Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2014, Article ID 192868, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/192868
Research Article

Application of Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm to Portfolio Adjustment Problem with Transaction Costs

School of Information, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China

Received 7 February 2014; Accepted 18 May 2014; Published 15 June 2014

Academic Editor: X. Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Wei Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Markowitz, “Portfolio selection,” Journal of Finance, vol. 7, pp. 77–91, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. J. Best and J. Hlouskova, “The efficient frontier for bounded assets,” Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 195–212, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  3. G. J. Alexander and A. M. Baptista, “A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1261–1273, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. I. Jacobs, K. N. Levy, and H. M. Markowitz, “Portfolio optimization with factors, scenarios, and realistic short positions,” Operations Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 586–599, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  5. J. R. Yu and W. Y. Lee, “Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  6. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  7. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  8. M. Inuiguchi and T. Tanino, “Portfolio selection under independent possibilistic information,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  9. C. Carlsson, R. Fullér, and P. Majlender, “A possibilistic approach to selecting portfolios with highest utility score,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. W. G. Zhang and Z. K. Nie, “On admissible efficient portfolio selection problem,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 357–371, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. E. Vercher, J. D. Bermúdez, and J. V. Segura, “Fuzzy portfolio optimization under downside risk measures,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 158, no. 7, pp. 769–782, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. P. Gupta, M. K. Mehlawat, and A. Saxena, “Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical programming,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 1734–1755, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  13. W. Chen, Y. Yang, and H. Ma, “Fuzzy portfolio selection problem with different borrowing and lending rates,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 263240, 15 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  14. R. C. Tsaur, “Fuzzy portfolio model with different investor risk attitudes,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 385–390, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. G. Zhang, Y. J. Liu, and W. J. Xu, “A possibilistic mean-semivariance-entropy model for multi-period portfolio selection with transaction costs,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 341–349, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  16. S. Barak, M. Abessi, and M. Modarres, “Fuzzy turnover rate chance constraints portfolio model,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 228, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. D. Arnott and W. H. Wanger, “The measurement and control of trading costs,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 73–80, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. C. T. Mao, “Essentials of portfolio diversification strategy,” Journal of Finance, vol. 25, pp. 1109–1121, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. J. Morton and S. R. Pliska, “Optimal portfolio management with transaction costs,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 5, pp. 337–356, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  20. M. J. Best and J. Hlouskova, “Portfolio selection and transactions costs,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 95–116, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  21. M. S. Lobo, M. Fazel, and S. Boyd, “Portfolio optimization with linear and fixed transaction costs,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 341–365, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. H. Konno and A. Wijayanayake, “Portfolio optimization problem under concave transaction costs and minimal transaction unit constraints,” Mathematical Programming B, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 233–250, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  23. H. Konno and A. Wijayanayake, “Portfolio optimization under D.C. transaction costs and minimal transaction unit constraints,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 137–154, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  24. X. L. Zhang, W. G. Zhang, W. J. Xu, and W. L. Xiao, “Possibilistic approaches to portfolio selection problem with general transaction costs and a CLPSO algorithm,” Computational Economics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 191–200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  25. T. J. Chang, N. Meade, J. E. Beasley, and Y. M. Sharaiha, “Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1271–1302, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Crama and M. Schyns, “Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 546–571, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  27. A. Fernández and S. Gómez, “Portfolio selection using neural networks,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 34, pp. 1177–1191, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  28. L. Yu, S. Wang, and K. K. Lai, “Neural network-based mean-variance-skewness model for portfolio selection,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  29. T. Cura, “Particle swarm optimization approach to portfolio optimization,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2396–2406, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. W. Chen and W. G. Zhang, “The admissible portfolio selection problem with transaction costs and an improved PSO algorithm,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 389, no. 10, pp. 2070–2076, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Krink and S. Paterlini, “Multiobjective optimization using differential evolution for real-world portfolio optimization,” Computational Management Science, vol. 8, no. 1-2, pp. 157–179, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. D. Bermúdez, J. V. Segura, and E. Vercher, “A multi-objective genetic algorithm for cardinality constrained fuzzy portfolio selection,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  33. D. Karaboga, “An idea based on honeybee swarm for numerical optimization,” Tech. Rep. TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  34. D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, “A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 459–471, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  35. D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, “On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 687–697, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. Karaboga and B. Akay, “A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 108–132, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  37. W. Y. Szeto, Y. Wu, and S. C. Ho, “An artificial bee colony algorithm for the capacitated vehicle routing problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 126–135, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Banharnsakun, T. Achalakul, and B. Sirinaovakul, “The best-so-far selection in Artificial Bee Colony algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2888–2901, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. X. Wang, X. Xie, and T. C. E. Cheng, “A modified artificial bee colony algorithm for order acceptance in two-machine flow shops,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Fullér and P. Majlender, “On weighted possibilistic mean and variance of fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 363–374, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  41. C. Carlsson and R. Fullér, “On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 315–326, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  42. A. Saeidifar and E. Pasha, “The possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers and their applications,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 1028–1042, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  43. B. Akay and D. Karaboga, “A modified Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for real-parameter optimization,” Information Sciences, vol. 192, pp. 120–142, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. B. Alatas, “Chaotic bee colony algorithms for global numerical optimization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 5682–5687, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. W. L. Xiang and M. Q. An, “An efficient and robust artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical optimization,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1256–1265, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. B. Kalayci and S. M. Gupta, “Artificial bee colony algorithm for solving sequence-dependent disassembly line balancing problem,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 7231–7241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. C. Tsai, “Integrating the artificial bee colony and bees algorithm to face constrained optimization problems,” Information Sciences, vol. 258, pp. 80–93, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar