Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 140469, 8 pages
Research Article

Combination of ERG9 Repression and Enzyme Fusion Technology for Improved Production of Amorphadiene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Warangal 506004, India
2Department of Zoology, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh 506009, India

Received 31 May 2013; Revised 31 July 2013; Accepted 12 August 2013

Academic Editor: Ravichandra Potumarthi

Copyright © 2013 Rama Raju Baadhe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) MTCC 3157 was selected for combinatorial biosynthesis of plant sesquiterpene amorpha-4,11-diene. Our main objective was to overproduce amorpha 4-11-diene, which is a key precursor molecule of artemisinin (antimalarial drug) produced naturally in plant Artemisia annua through mevalonate pathway. Farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) is a common intermediate metabolite of a variety of compounds in the mevalonate pathway of yeast and leads to the production of ergosterols, dolichol and ubiquinone, and so forth. In our studies, FPP converted to amorphadiene (AD) by expressing heterologous amorphadiene synthase (ADS) in yeast. First, ERG9 (squalane synthase) promoter of yeast was replaced with repressible methionine (MET3) promoter by using bipartite gene fusion method. Further to overcome the loss of the intermediate FPP through competitive pathways in yeast, fusion protein technology was adopted and farnesyldiphosphate synthase (FPPS) of yeast has been coupled with amorphadiene synthase (ADS) of plant origin (Artemisia annua L.) where amorphadiene production was improved by 2-fold (11.2 mg/L) and 4-fold (25.02 mg/L) in yeast strains YCF-002 and YCF-005 compared with control strain YCF-AD (5.5 mg/L), respectively.

1. Introduction

Microbial fermentation ensures production of industrially important metabolites in large quantities. Implication of rDNA technology in microbial fermentations offers production of desired heterologous proteins at large scale. Apart from the proteins, nature offers diverse classes of complex metabolites (isoprenoids) that are utilized in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries and so forth [1]. Many of these complex metabolites are produced naturally in low quantities in plants that are difficult or expensive to cultivate. Metabolic engineering, systems, and synthetic biology principles and methods allowed easy transfer of heterologous pathways from natural plant producer to a suitable microbial host such as yeast and E. coli [24]. E. coli was the most studied host for metabolic engineering of isoprenoid by modulating 1-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) and mevalonate (MVA) pathways [58]. Other studies on MVA pathway deregulation in yeasts have improved the biosynthesis of different isoprenoids [913]. The vital role of MVA pathway and eventual product (ergosterol) proportion from this pathway increased the interest for the engineering of isoprenoid pathway in yeast for the production of heterologous compounds [14]. Ergosterol synthesis was carried out by squalene synthase (ERG9), and conversion of farnesylpyrophosphate (FPP) to squalene was successfully regulated by replacing the native promoter with repressible promoters [2, 15]. ATP sulfurylase (MET3) catalyzes the reduction of sulfate to sulfide, involved in methionine metabolism. Addition of methionine had the ability to repress the MET3 promoter in S. cerevisiae and Ashbya gossypii [16, 17], and MET3 promoter was widely used as a molecular tool for yeast genetics [18].

Heterologous expression of pathways/enzymes in S. cerevisiae is complex due to the presence of numerous native host enzymes and tight regulation of the intermediate metabolites generated by the host machinery. The non native product formation is not only affected by the host environment but also by the loss of intermediate metabolites through diffusion, degradation, or converted by competitive enzymes/pathways [19, 20]. In order to avoid such intermediates loss and make heterologous expression more efficient, enzymes catalyzing successive reactions are often fused in close proximity to each other by using small linkers. Small linkers are the sequence codings for few amino acids, which separates the two proteins in space with a small distance allowing them to fold properly without constraints from each other. Consequently, the substrate was channeled between active sites of two or more sequential enzymes of a pathway, without allowing free diffusion of the intermediates. Subsequently it reducing the transit time required for the intermediates to spread the enzyme that catalyzes the next step in the reaction. Several elucidations in vitro and in vivo recommended that this strategy can be used to improve the flux through a metabolic pathway [2125].

In the present study, we used S. cerevisiae (MTCC 3157) for heterologous expression of amorphadiene synthase (ADS) for one-step conversion of FPP to amorphadiene. In order to increase the concentration and flux of FPP towards heterologous product, squalane synthase (ERG9) a key enzyme in ergosterol synthesis was repressed. Further to avoid FPP loss through competitive pathways, enzyme fusion strategy was applied. Here, we composed a chimeric fusion protein between farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS) of yeast and amorphadiene synthase (ADS) of Artemisia annua L. and was expressed in ERG9-repressed yeast strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Strains, Media, and Reagents

All the reagents and media used in this study were of, analytical grade and procured either from Himedia (India) or Merck (India) or Sigma (India). The strains used in this study were Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MTCC 3157), and E. coli DH5α (MTCC 1652).

2.2. ERG9 Promoter Replacement with MET3 Promoter

The MET3 promoter was amplified from genomic DNA of S. cerevisiae (MTCC 3157) using the primer pairs 1 and 2 (Table 1) containing restriction sites BcuI and Cfr42I. PCR was carried out in a total volume of 50 μL with the following reagents: 1x Ex Taq DNA polymerase buffer (Stratagene), 0.2 mM dNTPs (Pharmacia), 20 pmol of each primer, and 1 U Ex Taq DNA Polymerase (Takara, Japan). This PCR includes two cycles of 94°C (0.5 min), 50°C (1.0 min), and 72°C (1.5 min); 29 cycles of 94°C (0.5 min), 56°C (1 min), and 72°C (1.5 min); and 72°C (5 min). Resultant PCR fragment and pUG6 plasmid (Euroscarf, Germany) were digested with BcuI-Cfr42I restriction enzymes. The vector and PCR fragments were purified with NucleoSpin gel and PCR clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) and separated on 1% agarose gel (Merck Biosciences, India), and gel was further purified using NucleoSpin gel and PCR clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Ligation of the vector and PCR products was carried as per the standard protocol given for T4 DNA ligase (Merck Biosciences, India). The ligated plasmid mix was transformed into competent E. coli (DH5α) MTCC 1652, and transformants were selected on LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (50 mg/L), and the plasmid obtained was named as pUG6 MET3.

Table 1: List of the primers used in this study.

ERG9 promoter was replaced with methionine promoter by using fusion PCR, and four fragments were separately amplified before fusing them together in pairwise by using fusion PCR and a bipartite gene targeting method (Figure 1) [15, 26]. Two fragments containing the MET3 promoter and the KanMX selection cassette were amplified from plasmid pUG6 MET3 in two separate, but overlapping fragments using the two pairs of primers (3) a, b and (4) a, b (Table 1). Also 500 bp upstream region of the ERG9 promoter in the genome of S. cerevisiae was amplified using primers (5) and (6). Subsequently, the first 500 bp of the ERG9 open reading frame (ORF) region was amplified using primer pairs (7) and (8) (Table 1). Finally, PCR fragments were gel purified using the NucleoSpin gel and PCR clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) and subsequently fused together in pairs using fusion PCR to obtain two fragments, first one with MET3 promoter and 500 bp ORF region of ERG9 using primers (9) and (10) and a second fragment containing KanMX and first 500 bp upstream region of ERG9 using primers (11) and (12) (Table 1). Subsequently, fusion PCR fragments were gel purified with the NucleoSpin gel and PCR cleanup kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany).

Figure 1: Promoter replacement of ERG9 gene by using bipartite gene fusion method.
2.3. Construction of Fusion Proteins

An FPPS (ERG 20) gene fragment was obtained by PCR amplification as mentioned above using genomic DNA of S. cerevisiae MTCC 3157 with the primer pairs (13) and (14). The fragments were digested with EcoRI and ClaI and inserted into an EcoRI-ClaI vector fragment 2μ based pY01URA plasmid (Genecopeia USA) and the resulting plasmid is designated as pY01FPPS. For construction of plasmid expressing fusion protein FPPS-ADS, first FPPS and ADS were amplified separately using primer pairs (13), (14) and (15), (16) using pY01FPPS and pRS425ADS (Addgene#20119) as templates [2]. The two resulting PCR fragments were fused in the second round of PCR using primers (17) and (18). Similarly, ADS-FPPS fragments were generated in the first round using the primer pairs (19), (20) and (21), (22) and the resulting fragments fused together in second round of PCR using primer pair (23) and (24). The resulting two PCR fragments were cut with EcoRI-ClaI and individually cloned into EcoRI-ClaI plasmid 2μ-based pY01URA plasmid (Genecopeia, USA) and the resulting plasmids were named as pY01FPPS-ADS and pY01ADS-FPPS, respectively.

2.4. Strain Construction

Transformation of all strains of S. cerevisiae was performed by lithium acetate and PEG mediated transformation by using Yeastmaker transformation system 2 kit (Clontech, USA). S. cerevisiae strain (MTCC 3157), was used as the parent strain for all S. cerevisiae strains used in this study. Strain YCF-AD was constructed by the transformation of pESC-URA-ADS plasmid (constructed by using pESC-URA and Addgene#20119) in to MTCC 3157. Strain YCF-002 was generated by transforming the fusion PCR fragments in to strain YCF-AD and selected on Kanamycin and synthetic defined (SD)-URA drop out plates. Finally strain YCF-001 obtained by exclusion of plasmid pESC-URA-ADS from strain YCF-002 by selection on plates containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA). Strain YCF-004, YCF-005, and YCF-006 constructed by transforming the plasmids pY01FPPS, pY01FPPS-ADS, pY01ADS-FPPS, and the transformants were selected on SD-URA drop out plates (Table 2).

Table 2: Yeast strains and plasmids used in this study.
2.5. OD Measurement and Dry Weight Analysis

Optical density values of samples in triplicates were measured at 600 nm (OD600) by using UV-Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Cultures were further diluted until the OD600 value as <1.0 [14]. The dry weight was analyzed by using nitrocellulose filter papers (pore size 0.45 μm, Whatman). The filter papers were predried in a microwave oven at 60°C for 10 min. A known volume of the cell culture was filtered, and the residue was washed with distilled water and dried in an oven at 60°C [27].

2.6. Ergosterol Extraction and Analysis

An overnight culture grown in minimal medium supplemented with 1.5 mM methionine (glucose 20 g/L) was centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 min to get approximately 3 g of dry cells. The cell pellet was washed with distilled water, and the cell suspension was centrifuged for another 5 min at 5,000 rpm. Further cell pellet was mixed with 300 mL of 25% alcoholic KOH solution and vortexed for 1 min, and the suspension was saponified for 3 h at 90°C in a reflux. After cooling them to room temperature, nonsaponified sterols were extracted by adding 300 mL heptane followed by vortexing for 2 min. A vortex mixture of 10 mL heptane and 10 mL of alcoholic KOH solution is used as blank. After clarification of heptane layer 0.5 mL of heptane from both sample and blank was diluted tenfolds with 4.5 mL absolute ethanol. The absorbance of all samples were read against blank at 230 and 281.5 nm, respectively [14, 28].

The ergosterol content was calculated as milligram ergosterol per gram dry weight using the following equation [28]: where is a correction factor for dilutions and sample sizes, and 290 and 580 are of crystalline ergosterol and 24 (28)-dehydroergosterol, respectively.

2.7. Cultivation of Yeast in Shake Flask

Hundred milliliter medium was prepared with the following composition (g/L): galactose, 20; KH2PO4, 14.4; (NH4)2SO4, 7.5; MgSO4 7H2O, 0.5; trace metal solution, 2; and vitamin solution, 1 mL and 50 μL/L silicone antifoam. The pH was adjusted to 6.20 using 1 M NaOH and autoclaved separately from the carbon source solution. Vitamin solution was filter sterilized and aseptically added to the medium after autoclaving. Variou concentrations of methionine (0–3 mM) were used to know the minimal methionine concentration for the repression of ERG9 expression. Flasks were further incubated in a shaking incubator (Remi, India) at 30°C with 150 rpm.

2.8. Batch Fermentation

Batch fermentation was carried out in a controlled bioreactor (Spectrochem, India) containing 2 L mineral medium that consists of (g/L) galactose 20; (NH4)2SO4, 5; KH2PO4, 3; MgSO47H2O, 0.5; EDTA, 0.015; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.0045; CoC12·6H2O, 0.0003; MnC12 4H2O, 0.001; CuSO4 5H2O, 0.0003; CaC12·2H2O, 0.0000045; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.0003; NaMoO4,·2H2O, 0.0004; H3BO3, 0.001; KI, 0.0001; and 0.025 mL silicone antifoam (Merck). This medium was further autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min. Further filter sterilized vitamin solution containing (mg/L): biotin, 0.05; calcium pantothenate, 1; nicotinic acid, 1; inositol, 25; thiamine HCl, 1; pyridoxine HCl, 1; and para-aminobenzoic acid, 0.2 was added to the autoclaved mineral medium. Finally, media were supplemented with 2 mM filter sterilized methionine. During the fermentation process, the temperature was kept constant at 30 ± 2°C, and dissolved oxygen tension (50%) was maintained with sterilized air (0.2 μ filter) with airflow 1 L/min and with 250 rpm agitation and the off-gas passed through a outlet port. pH was controlled between 6.20 ± 0.5 by automatic addition of 1 M NaOH and 1 M HCl. Seed culture with OD600 of 0.02 from shake flask was inoculated into batch fermentor. After cells reaching 1 at OD600 20% (vol/vol) isopropyl myristate (Merck Millipore, Germany) was added aseptically to the media. This isopropyl myristate layer was sampled and diluted with ethylacetate for determination of amorphadiene concentration by gas chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Agilent Technologies, USA).

2.9. Analysis of Sesquiterpenes

Amorpha-4,11-diene and farnesol were analysed by gas chromatography with flame-ionization detector (GC/FID). Samples from fermentor were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, diluted directly into ethyl acetate, and mixed for 30 min on a vortex mixer. After phase separation 0.6 mL of the ethyl acetate, layer was transferred to a capped vial for analysis. The ethyl acetate-extracted samples were analyzed using the GC/FID. A 1 μL sample was split 1 : 20 and separated using a DB-WAX column (50 m × 200 μm × 0.2 μm) with hydrogen as the carrier gas with flow rate of 1.57 mL/min. The temperature program for the analysis was as follows. The column was initially held at 150°C for 3.0 min, followed by a temperature gradient of 5°C per min to a temperature of 250°C. Amorpha-4,11-diene and farnesol peak areas were converted to concentration values from external standard calibrations using authentic compounds [29].

2.10. Expression, Purification, and SDS-PAGE Analysis of the Proteins

Different yeast strains carrying the plasmids pADS, pFPPS, pFPPS-ADS,and pADS-FPPS were grown in appropriate SD drop out media at 37°C. After cells optical density values were reaching 2.5 at OD600, they were harvested and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, and cell pellet was resuspended in 10 mL distilled water, and proteins were extracted according to CelLytic Y Plus Kit (Sigma, USA). Purification was carried out in a single step using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). The supernatant was applied to a 5 mL Nickel CL-Agarose Column (Merck Biosciences, India), loaded with nickel. Further nonbound proteins were removed with washing buffer. Elution of adsorbed recombinant proteins was achieved with elution buffer (Merck Biosciences, India). Fractions were collected either used or stored at 4°C. SDS/PAGE was carried out in 10% resolving and 5% stacking gels according to instructions given by the manufacturer (Merck Biosciences, India) and the samples along with protein marker were loaded on Mini-PROTEAN Tetra cell (Bio-Rad, USA). After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with coomassie blue. Gel, visualized and analyzed in Gel Doc Fire Reader Documentation System (Merck Biosciences, India).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Methionine on ERG9 Expression

