Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2014, Article ID 453749, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/453749
Research Article

Gap Minimization for Peer-Evaluation in DEA Cross-Efficiency

1School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China
2Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Received 28 February 2014; Revised 19 July 2014; Accepted 20 July 2014; Published 6 August 2014

Academic Editor: Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi

Copyright © 2014 Anrong Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some models for estimating technical a nd scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Ebrahimnejad, M. Tavana, F. Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, R. Shahverdi, and M. Yousefpour, “A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry,” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, vol. 49, pp. 308–319, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Khodabakhshi and K. Aryavash, “The fair allocation of common fixed cost or revenue using DEA concept,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 214, pp. 187–194, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. S. G. Jalali Naini and H. R. Nouralizadeh, “A two-stage DEA to analyze the effect of entrance deregulation on Iranian insurers: a robust approach,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 423524, 24 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Payan, A. A. Noora, F. Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, and A. Khodabakhshi, “Relative efficiency in two-stage dea and its application to bank branches,” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, vol. 3, pp. 396–404, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. P. Andersen and N. Petersen, “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 39, pp. 1261–1264, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  8. H. Bal and H. H. Örkcü, “A goal programming approach to weight dispersion in data envelopment analysis,” Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 20, pp. 117–125, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Bal, H. H. Örkcü, and S. Çelebioǧlu, “Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 99–107, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Chen, “Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 545–551, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. F. Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and M. Mohammadpour, “An extension of cross redundancy of interval scale outputs and inputs in DEA,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 658635, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. M. Khodabakhshi, M. M. Goudarzi, M. Y. Maryaki, and M. Hajiani, “A one-model approach for computation of congestion with productions trade-offs and weight restrictions,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 3, pp. 69–80, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Li, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and M. Khodabakhshi, “A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 638–648, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. H. H. Örkcü and H. Bal, “Goal programming approaches for data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 346–356, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. S. Saati, M. Zarafat, A. Memariani, and G. R. Jahanshahloo, “A model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis,” Ricerca Operativa, vol. 31, pp. 47–59, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Wang and K. Chin, “A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3666–3675, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Wang, K. Chin, and P. Jiang, “Weight determination in the cross-efficiency evaluation,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 497–502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. R. Sexton, R. H. Silkman, and A. J. Hogan, “Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions,” in Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, H. R. Silkman, Ed., pp. 73–105, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  19. F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Khodabakhshi, M. Rostamy-Malkhlifeh, Z. Moghaddas, and M. Vaez-Ghasemi, “A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 492421, 20 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Doyle and R. Green, “Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 567–578, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, Y. Jafari, and R. Maddahi, “Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 544–549, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. F. Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and P. Zamani, “A new ranking method based on cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” African Journal of Business Management, vol. 5, pp. 7923–7930, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. X. Li and G. R. Reeves, “Multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 507–517, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  24. L. Liang, J. Wu, W. D. Cook, and J. Zhu, “Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 1025–1030, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Tofallis, “Input efficiency profiling: an application to airlines,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 253–258, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus