Abstract

A new method of indirect determination of Cu2+ was developed based on square-wave voltammetry by the oxidation of iodide in organic solvent at the liquid/liquid (L/L) interface. The limit of detection for the determination of Cu2+ in this method was found to be 5×104 mol/L, and the concentration ranged up to 1×102 mol/L gave a linear limiting current versus concentration response. For the same simulated wastewater, this method showed high accuracy compared with the result tested by sodium diethyldithiocarbamate extraction spectrophotometry. This approach could be applied to the indirect determination of the oxidative heavy metals in the industrial wastewater.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, zinc, nickel, copper, and chromium (VI) or their compounds have been used extensively by various metal finishing, mining, and chemical industries. This has led to a sharp increasing in the contamination of water. Due to their toxicity, the presence of these metals in excessive quantities will interfere with many beneficial uses of the water. For these reasons, it is necessary to explore a simple, sensitive and accurate detection method.

Many analytical methods have been developed for determination of heavy metals in water, such as colorimetric analysis [1], UV-VIS spectroscopy [24], and either flame or graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [58].In addition to these techniques, methods for multielemental determination have been developed, such as ion chromatography (IC) [911] and inductively coupled plasma combined with either atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) [12] or mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [13, 14].

Although these methodologies are rapid and sensitive for the determination of trace amounts of metals, they require complicated instrumentation with high capital and operational costs. Furthermore, these methods are not easily implemented into fully portable analytical tools for screening, detecting, identifying, and quantifying metal ions.

Different from these methods, electrochemical detection (ED), such as polarography, offers high sensitivity and selectivity for metals that are readily oxidized or reduced with simple instrumentation and low capital and operational costs. Therefore, it is suitable for online monitoring. Now, the application of polarography has been limited for the toxicity of mercury.

Electrochemistry at liquid/liquid (L/L) interfaces is mostly studying charge (ion and charge) transfer across an interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions and the associated chemical reactions. Based on the special property of the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIESs), using appropriate organic solvents with low toxicity to substitute toxic mercury is a new area for monitoring heavy metals.

Square-wave voltammetry is a large-amplitude differential technique in which a waveform composed of a symmetrical square wave, superimposed on a base staircase potential, is applied to the working electrode. Now, square-wave voltammetry has been applied in the field of ITIES. Mirceski and Scholz [15] studied the electrochemistry of iodine/iodide redox couple at the three-phase arrangement organic liquid (aqueous solution) graphite electrode of a reversible electrochemical process using square-wave voltammetry as the electro chemical method.

In this paper, a simple method of monitoring copper ions indirectly was designed by investigating the electrochemical reactions of iodine at the L/L interface with square-wave voltammetry. Different from the study of Mirceski and Scholz, a new composite electrode was chosen as the working electrode, which was prepared by inserting a Pt wire electrode into a micropipette. An organic solvent containing extracted iodine was injected into the pipette, thus the liquid/liquid interface was supported by setting the pipette just on the surface of aqueous solution below. Xie et al. [16] have studied the electrochemical behavior of iodine using such kind of electrode, and analyzed it by cyclic voltammetry. This paper improved their study from two aspects. First, by using square-wave voltammetry to substitute cyclic voltammetry, the analysis time was drastically reduced and its keen-edged peak shape made the curve more easily to scale the peak current and realize quantitative detection compared with cyclic voltammetry. Second, in the process of extraction, the volume of organic solvent was smaller than the volume of the stock aqueous solution which contained triiodide, rather than equal. As the concentration of extracted iodine in the organic solvent showed to be dramatically high in the smaller volume of organic solvent under the premise that the total amount of extracted iodine did not change, the peak current could be higher.

2. Experimental Part

2.1. Instruments and Chemicals

All the salts used as the supporting electrolytes were used as purchased and all the chemicals used here were of analytical grade. The aqueous solutions were prepared in deionized water. Organic solvents were saturated with deionized water prior to experiments. A stock aqueous solution of triiodide was determined by iodometry. Some solutions of iodine in organic solvent (methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)) were prepared by the extraction of iodine from a triiodide stock solution in water saturated MIBK.

All electrochemical experiments were performed at room temperature (25±1)C with an electrochemical analyzer (CHI832b, Chenhua, Shanghai, China); UV-VIS spectra were measured with a UV-VIS (UNICO UV-2102, UNICO (Shanghai) Instrument Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China).

2.2. Experimental Procedures

A conventional three-electrode cell was used, in this work by using saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode (E = 0.241 V versus standard hydrogen electrode) and a platinum electrode as the auxiliary electrode. The working electrode was a platinum wire (d = 0.1 mm) sealed in a classical capillary (d = 1.0 mm). Prior to all experiments, the platinum wire was immerged into 1 mol/L H2SO4 to be activated during cyclic voltammetric experiments. After activation, it was polished with sheepskin, cleaned successively with alcohol and acetone, and then dried with a hair drier. After that, 2040𝜇L of MIBK containing iodine was injected into a pipette using a microsyringe, and the platinum wire electrode was immersed into it. Then the combined electrode was immediately set just on the surface of the aqueous solution. The schematic diagram of the experimental assembly is shown in Figure 1. The liquid/liquid interface between aqueous phase and organic phase was supported as shown in part 5 of the Figure 1 (the cell employed and an interfacial area of 0.8 mm2). During square-wave voltammetry experiments, neither a significant distortion nor a change of the color of the organic phase had been observed. The interfacial area influences only the measured currents, where both the position of the response (peak potential) and the shapes were not affected.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of Extractive Volume Ratio on Peak Current

The effect of volume ratio between organic solvent (MIBK) and triiodide stock solution on peak current is shown in Figure 2. Different volumes of MIBK, that is, 10 mL, 8 mL, 6 mL, 4 mL, 2 mL were used to extract iodine from 10 mL aqueous phase. As shown in Figure 2, the peak currents varied when using different volumes of extractant and appeared significantly high when volume ratio was 0.2. This is in agreement with the principle that the concentration of iodine in MIBK increases along with the decrease of extractant volume under the premise that the total amount of extracted iodine did not change.

3.2. Quantitative Determination of Iodine

The triiodide stock aqueous solution was prepared with I2 and KI, and after investigation the authors came to the conclusion that the peak current does not change when using different mole ratio of I2 and KI. So a solution in which the mole ratio between I2 and KI was 1:8 was chosen and diluted into different concentrations.

The square-wave voltammograms (SWVs) of various concentrations of iodine in the triiodide stock aqueous solution chosen above are shown in Figure 3(a). The mechanism of iodine oxidation at the electrode surface can be explained as in literature 16. The peak current was directly proportional to I2 concentration as shown in Figure 3(b). The proportionality coefficient was 0.9970. So it is reasonable to suggest that the indirectly quantitative determination of Cu2+ is feasible.

3.3. Quantitative Determination of Cu2+

As it is well known, an oxidizing analyte is added to excess I to produce iodine and then the iodine is titrated with standard thiosulfate solution [17]. In this method, an indicator and standard solution are prepared. Here, the method of measuring the content of iodine in solution was improved. Iodine was prepared according to the chemical reactions as follows: 2Cu2++5I2CuI(s)+I3.(1) Then various concentrations of iodine were extracted into MIBK. Solvent extraction is a well established separation technique based on the principle that a solute can distribute itself in a certain ratio between two immiscible solvents, one of which is usually water and the other organic solvent. This method is widely used because of its simplicity, speed, and applicability to low analyte concentrations.

The square-wave voltammograms of the iodine prepared by reaction of 0.02 mol/L Cu2+ and various concentrations of I in a neutral electrolyte were obtained and the relationship between the concentrations of I and the peak current is shown in Figure 4. The peak current increased along with the increasing of I’s amount when the concentrations of I were less than 0.8 mol/L and stayed almost invariable when the concentrations of I were higher than 0.8 mol/L. Then the conclusion was made that the peak currents are invariable when the amount of I used is excess enough. So this study chose 1 mol/L KI as a reducer to produce iodine with different concentrations of Cu2+.

The square-wave voltammograms of the iodine prepared by the reaction of various concentrations of Cu2+ and 1 mol/L I in a neutral electrolyte are shown in Figure 5(a). The peak current was directly proportional to Cu2+ concentration as shown in Figure 5(b). The proportionality coefficient was 0.9983. The limit of detection for the determination of Cu2+ indirectly was found to be 5 × 10−4 mol/L, and the concentration ranged up to 1 × 10−2 mol/L gave a linear limiting current versus concentration response.

3.4. Detection for Actual Samples

A simulated wastewater containing Cu2+ was prepared and the peak current was determined through the same procedure as mentioned before. Then the concentration of Cu2+ in the sample was determined by the regression equation of Figure 6(b) (Y = 4.952 × 10−7+ 2.587 × 10−4X) based on the peak current (1.731 × 10−6 A). The result is 4.777 × 10−3 mol/L.

Besides the method studied in this paper, another classical method, spectrophotometry was also used as comparative study to determine the same sample. The absorbency degree of various concentrations of Cu2+ colored by sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) was detected by the UV-VIS at the wavelength of 440 nm and directly proportional to Cu2+ concentration as shown in Figure 6. The proportionality coefficient was 0.9952. After diluting 1000 times, the concentration of Cu2+ in the sample was determined by the regression equation of Figure 6(b) (Y = 0.045+116848.0315 X) based on the absorbency degree (0.446). So the Cu2+ concentration in this sample is 4.202 × 10−3 mol/L.

The two results of the same sample showed that the method studied in this paper gives good result with high accuracy in agreement with the result of spectrophotometry.

The interference experiment also showed that the peak current would not be interfered when the concentration of coexisted reductive metals (such as Zn2+, Ni2+) was ten times as the target metal. When existing two or more than two kinds of oxidative metals, the method could determine the total amount.

4. Conclusions

A new method of indirect determination of Cu2+ has been characterized by the oxidation of iodide in organic solvent at the L/L interface, in which the ion transfer from aqueous solution to organic phase proceeds. Considering the strong reductive properties of iodide in aqueous solution, iodine can be obtained by chemical reactions between excess iodide and heavy metal ions (e.g., Cu2+) in solution, then the content of heavy metal ions can be determined indirectly using the present method. The limit of detection for the determination of Cu2+ indirectly was found to be 5 × 10−4 mol/L, and the concentration ranged up to 1 × 10−2 mol/L gave a linear limiting current versus concentration response. Compared the result with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate extraction spectrophotometry, this method shows high accuracy. The advantage of this method is that it can be operated much more easier than sodium diethyldithiocarbamate extraction spectrophotometry.

The limit of detection was not low enough because the peak position appeared at 0.8 V, away from its normal position when the concentration of Cu2+ was lower than 5 × 10−4 mol/L. The reason for the potential shift is yet to be studied.

This approach could be applied to the indirect determination of the oxidative heavy metals, such as Cu2+, Cr (VI) in the industrial wastewater.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by “863” project (Grant no. 2006AA06Z405) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China.