The minimum concentration of methionine for expression of ERG9 was determined by growing the ERG9 repressed yeast cells in shake flasks supplemented with varying quantities of methionine (Figure 2). When yeast cells grown in the absence of methionine, cells propagated exponentially up to 10 h and followed by a slight drop in the growth and immediately after 12 h cells followed exponential phase up to 20 h. The methionine concentration at 1 mM elongated the lag phase and a lower final biomass concentration. There was a drastic decrease in the growth of the yeast beyond 2.5 mM methionine concentration, and the consequences were observed by measuring the ergosterol content (Table 3). The final ergosterol content of control yeast strain (MTCC 3157) was observed at 19.25 mg/g DW, and strain YCF-005 was given varied quantities of ergosterol at 0, 1, 2, 2.5, and 3 mM methionine as 19.22, 14.05, 13.98, and 13.75 and 3.31 mg/g DW, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3: The final ergosterol content with varying concentrations of methionine (average data obtained from triplicate of the experiments were represented).
Figure 2: Effect of methionine on the growth pattern of ERG9 repressed yeast strain (YCF-005) cultivated in shake flasks containing minimal medium and 20 g/L glucose (average data obtained from triplicate of the experiments were represented).
3.2. Combined Effect of ERG9 Repression and Chimeric Protein Expression

Transformed yeast strains harbouring amorphadiene synthase (ADS) was able to produce amorpha,4-11-diene (Figure 3). Strain YCF-005 analyzed for amorphadiene production by GC-MS as mentioned in materials and methods. Analysis of GC-MS for ethyl acetate extracts revealed the presence of amorphadiene major peak and other sesquiterpene as a minor peak (Figure 3(b)). Retention time, mass spectrum of main component (19.75 and 14.21 min) were almost matching with standard (19.70 and 14.18 min) (Figures 3(a), 3(c), and 3(d)). When AD producing strains analyzed for amorphadiene, strain YCF-002 produced 11.02 mg/L of amorphadiene, which was approximately 2-fold higher than AD (5.65 mg/L) produced by YCF-AD respectively (Figure 4).

Figure 3: GC-MS profile of the amorphadiene and farnesol produced by YCF-005 strain. (a) Standard chromatogram of amorphadiene and farnesol, (b) ethyl extract sample chromatogram, (c) farnesol authentic standard mass spectrum, (d) amorphadiene authentic standard mass spectrum, (e) amorphadiene, and (f) farnesol sample mass spectrum generated from sample chromatogram (b).
Figure 4: Amorphadiene concentration as a function of time in repressed (YCF-002, YCF-005, YCF-006) and nonrepressed (YCF-AD) yeast strains expression free enzymes (ADS) and chimera enzymes (FPPS-ADS and ADS-FPPS) (average data obtained from triplicate of the experiments were represented).

FPP conversion to farnesol in the strain YCF-004 was limited by expressing the fusion protein in yeast and to probe the effect of enzyme fusion on diversion of the flux more efficiently towards amorphadiene production. Different strains expressing the native proteins and chimeric proteins ADS, FPPS-ADS, and ADS-FPPS were analyzed. The strain transformed with the plasmid expressing ADS-FPPS produced amorphadiene (12.08 mg/L) at the same level as that for the strain expressing free ADS (Figure 4).

More interestingly, the strain transformed with the plasmid expressing FPPS-ADS produced amorphadiene at an almost 2-fold higher level (25.06 mg/L) than that for the strain expressing free FPPS and ADS (Figure 4).

3.3. SDS-PAGE Analysis

The four recombinant proteins were produced using the conditions reported as above. On SDS-PAGE the four proteins were compared across the protein molecular marker (Figure 5). Both fused proteins FPPS-ADS and ADS-FPPS molecular weights were approximately 105 kD which was almost equal to the sum of two individual proteins (FPPS 40 kD and 63 kD). This indicates the efficacious fusion of the two proteins to form a chimeric protein.

Figure 5: SDS/PAGE of recombinant enzymes produced in different yeast strains. Lane M: molecular mass standards; lane a, crude extract FPPS; lane b: purified FPPS; lane c: crude extract ADS; lane d: purified ADS; lane e: crude extract FPPS-ADS; lane f: purified FPPS-ADS lane g: crude extract ADS-FPPS; lane h: purified ADS-FPPS. The calculated molecular weights of FPPS, ADS, and the fusion enzymes were 40, 63, and 103 kDa, respectively.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we have improved the amorphadiene production by 4-fold in the yeast S. cerevisiae (MTCC 3157). In order to decrease the FPP flux towards ergosterol and competitive pathways, ERG9 promoter was replaced with repressible methionine (MET3) promoter, and strain YCF-005 growth rate was very low at 3.0 mM methionine concentration, due to low ergosterol production. There was no much effect on the growth beyond 1.5 mM methionine. One and half mM methionine was selected for the regulation of the MET3 promoter. The ergosterol content of the ERG9 repressed strain was quite low compared with control strain (MTCC 3157). Increasing concentration of methionine repressed the yeast strain and produced varied quantities of ergosterol (Table 3) upon increasing methionine, there was a tight regulation of the promoter. Subsequent repression of ERG9 leads to the accumulation of FPP derived farnesol. Farnesol accumulation observed in earlier studies with deletion and inhibition of ERG9 gene [3032]. Moreover farnesol at low concentration inhibits the growth of the cells by cell cycle arrest in some yeast cells [33]. We observed that strain YCF-001 produced 12.03 mg/g DW of farnesol and final concentration 24.12 mg/L and disclosed the possibility of pooling the available FPP towards amorphadiene by enzyme fusion technology. As mentioned in earlier studies, a discrepancy of methionine was not sufficient to repress ERG9 during fermentation and 2.5 mM methionine was maintained during fermentation [15].

We used isopropyl myristate as a solvent for trapping the volatile compounds and for phase separation, and that phase was analyzed for determination amorphadiene by GC-MS. Analysis of ethyl acetate extracts revealed the capability of yeast strains carrying ADS gene for production of amorphadiene. The major peak in the chromatogram confirmed as a amorphadiene and other minor peak as a farnesol with corresponding standards (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) [34, 35]. ERG9 (YCF-002) repression improved the amorphadiene production by increasing the FPP availability when compared with amorphadiene production in strain YCF-AD. Strains YCF-AD and YCF-002 were cultured in the fermentor and analyzed for amorphadiene and farnesol. Strain YCF-AD produced 5.65 mg/L of amorphadiene and 4.12 mg/L farnesol, as there was a 2-fold (11.02 mg/L) rise in amorphadiene production in strain YCF-002 (Figure 4). To overcome the natural loss of the metabolic intermediate FPP and its conversion towards farnesol, a chimeric protein with small Gly-Ser-Gly linker was constructed as ADS-FPPS and FPPS-ADS. Strain YCF-006 expressing ADS-FPPS produced 12.08 mg/L of amorphadiene which was almost close to amorphadiene produced by strain YCF-002 as YCF-005 produced 25.06 mg/L of amorphadiene and which was 2-fold higher than than the YCF-002 and subsequently 5-fold higher than YCF-001 (Figure 4). Strains (YCF-005) expressing FPPS-ADS do not produce higher amorphadiene yields compared with strains YCF-005 and YCF-002 as the active sites were likely far apart to produce a beneficial proximity effect [13]. The fusion phenomenon of the enzyme further confirmed by isolation and purification of FPPS, ADS, ADS-FPPS, and FPPS-ADS enzymes with SDS-PAGE and fused proteins molecular weights (105 kD) were almost equal to the sum of the individual enzymes ADS (63 kD) and FPPS (40 kD) (Figure 5).

5. Conclusion

Enzyme fusion technology will be an additive step to the metabolic engineering, and combination of metabolic engineering and enzyme fusion technology improves the flux of the intermediate metabolites in order to expand the heterologous components production. Further combinatorial expression of tHMGR and upregulation of UPC2 alleles with fusion technology accelerate the amorphadiene production. Further channeling acetyl-CoA into the mevalonate pathway will make it possible to further increase the FPP production which is having tremendous significance in chemical industry as well as in medicine.

Conflict of Interests

The authors confirm that this paper content has no conflict of interests.


The authors express their deep sense of gratitude to the Head, Department of Biotechnology and the Director of NIT, Warangal for all the support and constant encouragement in carrying out this work. Corresponding author, Rama Raju Baadhe, acknowledges M.H.R.D, India, for the Ph.D. fellowship.


  1. M. C. Y. Chang and J. D. Keasling, “Production of isoprenoid pharmaceuticals by engineered microbes,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 674–681, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. K. Ro, E. M. Paradise, M. Quellet et al., “Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast,” Nature, vol. 440, no. 7086, pp. 940–943, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. R. Baadhe, N. K. Mekala, S. R. Palagiri, and S. R. Parcha, “Development of petri net-based dynamic model for improved production of farnesyl pyrophosphate by integrating mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate pathways in yeast,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 1172–1182, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Nagasaki, A. Saito, A. Doi, H. Matsuno, and S. Miyano, Foundations of Systems Biology, Springer, London, UK, 1st edition, 2009.
  5. M. C. Y. Chang, R. A. Eachus, W. Trieu, D. K. Ro, and J. D. Keasling, “Engineering Escherichia coli for production of functionalized terpenoids using plant P450s,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 274–277, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Alper, K. Miyaoku, and G. Stephanopoulos, “Construction of lycopene-overproducing E. coli strains by combining systematic and combinatorial gene knockout targets,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 612–616, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. A. Carter, R. J. Peters, and R. Croteau, “Monoterpene biosynthesis pathway construction in Escherichia coli,” Phytochemistry, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 425–433, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. E. Jackson, E. A. Hart-Wells, and S. P. T. Matsuda, “Metabolic engineering to produce sesquiterpenes in yeast,” Organic Letters, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1629–1632, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Miura, K. Kondo, H. Shimada, T. Saito, K. Nakamura, and N. Misawa, “Production of lycopene by the food yeast, Candida utilis that does not naturally synthesize carotenoid,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 306–308, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. Miura, K. Kondo, T. Saito, H. Shimada, P. D. Fraser, and N. Misawa, “Production of the carotenoids lycopene, β-carotene, and astaxanthin in the food yeast Candida utilis,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1226–1229, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Shimada, K. Kondo, P. D. Fraser, Y. Miura, T. Saito, and N. Misawa, “Increased carotenoid production by the food yeast Candida utilis through metabolic engineering of the isoprenoid pathway,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 2676–2680, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. R. Baadhe, N. K. Mekala, S. R. Parcha, and Y. P. Devi, “Optimization of amorphadiene production in engineered yeast by response surface methodology,” 3 Biotech, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Albertsen, Y. Chen, L. S. Bach et al., “Diversion of flux toward sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by fusion of host and heterologous enzymes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 1033–1040, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Lamacka and J. Sajbidor, “Ergosterol determination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Comparison of different methods,” Biotechnology Techniques, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 723–725, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. A. Asadollahi, J. Maury, K. Moller et al., “Production of plant sesquiterpenes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of ERG9 repression on sesquiterpene biosynthesis,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 666–677, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Mao, Y. Hu, C. Liang, and C. Lu, “MET3 promoter: a tightly regulated promoter and its application in construction of conditional lethal strain,” Current Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Dünkler and J. Wendland, “Use of MET3 promoters for regulated gene expression in Ashbya gossypii,” Current Genetics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. S. Care, J. Trevethick, K. M. Binley, and P. E. Sudbery, “The MET3 promoter: a new tool for Candida albicans molecular genetics,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 792–798, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. J. Conrado, J. D. Varner, and M. P. DeLisa, “Engineering the spatial organization of metabolic enzymes: mimicking nature's synergy,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 492–499, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Jorgensen, A. V. Rasmussen, M. Morant et al., “Metabolon formation and metabolic channeling in the biosynthesis of plant natural products,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 280–291, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Bulow, “Characterization of an artificial bifunctional enzyme, β-galactosidase/galactokinase, prepared by gene fusion,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 443–448, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Carlsson, S. Ljung, and L. Bulow, “Physical and kinetic effects on introduction of various linker regions in β-galactosidase/galactose dehydrogenase fusion enzymes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1293, no. 1, pp. 154–160, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Orita, N. Sakamoto, N. Kato, H. Yurimoto, and Y. Sakai, “Bifunctional enzyme fusion of 3-hexulose-6-phosphate synthase and 6-phospho-3-hexuloisomerase,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 439–445, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. S. Seo, Y. J. Koo, J. Y. Lim et al., “Characterization of a bifunctional enzyme fusion of trehalose-6- phosphate synthetase and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase of Escherichia coli,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2484–2490, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Carlsson, P. Ljungcrantz, L. Bulow, and K. Mosbach, “Engineering of lactose metabolism in E. coli by introducing β-galactosidase/galactokinase fusion enzymes,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 439–444, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Erdeniz, U. H. Mortensen, and R. Rothstein, “Cloning-free PCR-based allele replacement methods,” Genome Research, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1174–1183, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Dynesen, H. P. Smits, L. Olsson, and J. Nielsen, “Carbon catabolite repression of invertase during batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of glucose, fructose, and mannose,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 579–582, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. N. Breivik and J. L. Owades, “Spectrophotometric semimicrodetermination of ergosterol in yeast,” Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 360–363, 1957. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. J. Westfall, D. J. Pitera, J. R. Lenihan et al., “Production of amorphadiene in yeast, and its conversion to dihydroartemisinic acid, precursor to the antimalarial agent artemisinin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. E111–E118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. T. Buurman, A. E. Blodgett, K. G. Hull, and D. Carcanague, “Pyridines and pyrimidines mediating activity against an efflux-negative strain of Candida albicans through putative inhibition of lanosterol demethylase,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 313–318, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. M. Hornby, B. W. Kebaara, and K. W. Nickerson, “Farnesol biosynthesis in Candida albicans: cellular response to sterol inhibition by zaragozic acid B,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2366–2369, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Song, “Detection of farnesyl diphosphate accumulation in yeast ERG9 mutants,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 317, no. 2, pp. 180–185, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Machida, T. Tanaka, Y. Yano, S. Otani, and M. Taniguchi, “Farnesol-induced growth inhibition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a cell cycle mechanism,” Microbiology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 293–299, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. J. Bouwmeester, T. E. Wallaart, M. H. A. Janssen et al., “Amorpha-4,11-diene synthase catalyses the first probable step in artemisinin biosynthesis,” Phytochemistry, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 843–854, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Scalcinati, C. Knuf, S. Partow et al., “Dynamic control of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for the production of plant sesquitepene α-santalene in a fed-batch mode,” Metabolic Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 91–103, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus