Research Article
Polythiophene-Chitosan Magnetic Nanocomposite as a Highly Efficient Medium for Isolation of Fluoxetine from Aqueous and Biological Samples
Table 2
Comparing the current work with some other methods used for the determination of fluoxetine.
| Method | Recovery (%) | LOD (µg L−1) | LDR (µg L−1) | RSD (%) | Analytical grade% | Triplicate | Ref. |
| Spectrofluorimetry | 97 | 70 | 250–5000 | 2.2 | 99 purity | | [43] | LLE-CPE-FL | 102 | 100 | 5000–50000 | 3.5 | 99 purity | | [43] | Spectrophotometry | 19 | — | 1000–2000 | 1.0 | 99 purity | | [10] | SBSE-LC-MS | 52–63 | 3 | 10–500 | 5.0 | Analytical standards | | [8] | LLE-HPLC-FL | 97–99 | — | 25–1000 | 1.0 | 99 purity | | [2] | SPE-CZE | 89 | 10 | 100–200 | 3.0 | — | | [5] | Magnetic-SPE- SF | 80–104 | 20 | 50–1000 | 1.4 | >99.3 purity | — | [35] | Magnetic-SPE- SF | 76–99 | 1 | 50–5000 | 3 | >99.3 purity | | [44] | Fluorimetric method | 97–100 | 11 | 35–500 | 3 | 99.5 purity | | [45] | Developed method | 56–93 | 5 | 15–1000 | 2 | | | — |
|
|
Limit of detection. Linear dynamic range. Relative standard deviation.
|