Study on the Detectability of the Sky-Surface Wave Hybrid Radar

Abstract

Working in the HF (high-frequency) band and the transmitter and receiver locating separately, the sky-surface wave hybrid radar both has the capabilities of the OTHR (over-the-horizon radar) and the advantage of the bistatic radar. As the electromagnetic wave will be disturbed by the ionosphere, interfered by the sea clutter and attenuated by the sea surface, the detectability of this radar system is more complex. So, in this paper, we will discuss the problem detailedly. First of all, the radar equation is deduced based on the propagation of the electromagnetic wave. Then, how to calculate the effect of the ionosphere and the propagation loss is discussed. And an example based on the radar equation is given. At last, the ambiguity function is used to analyze the range and velocity resolution. From the result, we find that the resolution has relation with the location of the target and the height of reflection point of the ionosphere. But compared with the location, the effect of the ionospheric height can be ignored.

1. Introduction

Sky-wave and surface-wave OTH radar take advantage of characteristics of HF electromagnetic wave refraction by the ionosphere and diffraction on the sea surface respectively to achieve the targets detection. The sky-surface wave hybrid radar is a new type of radar systems, which has strong application prospects on detecting the stealth target, countering antiradiation missiles, enhancing the radar survivability, and other aspects. However, the detectability of single sky-wave or ground-wave radar is difficult to improve. So applying the MIMO (multi input multi output) radar theory into the sky-wave and ground-wave radar system to improve the performance of the OTH radar is one of new research fields in recent years [1].

The sky-surface wave hybrid radar is a MIMO radar system. This system is based on the technology of the existing sky-wave and ground-wave OTH radar system and works as a bistatic radar. So the detectability and target recognition performance can be further improved. In this system, the transmitter of the sky-wave radar is located inland far away from the coast, while the receiver of the ground-wave radar is on the coast, as the coastal part of the system only receives the echo, which prevents the receiver from the antiradiation missile. Meanwhile, the multireceivers receive the target echoes from different directions, which can effectively solve the problem of RCS (Radar Cross Section) flickering and improve detectability of the low-altitude target.

Nowadays, this hybrid radar is at the experimental stage. Papers [2–4] describe the research status of this system in Canada, USA, and Australia. From these papers, we find that the test systems are built with the same working principle. These systems transmit the wave with the sky wave mode and the receivers are placed close to the target. Since the receivers are close to the target, the target echo is relatively stronger which can improve the detection probability. Researchers in Wuhan University try to use the broadcast signal DRM to realize the target detection in the hybrid mode [5]. As a new radar system, only the sea clutter characteristics, the ionospheric influence on the resolution, and the time availability and the asynchronous filtering are mentioned in papers [6–10]. Few works on the analysis of the radar detectability have been reported. So we will discuss this topic thoroughly in this paper.

This paper mainly studies two aspects of the radar detectability. On one hand, the hybrid sky-surface wave radar equation is deduced. Then the attenuation effect of the ionosphere and sea surface on the radar detectability is analyzed. And an example is given to illustrate how to use the radar equation to calculate the detection range. On the other hand, the ambiguous function of the hybrid radar with FMCW (frequency modulated continuous wave) is analyzed and used to study the range and velocity resolutions of the hybrid sky-surface wave radar. And the results are compared with the ones of monostatic OTH radar.

2. The Radar Equation and the Propagation Loss

In this section, we will describe the working principle of the sky-surface wave hybrid radar and deduce the radar equation. In the equation, the most important parameter is the propagation loss. So we will discuss how to calculate it. Then, an example is given.

2.1. The Geometry of Sky-Surface Wave Hybrid Radar

The work pattern of the sky-surface wave hybrid radar is different from the sky-wave and the surface-wave OTH radar. The transmitter located far from the coast emits the electromagnetic waves and the receiver located at the coast receives the echo signal. So the radar equation should be based on the equations of sky-wave and surface-wave OTH radar equation, and the effect of the ionosphere and sea surface propagation should also be taken into consideration. The geometrical model of this radar is shown in Figure 1. For simplification, the curvature of the earth and the curve propagation in the ionosphere are not considered in this paper.

Figure 1 

The geometrical model of the HF sky-surface hybrid radar.

In Figure 1, 𝐿 is the straight line distance from the transmitter to the receiver; ℎ is the vertical distance from ionospheric reflection point to the ground; 𝑅₁ is the distance from the transmitter to reflection point; 𝑅₂ is the distance from the target to reflection point; 𝑅_𝑤𝑔 is the straight line distance from the transmitter to the target; 𝑅_𝑟 is the distance between receiver and the target; 𝛼 is the emission elevation of the radar beam; 𝛽 is the bistatic angle of transmitter, receiver, and target; 𝜃_𝑟 is the angle between the baseline of the transmitter to the receiver and the line of receiver to the target; 𝑣 is the target velocity; Φ is the angle between the target velocity direction and the bisectors of 𝛽. From the geometrical relationship, it can be found that 𝑅₁=𝑅₂ and the propagation distance of the wave is 𝑅=𝑅₁+𝑅₂+𝑅_𝑟.

2.2. The Radar Equation of the Hybrid Radar

Without considering the ionospheric effect, the power density of the wave emitted by the transmitter at the target location is 𝑆_𝑡=𝑃_𝑡𝜎_𝑡4𝜋𝑅²_𝑠W/m², (1) where 𝑃_𝑡 denotes the transmitting power of the sky-wave radar (W) and 𝑅_𝑠 denotes the propagation distance from the transmitter to the target. The scattering power at the target is 𝑃_𝑡2=𝑆_𝑡×𝜎_𝑡×10⁻³=𝑃_𝑡𝜎_𝑡4𝜋𝑅²_𝑠×10⁻³(kW), (2) where 𝜎_𝑡 is the RCS. The field intensity received by the receiver is 𝐸_𝑟𝑅_𝑟=𝐸𝑅_𝑟𝑃_𝑡23𝜇V/m. (3)

The effective cross-sectional area of the receiving antenna is 𝐴_𝑟=𝐷_𝑟𝜆²/4𝜋, where 𝜆 is the working wavelength of the radar; then the power received by the receiving antenna is𝑃_𝑟=𝐸²_𝑟𝑅_𝑟120𝜋×10⁻¹²×𝐴_𝑟(kW). (4)

𝐸_𝑟 (𝑅_𝑟) is the radiation field intensity (μV/m) where the distance to the receivers is 𝑅_𝑟 and the transmitter is located at the coast with the transmitting power 1 kW. Then 𝑃_𝑟 can be written as 𝑃_𝑟=5.6×10⁻²¹𝐸²𝑅_𝑟𝑃_𝑡𝐷_𝑡𝐷_𝑟𝜆²𝜎_𝑡𝑅²_𝑠(W). (5)

A total loss factor 𝐿 is used to express the effects of different factors on the radar detection performance. And 𝐿 should include the following factors: ① the ionospheric propagation loss 𝐿_𝑝, which includes the absorption loss, polarization loss generated by the Faraday effect, multipath effects, and so on; ② the radar system loss 𝐿_𝑠, which contains the loss produced by the weighting processing, the beam forming, the antenna efficiency, and so on; ③ sea wave additional loss 𝐿_𝑤.

If the coherent time is 𝑇_𝑐, the received effective energy 𝐸_𝑟𝑎 can be written as 𝐸_𝑟𝑎=𝑃_𝑟×𝑇_𝑐𝐿=5.6×10⁻²¹𝐸²𝑅_𝑟𝑃_𝑡𝐷_𝑡𝐷_𝑟𝜆²𝜎_𝑡×𝑇_𝑐𝑅²_𝑠𝐿_𝑝𝐿_𝑠𝐿_𝑤(W). (6)

For the target with a low radial velocity, the signal to clutter energy ratio (SCR) should be taken into consideration in the radar equation, while for the target with a high one, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) should be considered. The power of the noise 𝑃_𝑛(𝑓)=𝐾𝑇_𝑜𝐹_𝑎. Then the radar equation is𝑆𝑁=𝐸_𝑟𝑎𝑃_𝑛𝑓=5.6×10⁻²¹𝐸²𝑅_𝑟𝑃_𝑡𝐷_𝑡𝐷_𝑟𝜆²𝜎_𝑡×𝑇_𝑐𝑅²_𝑠𝐿_𝑝𝐿_𝑠𝐿_𝑤𝐾𝑇_𝑜𝐹_𝑎, (7) where 𝑃_𝑡 is the mean transmission power, 𝐾 is Boltzmann’s constant, 𝑇_𝑜 is the absolute temperature, and 𝐹_𝑎 is the external noise factor.

To calculate (7), 𝐸(𝑅) and the system loss should be known. For 𝐸(𝑅), we can get the value in the ITU-Radio wave Propagation (Vol.2000) report, as shown in Figure 2. For the latter, the sea wave additional loss and ionospheric propagation loss are mainly considered and how to calculate them is discussed in Sections 2.3 and 2.4.

(a) The curve of 𝐸(𝑅) changes with the 𝑅 changes in different frequency at sea level

(b) The curve of 𝐸(𝑅) changes with the 𝑅 changes in different height when frequency is 5 MHz

Figure 2 

The characters of 𝐸(𝑅).

2.3. The Sea Wave Additional Loss Factor

The value of 𝐸(𝑅) in Figure 2 is gotten when the sea surface is smooth. However, the sea wave, sea wind, and the weather will cause an additional loss 𝐿_𝑤. And 𝐿_𝑤 is related to the radar working frequency, sea-state, and the propagation distance.

𝐿_𝑤 can be obtained in paper [11], as shown in Figure 3. The sea surface additional loss increases sharply as the frequency, sea wind, and propagation distance increase. To reduce the effect of 𝐿_𝑤, the working frequency of the this hybrid radar should be selected in the low band.

(a) 𝑓=3 MHz

(b) 𝑓=5 MHz

(c) 𝑓=10 MHz

(d) 𝑓=20 MHz

Figure 3 

The curve of 𝐿𝑤 with different sea states (S-T is sea state; W-V is wind velocity).

Figure 3 shows 𝐿_𝑤 varies with different sea states when the working frequency is 3 MHz, 5 MHz, 10 MHz, and 20 MHz. Using the interpolation method, we can approximately calculate 𝐿_𝑤 when the frequency is 3~20 MHz and the sea state is from state 1 to state 6.

2.4. The Ionospheric Propagation Loss

The ionospheric propagation loss includes the polarization loss and the ionospheric absorption loss 𝐿. The polarization loss is usually 3 dB. And the ionospheric absorption loss usually is obtained with𝐿=677.2sec𝜃₀𝑓+𝑓_𝐻^1.98+10.2𝐼. (8)

The unit of 𝐿 is dB. 𝜃₀ is the incident angle at 100 km high, and 𝜃₀=arcsin(0.985⋅cosΔ). Δ is the launch elevation, 𝑓 is the working frequency (MHz), and 𝑓_𝐻 is the magnetic gyro frequency (MHz) at 100 km high. 𝐼 is an absorption index [12, 13].

2.5. An Example of HF Sky-Surface Wave Hybrid Radar

Without considering the curvature of the earth, the geometrical model of this hybrid radar is shown in Figure 1. Assuming the working frequency 𝑓_𝑜=10 MHz, the straight distance between the transmitting station and the receiving station 𝐿=1000 km and the height from ionospheric reflection point to the ground ℎ=200 km. As the detection range of the surface-wave radar is usually less than 200 km, let 𝑅_𝑟=230 km.

Let the transmitting gain 𝐷_𝑡=100, let the receiving gain 𝐷_𝑟=14, let the aircraft 𝜎_𝑡=100 m², let the coherent integration time 𝑇_𝑐=60 s, let the radar system loss 𝐿_𝑠=10 dB, 𝑇_𝑜=290K, let  𝐾=1.38×10⁻²³, and let the noise factor 𝐹_𝑎=40 dB.

When 𝑅_𝑟=230 km and 𝑓_𝑜=10 MHz, we can get 𝐸(𝑅)=45.3 dBμV/m in Figure 2.

When the sea-state is 5, the additional wave loss 𝐿_𝑤=8.6 dB is calculated by the interpolation based on the data as shown in Figure 3. But the value of 𝐿_𝑤 is the back and forth attenuation in Figure 3. As 𝐿_𝑤 is the attenuation of the back propagation in (7), 𝐿_𝑤 should be half of 8.6 dB. 𝐿_𝑤=4.3 dB.

By (8), the ionospheric attenuation 𝐿=7.1 dB. And the attenuation loss of the Faraday effect is 3 dB. Taking these values into (7), we can get the transmitting power 𝑃_𝑡=32.7 kW, which is similar to an actual value of the OTH radar. So (8) is correct theoretically.

3. Analysis of the Ambiguous Function of the Hybrid Radar

We often use the ambiguity function to analyze the range-velocity resolution of the radar system and the effect factors of the resolution. So in this section, we will discuss the ambiguous function of the hybrid radar [14, 15].

3.1. Calculation of the Geometrical Parameters

From Figure 1, the distance between the transmitting station to the target is 𝑅²_𝑤𝑔=𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²−2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜋−𝜃_𝑟=𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟. (9)

Then, 𝑅²₁=ℎ²+12𝑅_𝑤𝑔²=ℎ²+14𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟. (10)

The total propagation distance is 𝑅=𝑅_𝑟+2ℎ²+14𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟. (11)

Assuming the transmitting station and the receiving station are stationary, the range rate of the target relative to the transmitting station is the velocity component along the direction of target to the ionospheric reflection point, which can be expressed as 𝑑𝑅𝑑𝑡^𝑡𝛽=𝑣cos𝜙−2cos𝛼. (12)

The range rate relative to the receiving station is 𝑑𝑅𝑑𝑡^𝑟𝛽=𝑣cos𝜙+2. (13)

Then the change rate of the total propagation distance is 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑅=𝑅𝑑𝑡^𝑡+𝑅_𝑟𝛽=𝑣cos𝜙cos2()𝛽1+cos𝛼+sin𝜙sin2(cos𝛼−1), (14) where 𝑅cos𝛽=^2𝑤𝑔+𝑅²_𝑟−𝐿²2𝑅_𝑤𝑔𝑅_𝑟=𝑅_𝑟+𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟. (15)

The relationship between the launch elevation 𝛼 and 𝜃_𝑟 is 𝛼=arctan2ℎ𝑅_𝑤𝑔=arctan2ℎ𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟. (16)

Then the total propagation distance can be obtained by the initial value 𝑅_𝑜 and the range rate. The expression is 𝑅(𝑡)=𝑅_𝑜=𝑅+𝑣𝑡=𝑅_𝑟+2√𝐷+𝑣𝐴₁12+𝐵2√𝐶+𝐴₂12−𝐵2√𝐶𝑡, (17) where 𝐴₁=cos𝜙(1+cos𝛼),𝐴₂=sin𝜙(−1+cos𝛼),𝐵=𝑅_𝑟+𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟,𝐶=𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟,𝐷=ℎ²+14𝐶. (18)

3.2. The Ambiguity Function of the Hybrid Radar

The FMCW signal is often used as the transmitting signal in the OTH radar system, which is expressed as below: 𝑆_𝑇(𝑡)=cos2𝜋𝑓_𝑜𝑡+𝜇𝑡²2+𝜙_𝑜, (19) where 𝑇 is the sweeping period, 𝜇=𝐵_𝑤/𝑇 is the sweeping slope, and 𝐵_𝑤 is the sweeping bandwidth.

For simplification, assume there are only two targets in the area that can be detected. The positions of the two targets in the radar plane are (𝑅_𝑟, 𝜃_𝑟) and (𝑅_𝑟+𝛿, 𝜃_𝑟), respectively. Only the velocity component of the target along direction of the bistatic angle bisector can be detected, That is, Φ=0. Let the velocity component along the bistatic angle of two targets be 𝑉, 𝑉+𝜁. Then, the echo time delay of Target 1 is𝜏₁(𝑡)=𝑅₁(𝑡)𝑐=𝑅_𝑟+2√𝐷1𝑐+𝑉𝑐𝐴₁12+𝐵2√𝐶𝑡=𝐸₁+𝐹₁𝑡. (20)

The echo time delay of Target 2 is 𝜏₂(𝑡)=𝑅₂(𝑡)𝑐=𝑅_𝑟+𝛿+21𝐷+21𝐵𝛿+4𝛿²1𝑐+𝑉+𝜁𝑐𝐴₁12+𝐵+𝛿2𝐶+2𝐵𝛿+𝛿²𝑡=𝐸₂+𝐹₂𝑡. (21)

In the period [0,𝑇], the echo can be expressed as 𝑆₁(𝑡)=𝑆_𝑇𝑡−𝜏₁(𝑡,𝑆₂)(𝑡)=𝑆_𝑇𝑡−𝜏₂(𝑡). (22)

The resolution depends on the difference between the two targets in the time period 𝑇, so𝜉²=^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2𝑆₁(𝑡)−𝑆₂(𝑡)²𝑑𝑡=2𝐸−2^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2𝑆₁(𝑡)𝑆^∗₂(𝑡)𝑑𝑡=2𝐸−2𝐸Re^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2𝑒^{𝑗2𝜋{[𝑓𝑜(𝐸2−𝐸1)+(𝜇/2)(𝐸21−𝐸22)]+[𝑓𝑜(𝐹2−𝐹1)+𝜇(𝐸2−𝐸1)+(𝐸1𝐹1−𝐸2𝐹2)]𝑡+𝜇[(𝐹2−𝐹1)+(1/2)(𝐹21−𝐹22)]𝑡2}}𝑑𝑡, (23)where 𝐸=∫^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2|𝑆₁(𝑡)|²𝑑𝑡=∫^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2|𝑆₂(𝑡)|²𝑑𝑡=contant.

So 𝜉 is related to the ambiguity function 𝜒(𝛿,𝜁): 𝜒(𝛿,𝜁)=^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2𝑒^{𝑗2𝜋{𝑓𝑜(𝐹2−𝐹1)+𝜇[(𝐸2−𝐸1)+(𝐸1𝐹1−𝐸2𝐹2)]𝑡+𝜇[(𝐹2−𝐹1)+(1/2)(𝐹21−𝐹22)]𝑡2}}𝑑𝑡≈^𝑇/2_−𝑇/2𝑒^{𝑗2𝜋{𝑓𝑜(𝐹2−𝐹1)𝑡+𝜇(𝐸2−𝐸1)𝑡}}𝑑𝑡. (24)

Equation (24) can be simplified as 𝜒()𝜁𝛿,𝜁=sin𝑐𝜋𝑇𝜆𝐴₁12+𝐵+𝛿2𝐶+2𝐵𝛿+𝛿²+𝜋𝐵_𝑤𝑐𝛿+21𝐷+21𝐵𝛿+4𝛿²−2√𝐷. (25)

From (25), we find that 𝜒(𝛿,𝜁) is the function of 𝑅_𝑟 and 𝜃_𝑟, which indicates that the ambiguity function is related to the location of the target.

3.3. Range Resolution

When the range resolution is considered, the velocity components of the two targets along the direction of the bistatic bisector are the same, which means 𝜁=0. So the ambiguity function of the range resolution can be expressed as 𝜒(𝛿,0)=sin𝑐𝜋𝐵_𝑤𝑐𝛿+21𝐷+21𝐵𝛿+4𝛿²−2√𝐷. (26)

The condition that two targets can be distinguished is 𝜒(𝛿,0)≥−3 dB, so 𝐵_𝑤𝑐|𝛿|+21𝐷+2𝐵|𝛿|+14𝛿²−2√𝐷≤𝑎, (27) where 𝑎=0.443. Then (27) can be written as 2𝛿²+2𝐵|𝛿|+41𝐷+2𝐵|𝛿|+14𝛿²≤4𝑎𝑐√𝐷𝐵_𝑤+𝑎²𝑐²𝐵²_𝑤. (28) As 2𝛿²≪2𝐵|𝛿|+4𝐷+(1/2)𝐵|𝛿|+(1/4)𝛿²(1/2), (1/2)𝐵|𝛿|+(1/4)𝛿²≪𝐷, 𝑎²𝑐²/𝐵²_𝑤≪4𝑎𝑐√𝐷/𝐵_𝑤, and 2|𝛿|≤𝛿_𝑅, so the radar range resolution 𝛿_𝑅 is 𝛿_𝑅=4𝑎𝑐𝐵_𝑤𝐵/√×𝐵𝐷+2=4𝑎𝑐_𝑤𝑅_𝑟+𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟÷ℎ²+14𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟+2⁻¹ (29)

From (29), it can be known that the range resolution of the hybrid radar is not only inversely proportional to the transmitting bandwidth, but also related to the location of the target and the height of reflection points in the ionosphere. Figure 4 shows the simulation results of 𝛿_𝑅 with the working frequency is 15 MHz and the bandwidth is 20 kHz.

(a) The range ambiguous function when 𝜃𝑟 is 0, 30°, or 60°

(b) When 𝑅𝑟=150 km, the range resolution changes with 𝜃𝑟 and ℎ

(c) When ℎ=200 km, the range resolution changes with ℎ and 𝜃𝑟

(d) When 𝑅𝑟=150 km, the range resolution changes with ℎ and 𝜃𝑟

Figure 4 

The ambiguous function and the range resolution of the hybrid radar.

As shown in Figure 4(b), the range resolution increases when 𝜃_𝑟 increases. And when 𝜃_𝑟≥30^∘, the increasing rate increases significantly. Figures 4(c) and 4(d) illustrate that the range resolution increases with 𝑅_𝑟 decreases and ℎ increases respectively. We also find that the changes of ℎ and 𝑅_𝑟 have little effect on the range resolution when 𝜃_𝑟 is small. Only when 𝜃_𝑟 is large, the changes have an obvious effect.

The range resolution of sky-wave or surface-wave radar is Δ𝑅=𝑐/2𝐵, which means the range resolution is only related to the bandwidth. When 𝐵=20 kHz, Δ𝑅=7.5 km. So, from Figure 4(b), when 𝜃_𝑟<44^∘, the hybrid radar has a better range resolution than monostatic OHT radar.

3.4. The Velocity Resolution

When the velocity resolution is considered, the location of the two targets are same, which means 𝛿=0. So the ambiguity function of the velocity resolution can be expressed as 𝜒()𝜁0,𝜁=sin𝑐𝜋𝑇𝜆𝐴₁12+𝐵2√𝐶. (30)

As the condition that two targets can be distinguished is 𝜒(0,𝜁)≥−3 dB, so 𝑇𝜁𝜆𝐴₁12+𝐵2√𝐶≤𝑎. (31)

As 2|𝜁|≤𝜁_𝑣, the velocity resolution 𝜁_𝑣 is𝜁_𝑣≈2𝑎𝜆𝑇1𝐴₁1/2+𝐵/2√𝐶=2𝑎𝜆𝑇1×1+arctan2ℎ𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟12+𝑅_𝑟+𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟2𝑅²_𝑟+𝐿²+2𝑅_𝑟𝐿cos𝜃_𝑟⁻¹. (32)

By (32), it can be known that the velocity resolution of the hybrid radar is not only inversely proportional to the sweep period and proportional to the wavelength, but also related to the location of the target and the height of reflection points in the ionosphere. Figure 5 shows the simulation results about 𝜁_𝑣 with 𝑇=1 s and 𝑓=15 MHz.

(a) The velocity ambiguous function when 𝜃𝑟 is 0, 30°, or 60°

(b) When 𝑅𝑟=150 km, the velocity resolution changes with 𝜃𝑟 and ℎ

(c) When ℎ=200 km, the velocity resolution changes with ℎ and 𝜃𝑟

(d) When 𝑅𝑟=150 km, the velocity resolution changes with ℎ and 𝜃𝑟

Figure 5 

The ambiguous function and the velocity resolution of the hybrid radar.

As shown in Figure 5, we can get the similar conclusion of the velocity resolution with the one about the range resolution.

For the velocity resolution of the sky-wave or surface-wave radar is Δ𝑉=𝜆/2𝑇, Δ𝑉 is only related to the sweeping period. When 𝑇=1 s, Δ𝑉=10 m/s. In comparison with Figure 5(b), when 𝜃_𝑟<60.7^∘, the hybrid radar has a better velocity resolution than the monostatic OHT radar.

3.5. The Coupling Analysis of Range and Velocity

From the ambiguity theory [16], when the velocity and range of the two targets are not same, the time difference and frequency difference should be different. But under some conditions, 𝜒(𝛿,𝜁)=0 may occur, which means that two targets cannot be distinguished. By (25), let 𝜒(𝛿,𝜁)=0; it can be obtained that𝑇𝜁𝐴₁12+𝐵+𝛿2𝐶+2𝐵𝛿+𝛿²+𝐵_𝑤𝑐𝛿+21𝐷+21𝐵𝛿+4𝛿²−2√𝐷=0. (33)

The equation above is rewritten as 2𝐵+41𝐷+21𝐵𝛿+4𝛿²5𝛿+4𝛿²=−4𝑇𝑐𝜁𝜆𝐵_𝑤𝐴₁12+𝐵+𝛿2𝐶+2𝐵𝛿+𝛿²+𝑇𝑐𝜁𝜆𝐵_𝑤𝐴₁²12+𝐵+𝛿2𝐶+2𝐵𝛿+𝛿². (34)

The second term of the left side of (34) can be ignored compared with the first term, and 𝐷+(1/2)𝐵𝛿+(1/4)𝛿²≈√𝐷, 1/2+(𝐵+𝛿)/2𝐶+2𝐵𝛿+𝛿²≈cos(𝛽/2), so𝛿𝜁≈−4𝑇𝑐𝜁𝜆𝐵_𝑤12𝐵/√𝐷𝛽cos2. (35)

When the difference of the range-velocity between the two targets satisfies (35), the two targets cannot be distinguished.

4. Conclusion

As a new type of bistatic radar, the hybrid sky-surface wave OTH radar is different with the sky-wave and the surface-wave OTH radar. So the radar equation and the range-velocity resolution, the two aspects of the detection performance of this hybrid radar, are studied in this paper. According to the ones of the sky-wave and the surface-wave radar, the radar equation of this hybrid radar which concludes the ionospheric loss and the wave additional loss is derived. Then, an example is given to testify the validity. From the analysis of the ambiguity function, we find that the range-velocity resolution of this radar is related to the location of the target and the reflection height in the ionosphere. In a certain launch elevation, the range-velocity resolution is better with respect to the one of the monostatic OHT radar, and the effect of the target location and the ionospheric reflection height can be ignored to some extent. It can be predicted that with more MIMO radar theory is applied to this radar system, the performance of the OHT radar will be further enhanced.

In this paper, the detectability of the radar system with one sky-wave radar transmitter and one surface-wave radar receiver is studied. How to evaluate the performance of the netted radar system with multiple surface-wave radar receivers and networked control [17] will be the future work.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

At the point of finishing this paper, the author would like to express his sincere thanks to the National Natural Science Foundation (no. 61201303) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HIT.NSRIF.2013027).