Journal of Applied Mathematics

Volume 2017, Article ID 7305230, 10 pages

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7305230

## Solvability of the Brinkman-Forchheimer-Darcy Equation

School of Science and Technology, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

Correspondence should be addressed to Piotr Skrzypacz; zk.ude.un@zcapyzrks.rtoip

Received 26 May 2017; Accepted 19 June 2017; Published 20 July 2017

Academic Editor: Malgorzata Peszynska

Copyright © 2017 Piotr Skrzypacz and Dongming Wei. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The nonlinear Brinkman-Forchheimer-Darcy equation is used to model some porous medium flow in chemical reactors of packed bed type. The results concerning the existence and uniqueness of a weak solution are presented for nonlinear convective flows in medium with variable porosity and for small data. Furthermore, the finite element approximations to the flow profiles in the fixed bed reactor are presented for several Reynolds numbers at the non-Darcy’s range.

#### 1. Introduction

In this section we introduce the mathematical model describing incompressible isothermal flow in porous medium without reaction. The considered equations for the velocity and pressure fields are for flows in fluid saturated porous media. These problems are of importance for example in oil reservoir optimization; see [1]. Most research results for flows in porous media are based on the Darcy equation which is considered to be a suitable model at a small range of Reynolds numbers. However, there are restrictions of Darcy equation for modelling some porous medium flows; that is, in closely packed media, saturated fluid flows at slow velocity but with relatively large Reynolds numbers. The flows in such closely packed medium behave nonlinearly and cannot be modelled accurately by the Darcy equation which is linear. The deficiency can be circumvented with the Brinkman–Forchheimer-Darcy law for flows in closely packed media, which leads to the following model: let , , represent the reactor channel. We denote its boundary by . The conservation of volume-averaged values of momentum and mass in the packed reactor reads as followswhere and denote the unknown velocity and pressure, respectively. The positive quantity stands for porosity which describes the proportion of the nonsolid volume to the total volume of material and varies spatially in general. The expression represents the friction forces caused by the packing of spherical particles with one constant diameter. The right hand side represents an outer force (e.g., gravitation), the constant fluid density, and the constant kinematic viscosity of the fluid, respectively. The expression symbolizes the dyadic product of with itself.

The formula given by Ergun [2] will be used to model the influence of the packing on the flow inertia effectsThereby stands for the diameter of pellets and denotes the Euclidean vector norm. The linear term in (2) accounts for the head loss according to Darcy and the quadratic term is the Forchheimer law. The model (1)-(2) with the pressure term of the form has been proposed in [3, Section ]. For the derivation of the equations, their limitations, modelling, and homogenization questions in porous media we refer to [4–9] and [10, Chapter 1].

To close the system (1) we prescribe Dirichlet boundary conditionwherehas to be fulfilled on each connected component of the boundary . The distribution of porosity is assumed to satisfy the boundswith some constants .

A comprehensive account of fluid flows through porous media beyond Darcy law’s valid regimes and classified by the Reynolds number can be found in, for example, [11]. Also, see [12] for simulating pumped water levels in abstraction boreholes using such nonlinear Darcy-Forchheimer law and [13–15] for recent references on this model.

In the next section we use the porosity distribution which is estimated for packed beds consisting of spherical particles and takes the near wall channeling effect into account. This kind of porosity distribution obeys assumption .

Let us introduce dimensionless quantities where denotes the magnitude of some reference velocity. For simplicity of notation we omit the asterisks. Then, the reactor flow problem reads in dimensionless form as follows:wherewithand the Reynolds number is defined by

The existence and uniqueness of the solution of a system for flow, temperature, and solute transport containing the nonlinear flow model (6) but with constant porosity and without the convective term have been established in [16]. We will extend this result for the flow component to the case (6) when the variable porosity depends on the location and the convective term is included. The recent existence results for the linear Brinkman problem with spatially varying can be found in [17].

*Remark 1. *Equation (6) becomes a Navier-Stokes problem if .

*Notation*. Throughout the work we use the following notations for function spaces. For , and bounded subdomain ; let be the usual Sobolev space equipped with norm . If , we denote the Sobolev space by and use the standard abbreviations and for the norm and seminorm, respectively. We denote by the space of functions with compact support contained in . Furthermore, stands for the closure of with respect to the norm . The counterparts spaces consisting of vector valued functions will be denoted by bold faced symbols like or . The inner product over and will be denoted by and , respectively. In the case the domain index will be omitted. In the following we denote by the generic constant which is usually independent of the model parameters; otherwise dependence will be indicated.

#### 2. Existence and Uniqueness Results

In the following the porosity is assumed to belong to . We start with the weak formulation of problem (6) and look for its solution in suitable Sobolev spaces that are adjusted to the modified momentum and mass balances in (6) and to the smoothness of the weighting function .

##### 2.1. Variational Formulation

Letbe the space consisting of functions with zero mean value. We define the spaces Let us introduce the following bilinear forms:Furthermore, we define the semilinear form and trilinear form We set Multiplying momentum and mass balances in (6) by test functions and , respectively, and integrating by parts implies the weak formulationFirst, we recall the following result from [18].

Theorem 2. *The mapping is an isomorphism from onto itself and from onto itself. It holds for all that*

In the following the closed subspace of defined by will be employed. Next, we establish and prove some properties of trilinear form and nonlinear form .

Lemma 3. *Let and with and . Then we haveFurthermore, the trilinear form and the nonlinear form are continuous; that is,and for and for a sequence with , we have also*

*Proof. *We follow the proof of [19, Lemma , 2, Chapter IV] and adapt it to the trilinear form which has the weighting factor . Hereby, symbols with subscripts denote components of bold faced vectors, for example, . Let , , and . Integrating by parts and employing density argument, we obtain immediately (19). From Sobolev embedding (see [20]) and Hölder inequality follows and consequently the proof of (20) is completed. Since and , the continuity estimate (20) implies The continuity of follows from Hölder inequality and Sobolev embedding (see [20]).

In the next stage we consider the difficulties caused by prescribing the inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition. Analogous difficulties are already encountered in the analysis of Navier-Stokes problem. We will carry out the study of three-dimensional case. The extension in two dimensions can be constructed analogously. Since , we can extend inside of in the form of with some . The operator is defined then as We note that in the two-dimensional case the vector potential can be replaced by a scalar function and the operator is then redefined as . Our aim is to adapt the extension of Hopf (see [21]) to our model. We recall that for any parameter there exists a scalar function such thatFor the construction of see also [19, Lemma , 2, Chapter IV].

Let us defineIn the following lemma we establish bounds which are crucial for proving existence of velocity.

Lemma 4. *The function satisfies the following conditions:and for any there exists sufficiently small such that*

*Proof. *The relations in (31) are obvious. We follow [16] in order to show (32). Since Sobolev’s embedding theorem implies , so we get according to the properties of in the following bound: Defining we obtain from Cauchy-Schwarz and triangle inequalitiesand consequentlyApplying Hardy inequality (see [20]) and using Sobolev embedding , estimate (38) becomeswhere From (36) and (40), Poincaré inequality, and the fact that we conclude that for any we can choose sufficiently small such that holds. Therefore the proof of estimate (32) is completed. Now, we take a look at the trilinear convective term The first term of above difference becomes small due to [19, Lemma , 2, Chapter IV], and it satisfiesas long as is chosen sufficiently small. Using Hölder inequality, Sobolev embedding yields which together with (40) implies for sufficiently small the boundFrom (44) and (46) follows the desired estimate (33).

While the general framework for linear and nonsymmetric saddle point problems can be found in [18], our problem requires more attention due to its nonlinear character. Setting , the weak formulation (16) is equivalent to the following problem:Let us define the nonlinear mapping withwhere defines the inner product in via . Then, the variational problem (47) reads in the space as follows.

Find such that

##### 2.2. Solvability of Nonlinear Saddle Point Problem

We start our study of the nonlinear operator problem (49) with the following lemma.

Lemma 5. *The mapping defined in (48) is continuous and there exists such that*

*Proof. *Let be a sequence in with . Then, applying Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and (33), we obtain for any The boundedness of in , (22), the Poincaré inequality, and the above inequality imply that Thus, employing we state that is continuous. Now, we note that for any we haveFrom the Poincaré inequality, we infer the estimate which together with (32), (33), and (54) results in Choosing such that and withleads to the desired assertion (50).

The following lemma plays a key role in the existence proof.

Lemma 6. *Let be finite dimensional Hilbert space with inner product inducing a norm and be a continuous mapping such that Then there exists , with , such that *

*Proof. *See [22].

Now we are able to prove the main result concerning existence of velocity.

Theorem 7. *The problem (49) has at least one solution .*

*Proof. *We construct the approximate sequence of Galerkin solutions. Since the space is separable, there exists a sequence of linearly independent elements . Let be the finite dimensional subspace of with and endowed with the scalar product of . Let , be a Galerkin solution of (49) defined byFrom Lemmas 5 and 6 we conclude thathas a solution . The unknown coefficients can be obtained from the algebraic system (62). On the other hand, multiplying (62) by and adding the equations for we have This gives together with (58) the uniform boundedness in therefore there exists and a subsequence (we write for the convenience instead of ) such that Furthermore, the compactness of embedding implies Taking the limit in (63) with we getFinally, we apply the continuity argument and state that (68) is preserved for any ; therefore is the solution of (49).

For the reconstruction of the pressure we need inf-sup-theorem.

Theorem 8. *Assume that the bilinear form satisfies the inf-sup conditionThen, for each solution of the nonlinear problem (49) there exists a unique pressure such that the pair is a solution of the homogeneous problem (47).*

*Proof. *See [19, Theorem , 1, Chapter IV].

We end up this subsection by proving the existence of the pressure.

Theorem 9. *Let be solution of problem (49). Then, there exists unique pressure .*

*Proof. *We verify the inf-sup condition (69) of Theorem 8 by employing the isomorphism of Theorem 2. From [19, Corollary , Section , Chapter I] follows that for any in there exists in such that with a positive constant . Setting and applying the isomorphism in Theorem 2, we obtain the estimate where . From the above estimate we conclude the inf-sup condition (69).

##### 2.3. Uniqueness of Weak Solution

We exploit a priori estimates in order to prove uniqueness of weak velocity and pressure.

Theorem 10. *If , are sufficiently small; then the solution of (49) is unique.*

*Proof. *Assume that and are two different solutions of (47). From (19) in Lemma 3 we obtain . Then, we obtainFrom Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Sobolev embedding we deduceand according to (20) we haveand by (31) we can find such thatNow, we find upper bounds for and . Testing (47) with results in From Sobolev embedding we deduce for sufficiently small Putting (73), (74), (75), and (77) into (72) and using the inequality we obtainFor sufficiently small , the constant in (77) gets small and consequently the right hand side of (79) is nonnegative. This implies and according to Theorem 9 .

#### 3. A Channel Flow Problem in Packed Bed Reactors

In this section, we provide an example of the flow problem in packed bed reactors with numerical solutions at small and relatively large Reynolds numbers to show the nonlinear behavior of the velocity solutions. Our numerical tests were conducted using the noncommercial object-oriented finite element package MoonMD [23] that was originally developed by the research group in Magdeburg and used for several benchmarks. The numerical results generated by MoonMD have been also verified by commercial software packages FLUENT® and FEMLAB®; see [24] and [3, Chapter 2.6].

Let the reactor channel with Newtonian-fluid be represented by the plain domain where and . In all computations we use the porosity distribution from [3, Section ] which is determined experimentally and takes into account the effect of wall channeling in packed bed reactorswhere . The distribution of the porosity is presented in Figure 1. We distinguish between the inlet, outlet, and membrane parts of domain boundary and denote them by , , and , respectively. Let At the inlet and at the membrane wall we prescribe Dirichlet boundary conditions, namely, the plug flow conditions where and . We consider the case of fixed bed reactor, that is, . At the outlet we set the following outflow boundary condition: where denotes the outer normal. This boundary condition results from the integration by parts when deriving the weak formulation, and it is called the* do-nothing* boundary condition. In order to avoid discontinuity between the inflow and wall conditions we replace constant profile by trapezoidal one with zero value at the corners. Our computations are carried out on the Cartesian mesh which consists of 100 stretched rectangular cells on the coarse level (see Figure 2) and will be three times uniformly refined. In order to approximate the weak solution of the dimensionless system from (6) subject to the Dirichlet and* do-nothing* boundary conditions, we apply biquadratic conforming and discontinuous piecewise linear finite elements for the velocity and pressure, respectively.