Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 234528, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/234528
Research Article

Intermediaries in Trust: Indirect Reciprocity, Incentives, and Norms

1Department of Social Studies, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 35195 Växjö, Sweden
2Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Via San Faustino 74B, 25122 Brescia, Italy
3MTA TK Lendület Research Center for Educational and Network Studies (RECENS), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Országház Utca 30, Budapest 1014, Hungary

Received 2 September 2014; Accepted 4 December 2014

Academic Editor: Vincent Buskens

Copyright © 2015 Giangiacomo Bravo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. S. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Harvard, Mass, USA, 1990.
  2. R. S. Burt and M. Knez, “Kinds of third-party effects on trust,” Rationality and Society, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 255–292, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. S. Cookm and R. Hardin, “Norms of cooperativeness and networks of trust,” in Social Norms, M. Hechter and K.-D. Opp, Eds., pp. 327–347, Russel Sage Foundation, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Bateson, D. Nettle, and G. Roberts, “Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting,” Biology Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 412–414, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. Bohnet and B. S. Frey, “The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43–57, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. N. Cason and V.-L. Mui, “A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game,” Economic Journal, vol. 107, no. 444, pp. 1465–1483, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. J. Haley and D. M. T. Fessler, “Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity an anonymous economic game,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 245–256, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Rigdon, K. Ishii, M. Watabe, and S. Kitayama, “Minimal social cues in the dictator game,” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 358–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Boero, G. Bravo, M. Castellani, and F. Squazzoni, “Reputational cues in repeated trust games,” Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 871–877, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Bacharach and D. Gambetta, “Trust in signs,” in Trust and Society, K. S. Cook, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 148–184, Russell Sage, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  11. F. Squazzoni, G. Bravo, and K. Takács, “Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study,” Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 287–294, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Cook, R. Hardin, and M. Levi, Cooperation without Trust, Russell Sage, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  13. R. Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, Russell Sage, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  14. J. P. Bailey and Y. Bakos, “An exploratory study of the emerging role of electronic intermediaries,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 7–20, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. W. Palmer, J. P. Bailey, and S. Faraj, “The role of intermediaries in the development of trust on the WWW: the use and prominence of trusted third parties and privacy statements,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 5, no. 3, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Sorenson and T. E. Stuart, “Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1546–1588, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Berg, J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe, “Trust, reciprocity and social history,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 122–142, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. D. Johnson and A. A. Mislin, “Trust games: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 865–889, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. Buskens and W. Raub, “Rational choice research on social dilemmas: embeddedness effects on trust,” in Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research, R. Wittek, T. A. B. Snijders, and V. Nee, Eds., Russell Sage, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. V. Buskens, W. Raub, and J. van der Veer, “Trust in triads: an experimental study,” Social Networks, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 301–312, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Fehr and U. Fischbacher, “The nature of human altruism,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6960, pp. 785–791, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Keser, “Experimental games for the design of reputation management systems,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 498–506, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Seinen and A. Schram, “Social status and group norms: indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment,” European Economic Review, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 581–602, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Barrera and G. G. Van De Bunt, “Learning to trust: networks effects through time,” European Sociological Review, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 709–721, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. S. Frey and F. Oberholzer-Gee, “The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding- out,” American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 746–755, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. D. Alexander, The Biology of Moral Systems, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  27. M. A. Nowak and K. Sigmund, “The dynamics of indirect reciprocity,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 561–574, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J.-J. Laffont and D. Martimort, The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2002.
  29. D. Ariely, A. Bracha, and S. Meier, “Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially,” American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 544–555, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Heyman and D. Ariely, “Effort for payment: a tale of two markets,” Psychological Science, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 787–793, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
  32. P. Kollock, “Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 24, pp. 182–214, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Almås, A. W. Cappelen, E. Ø. Sørensen, and B. Tungodden, “Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance,” Science, vol. 328, no. 5982, pp. 1176–1178, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Fehr and K. M. Schmidt, “A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 817–868, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. A. Nowak, K. M. Page, and K. Sigmund, “Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5485, pp. 1773–1775, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Rabin, “Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics,” American Economic Review, vol. 83, pp. 1281–1302, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  37. F. Cochard, P. Nguyen Van, and M. Willinger, “Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Bowles, “Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: evidence from economic experiments,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5883, pp. 1605–1609, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Boero, G. Bravo, M. Castellani, and F. Squazzoni, “Why bother with what others tell you? An experimental data-driven agent-based model,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13, no. 3, article 6, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. A. Nowak and R. Highfield, SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  41. B. S. Frey and R. Jegen, “Motivation crowding theory,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 589–611, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. F. Squazzoni, “A social science-inspired complexity policy: beyond the mantra of incentivization,” Complexity, vol. 19, pp. 5–13, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. E. Shafir, The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2013.
  44. S. Bowles and S. Polanía-Reyes, “Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements?” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 368–425, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. Greiner, “An online recruitment system for economic experiments,” in Forschung und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003, K. Kremer and V. Macho, Eds., pp. 79–93, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  46. U. Fischbacher, “Z-Tree: zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments,” Experimental Economics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus