Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry

Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Green Analytical Methods and Nanomaterials for Sample Preparation

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5579500 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5579500

Thi Oanh Nguyen, Cao-Son Tran, Thi Thu Hang Do, Thi Minh Hoa Nguyen, Quang-Dong Bui, Cao-Tien Bui, Hong-Ngoc Nguyen, Thu-Hien Dang, Viet-Chien Dinh, Thi Anh Huong Nguyen, Thi Hong Hao Le, "Rapid Screening and Quantitative Determination of Illegal Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors (PDE-5i) in Herbal Dietary Supplements", Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2021, Article ID 5579500, 11 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5579500

Rapid Screening and Quantitative Determination of Illegal Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors (PDE-5i) in Herbal Dietary Supplements

Academic Editor: Sibel A. Ozkan
Received25 Jan 2021
Revised07 Apr 2021
Accepted26 Apr 2021
Published05 May 2021

Abstract

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) are the first-line medication for oral erectile dysfunction, which are used according to the prescription of doctors. However, these substances have been found illegally in supplementary foods. The quality and safety of dietary supplements for enhancing male sexual performance have been questioned, raising the need for continual development of analytical methods. Liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry has become one of the most effective methods to identify and measure PDE-5i concentration. In this research, we focused on (i) developing and validating an effective screening and quantitation method for more than 53 PDE-5i in ingredients and supplementary products using LC-Q-Exactive after a simple sample extraction and (ii) assessing PDE-5i content in natural-based supplementary products available in Vietnam market. The extraction method used a small amount of organic solvent, which makes it more environmentally friendly (greener). The developed method has a limit of detection of 0.4 mg/kg, a limit of quantitation of 1.2 mg/kg, recoveries from 80 to 110%, and repeatability lower than 15%. Ninety-two herbal supplementary foods and ingredients used for enhancement of male sexual performance available in Vietnamese markets were collected. Fourteen PDE-5i including conventional and novel analogous were detected and measured in eighteen food supplements and two formulation ingredient samples.

1. Introduction

Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) is an enzyme responsible for the breakdown of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in the corporal smooth muscle [1]. Thus, PDE-5i are considered the first-line medication for oral erectile dysfunction (ED) therapies [2]. After the approval of sildenafil, several PDE-5i have been approved and demonstrated well-established efficacy in patients with ED such as tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil, mirodenafil, undenafil, and lodenafil. Additionally, PDE-5i proved their great potential in the treatment of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, cognition (Alzheimer’s disease), cancer therapeutics, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, renoprotection, etc. [3]. Although the safety of PDE-5i was proven, the use of PDE-5i has some adverse effects such as ataxia caused by acetildenafil and its analogs and symptoms of giddiness, headache, shortness of breath, and backache [4]. PDE-5i have an interaction effect with other medicines such as nitrates. From 2007, the US FDA announced that a warning of the potential risk of visual and auditory impairment related to nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and sudden sensorineural hearing loss would be added to drug labels of PDE-5i [3]. Seriously, the first known fatal case related to desmethyl carbodenafil, an unapproved PDE-5i, on a 34-year old male was reported in 2017 [5]. Therefore, the use of PDE-5i in therapy should strictly obey the advice of pharmacists.

PDE-5i, namely sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and their analogs, have been added in supplementary foods, which were supposed to be made of natural ingredients. The presence of PDE-5i in these supplement foods without labeling is consumer deception. In 2013, J.H. Lee et al. reported more than 46 PDE-5i analogs in various forms of health food products in the online and offline market of Korea [6]. A case study in the Czech market revealed that 10 over 64 natural herbal-based supplements for ED treatment contain both registered or unregistered synthetic PDE-5i [7]. In the summary of the Min-Yong Low research group, Asia reported the highest number of PDE-5i as adulterants in dietary supplements and was followed by Europe and North America [4]. Research of the Malaysian market showed 82% tested unregistered products and 14% of the registered products were adulterated with PDE-5i or their analogs [8]. The regulation of PDE-5i has been complicated because of the increasing number of novel synthetic PDE-5i analogs. Thus, the current situation raises the need for continual development of analytical methods to quickly detect PDE-5i analogs in these products.

The rapid and accurate identification and measurement of popular and unknown PDE-5i have been improved by numerous analytical techniques including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [9, 10], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [11], vibrational spectroscopy, liquid chromatography-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (LC-FT-ICR-MS), etc. [12]. The most effective approach for the identification of PDE-5i in supplements is HLPC-MS [6, 13, 14], although some publications had been done by HPLC with a UV detector [9] or photodiode array detector [14]. In 2015, the AOAC International published an official method for screening and identification of PDE-5i in dietary ingredients and supplements [15]. The samples were simply extracted with a mixture of solvent (methanol, acetonitrile, water), then diluted, filtered, and analyzed by LC quadrupole-orbital ion trap MS. Identification of targeted and nontargeted analytes was conducted based on retention time, accurate mass, and isotopic pattern of precursors ions and product ions using an in-house database. Recently, Hong et al. have reported a screening and classification method of PDE-5i by GC-MS [16]. Specific common ions according to structural after the trimethylsilyl derivatization characteristics of four PDE-5i classes were found.

The development of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) techniques has made screening applications more selective than conventional MS techniques. Currently, time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF) or Orbitrap mass spectrometry techniques can achieve high mass accuracy (below 5 ppm). In particular, Orbitrap mass spectrometry can perform high-resolution MS/MS allows both the screening of unknown compounds and the quantification of target substances. Therefore, liquid chromatography coupled with HRMS has become one of the most effective methods to identify and measure PDE-5i concentration. Our goals are (i) developing and validating a screening and quantitation method for PDE-5i in supplementary products and (ii) assessing PDE-5i content in natural-based supplementary products and ingredients available in the Vietnam market.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Fifty-three PDE-5i standards were obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Martin Ross Avenue, North York, Ontario, Canada) and LGC Standards (GmbH Mercatorstrasse, Wesel, Germany). Methanol, acetonitrile, n-hexane, and other organic solvents were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Formic acid and ammonium formate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Deionized water (18.2 MegaOhm.cm) was purified using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Co., Bedford, MA, USA).

Each solid standard was accurately weighed about 10 mg and diluted by 10 mL methanol to obtain a 1000 μg/mL standard solution. The stock solutions were kept in dark bottles at 4°C and to use for 1 year. The working solutions were prepared by diluting the stock solutions with methanol into the concentration of 0.01, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 μg/mL.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Ninety-two supplement foods and ingredients specific for the enhancement of male sexual performance were collected in local stories in Vietnam.

Samples in the form of tablets were crushed into a fine powder. In samples in the form of hard-shelled capsules or soft-gel capsules, the capsules had been removed and the inside content only has been homogenized. Each homogeneous sample was weighed 0.10 g in a 15 mL centrifuge tube by an analytical balance. Then, 4.0 mL of acetonitrile: water (1 : 1, v/v) was added and mixed well before being sonicated for 30 minutes. The extract was centrifuged for 5 minutes at a speed of 6000 rpm. The solution was separated from the residue and filtered through a polytetrafluoroethylene filter (0.2 μm) before being injected into a liquid chromatography high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). For the soft-gel capsule samples, 1.0 mL of n-hexane was added to the solution after centrifuging and mixed well to clean the oily components; only the aqueous layer was used for LC-HRMS analysis. For samples containing PDE-5i over the calibration curves, we have to reanalyze with a proper dilution factor.

2.3. Liquid Chromatography and High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry Condition

The sample solutions were analyzed by the UltiMate 3000 UHPLC system coupled with Q-exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). The separation was conducted on Waters BEH C18 (100 mm × 1.7 μm × 2.1 mm) column with an appropriate precolumn at the temperature of 40°C. Mobile phase A was 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in water; mobile phase B was 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile: methanol (1 : 1, v/v). The gradient was 0–5 min, 2% B; 5–15 min, 2–40% B; 15–22 min, 40–95% B; 25–26 min, 95–2% B; 26–29 min, 2% B. The injection volume was 10 μL. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min.

The Q-exactive was equipped with heated electrospray ionization (HESI) source with the following parameters: HESI temperature of 320°C, the capillary temperature of 350°C, spray voltage of 5000 V, sheath gas flow of 30 arbitrary units, the auxiliary gas flow of 10 arbitrary units. The mass spectrometer was operated in the full MS/data-dependent MS/MS mode (full MS-dd-MS/MS) with the following parameters: scan range 200–2000 m/z, resolution 70,000 FWHM (defined for m/z 200; 3 Hz), automatic gain control (AGC) target 1e6, maximum inject time 20 ms, and in the dd-MS/MS mode: resolution 17,500 FWHM (defined for m/z 200; 12 Hz), AGC target 1e5, isolation window 1 m/z, normalized collision energy 40%, 70%, 100%. Full spectral information was utilized for identification and quantification. For data collection and analysis, the screening PDE-5i process was conducted by Compound discoverer 3.1 software (Thermo Fisher), and the quantitation process was conducted by TraceFinder 4.1 software (Thermo Fisher). Mass spectrometric information, including m/z of precursor and product ions of analytes, was shown in Table 1. It can be seen that the analogs of sildenafil produced the common ions at m/z 283. It is in line with previous studies that the ion is the result of cleavage of the C-S bond and loss of the ethyl group on the ethoxy substituent on the phenyl ring. For the tadalafil group, the ions at m/z 169 (pyridine-indole ring) and 135 were always recorded. The ion at m/z 344 is characterized for vardenafil and its analogs [7, 17]. Thio-sildenafil group often produces ion at m/z 299 corresponding to the cleavage of C-N bond and loss of the ethyl group on the ethoxy substituent on the phenyl ring [18].


NoPDE-5iChemical formulaRetention time (min)Ion typePrecursor ion (m/z)Product ions (m/z)

1MirodenafilC26H37N5O5S7.57M + H532.258899.09167; 296.13935; 312.13427; 70.06513; 56.04948; 84.0682; 210.06619; 129.10224; 88.07569; 121.03964
2NoracetildenafilC24H32N6O313.96M + H453.260970.06513; 97.07602; 113.10732; 98.08385; 58.06513; 56.04948; 297.1346; 166.09749; 325.12952; 353.16082
3Desmethyl fondenafilC23H30N6O315.29M + H439.2459339.14505; 311.11395; 396.20255; 374.42169; 319.71493; 196.38647; 165.01724; 120.37976; 99.0919; 73.11301
4N-OctylnortadalafilC29H33N3O415.64M + H489.3126169.07602; 135.04406; 204.08078; 262.08626; 338.22269; 115.05423; 197.07094; 264.10191; 130.06513; 232.07569
5AcetylvardenafilC25H34N6O316.01M + H467.2765169.09715; 70.06513; 84.08078; 341.16082; 111.09167; 72.08078; 127.12297; 97.07602; 112.0995; 110.06004
6Lodenafil carbonateC47H62N12O11S216.07M + H1048.642112.0995; 82.06513; 58.06513; 97.07602; 111.09167; 56.04948; 487.2122; 83.06037; 84.08078; 283.11895
7HydroxyacetildenafilC25H34N6O416.13M + H483.271497.07602; 70.06513; 127.08659; 143.11789; 100.07569; 297.1346; 88.07569; 166.09749; 112.0995; 128.09441
8CarbodenafilC24H32N6O316.23M + H453.2609311.11387; 339.14517; 166.09749; 255.12404; 69.04472; 97.07602; 225.07709; 70.06513
9AcetildenafilC25H34N6O316.48M + H467.2765111.09167; 97.07602; 70.06513; 84.08078; 72.08078; 127.12297; 112.0995; 297.1346; 56.04948; 166.09749
10DescarbonsildenafilC21H30N6O4S16.59M + H463.2129418.15475; 311.15069; 432.17177; 406.15494; 361.13279; 344.14795; 283.11908; 238.83536; 192.99106; 175.69979; 151.05383; 125.02768; 87.09227; 72.08158; 58.066
11PiperiacetildenafilC24H31N5O316.75M + H438.2598.09643; 70.06513; 297.1346; 55.05423; 166.09749; 341.16082; 69.04472; 325.12952; 86.09643
12DimethylacetildenafilC25H34N6O316.96M + H467.276584.08078; 127.12297; 112.0995; 111.09167; 70.06513; 297.1346; 58.06513; 166.09749; 325.1659; 410.21867
13HydroxyvardenafilC23H32N6O5S17.09M + H505.2228169.09715; 344.14791; 99.09167; 110.06004; 299.11387; 123.09167; 58.06513; 56.04948; 68.01309; 82.06513
14N-DesethylvardenafilC21H28N6O4S17.10M + H461.1966169.09715; 344.14791; 110.06004; 299.11387; 316.11661; 123.09167; 68.01309; 82.06513; 56.04948
15PiperazonifilC25H34N6O417.10M + H483.2726465.26167; 436.22269; 429.52412; 408.22737; 380.20885; 339.1819; 297.13488; 266.45598; 244.12189; 203.11833; 153.1027; 127.08668; 99.0923; 72.08144
16VardenafilC23H32N6O4S17.20M + H489.2279169.09715; 344.14791; 110.06004; 299.11387; 72.08078; 123.09167; 70.06513; 376.1074; 68.01309; 113.10732
17AvanafilC23H26ClN7O317.33M + H484.1858155.02582; 375.12184; 105.03349; 77.03858; 95.04914; 53.03858; 357.11128; 233.1033; 67.05423; 221.1033
18IsosildenafilC22H30N6O4S17.35M + H475.212258.06513; 99.09167; 283.11895; 100.0995; 56.04948; 253.072; 70.06513; 311.15025; 225.07709
19HydroxyhomosildenafilC23H32N6O5S17.36M + H505.222899.09167; 70.06513; 58.06513; 84.0682; 97.07602; 283.11895; 88.07569; 129.10224; 112.0995; 311.15025
20N-DesmethylsildenafilC21H28N6O4S17.37M + H461.196685.07602; 283.11895; 311.15025; 56.04948; 299.10868; 225.07709; 254.07983; 253.072; 377.1278; 344.14791
21SildenafilC22H30N6O4S17.39M + H475.212258.06513; 100.0995; 99.09167; 56.04948; 283.11895; 70.06513; 311.15025; 225.07709; 299.11387
22HomosildenafilC23H32N6O4S17.47M + H489.227972.08078; 58.06513; 99.09167; 113.10732; 70.06513; 283.11895; 84.08078; 71.07295; 114.11515; 311.15025
23AcetaminotadalafilC23H20N4O517.60M + H433.1507204.08078; 262.08626; 135.04406; 205.0886; 233.08352; 232.07569; 169.07602; 191.07295; 263.09408; 250.08626
24AminotadalafilC21H18N4O417.60M + H391.1401204.08078; 135.04406; 262.08626; 233.08352; 169.07602; 232.07569; 250.08626; 191.07295; 203.07295
25Sildenafil N-oxideC22H30N6O5S17.60M + H491.207199.09167; 56.04948; 70.06513; 404.1387; 344.14791; 58.06513; 97.07602; 283.11895; 311.15025; 377.1278
26CyclopentylnafilC26H36N6O4S17.70M + H529.2592461.19682; 377.13029; 344.1461; 313.16608; 277.28223; 237.59493; 210.18739; 169.09731; 142.733; 98.09704; 75.59057
27DimethylsildenafilC23H32N6O4S17.71M + H489.227999.09167; 71.07295; 56.04948; 113.10732; 70.06513; 283.11895; 311.15025; 84.08078; 377.1278; 225.07709
28NortadalafilC21H17N3O417.77M + H376.1292204.08078; 262.08626; 135.04406; 233.08352; 232.07569; 169.07602; 191.07295; 254.0924; 250.08626
29UdenafilC25H36N6O4S17.98M + H517.259284.08078; 112.11208; 283.11895; 58.06513; 325.1659; 299.11387; 81.06988; 255.12404; 79.05423; 82.06513
30BenzamidenafilC19H23N3O618.02M + H390.166151.07536; 107.04914; 135.04406; 91.05423; 79.05423; 105.03349; 90.0464; 136.05188; 65.03858; 93.03349
31NorneovardenafilC18H20N4O418.07M + H357.1557169.07602; 110.06004; 329.12443; 328.11661; 123.09167; 68.01309; 300.08531; 55.05423; 82.06513; 95.06037
32Propoxyphenyl-homohydroxysildenafilC24H34N6O5S18.13M + H519.238499.09167; 70.06513; 283.11895; 84.0682; 97.07602; 299.11387; 129.10224; 88.07569; 112.0995; 255.12404
33O-desethyl-o-propyl sildenafilC23H32N6O4S18.14M + H489.2285447.1196; 416.97849; 391.14451; 347.08125; 325.16612; 283.11909; 252.20022; 230.78935; 193.95794; 163.05384; 107.28071; 100.10004; 91.75806; 70.06595; 58.06599
342-Hydroxypropyl nortadalafilC24H23N3O518.20M + H434.1711135.04406; 169.07602; 204.08078; 262.08626; 284.13935; 197.07094; 130.06513; 115.05423; 232.07569; 312.13427
35Propoxyphenyl aildenafilC24H34N6O4S18.39M + H503.2447461.19514; 391.14362; 347.08197; 325.16609; 283.11925; 256.09442; 189.66799; 159.62481; 137.61562; 113.1077; 99.09223; 91.76256; 71.07376
36Acetil acidC18H20N4O418.45M + H357.1557285.1345; 300.08487; 313.16528; 273.23201; 234.78161; 329.12441; 57.55269; 76.77712; 91.7671; 128.3394; 166.09776
37TadalafilC22H19N3O418.69M + H390.1448204.08078; 135.04406; 262.08626; 169.07602; 205.0886; 232.07569; 233.08352; 240.11314; 268.10805; 250.08626
38Depiperazino-thiosildenafilC17H20N4O4S218.80M + H409.1012381.06896; 365.03707; 352.03045; 328.13556; 300.10448; 272.07283; 253.43238; 218.38203; 200.90222; 182.07341; 146.98571; 130.30821; 91.75983; 69.50264
39MutaprodenafilC27H35N9O5S218.95M + H630.2282142.00711; 602.23247; 560.22363; 516.1504; 489.22772; 439.15549; 404.13937; 377.12856; 344.14797; 312.15851; 288.21153; 219.20777; 163.22714; 113.10774; 84.98616
40GendenafilC19H22N4O319.24M + H355.1765327.14517; 285.1346; 298.10604; 256.09548; 311.11387; 69.04472; 120.04439; 154.0611; 313.1659; 166.09749
41HydroxychlorodenafilC19H23ClN4O319.26M + H391.1531313.12952; 285.1346; 363.12184; 256.09548; 120.04439; 69.04472; 166.09883; 78.99452; 327.14517; 255.08765
42HydroxythiovardenafilC23H32N6O4S219.57M + H521.1999167.06375; 360.12506; 99.09167; 315.09037; 138.02462; 150.10257; 58.06513; 299.09611; 70.06513; 332.09307
43ChloropretadalafilC22H19ClN2O519.65M + H427.1055135.04406; 274.08559; 204.08078; 216.08078; 189.06988; 262.08674; 244.0735; 302.08117
44ChlorodenafilC19H21ClN4O319.79M + H389.1375361.10619; 285.1346; 311.11387; 154.0611; 166.09749; 69.0573; 256.09548; 76.97887; 165.0183
45BenzylsildenafilC28H34N6O4S20.01M + H551.243591.05423; 65.03858; 134.09643; 377.1278
46NitrodenafilC17H19N5O420.09M + H358.151330.11968; 316.11661; 154.0611; 256.09548; 68.0369; 255.08765; 313.11694; 227.09274; 269.1033; 136.05054
47PseudovardenafilC22H29N5O4S20.21M + H460.2013169.09715; 110.06004; 344.14791; 299.11387; 123.09167; 284.12678; 68.01309; 82.06513; 55.05423; 95.06037
48ImidazosagatriazinoneC17H20N4O220.32M + H313.1659285.1346; 256.09548; 120.04439; 68.0369; 255.08765; 241.072; 269.1033; 69.04472; 154.0611; 94.02874
49Propoxyphenylthio-hydroxyhomosildenafilC24H34N6O4S220.55M + H535.215699.09167; 70.06513; 56.04948; 299.09611; 58.06513; 84.0682; 129.10224; 315.09037; 88.07569; 271.10119
50ThiohomosildenafilC23H32N6O3S220.55M + H505.20572.08078; 99.09167; 113.10732; 56.04948; 299.09611; 70.06513; 84.08078; 327.12741; 71.07295; 355.15806
51Hydroxythio-homosildenafilC23H32N6O4S220.56M + H521.199999.09167; 70.06513; 58.06513; 84.0682; 299.09611; 129.10224; 97.07602; 88.07569; 327.12741; 112.0995
52NorneosildenafilC22H29N5O4S20.64M + H460.2013283.11895; 84.08078; 299.09611; 311.15025; 154.0611; 316.11661; 255.12404; 344.14791; 166.09749
53ThiosildenafilC23H32N6O3S221.47M + H505.20599.09167; 71.07295; 299.09611; 113.10732; 56.04948; 70.06513; 327.12741; 84.08078; 241.0542; 298.08828

2.4. Screening and Quantification of Real Samples

Real samples were first screened PDE-5i as the scheme in Figure 1. Most of the detected PDE-5i were listed in our mass spectrometry library unless the new suspected compounds were extracted and purified, and then the structure was determined by infrared spectroscopy. For the quantitative purpose, the concentration of PDE-5i in the samples was calculated by matrix match calibration curves.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Optimization of LC-HRMS Condition

First of all, parameters for detecting PDE-5i in Q-exactive mass spectrometer should be set up before further optimization. All PDE-5i have chemical structures suitable for being ionized by electrospray ionization source in positive mode. A 500 μL mixture of 1 μg/mL standard solution of PDE-5i was injected into the Q-exactive mass spectrometer to optimize ionization and detection conditions such as capillary voltage, the temperature of HESI, the temperature of ion transfer tube, S-lens level, maximum injection time, and automatic gain control. After that, the MS/MS data were recorded: full-scan mode for precursor ions and dd-MS2 (data-dependent MS2) for product ions (All ion fragmentation-AIF). The normalized collision energy (NCE) was 40, 70, 100%. The MS/MS data were compared with mzCloud Mass Spectral Library (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the mass accuracy was less than 5 ppm, which meets the requirements of AOAC International. The MS/MS data of fifty-three standard PED-5i for identification was presented in Table 1. For the detection of PDE-5i without standard solutions, MS/MS information (Table S1) in the mzCloud Mass Spectral Library can be used.

PDE-5i are less polar compounds, so they can be analyzed by the C18 base chromatography column. Because of their similar structures, PDE-5i should be separated by a chromatography column that has a small particle size. Therefore, we chose BEH C18 (100 mm × 1.7 μm × 2.1 mm, Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, USA). Commonly, mobile phases for PDE-5i analysis are acetonitrile: water and acetonitrile: methanol (1 : 1, v/v), adding additives such as formic acid, ammonium format, or both of them. We investigated and chose the mobile phase system including mobile phase A: 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B: 10 mM ammonium format and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile: methanol (1 : 1, v/v). The use of both ammonium formate and formic acid additives is important to gain the sensitivity of some PDE-5i and is consistent with AOAC 2015.12 method [15]. Then, the gradient was optimized and lasted 29.0 minutes to separate some isomeric PDE-5i such as Carbodenafil and Noracetildenafil, Benzamidenafil, and Tadalafil. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. This slow and long gradient is similar to that of the reference methods published by AOAC International and US USP [19]. The retention time of each analyte was shown in Table 1. Extracted chromatograms of PDE-5i were shown in the supplementary document (Figures S1, S2).

3.2. Optimization of Extraction

Referring to previous studies [7, 20], five extraction solutions were selected to examine extraction efficiency when extracting spiked samples at the concentration of 4 mg/kg in samples. The results of four representative compounds were presented in Figure 2. A one-way ANOVA test was conducted to compare the intensity of four compounds. The results ( value from 1.5E-10-4.9E-6 < 0.05) indicated that signal intensity changed significantly with different solvent extraction, and the mean comparison showed that the mixture of acetonitrile: water (1 : 1, v/v) gave significantly higher intensities of analytes compared to the other tested solvents. Comparing to the mixture of methanol: water (70 : 30, v:v) used by Lee et al. [17], Jeong et al. [21], or methanol used by Ren et al. [22], this method uses less organic solvent for a greener sample preparation. Thus, it was chosen to extract real samples.

For the soft-gel capsule sample, however, we added a second solvent to remove oily components of samples before injecting the extraction into the LC-HRMS system. Three organic solvents including n-hexane, diethyl ether, and ethyl acetate were examined, and the result was shown in Figure 3. We also compared the intensity of analytes by one-way ANOVA test. All three cleaning ways improved the intensity of analytes. The intensity of analytes in oily samples washed by n-hexane was significantly higher than that of the other solvents. Therefore, n-hexane was chosen for cleaning oily samples to reduce unwanted compounds injected into the LC-HRMS system. The use of n-hexane has not been reported before. It helps protect the ion source from fat contamination.

3.3. Method Validation

The developed method had been validated before applied to real samples analysis. The specificity of the method was proved by mass accuracy of precursor ions and productions and comparison between blank samples and standard materials. The validation parameters were showed in Table S2. Calibration curves of PDE-5i were constructed from 10 to 1000 ng/mL, and the regression coefficients were larger than 0.995, and relative standard deviations were less than 15%. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.4 and 1.2 mg/kg, respectively. The repeatability and the recovery of the method were evaluated by analyzing spiked tablet samples and soft-gel capsule samples at three levels 30.0, 100.0, 200.0 ng/mL in solution (1.2, 4, 8 mg/kg in samples) and six repetitions. The method met the AOAC International requirement as recoveries were in the range of 80–110%, and the relative standard deviation was from 2.81 to 12.6%. The matrix effect (ME) of the method was assessed by comparing the slope of the calibration curve in solution (A) and one in the matrix (A′) as follows:

All the compounds showed ME less than 10%. Thus, calibration curves in the standard solution can be used to calculate the concentration of PED-5i in real samples.

3.4. Analysis of Real Samples

For screening purposes, 92 real samples were analyzed by the developed method (n = 3); the screening process was conducted by Compound Discoverer 3.1 software. The spectrum was compared with the online mzCloud mass spectrometry library, Chemspider library, Mzvault library, and predicted structure. The accuracy of the process was presented by the matching index (>80%) with each library. Among 92 collected samples, twenty samples were detected containing PDE-5i; the others were not detected. In the positive samples, we identified thirteen PDE-5i already existing in the used libraries and one compound nonexisting in the used libraries. This compound was discovered as N-hydroxyethyl dithio-desethyl carbodenafil in a previous study [23]. The number of detected samples and identified PDE-5i was shown in Table 2. Ten of fourteen PDE-5i (71%) were sildenafil analogs, which is higher than the value (62%) reported by Kee et al. [4]. There were three analogs of tadalafil (21%) and only one analog of vardenafil (7.1%).


PDE-5iNumber of detected samples

Nortadalafil11
Tadalafil10
Sildenafil9
Hydroxyhomosildenafil6
Hydroxythiohomosildenafil6
Homosildenafil6
Thiohomosildenafil1
Sildenafil N-oxyde2
Chloropredadalafil1
Propoxyphenyl-homohydroxysildenafil1
Propoxyphenylaildenafil1
Hydroxythiovardenafil1
Methisosildenafil1
N-hydroxyethyl dithio-desethyl carbodenafil2

After screening, positive samples were confirmed and quantified. The concentration of PDE-5i in these samples was calculated by calibration curves and presented in Table 3. It can be seen that most of the positive samples contain one or two PDE-5i at high concentration (>1 mg/g) and some other PDE-5i at low concentration. We suppose that high concentration PDE-5i ingredients were added intentionally to the sample, and the low concentration PDE-5i may be side products in the production of the main PDE-5i ingredients. Nortadalafil, Tadalafil, and Sildenafil were often detected in real samples as the main active compounds. On the other hand, few samples (S 14 and 15) detected some PDE-5i at low concentration (much lower than the dosage using in ED treatment). The origin of PDE-5i in these samples was not clear and needed to be studied further.


SamplePDE-5iConcentration (mg/g)

S 1Nortadalafil50.0 ± 0.13
Tadalafil11.6 ± 0.05
Sildenafil-N-oxide∼0.073
S 2Nortadalafil4.41 ± 0.05
Chloropretadalafil∼0.006
S 3Sildenafil22.2 ± 0.11
Tadalafil0.39 ± 0.007
Sildenafil-N-oxide∼0.06
S 4Propoxyphenylaildenafil1.02 ± 0.06
Thiohomosildenafil0.78 ± 0.005
Homosildenafil∼0.031
Methisosildenafil∼0.03
S 5–9Hydroxyhomosildenafil1.05–20.1
Hydroxythiohomosildenafil0.78–22.5
S 10Tadalafil∼0.08
S 11Tadalafil10.2 ± 0.05
Chloropretadalafil5.25 ± 0.06
S 12Nortadalafil12.2 ± 0.05
Chloropretadalafil0.25 ± 0.06
S 13Nortadalafil10.2 ± 0.04
Chloropretadalafil5.25 ± 0.10
S 14Acetil acid0.13 ± 0.06
S 15Tadalafil0.12 ± 0.05
S 16Sildenafil5.25 ± 0.11
Tadalafil4.77 ± 0.15
Aminotadalafil0.52 ± 0.05
Sildenafil N-oxyde0.56 ± 0.06
S 17Nortadalafil0.52 ± 0.06
Chloropretadalafil4.77 ± 0.10
S 18Nortadalafil12.1 ± 0.06
M 1Nortadalafil170.0 ± 1.22
M 2Hydroxythiohomosildenafil226.8 ± 1.36
Hydroxythiovardenafil216.8 ± 2.00
Propoxyphenyl-homohydroxysildenafil0.13 ± 0.06
Hydroxyhomo-sildenafil∼0.048
Hydroxyvardenafil∼0.047

S: supplementary food, M: medicine ingredient, “S 5–9” indicates samples: S 5, S 6, S 7, S 8, S 9.

4. Conclusion

In this study, we have developed and validated a rapid screening and quantitation method using LC-HRMS for more than 53 PDE-5i in ingredients and supplementary products for enhancing male sexual performance. The validation parameters of this method, such as LODs, LOQs, recoveries, and regression coefficients, were acceptable according to the requirement of AOAC for an analytical method. The success of this method demonstrated the utilization of the fragmentation mass spectra library for analytes confirmation. The developed method was applied to analyze 92 natural-based ingredients and supplementary products available in the Vietnam market. We had screened and detected 14 PDE-5i. The results of real samples analysis implied that the manufacturers had deceived customers by not declaring PDE-5i on the label but adding these ingredients in the products. Thus, our study provides a warning on the quality control of supplementary foods to avoid any health risks to the community.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available within the article, the support information in word form, and from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work has received funding from the National Institute of Food Control, Vietnam (project number: NIFC.DTCS.20.06).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information is provided in word form. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. T. F. Lue, F. Giuliano, F. Montorsi et al., “Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–23, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. H. Hong, Y. S. Kwon, and I. Y. Kim, “Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors,” Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. R. McNamara and C. F. Donatucci, “Newer phosphodiesterase inhibitors: comparison with established agents,” Urologic Clinics of North America, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C.-L. Kee, X. Ge, V. Gilard, M. Malet-Martino, and M.-Y. Low, “A review of synthetic phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) found as adulterants in dietary supplements,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 147, pp. 250–277, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. L. Bakota, A. T. Kelly, J. P. Walterscheid, and D. R. Phatak, “A case report of fatal desmethyl carbodenafil toxicity,” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 250–255, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. H. Lee, N. S. Kim, K. M. Han, S. H. Kim, S. Cho, and W. S. Kim, “Monitoring by LC-MS/MS of 48 compounds of sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil and their analogues in illicit health food products in the Korean market advertised as enhancing male sexual performance,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1849–1857, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Jiru, M. Stranska-Zachariasova, Z. Dzuman et al., “Analysis of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors as possible adulterants of botanical-based dietary supplements: extensive survey of preparations available at the Czech market,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 164, pp. 713–724, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. B. Bujang, C. F. Chee, C. H. Heh, N. A. Rahman, and M. J. C. Buckle, “Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and their analogues as adulterants of herbal and food products: analysis of the Malaysian market, 2014–16,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1101–1109, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. I. Fejős, G. Neumajer, S. Béni, and P. Jankovics, “Qualitative and quantitative analysis of PDE-5 inhibitors in counterfeit medicines and dietary supplements by HPLC–UV using sildenafil as a sole reference,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Biomedical Analysis, vol. 98, pp. 327–333, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. C. Reepmeyer and J. T. Woodruff, “Use of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and a chemical cleavage reaction for the structure elucidation of a new sildenafil analogue detected as an adulterant in an herbal dietary supplement,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 887–893, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Trefi, C. Routaboul, S. Hamieh, V. Gilard, M. Malet-Martino, and R. Martino, “Analysis of illegally manufactured formulations of tadalafil (Cialis) by 1H NMR, 2D DOSY 1H NMR and Raman spectroscopy,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. N. Patel, L. Li, C.-L. Kee, X. Ge, M.-Y. Low, and H.-L. Koh, “Screening of synthetic PDE-5 inhibitors and their analogues as adulterants: analytical techniques and challenges,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 87, pp. 176–190, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E.-S. Lee, J. W. Kim, J. H. Lee et al., “Identification of a new tadalafil analogue found in a dietary supplement,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 621–626, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Zou, S. S.-Y. Oh, P. Hou, M.-Y. Low, and H.-L. Koh, “Simultaneous determination of synthetic phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors found in a dietary supplement and pre-mixed bulk powders for dietary supplements using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection and liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1104, no. 1-2, pp. 113–122, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Vaclavik, J. R. Schmitz, J.-F. Halbardier, and K. Mastovska, “Single-laboratory validation study of a method for screening and identification of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in dietary ingredients and supplements using liquid chromatography/quadrupole-orbital ion trap mass spectrometry: first action 2015.12,” Journal of AOAC International, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, M. E. Lee et al., “Reliable screening and classification of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in dietary supplements using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry combined with specific common ions,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1623, p. 461210, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E.-S. Lee, J. H. Lee, K. M. Han et al., “Simultaneous determination of 38 phosphodiestrase-5 inhibitors in illicit erectile dysfunction products by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 83, pp. 171–178, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. N. Man, N. M. Noor, and R. Lajis, “Identification of thioketone analogues of sildenfil using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 39, pp. 7055–7060, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Bzhelyansky, Screening for Undeclared Drugs and Drug Analogues, U.S. Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MA, USA, 2020.
  20. C.-L. Kee, X. Ge, and M.-Y. Low, “Application of Orbitrap-mass spectrometry to differentiate isomeric sildenafil- and thiosildenafil-like analogues used for the adulteration of dietary supplements,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1737–1748, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. H. Jeong, J. H. Lee, H. J. Kim et al., “LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and their analogues in foods and dietary supplements in Korea,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Ren, C. Wu, and J. Zhang, “Simultaneous screening and determination of 18 illegal adulterants in herbal medicines and health foods for male sexual potency by ultra-fast liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 35, no. 21, pp. 2847–2857, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C.-L. Kee, X. Ge, C.-S. Tran, Q.-D. Bui, N.-P. Cheah, and M.-Y. Low, “Isolation and characterization of N-hydroxyethyl dithio-desethyl carbodenafil from a health supplement,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 189, p. 113431, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Thi Oanh Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views429
Downloads405
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.