “Determination of law families of fliliform Lie algebres,” in
*Proceedings of the Workshop of Matricial Analysis and Applications*, Vitoria, Spain, 1995. View at: Google Scholar - J. R. Gomez and A. Jiménez-Merchan, “Naturally graded quasi-filiform Lie algebras,”
*Journal of Algebra*, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 211–228, 2002. View at: Google Scholar - L. García-Vergnolle, “Sur les algèbres de Lie quasi-filiformes admettant un tore de dérivations,”
*Manuscripta Mathematica*, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 489–505, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - M. Vergne,
*Varieté des algèbres de Lie nilpotentes [Ph.D. thesis]*, Kluwer Academic, Paris, France, 1966. - M. Vergne, “Cohomologie des algèbres de Lie nilpotentes. Application à l'étude de la variété des algèbres de Lie nilpotentes,”
*Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France*, vol. 98, pp. 81–116, 1970. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - F. Pérez,
*Clasificacion de las algebras de lie cuasifiliformes de dimension 9 [Ph.D. thesis]*, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2007. - G. G. A. Bäuerle and E. A. de Kerf,
*Lie Algebras Part 1, Studies in Mathematical Physics 1*, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1990. - J. C. Benjumea, D. Fernandez, M. C. Márquez, J. Nuñez, and J. A. Vilches,
*Matemáticas Avanzadas y Estadística para Ciencias e Ingenierías*, Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2006. - J. R. Sendra, S. Perez-Diaz, J. Sendra, and C. Villarino,
*Introducción a la Computación Simbólica y Facilidades Maple*, Addlink Media, 2009. - M. Goze, “Perturbations of Lie algebra structures,” in
*Deformation Theory of Algebras and Structures and Applications*, M. Hazewinkel and M. Gerstenhaber, Eds., pp. 265–355, Kluwer, New York, NY, USA, 1988. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Mercedes Pérez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.